Friday, April 4, 2008
Resolution on Saving Manufacturing Jobs
Note: As I recently traveled through Wisconsin and Michigan many people wanted to know about our struggle to save the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant through public ownership.
This resolution aimed at Presidential candidates is excellent and should be circulated at campaign rallies and meetings everywhere. This resolution should be posted in every union hall all over the United States... please feel free to copy and post widely... you might want to copy and post this to your blog and ask friends to do the same.
For additional resolutions checkout:
http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/2008_02_15_archive.html
With the continued attacks on workers and the endless layoffs and closings of plants, people in Michigan have followed the example of Minnesotans trying to save the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant through public ownership and put together this resolution to use during this election season:
Thursday, April 3, 2008
Support Manufacturing Jobs!
Resolution on Saving Manufacturing Jobs
Whereas our manufacturing base is steadily being eroded and
Whereas this loss of jobs is harmful to our nation and the communities we live in and
Whereas those good paying jobs are frequently replaced with lower paying non-union ones that are driving down the standard of living for all working families and
Whereas the loss of our core manufacturing industry will mean the
loss of our technological edge and vital skills and reduced tax revenues for schools and public services and
Whereas every manufacturing job creates seven others and supports small business, directly and indirectly related to manufacturing and
Whereas the $170 billion we are annually spending on the war in Iraq takes away money that could be better used to rebuild our industrial base and retrain workers
Therefore in rebuilding our industrial base primary attention needs to be placed on locating these new facilities in communities with high unemployment and historic manufacturing centers, such as Detroit, Pontiac, Grand Rapids and Flint and
Therefore by rebuilding our industrial base and with it the construction of mass transit, environmentally friendly autos, affordable and energy efficient housing, and the modernization of our infrastructure, we will create jobs, provide cleaner air for all of us, lower individual family's energy bills, and allow greater energy independence for America
Therefore be it resolved that we call on the Presidential candidates to state their support for taking one-half of the money currently being spent in Iraq to be used instead to rebuild industry and provide jobs in the United States.
Posted by Melissa O'Rourke
Taken From: Labor Up Front
Provided courtesy of:
Alan L. Maki
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell phone: 651-587-5541
E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net
Check out my blog:
Thoughts From Podunk
http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/
This resolution aimed at Presidential candidates is excellent and should be circulated at campaign rallies and meetings everywhere. This resolution should be posted in every union hall all over the United States... please feel free to copy and post widely... you might want to copy and post this to your blog and ask friends to do the same.
For additional resolutions checkout:
http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/2008_02_15_archive.html
With the continued attacks on workers and the endless layoffs and closings of plants, people in Michigan have followed the example of Minnesotans trying to save the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant through public ownership and put together this resolution to use during this election season:
Thursday, April 3, 2008
Support Manufacturing Jobs!
Resolution on Saving Manufacturing Jobs
Whereas our manufacturing base is steadily being eroded and
Whereas this loss of jobs is harmful to our nation and the communities we live in and
Whereas those good paying jobs are frequently replaced with lower paying non-union ones that are driving down the standard of living for all working families and
Whereas the loss of our core manufacturing industry will mean the
loss of our technological edge and vital skills and reduced tax revenues for schools and public services and
Whereas every manufacturing job creates seven others and supports small business, directly and indirectly related to manufacturing and
Whereas the $170 billion we are annually spending on the war in Iraq takes away money that could be better used to rebuild our industrial base and retrain workers
Therefore in rebuilding our industrial base primary attention needs to be placed on locating these new facilities in communities with high unemployment and historic manufacturing centers, such as Detroit, Pontiac, Grand Rapids and Flint and
Therefore by rebuilding our industrial base and with it the construction of mass transit, environmentally friendly autos, affordable and energy efficient housing, and the modernization of our infrastructure, we will create jobs, provide cleaner air for all of us, lower individual family's energy bills, and allow greater energy independence for America
Therefore be it resolved that we call on the Presidential candidates to state their support for taking one-half of the money currently being spent in Iraq to be used instead to rebuild industry and provide jobs in the United States.
Posted by Melissa O'Rourke
Taken From: Labor Up Front
Provided courtesy of:
Alan L. Maki
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell phone: 651-587-5541
E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net
Check out my blog:
Thoughts From Podunk
http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
Racism and the 2008 Elections
Note: Yahoo has been a purveyor of racist hate and bigotry along with anti-Semitism and anti-communism. Yahoo has a business relationship with Brownstein/Hyatt/Farber/Schreck which is the lobbyist of choice for most of the industries comprising the military-financial-industrial complex. First Yahoo publishes "news" articles claiming Reverend Wright is "un-American;" as if vigorously speaking out against racial injustice is unpatriotic--- which raises the question, does Yahoo and Brownstein/Hyatt/Farber/Schreck even think it legitimate to speak out against racism and injustice in this country? Apparently not.
This is the letter I sent to a "reporter" writing about Obama's problems with white voters; when the reporter should have been writing about this country's problems with racism and bigotry because that is the real issue.
Both Yahoo and Google are purveyors of racist hate and every form of bigotry.
Ms. Przybyla;
I read your article, printed below, on Yahoo.
I am not interested in defending Obama. In fact, I wouldn’t bother walking across the street to vote for the guy.
However, there is a much larger issue of racism emanating from someplace around these 2008 Elections, and the problem, in my opinion, is not with Reverend Wright. The problem is with you and other reporters ignoring where the real racism is coming from, and the reason for what appears to be this well orchestrated, intense campaign of racist hate. Historically in America racism has always raised its ugly head when the economy is in recession.
But, what I really don’t understand is how you reporters have not mentioned those like the racist rocker Ted Nugent who is spewing his racist hate on the airwaves and even on University Campuses as he claims to be on a campaign to support John McCain for President.
Now, anyone that is halfway intelligent with a modicum of common sense who first listens to Reverend Wright, and than listens to Ted Nugent can tell that Reverend Wright is attacking injustice while Ted Nugent is promoting injustice and racial hate; yet you ignore all of this.
I listened as Ted Nugent spewed his racist filth packaged with the worst obscenities on a Traverse City, Michigan radio station promoting his talk at Ferris State University in Big Rapids, Michigan. Now, if this is what students in America are learning in universities I think there is good reason for many of us to join Reverend Wright and say, “God damn America.”
There is a very important issue here which goes well beyond who one supports for President.
If you and other reporters cannot discern the problem, maybe more of us should start shouting: God damn America; God damn America is filled with a bunch of racists and bigots and the God damn country is going to hell in a hand basket real quick as this racist and fascist poison is spread by the likes of Ted Nugent.
There is real reason for unease in this country.
One reason I would never consider voting for Obama is because he lacks the courage to stand up to present day racists, bigots and hate-mongers like Ted Nugent and insist that John McCain renounce Nugent’s support and endorsement.
Besides, what kind of nut gets on the radio talking about how he keeps a guitar and a machine gun in every room in his home, as Ted Nugent does? More to the point, what kind of Presidential candidate would remain silent and accept this kind of support?
I noticed the Associated Press went so far as to characterize Reverend Wright’s remarks as “anti-American;” I might ask what has happened to free speech? On the other hand, because Ted Nugent wraps his bigoted, fascist and racist diatribe in the American flag in the guise of some kind of super-patriotism, does this make him pro-American? I find Nugent’s disgusting message of hate very unpatriotic and completely out of sync with anything remotely patriotic. I know my dad and my uncles who fought Hitler would think, listening to racist rocker Ted Nugent supporting John McCain, that Hitler had won the war.
Perhaps it takes the reactionary, right-wing rocker Ted Nugent wearing American flag regalia to “assuage” white voters? If so, maybe we should pause, lower the flag, and say “shame on America.”
Speaking of Indiana… I saw a KKK’er being interviewed on television in Indiana not long ago, and he said there was a bullet waiting for Obama. He, too, was supporting John McCain.
Alan L. Maki
Heidi Przybyla Tue Apr 1, 10:00 AM ET
April 1 (Bloomberg) -- Andrea Helmer was interested in Barack Obama until she heard sound bites of his fiery pastor's sermons. Last week, she volunteered for Hillary Clinton's campaign in Indiana.
``As things came out regarding some of the things his pastor has said, I got concerned,'' said Helmer, a 36-year-old respiratory therapist and mother of two in Evansville, Indiana.
Interviews with dozens of Democrats in this overwhelmingly white region -- where voters will go to the polls in the May 6 primary -- suggest residual concerns over the controversy involving Obama's former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright.
To be sure, this flies in the face of most polls taken after Obama's widely praised March 18 speech on race and the Wright controversy. In a March 30 Gallup survey, he had widened his lead over Clinton among Democratic voters to 10 points. A week earlier, he was also up 10 points in a Pew Research poll.
In an NBC/Wall Street Journal national survey last week, he ran slightly ahead of Republican John McCain in a general- election match-up, while Clinton ran slightly behind.
The polls are ``good news'' for Obama, said Jenny Backus, an unaligned Democratic strategist. ``He was able to use what was a pretty potentially dangerous issue for his campaign as a way to reinforce his campaign message.''
Unease Among Whites
Still, there are stirrings of unease among white voters, including those who fear the issue will hurt Obama in a general election. Pew also found that 39 percent of all white voters who had heard of the controversy, including Republicans and independents, said it made them less favorable toward Obama.
John Friend, an uncommitted Democrat and Evansville city councilman, said Republicans may use Obama's ties to the pastor much in the same way they attacked Democratic candidate John Kerry's patriotism in 2004.
``It's going to be like the Swift Boat thing,'' Friend said.
Last month, excerpts of sermons in which Wright is heard saying ``God damn America'' and ``U.S. of KKKA'' were broadcast on television and distributed over the Internet. In response, Obama delivered what his aides billed as a major address on race on March 18 in which he condemned the remarks.
That didn't repair the damage for some white voters, said Trent Van Haaften, an Indiana state representative from Mount Vernon who is backing Obama.
One Visit
``The 10-second sound bite'' is all that many voters know about the Illinois senator, who so far has visited Indiana just once this year, Van Haaften said.
While Obama, 46, is far behind Clinton, 60, in the April 22 Pennsylvania primary, the Indiana contest is competitive. Even if he loses in Pennsylvania, winning in Indiana and North Carolina two weeks later could allow him to wrap up the nomination.
The Obama campaign had long seen friendly territory in Indiana and Helmer's majority white and rural eighth district, which borders the candidate's home state of Illinois.
The recent intense focus on Wright is complicating Obama's efforts to appeal to some in culturally conservative southwest Indiana, which has a record of electing Republicans and conservative Democrats. Evansville is 86 percent white and 11 percent black.
For Helmer, who said she is worried about the slumping economy and rising health-care costs, Clinton, a New York senator, is a familiar figure she associates with the better times of the administration of her husband, former President Bill Clinton.
More Overtime
``Back when Clinton was in office our money was more stable, jobs were coming in, my husband had a lot more overtime,'' Helmer said.
That familiarity, along with media coverage of the pastor controversy, is pushing voters toward Clinton, said Democrat Justin Jarvis, a 34-year-old Evansville health-care worker.
``I know people who were previously Obama supporters who view it as reverse racism at its worst,'' he said.
Michael Rivera, a 33-year-old computer programmer from Evansville, said he had donated to the Obama campaign and now believes his electability is damaged.
``I understood where he was coming from, but I don't think anyone else will,'' said Rivera, who currently is backing Clinton.
Obama Response
Obama has spent the past two weeks responding to questions about the issue and last week said he would have left the church if Wright hadn't announced plans to retire and acknowledged his comments were offensive.
On March 25, Clinton fanned the flames by saying Wright ``would not have been my pastor.''
Phil Hoy, a 71-year-old retired minister who represents Evansville in the General Assembly and supports Obama, said the episode is hard to overcome in his community.
``We are not the most progressive state,'' said Hoy, who belongs to the same denomination as Obama, the United Church of Christ.
In addition, Clinton visited Evansville last month.
Obama may be able to turn Indiana around. He is stepping up efforts to court white rural voters in Pennsylvania, where he is on a six-day bus tour with Senator Bob Casey.
Evansville Mayor Jonathan Weinzapfel, who hasn't endorsed a candidate, said he expects the picture to change if Obama makes a similar effort in his area.
``Before Senator Clinton announced her visit the only real enthusiasm I heard was for Senator Obama,'' he said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Heidi Przybyla in Washington at hprzybyla@bloomberg.net
Alan L. Maki
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell phone: 651-587-5541
E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net
Check out my blog:
Thoughts From Podunk
http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/
This is the letter I sent to a "reporter" writing about Obama's problems with white voters; when the reporter should have been writing about this country's problems with racism and bigotry because that is the real issue.
Both Yahoo and Google are purveyors of racist hate and every form of bigotry.
Ms. Przybyla;
I read your article, printed below, on Yahoo.
I am not interested in defending Obama. In fact, I wouldn’t bother walking across the street to vote for the guy.
However, there is a much larger issue of racism emanating from someplace around these 2008 Elections, and the problem, in my opinion, is not with Reverend Wright. The problem is with you and other reporters ignoring where the real racism is coming from, and the reason for what appears to be this well orchestrated, intense campaign of racist hate. Historically in America racism has always raised its ugly head when the economy is in recession.
But, what I really don’t understand is how you reporters have not mentioned those like the racist rocker Ted Nugent who is spewing his racist hate on the airwaves and even on University Campuses as he claims to be on a campaign to support John McCain for President.
Now, anyone that is halfway intelligent with a modicum of common sense who first listens to Reverend Wright, and than listens to Ted Nugent can tell that Reverend Wright is attacking injustice while Ted Nugent is promoting injustice and racial hate; yet you ignore all of this.
I listened as Ted Nugent spewed his racist filth packaged with the worst obscenities on a Traverse City, Michigan radio station promoting his talk at Ferris State University in Big Rapids, Michigan. Now, if this is what students in America are learning in universities I think there is good reason for many of us to join Reverend Wright and say, “God damn America.”
There is a very important issue here which goes well beyond who one supports for President.
If you and other reporters cannot discern the problem, maybe more of us should start shouting: God damn America; God damn America is filled with a bunch of racists and bigots and the God damn country is going to hell in a hand basket real quick as this racist and fascist poison is spread by the likes of Ted Nugent.
There is real reason for unease in this country.
One reason I would never consider voting for Obama is because he lacks the courage to stand up to present day racists, bigots and hate-mongers like Ted Nugent and insist that John McCain renounce Nugent’s support and endorsement.
Besides, what kind of nut gets on the radio talking about how he keeps a guitar and a machine gun in every room in his home, as Ted Nugent does? More to the point, what kind of Presidential candidate would remain silent and accept this kind of support?
I noticed the Associated Press went so far as to characterize Reverend Wright’s remarks as “anti-American;” I might ask what has happened to free speech? On the other hand, because Ted Nugent wraps his bigoted, fascist and racist diatribe in the American flag in the guise of some kind of super-patriotism, does this make him pro-American? I find Nugent’s disgusting message of hate very unpatriotic and completely out of sync with anything remotely patriotic. I know my dad and my uncles who fought Hitler would think, listening to racist rocker Ted Nugent supporting John McCain, that Hitler had won the war.
Perhaps it takes the reactionary, right-wing rocker Ted Nugent wearing American flag regalia to “assuage” white voters? If so, maybe we should pause, lower the flag, and say “shame on America.”
Speaking of Indiana… I saw a KKK’er being interviewed on television in Indiana not long ago, and he said there was a bullet waiting for Obama. He, too, was supporting John McCain.
Alan L. Maki
Heidi Przybyla Tue Apr 1, 10:00 AM ET
April 1 (Bloomberg) -- Andrea Helmer was interested in Barack Obama until she heard sound bites of his fiery pastor's sermons. Last week, she volunteered for Hillary Clinton's campaign in Indiana.
``As things came out regarding some of the things his pastor has said, I got concerned,'' said Helmer, a 36-year-old respiratory therapist and mother of two in Evansville, Indiana.
Interviews with dozens of Democrats in this overwhelmingly white region -- where voters will go to the polls in the May 6 primary -- suggest residual concerns over the controversy involving Obama's former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright.
To be sure, this flies in the face of most polls taken after Obama's widely praised March 18 speech on race and the Wright controversy. In a March 30 Gallup survey, he had widened his lead over Clinton among Democratic voters to 10 points. A week earlier, he was also up 10 points in a Pew Research poll.
In an NBC/Wall Street Journal national survey last week, he ran slightly ahead of Republican John McCain in a general- election match-up, while Clinton ran slightly behind.
The polls are ``good news'' for Obama, said Jenny Backus, an unaligned Democratic strategist. ``He was able to use what was a pretty potentially dangerous issue for his campaign as a way to reinforce his campaign message.''
Unease Among Whites
Still, there are stirrings of unease among white voters, including those who fear the issue will hurt Obama in a general election. Pew also found that 39 percent of all white voters who had heard of the controversy, including Republicans and independents, said it made them less favorable toward Obama.
John Friend, an uncommitted Democrat and Evansville city councilman, said Republicans may use Obama's ties to the pastor much in the same way they attacked Democratic candidate John Kerry's patriotism in 2004.
``It's going to be like the Swift Boat thing,'' Friend said.
Last month, excerpts of sermons in which Wright is heard saying ``God damn America'' and ``U.S. of KKKA'' were broadcast on television and distributed over the Internet. In response, Obama delivered what his aides billed as a major address on race on March 18 in which he condemned the remarks.
That didn't repair the damage for some white voters, said Trent Van Haaften, an Indiana state representative from Mount Vernon who is backing Obama.
One Visit
``The 10-second sound bite'' is all that many voters know about the Illinois senator, who so far has visited Indiana just once this year, Van Haaften said.
While Obama, 46, is far behind Clinton, 60, in the April 22 Pennsylvania primary, the Indiana contest is competitive. Even if he loses in Pennsylvania, winning in Indiana and North Carolina two weeks later could allow him to wrap up the nomination.
The Obama campaign had long seen friendly territory in Indiana and Helmer's majority white and rural eighth district, which borders the candidate's home state of Illinois.
The recent intense focus on Wright is complicating Obama's efforts to appeal to some in culturally conservative southwest Indiana, which has a record of electing Republicans and conservative Democrats. Evansville is 86 percent white and 11 percent black.
For Helmer, who said she is worried about the slumping economy and rising health-care costs, Clinton, a New York senator, is a familiar figure she associates with the better times of the administration of her husband, former President Bill Clinton.
More Overtime
``Back when Clinton was in office our money was more stable, jobs were coming in, my husband had a lot more overtime,'' Helmer said.
That familiarity, along with media coverage of the pastor controversy, is pushing voters toward Clinton, said Democrat Justin Jarvis, a 34-year-old Evansville health-care worker.
``I know people who were previously Obama supporters who view it as reverse racism at its worst,'' he said.
Michael Rivera, a 33-year-old computer programmer from Evansville, said he had donated to the Obama campaign and now believes his electability is damaged.
``I understood where he was coming from, but I don't think anyone else will,'' said Rivera, who currently is backing Clinton.
Obama Response
Obama has spent the past two weeks responding to questions about the issue and last week said he would have left the church if Wright hadn't announced plans to retire and acknowledged his comments were offensive.
On March 25, Clinton fanned the flames by saying Wright ``would not have been my pastor.''
Phil Hoy, a 71-year-old retired minister who represents Evansville in the General Assembly and supports Obama, said the episode is hard to overcome in his community.
``We are not the most progressive state,'' said Hoy, who belongs to the same denomination as Obama, the United Church of Christ.
In addition, Clinton visited Evansville last month.
Obama may be able to turn Indiana around. He is stepping up efforts to court white rural voters in Pennsylvania, where he is on a six-day bus tour with Senator Bob Casey.
Evansville Mayor Jonathan Weinzapfel, who hasn't endorsed a candidate, said he expects the picture to change if Obama makes a similar effort in his area.
``Before Senator Clinton announced her visit the only real enthusiasm I heard was for Senator Obama,'' he said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Heidi Przybyla in Washington at hprzybyla@bloomberg.net
Alan L. Maki
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell phone: 651-587-5541
E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net
Check out my blog:
Thoughts From Podunk
http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
Cesar Chavez
An Organizer's Tale
By: Cesar Chavez (1927 - 1993)

United Farm Workers of America

Published: July, 1966
1. It really started
It really started for me sixteen years ago in San Jose, California, when I was working on an apricot farm. We figured he was just another social worker doing a study of farm conditions, and I kept refusing to meet with him. But he was persistent. Finally, I got together some of the rough element in San Jose. We were going to have a little reception for him to teach the gringo a little bit of how we felt.
There were about thirty of us in the house, young guys, mostly. I was supposed to give them a signal - change my cigarette from my right hand to my left, and then we were going to give him a lot of hell. But he started talking and the more he talked, the more wide-eyed I became and the less inclined I was to give the signal. A couple of guys who were pretty drunk at the time still wanted to give the gringo the business, but we got rid of them. This fellow was making a lot of sense, and I wanted to hear what he had to say.

Cesar Chavez and Fred Ross, 1989.
His name was Fred Ross, and he was an organizer for the Community Service Organization (CSO), which was working with Mexican-Americans in the cities. I became immediately really involved. Before long I was heading a voter registration drive. All the time I was observing the things Fred did, secretly, because I wanted to learn how to organize, to see how it was done. I was impressed with his patience and understanding of people. I thought this was a tool, one of the greatest things he had.
It was pretty rough for me at first. I was changing and had to take a lot of ridicule from the kids my age, the rough characters I worked with in the fields. They would say, "Hey, big shot. Now that you're a politico, why are you working here for 65 cents an hour?" I might add that our neighborhood had the highest percentage of San Quentin [state penitentiary] graduates. It was a game among us in the sense that that we defended ourselves from outsiders, although inside the neighborhood there was not a lot of fighting.
After six months of working every night in San Jose, Fred assigned me to take over the CSO chapter in Decoto. It was a tough spot to fill. I would suggest something, and people would say, "No, let's wait 'till Fred gets back," or "Fred wouldn't do it that way." This is pretty much a pattern with people, I discovered, whether I was put in Fred's position, or later, when someone else was put in my position.
After the Decoto assignment I was sent to start a new chapter in Oakland. Before I left, Fred came to a place in San Jose called the Hole-In-The-Wall and we talked for half an hour over coffee. He was in a rush to leave, but I wanted to keep him talking. I was that scared of my assignment.
2. Hard times in Oakland
There were hard times in Oakland. First of all, it was a big city and I'd get lost every time I went anywhere. There I arranged a series of house meetings. I would get to the meeting early and drive back and forth past the house, too nervous to go in and face the people. Finally, I would force myself to go inside and sit in a corner. I was quite thin then, and young, and most of the people were middle-aged.
Someone would say, "Where's the organizer?" And I would pipe up, "Here I am." Then they would say in Spanish - these were very poor people and we hardly spoke anything but Spanish - "Ha! This kid?" Most the them said they were interested, but the hardest part was to get them to start pushing themselves on their own initiative.
The idea was to set up a meeting and them get each attending person to call his own house meeting, inviting new people - a sort of chain letter effect. After a house meeting I would lie awake going over the whole thing, trying to see why people laughed at one point, or why they were for one thing and against another. Those late evenings I was also learning to read and write. I had left school in the 7th grade after attending 67 different schools, and my reading wasn't the best.
At our first organizing meeting we had 368 people. I'll never forget it because it was very important to me. You eat your heart out. The meeting is called for seven o'clock and you start to worry about four o'clock. You wait. Will they show up? Then the first one arrives. By seven, there are only twenty people. You have everything in order; you have to look calm. Little by little, they filter in and at a certain point you know it will be a success.
After four months in Oakland, I was transferred. The chapter was beginning to move on its own, so Fred assigned me to organize the San Joaquin Valley. Over the months, I developed what I used to call 'schemes' or 'tricks' - now I call them 'techniques' - of making initial contacts.
3. Little things were very important
The main thing in convincing someone is to spend time with him. It doesn't matter if he can read, write or even speak well. What is important is that he is a man and second, that he has shown some initial interest. One good way to develop leadership is to take a man with you in your car. It works a lot better if you're doing the driving; that way you are in charge. You drive, he sits there, and you talk.
These little things were very important to me. I was caught in a big game by then, figuring out what makes people work. I found that if you work hard enough, you can usually shake people into working too, those who are concerned. You work harder and they work harder still, up to a point and then they pass you. Then, of course, they're on their own.
I also learned to keep away from the established groups and so-called leaders, and to guard against philosophizing. Working with low-income people is different from working with the professionals, who like to sit around talking about how to play politics.
When you're trying to recruit a farmworker, you have to paint a little picture, and then you have to color in the picture. We found out that the harder a guy is to convince, the better leader or member he becomes. When you exert yourself to convince him, you have his confidence and he has good motivation. A lot of people who say OK right away wind up hanging around the office, taking up the workers' time.
4. Some kind of communicable disease
During the McCarthy Era in one Valley town, I was subjected to a lot of redbaiting. We have been recruiting people for citizenship classes at the high school when we got into a quarrel with the naturalization examiner. He was rejecting people on the grounds that they were just parroting when they learned in citizenship class.
One day we had a meeting about it in Fresno, and I took along some of the leaders of our local chapter. Some redbaiting official gave us a hard time, and the people got scared and took his side. They did it because it seemed easy at the moment, even though they knew that sticking with me was the right thing to do. It was disgusting. When we left the building they walked by themselves ahead of me as if I had some kind of communicable disease. I had been working with these people for three months and I was very sad to see that. It taught me a great lesson.
That night I learned that the chapter offers were holding a meeting to review my letters and printed materials to see if I really was a Communist. I drove out there and walked right in on their meeting. I said, "I hear you've been discussing me, and I thought it would be nice if I was here to defend myself. Not that it matters much to you or even to me, because as far as I'm concerned you are a bunch of cowards."
At that they began to apologize. "Let's forget it," they said. "You're a nice guy." I didn't want apologies; I wanted a full discussion. I told them I didn't give a damn, but that they had to learn to distinguish fact from what appeared to be a fact because of fear. I kept them there 'till two in the morning. Some of the women cried. I don't know if they investigated me any further, but I stayed on another few months and things worked out.
This was not an isolated case. Often when we'd leave people to themselves they would get frightened and draw back into their shells where they had been all the years. I learned quickly that there is no real appreciation. Whatever you do, and no matter what reasons you may give to others, you do it because you want to see it done, or maybe because you want power. And there shouldn't be any appreciation, understandably. I know good organizers who were destroyed, washed out, because they expected people to appreciate what they'd done.
Anyone who comes in with the idea that farmworkers are free of sin and that the growers are all bastards, either has never dealt with the situation or is an idealist of the first order. Things don't work that way.
For more than ten years I worked for the CSO. As the organization grew, we found ourselves meeting in fancier and fancier motels and holding expensive conventions. Doctors, lawyers and politicians began joining. They would get elected to some office in the organization and then, for all practical purposes, leave. Intent on using the CSO for their own prestige purposes, these "leaders," many of them, lacked the urgency we had to have.
5. A union
When I became general director I began to press for a program to organize farmworkers into a union, an idea most of the leadership opposed. So I started a revolt within the CSO. I refused to sit at the head table at meetings, refused to wear a suit and tie, and finally I even refused to shave and cut my hair. It used to embarrass some of the professionals. At every meeting I got up and gave my standard speech: We shouldn't be meeting in fancy motels. We were getting away from the people. Farmworkers had to be organized.
Nothing happened, so in March 1962 I resigned and came to Delano to begin organizing the Valley on my own.
By hand I drew a map of all the towns between Arvin and Stockton - 86 of them, including farming camps - and decided to hit them all to get a small nucleus of people working in each. For six months I traveled around, planting an idea. We had a simple questionnaire, a little card with space for a name, address and how much the worker though he ought to be paid. My wife Helen mimeographed them, and we took our kids for two or three day jaunts to these towns, distributing the cards door-to-door and to camps and groceries.
Some 80,000 cards were sent back from eight Valley counties. I got a lot of contacts that way, but I was shocked at the wages the people were asking. The growers were paying $1 and $1.15, and maybe 95% of the people thought they should be getting only $1.25. Sometimes people scribbled messages on the cards: "I hope to God we win," or "Do you think we can win?" or "I'd like to know more." So I separated the cards with the penciled notes, got in my car and went to those people.
We didn't have any money at all in those days, none for gas and hardly any for food. So I went to people and started asking for food. It turned out to be about the best thing I could have done, although at first it's hard on your pride.
Some of our best members came in that way. If people give you their food, they'll give you their hearts. Several months and many meetings later we had a working organization, and this time the leaders were the people.
6. Getting some color into the movement
None of the farmworkers had collective bargaining contracts, and I thought it would take ten years before we got that first contract. I wanted desperately to get some color into the movement, to give people something they could identify with, like a flag. I was reading some books about how various leaders discovered what colors contrasted and stood out the best. The Egyptians had found out that a red field with a white circle and a black emblem in the center crashed into your eyes like nothing else.
I wanted to use the Aztec eagle in the center, as on the Mexican flag. So I told my cousin Manuel, "Draw an Aztec eagle." Manuel had a little trouble with it, so we modified the eagle to make it easier for people to draw.
The first big meeting of what we decided to call the National Farm Workers Association was held in September 1962, at Fresno, with 287 people. We had our huge red flag on the wall, with paper tacked over it. When the time came, Manuel pulled a cord ripping the paper off the flag and all of a sudden it hit the people. Some of them wondered if it was a Communist flag, and I said it probably looked more like a neo-Nazi emblem than anything else. They wanted an explanation, so Manuel got up and said, "When that damn eagle flies -- that's when the farmworkers problems are going to be solved."

Dolores Huerta signs up members at the National Farmworkers Association founding convention, Fresno, California, 1962 (Joe Gunterman).
7. Money wasn't going to organize people
One of the first things I decided was that outside money wasn't going to organize people, at least not in the beginning. I even turned down a grant from a private group -- $50,000 to go directly to organize farmworkers -- for just this reason. Even when there are no strings attached, you are still compromised because you feel you have to produce immediate results. This is bad, because it takes a long time to build a movement, and your organization suffers if you get too far ahead of the people it belongs to.
We set the dues at $42 a year per family, really a meaningful dues, but of the 212 people we got to pay, only 12 remained by June, 1963. We were discouraged at that, but not enough to make us quit.
Money was always a problem. Once we were facing a $180 gas bill on a credit card I'd gotten a long time ago and was about to lose. And we had to keep that credit card. One day my wife and I were picking cotton, pulling bolls, to make a little money to live on. Helen said to me, "Do you put all this in the bag, or just the cotton?" I thought she was kidding and told her to throw the whole boll in. She had nothing but a sack of bolls at the weighing. The man said, "Whose sack is this?" I said, "Well, my wife's." He told us we were fired. "Look at all that crap you brought in," he said. Helen and I started laughing. We were going anyway.
The movement really caught on in 1964. By August we had a thousand members. We'd had a beautiful 90-day drive in Corcoran, where they had the Battle of the Corcoran Farm Cap 30 years ago, and by November we had assets of $25,000 in our credit union, which helped to stabilize the membership. I had gone without pay the whole of 1963. The next year the members voted me a $40 a week salary, after Helen had to quit working in the fields to manage the credit union.
8. Our first strike
Our first strike was in May, 1965, a small one but it prepared us for the big one. A farmworker from McFarland names Epifano Camacho came to see me. He said he was sick and tired to how people working the roses were being treated, and he was willing to "go the limit." I assigned Manuel and Gilbert Padilla to hold meetings at Camacho's house. The people wanted union recognition, but the real issue, as in most cases when you begin, was wages. For grafting roses, they were promised $9.00 a thousand, but they were actually getting $6.50 and $7.00. Most of them signed cards giving us the right to bargain for them.
We chose the biggest company with about 85 employees, not counting the irrigators and supervisors, and we held a series a meetings to prepare the strike and call the vote. There would be no picket line; everyone pledged on their honor not break the strike.
Early on the first morning of the strike, we sent out ten cars to check the people's homes. We found lights in five or six homes and knocked on the doors. The men were getting up and we'd say, "Where are you going?" They would dodge, saying "Oh, uh ... I was just getting up, you know." We'd say, "Well, you're not going to work, are you?" And they'd say, "No."
Dolores Huerta, who was driving the green panel truck, saw a light in one house where four rose-workers lived. They told her they were going to work, even after she reminded them of their pledge. So she moved the truck so it blocked their driveway, turned off the key, put it in her purse and sat there alone.
That morning the company foreman was madder than hell and refused to talk to us. None of the grafters has shown up for work. At 10:30 we started to go to the company office, but it occurred us that maybe a woman would have a better chance. So Dolores knocked on the office door, saying, "I'm Dolores Huerta from the National Farm Workers Association." "Get out!" the man said, "You communist ... Get out!" I guess they were expecting us, because as Dolores stood arguing with him, the cops came and told her to leave. She left.
For two days, the fields were idle. On Wednesday, they recruited 35 Filipinos from out of town who knew nothing of the strike. They drove through escorted by three sheriff's patrol cars, one in front, one in the middle and one at the rear with a dog. We didn't have a picket line, but we parked across the street and just watched them go through, not saying a word. All but seven stopped working after half an hour, and the rest had quit by mid-afternoon.
The company made an offer the evening of the fourth day, a package deal that amounted to a 120% wage increase, but no contract. We wanted to hold out for a contract and more benefits, but a majority of the rose-workers wanted to accept the offer and go back. We are a democratic union so we had to support what they wanted to do. They had a meeting and voted to settle.
Then we had a problem with a few militants who wanted to hold out. We had to convince them to go back to work, and a united front, because otherwise they would be canned. So we worked - Tony Orendain and I, Dolores and Gilbert, Jim Drake and all the organizers - knocking on doors 'till two in the morning, telling people, "You have to go back or you'll lose your job." And they did. They worked.
9. Our second strike
Our second strike, and our last before the big one at Delano, was in the grapes at Martin's Ranch last summer. The people were getting a raw deal there, being pushed around pretty badly. Gilbert went out to the field, climbed on top of a car and took a strike vote. They voted unanimously to go out. Right away they started bringing in strikebreakers, so we launched a tough attack on the labor contractors, distributed leaflets portraying them as really low characters. We attacked one, Luis Campos, so badly that he just gave up the job, and he took 27 of his men out with him. All he asked was that we distribute another leaflet reinstating him in the community. And we did.
What was unusual was that the grower would talk to us. The grower kept saying, "I can't pay. I just haven't got the money." I guess he must have found the money somewhere, because we were asking $1.40 and we got it.
We had jut finished the Martin strike when the Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee, AFL-CIO, started a strike against the grape growers, DiGiorgio, Schenley liquors and small growers, asking $1.40 an hour and 25 cents a box. There was a lot of pressure from our members for us to join the strike, but we had some misgivings. We didn't feel ready for a big strike like this one, that was sure to last a long time. Having no money - just $87 in the strike fund - meant we'd have to depend on God knows who.
Eight days after the strike started - it takes time to get 1,200 people together from all over the Valley - we held a meeting in Delano and voted to go out. I asked the membership to release us from the pledge not to accept outside money, because we'd need it now, a lot of it. The help came. It started because of the close, and I would say even beautiful relationship that we've had with the Migrant Ministry for some years. They were the first to come to our rescue, financially and in every other way, and they spread the word to other benefactors.
We had planned, before, to start a labor school in November. It never happened, but we have the best labor school we could ever have, in the strike. The strike is only a temporary condition, however. We have over 3,000 members spread out over a wide area, and we have to service them when they have problems. We get letters from New Mexico, Colorado, Texas, California, from farmworkers saying, "We're getting together and we need an organizer." It kills you when you haven't got the personnel and resources. You feel badly about not sending an organizer because you look back and remember all the difficulty you had in getting two or three people together and here they're together. Of course, we're training organizers, many of them younger than I was when I started in CSO. They can work 20 hours a day, sleep four and be ready to hit it again. When you get to be 39, it's a different story.
The people who took part in the strike and the march have something more than their material interest going for them. If it were only material, they wouldn't have stayed on the strike long enough to win. It is difficult to explain, but it flows out in the ordinary things they say.
For instance, some of the younger guys are saying, "Where do you think is going to be the next strike?" I say, "Well, we have to win in Delano." They say, "Well win, but where do we go next?" I say, "Maybe most of us will be working in the fields." They say, "No, I don't want to go and work in the fields. I want to organize. There are a lot of people that need our help." So I say, "You're going to be pretty poor then, because when you strike you don't have much money." They say they don't care about that.
Others are saying, "I have friends who are working in Texas. If we could only help them." It is bigger, certainly, than just a strike. And if this spirit grows within the farm labor movement, one day we can use the force that we have to help correct a lot of things that are wrong in this society. But that is for the future. Before you can run, you have to learn how to walk.
10. Why?
There are vivid memories from my childhood - what we had to go through because of low wages and the conditions, basically because there was no union. I suppose if I wanted to be fair I could say that I'm trying to settle a personal score. I could dramatize it by saying that I want to bring social justice to farmworkers. The truth is that I went through a lot of hell, and a lot of people did. If we can even the score a little for the workers then we are doing something.
Besides, I don't know any other work I like to do better than this. I really don't, you know.
By: Cesar Chavez (1927 - 1993)

United Farm Workers of America

Published: July, 1966
1. It really started
It really started for me sixteen years ago in San Jose, California, when I was working on an apricot farm. We figured he was just another social worker doing a study of farm conditions, and I kept refusing to meet with him. But he was persistent. Finally, I got together some of the rough element in San Jose. We were going to have a little reception for him to teach the gringo a little bit of how we felt.
There were about thirty of us in the house, young guys, mostly. I was supposed to give them a signal - change my cigarette from my right hand to my left, and then we were going to give him a lot of hell. But he started talking and the more he talked, the more wide-eyed I became and the less inclined I was to give the signal. A couple of guys who were pretty drunk at the time still wanted to give the gringo the business, but we got rid of them. This fellow was making a lot of sense, and I wanted to hear what he had to say.

Cesar Chavez and Fred Ross, 1989.
His name was Fred Ross, and he was an organizer for the Community Service Organization (CSO), which was working with Mexican-Americans in the cities. I became immediately really involved. Before long I was heading a voter registration drive. All the time I was observing the things Fred did, secretly, because I wanted to learn how to organize, to see how it was done. I was impressed with his patience and understanding of people. I thought this was a tool, one of the greatest things he had.
It was pretty rough for me at first. I was changing and had to take a lot of ridicule from the kids my age, the rough characters I worked with in the fields. They would say, "Hey, big shot. Now that you're a politico, why are you working here for 65 cents an hour?" I might add that our neighborhood had the highest percentage of San Quentin [state penitentiary] graduates. It was a game among us in the sense that that we defended ourselves from outsiders, although inside the neighborhood there was not a lot of fighting.
After six months of working every night in San Jose, Fred assigned me to take over the CSO chapter in Decoto. It was a tough spot to fill. I would suggest something, and people would say, "No, let's wait 'till Fred gets back," or "Fred wouldn't do it that way." This is pretty much a pattern with people, I discovered, whether I was put in Fred's position, or later, when someone else was put in my position.
After the Decoto assignment I was sent to start a new chapter in Oakland. Before I left, Fred came to a place in San Jose called the Hole-In-The-Wall and we talked for half an hour over coffee. He was in a rush to leave, but I wanted to keep him talking. I was that scared of my assignment.
2. Hard times in Oakland
There were hard times in Oakland. First of all, it was a big city and I'd get lost every time I went anywhere. There I arranged a series of house meetings. I would get to the meeting early and drive back and forth past the house, too nervous to go in and face the people. Finally, I would force myself to go inside and sit in a corner. I was quite thin then, and young, and most of the people were middle-aged.
Someone would say, "Where's the organizer?" And I would pipe up, "Here I am." Then they would say in Spanish - these were very poor people and we hardly spoke anything but Spanish - "Ha! This kid?" Most the them said they were interested, but the hardest part was to get them to start pushing themselves on their own initiative.
The idea was to set up a meeting and them get each attending person to call his own house meeting, inviting new people - a sort of chain letter effect. After a house meeting I would lie awake going over the whole thing, trying to see why people laughed at one point, or why they were for one thing and against another. Those late evenings I was also learning to read and write. I had left school in the 7th grade after attending 67 different schools, and my reading wasn't the best.
At our first organizing meeting we had 368 people. I'll never forget it because it was very important to me. You eat your heart out. The meeting is called for seven o'clock and you start to worry about four o'clock. You wait. Will they show up? Then the first one arrives. By seven, there are only twenty people. You have everything in order; you have to look calm. Little by little, they filter in and at a certain point you know it will be a success.
After four months in Oakland, I was transferred. The chapter was beginning to move on its own, so Fred assigned me to organize the San Joaquin Valley. Over the months, I developed what I used to call 'schemes' or 'tricks' - now I call them 'techniques' - of making initial contacts.
3. Little things were very important
The main thing in convincing someone is to spend time with him. It doesn't matter if he can read, write or even speak well. What is important is that he is a man and second, that he has shown some initial interest. One good way to develop leadership is to take a man with you in your car. It works a lot better if you're doing the driving; that way you are in charge. You drive, he sits there, and you talk.
These little things were very important to me. I was caught in a big game by then, figuring out what makes people work. I found that if you work hard enough, you can usually shake people into working too, those who are concerned. You work harder and they work harder still, up to a point and then they pass you. Then, of course, they're on their own.
I also learned to keep away from the established groups and so-called leaders, and to guard against philosophizing. Working with low-income people is different from working with the professionals, who like to sit around talking about how to play politics.
When you're trying to recruit a farmworker, you have to paint a little picture, and then you have to color in the picture. We found out that the harder a guy is to convince, the better leader or member he becomes. When you exert yourself to convince him, you have his confidence and he has good motivation. A lot of people who say OK right away wind up hanging around the office, taking up the workers' time.
4. Some kind of communicable disease
During the McCarthy Era in one Valley town, I was subjected to a lot of redbaiting. We have been recruiting people for citizenship classes at the high school when we got into a quarrel with the naturalization examiner. He was rejecting people on the grounds that they were just parroting when they learned in citizenship class.
One day we had a meeting about it in Fresno, and I took along some of the leaders of our local chapter. Some redbaiting official gave us a hard time, and the people got scared and took his side. They did it because it seemed easy at the moment, even though they knew that sticking with me was the right thing to do. It was disgusting. When we left the building they walked by themselves ahead of me as if I had some kind of communicable disease. I had been working with these people for three months and I was very sad to see that. It taught me a great lesson.
That night I learned that the chapter offers were holding a meeting to review my letters and printed materials to see if I really was a Communist. I drove out there and walked right in on their meeting. I said, "I hear you've been discussing me, and I thought it would be nice if I was here to defend myself. Not that it matters much to you or even to me, because as far as I'm concerned you are a bunch of cowards."
At that they began to apologize. "Let's forget it," they said. "You're a nice guy." I didn't want apologies; I wanted a full discussion. I told them I didn't give a damn, but that they had to learn to distinguish fact from what appeared to be a fact because of fear. I kept them there 'till two in the morning. Some of the women cried. I don't know if they investigated me any further, but I stayed on another few months and things worked out.
This was not an isolated case. Often when we'd leave people to themselves they would get frightened and draw back into their shells where they had been all the years. I learned quickly that there is no real appreciation. Whatever you do, and no matter what reasons you may give to others, you do it because you want to see it done, or maybe because you want power. And there shouldn't be any appreciation, understandably. I know good organizers who were destroyed, washed out, because they expected people to appreciate what they'd done.
Anyone who comes in with the idea that farmworkers are free of sin and that the growers are all bastards, either has never dealt with the situation or is an idealist of the first order. Things don't work that way.
For more than ten years I worked for the CSO. As the organization grew, we found ourselves meeting in fancier and fancier motels and holding expensive conventions. Doctors, lawyers and politicians began joining. They would get elected to some office in the organization and then, for all practical purposes, leave. Intent on using the CSO for their own prestige purposes, these "leaders," many of them, lacked the urgency we had to have.
5. A union
When I became general director I began to press for a program to organize farmworkers into a union, an idea most of the leadership opposed. So I started a revolt within the CSO. I refused to sit at the head table at meetings, refused to wear a suit and tie, and finally I even refused to shave and cut my hair. It used to embarrass some of the professionals. At every meeting I got up and gave my standard speech: We shouldn't be meeting in fancy motels. We were getting away from the people. Farmworkers had to be organized.
Nothing happened, so in March 1962 I resigned and came to Delano to begin organizing the Valley on my own.
By hand I drew a map of all the towns between Arvin and Stockton - 86 of them, including farming camps - and decided to hit them all to get a small nucleus of people working in each. For six months I traveled around, planting an idea. We had a simple questionnaire, a little card with space for a name, address and how much the worker though he ought to be paid. My wife Helen mimeographed them, and we took our kids for two or three day jaunts to these towns, distributing the cards door-to-door and to camps and groceries.
Some 80,000 cards were sent back from eight Valley counties. I got a lot of contacts that way, but I was shocked at the wages the people were asking. The growers were paying $1 and $1.15, and maybe 95% of the people thought they should be getting only $1.25. Sometimes people scribbled messages on the cards: "I hope to God we win," or "Do you think we can win?" or "I'd like to know more." So I separated the cards with the penciled notes, got in my car and went to those people.
We didn't have any money at all in those days, none for gas and hardly any for food. So I went to people and started asking for food. It turned out to be about the best thing I could have done, although at first it's hard on your pride.
Some of our best members came in that way. If people give you their food, they'll give you their hearts. Several months and many meetings later we had a working organization, and this time the leaders were the people.
6. Getting some color into the movement
None of the farmworkers had collective bargaining contracts, and I thought it would take ten years before we got that first contract. I wanted desperately to get some color into the movement, to give people something they could identify with, like a flag. I was reading some books about how various leaders discovered what colors contrasted and stood out the best. The Egyptians had found out that a red field with a white circle and a black emblem in the center crashed into your eyes like nothing else.
I wanted to use the Aztec eagle in the center, as on the Mexican flag. So I told my cousin Manuel, "Draw an Aztec eagle." Manuel had a little trouble with it, so we modified the eagle to make it easier for people to draw.
The first big meeting of what we decided to call the National Farm Workers Association was held in September 1962, at Fresno, with 287 people. We had our huge red flag on the wall, with paper tacked over it. When the time came, Manuel pulled a cord ripping the paper off the flag and all of a sudden it hit the people. Some of them wondered if it was a Communist flag, and I said it probably looked more like a neo-Nazi emblem than anything else. They wanted an explanation, so Manuel got up and said, "When that damn eagle flies -- that's when the farmworkers problems are going to be solved."

Dolores Huerta signs up members at the National Farmworkers Association founding convention, Fresno, California, 1962 (Joe Gunterman).
7. Money wasn't going to organize people
One of the first things I decided was that outside money wasn't going to organize people, at least not in the beginning. I even turned down a grant from a private group -- $50,000 to go directly to organize farmworkers -- for just this reason. Even when there are no strings attached, you are still compromised because you feel you have to produce immediate results. This is bad, because it takes a long time to build a movement, and your organization suffers if you get too far ahead of the people it belongs to.
We set the dues at $42 a year per family, really a meaningful dues, but of the 212 people we got to pay, only 12 remained by June, 1963. We were discouraged at that, but not enough to make us quit.
Money was always a problem. Once we were facing a $180 gas bill on a credit card I'd gotten a long time ago and was about to lose. And we had to keep that credit card. One day my wife and I were picking cotton, pulling bolls, to make a little money to live on. Helen said to me, "Do you put all this in the bag, or just the cotton?" I thought she was kidding and told her to throw the whole boll in. She had nothing but a sack of bolls at the weighing. The man said, "Whose sack is this?" I said, "Well, my wife's." He told us we were fired. "Look at all that crap you brought in," he said. Helen and I started laughing. We were going anyway.
The movement really caught on in 1964. By August we had a thousand members. We'd had a beautiful 90-day drive in Corcoran, where they had the Battle of the Corcoran Farm Cap 30 years ago, and by November we had assets of $25,000 in our credit union, which helped to stabilize the membership. I had gone without pay the whole of 1963. The next year the members voted me a $40 a week salary, after Helen had to quit working in the fields to manage the credit union.
8. Our first strike
Our first strike was in May, 1965, a small one but it prepared us for the big one. A farmworker from McFarland names Epifano Camacho came to see me. He said he was sick and tired to how people working the roses were being treated, and he was willing to "go the limit." I assigned Manuel and Gilbert Padilla to hold meetings at Camacho's house. The people wanted union recognition, but the real issue, as in most cases when you begin, was wages. For grafting roses, they were promised $9.00 a thousand, but they were actually getting $6.50 and $7.00. Most of them signed cards giving us the right to bargain for them.
We chose the biggest company with about 85 employees, not counting the irrigators and supervisors, and we held a series a meetings to prepare the strike and call the vote. There would be no picket line; everyone pledged on their honor not break the strike.
Early on the first morning of the strike, we sent out ten cars to check the people's homes. We found lights in five or six homes and knocked on the doors. The men were getting up and we'd say, "Where are you going?" They would dodge, saying "Oh, uh ... I was just getting up, you know." We'd say, "Well, you're not going to work, are you?" And they'd say, "No."
Dolores Huerta, who was driving the green panel truck, saw a light in one house where four rose-workers lived. They told her they were going to work, even after she reminded them of their pledge. So she moved the truck so it blocked their driveway, turned off the key, put it in her purse and sat there alone.
That morning the company foreman was madder than hell and refused to talk to us. None of the grafters has shown up for work. At 10:30 we started to go to the company office, but it occurred us that maybe a woman would have a better chance. So Dolores knocked on the office door, saying, "I'm Dolores Huerta from the National Farm Workers Association." "Get out!" the man said, "You communist ... Get out!" I guess they were expecting us, because as Dolores stood arguing with him, the cops came and told her to leave. She left.
For two days, the fields were idle. On Wednesday, they recruited 35 Filipinos from out of town who knew nothing of the strike. They drove through escorted by three sheriff's patrol cars, one in front, one in the middle and one at the rear with a dog. We didn't have a picket line, but we parked across the street and just watched them go through, not saying a word. All but seven stopped working after half an hour, and the rest had quit by mid-afternoon.
The company made an offer the evening of the fourth day, a package deal that amounted to a 120% wage increase, but no contract. We wanted to hold out for a contract and more benefits, but a majority of the rose-workers wanted to accept the offer and go back. We are a democratic union so we had to support what they wanted to do. They had a meeting and voted to settle.
Then we had a problem with a few militants who wanted to hold out. We had to convince them to go back to work, and a united front, because otherwise they would be canned. So we worked - Tony Orendain and I, Dolores and Gilbert, Jim Drake and all the organizers - knocking on doors 'till two in the morning, telling people, "You have to go back or you'll lose your job." And they did. They worked.
9. Our second strike
Our second strike, and our last before the big one at Delano, was in the grapes at Martin's Ranch last summer. The people were getting a raw deal there, being pushed around pretty badly. Gilbert went out to the field, climbed on top of a car and took a strike vote. They voted unanimously to go out. Right away they started bringing in strikebreakers, so we launched a tough attack on the labor contractors, distributed leaflets portraying them as really low characters. We attacked one, Luis Campos, so badly that he just gave up the job, and he took 27 of his men out with him. All he asked was that we distribute another leaflet reinstating him in the community. And we did.
What was unusual was that the grower would talk to us. The grower kept saying, "I can't pay. I just haven't got the money." I guess he must have found the money somewhere, because we were asking $1.40 and we got it.
We had jut finished the Martin strike when the Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee, AFL-CIO, started a strike against the grape growers, DiGiorgio, Schenley liquors and small growers, asking $1.40 an hour and 25 cents a box. There was a lot of pressure from our members for us to join the strike, but we had some misgivings. We didn't feel ready for a big strike like this one, that was sure to last a long time. Having no money - just $87 in the strike fund - meant we'd have to depend on God knows who.
Eight days after the strike started - it takes time to get 1,200 people together from all over the Valley - we held a meeting in Delano and voted to go out. I asked the membership to release us from the pledge not to accept outside money, because we'd need it now, a lot of it. The help came. It started because of the close, and I would say even beautiful relationship that we've had with the Migrant Ministry for some years. They were the first to come to our rescue, financially and in every other way, and they spread the word to other benefactors.
We had planned, before, to start a labor school in November. It never happened, but we have the best labor school we could ever have, in the strike. The strike is only a temporary condition, however. We have over 3,000 members spread out over a wide area, and we have to service them when they have problems. We get letters from New Mexico, Colorado, Texas, California, from farmworkers saying, "We're getting together and we need an organizer." It kills you when you haven't got the personnel and resources. You feel badly about not sending an organizer because you look back and remember all the difficulty you had in getting two or three people together and here they're together. Of course, we're training organizers, many of them younger than I was when I started in CSO. They can work 20 hours a day, sleep four and be ready to hit it again. When you get to be 39, it's a different story.
The people who took part in the strike and the march have something more than their material interest going for them. If it were only material, they wouldn't have stayed on the strike long enough to win. It is difficult to explain, but it flows out in the ordinary things they say.
For instance, some of the younger guys are saying, "Where do you think is going to be the next strike?" I say, "Well, we have to win in Delano." They say, "Well win, but where do we go next?" I say, "Maybe most of us will be working in the fields." They say, "No, I don't want to go and work in the fields. I want to organize. There are a lot of people that need our help." So I say, "You're going to be pretty poor then, because when you strike you don't have much money." They say they don't care about that.
Others are saying, "I have friends who are working in Texas. If we could only help them." It is bigger, certainly, than just a strike. And if this spirit grows within the farm labor movement, one day we can use the force that we have to help correct a lot of things that are wrong in this society. But that is for the future. Before you can run, you have to learn how to walk.
10. Why?
There are vivid memories from my childhood - what we had to go through because of low wages and the conditions, basically because there was no union. I suppose if I wanted to be fair I could say that I'm trying to settle a personal score. I could dramatize it by saying that I want to bring social justice to farmworkers. The truth is that I went through a lot of hell, and a lot of people did. If we can even the score a little for the workers then we are doing something.
Besides, I don't know any other work I like to do better than this. I really don't, you know.
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Beyond the New Deal

This article below by Howard Zinn provides some very interesting and thought-provoking ideas. I would encourage people to read, and then read it--- over and over again.
The essay, however, lacks some critical details about the "New Deal" which Zinn continues to evade, and intentionally ignores because of his anti-communist bias which prevents him from fully understanding the New Deal.
If Zinn would be able to drop his anti-communist bias which has prevented him from objectively analyzing history he would be much more effective as a leading voice on the left for social change.
To intentionally leave out the role of the Communist Party USA is not something specific to this particular essay of Zinn's; it is part of his continuing and long held view that because he disagrees with Marxism he has the right to ignore its major proponent--- the Communist Party USA. Zinn has done the same thing in an otherwise very entertaining and educational play he wrote: Marx In SoHo. In this play Zinn completely ignores the role of communist party clubs as he attempts to inform the audience about what Marxism is.
First, in the essay below, Howard Zinn who is a historian fails to note that the movements which he credits with pushing President Franklin Roosevelt forward in a progressive direction were organized, by-and-large, by the Communist Party USA.
In fact, Willian Z. Foster ran for President on the Communist Party USA ticket against Roosevelt in 1932 in a campaign which focused on the need for the reforms (and socialist revolution)and in the 1936 Presidential Election which Zinn focuses on in the essay below, Earl Browder ran for President on the CPUSA ticket outlining in complete detail the kind of reforms needed by farmers and working people to survive the Great Depression.
In fact, it was William Z. Foster who was the major shaper and architect of the New Deal reform package of which Earl Browder fine-tuned the "New Deal" for implementation... because of the way Browder did this he became recognized as the foremost champion of the needs and rights of the working class in the United States. Because of the way Earl Browder conducted his presidential campaign in reaching out--- first and foremost to the working class, and then to all segments of American society, it became impossible for the "New Deal" not to be implemented.
While Zinn correctly acknowledges, in his essay below, the need for movement building to push who ever is elected president in 2008 towards a new "New Deal" and "Beyond the New Deal," he fails to understand that these "movements" in the 1930's were, by-and-large, the results of many years of painstaking, grassroots and rank and file work by members of the Communist Party USA who worked through the Communist Party clubs they were members of. The unions, the unemployed councils, the progressive political campaigns, the civil rights activities which sowed the seeds that latter blossomed to destroy Jim Crow... none of this grew out of "thin air" or out of mere "hope." The organizational base had been created and established.
Zinn and the "new" activists he influences are going to have to consider, learn and understand this very special role of Communist Parties if they want to see real change in this country because none of these "movements" Zinn refers to were the products of the anarchism (with a mix of Marxism and non-Marxist socialism), which he adheres to and advocates; such thinking is useful in as much as it gives "hope" to there being an alternative to capitalism; but, without building the base and foundation for real grassroots and rank and file activism this "hope" will remain mere words uttered by an actor playing Karl Marx in a Zinn play which fails to acknowledge the role of communist clubs as being an integral part of Marxism... at least the kind of Marxism which contributes to movement building and real change.
Second, the struggle for the "New Deal" reforms was not merely anti-capitalist as Zinn would have us believe; this struggle was based on a movement that was anti-capitalist and pro-socialist; very pro-Soviet, in fact. Public ownership and nationalization were demands which were strenuously and vigorously advanced.
In fact, the movements which gave birth to the "New Deal" reforms were so unmistakably anti-capitalist and pro-socialist that those who fought in opposition to these "New Deal" reforms more often then not noted the similarities between these needed reforms and socialism that anti-communism was the foundation and basis for attacking the "New Deal" reforms. The main proponent of these "New Deal" reforms in the Roosevelt Administration was Secretary of Labor--- Frances Perkins.
In response to the anti-communist attacks on the "New Deal" reforms, which often took the line that what was being advocated was taken straight from the "Communist Manifesto," Labor Secretary Frances Perkins boldly responded to this red-baiting.
Unfortunately, Howard Zinn is not able to be as honest as Frances Perkins whose typical response to this red-baiting was: I would rather see these reforms in reality helping people, rather than words in a pamphlet.
If Zinn and other liberals and progressives really want to see movement towards a new "New Deal" which goes beyond the "New Deal," they are going to have to pitch in and help rebuild the Communist Party USA and help to establish Communist Party Clubs all over this country.
Zinn is going to have to re-assess his own version of "red-baiting" which includes writing the activities of the Communist Party USA out of history, and Zinn is going to have to re-think his anarchist, non-Marxist socialist views. I don't even know how anyone can be a "non-Marxist" socialist.
Here in Minnesota--- and around the Midwest, Zinn's anarchist, non-Marxist socialist views are leading to defeat after defeat for progressives. These views have left progressives trapped and in a bind with no alternative in the political and electoral arena. These pseudo-progressive views have left many on the left thinking that developing alternatives to the capitalist economic crisis and imperialist wars will be found in the next demonstration.
To be sure, demonstrations in the streets are an important and integral part and component of fighting for an alternative agenda. However, without building a solid foundation and base to work from in the mines, mills and factories and in working class communities aimed at fighting for needed reforms and at taking power, demonstration after demonstration leads to nothing except one more demonstration.
People should be moving from demonstrations into movement building where they live, go to school and work. Demonstrations should not be seen as something separate from electoral work and building community-wide, state-wide, regional and country-wide networks of activists working on specific issues while always trying to make the links to capitalism and the need for socialism.
Anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist and pro-socialist education leading to more advanced organization which leads to greater unity of action is what is called for.
Zinn seldom talks of class; nor mentions "working class."
Zinn talks of mobilizing "citizens;" but, he seldom mentions mobilizing the working class; let alone mentioning the united front of the working class led by the Communist Party USA which formed the most important contingent of the all people's front which successfully fought for the "New Deal" by transforming the Roosevelt Administration, an otherwise capitalist government, into a reflection of this all important all people's front which became the government.
Frances Perkins, Harry Hopkins, Henry Wallace and others in the Administration who worked closely with Fred Stover, Paul Robeson, Minnesota's two popular socialist Governors Floyd Olson and Elmer Benson and at the grass-roots the movers and shakers were people like the UAW's Wyndham Mortimer, Phil Raymond and Nadia Barkan along with Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party organizer John Bernard--- the Communist Party member whose organizing skills resulted in getting himself elected to the United States Congress where he became one of the primary champions of implementing the "New Deal" reforms. William Z. Foster and Earl Browder provided the leadership.
In fact, the Communist Party USA was in the forefront of organizing the Farmer-Labor Party nationally and this party became so successful many thought that Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party Governor Floyd B. Olson would present a socialist challenge to FDR for the presidency because Roosevelt was implementing the "New Deal" too slowly... they admonished Roosevelt for giving in to the ultra-right in droppoing socialized health care from the "New Deal" reforms... even Roosevelt himself feared such a challenge from Floyd Olson who got up from his death-bed and traveled to Washington D.C. to plead the case for socialized health care with Roosevelt.
It will take much more than "one big demonstration" to get "Beyond the New Deal." What is required is building upon the progressive legacy, base and foundation which gave birth to the "New Deal."
What we need to get "beyond" is not the "New Deal;" but this pseudo-progressive thinking of academics who have the luxury of indulging in this grossly distorted history which continues to exclude the role of the Communist Party and Communist Party Clubs.
Zinn does not give any particulars as to what he means by "beyond" the "New Deal."
When I think of moving "beyond" the "New Deal" I think of public ownership of the closing auto plants like the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant to save two-thousand jobs at a factory that could easily be employing more than 4,000 workers... an issue Howard Zinn, the liberal radical refuses to address.
When I think of moving "beyond" the "New Deal," I think of politicians who have the courage to stand up and say "NO" to two-million workers across this country going to work in loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos at poverty wages without any rights under state or federal labor laws... the very laws created by the "New Deal" for all other workers.
Why is it so hard for Howard Zinn and those who profess this new blend of anarchist/latte-liberal/non-Marxist socialism to be able to stand up and say that the creation of some four hundred right-to-work colonies created around the Indian gaming industry is wrong? Not once has Zinn or The Nation Magazine had the courage to address this issue; why?
Tens of thousands of "adjuncts" are employed in the college/university community across this country... these are Zinn's colleagues. These "adjuncts" or "part-timers" are teaching those who will be in the forefront of creating the next expanding capitalist bubble in the new "green" society; yet, these "adjuncts" aren't even being paid what amounts to living wages by the most prestigious of colleges and universities! These universities are forcing "adjuncts" to live in poverty!
Ironically, these "adjuncts" aren't much better off than casino workers!
How do we move "beyond" the "New Deal" when massive industrial unions created largely by the "New Deal" are "negotiating" wages and working conditions down towards what they were as the "New Deal" kicked in to benefit working people?
Zinn, whose books have been used to "educate" many of the present day "enlightened" union leaders, does not explain how we can move "beyond the New Deal" with the "leadership" of industrial unions moving to the political "right" while laying claim to being the friends of the bosses.
How do we move "beyond the New Deal" when you have a union leadership like the UAW Local 879 leadership in the Twin Cities taking the position that the demolition of the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant is a good progressive thing so that upscale housing can be built in its place as thousands of homes are sitting vacant because working people have been evicted from their foreclosed homes?
Abe Lincoln was right in stating,
"Corporations have become enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow..."including, I might add, the corruption of union leaders who have the unmitigated gall to take union dues from workers who will lose their jobs because these union leaders have been bought off by the Ford Motor Company and are in bed with corrupt politicians as they will try to explain that destroying the the jobs of the members they have been elected to represent is really for their own good.
How do we move "Beyond the New Deal" when corrupt Democratic Party politicians like Chris Coleman- Mayor of St. Paul- publishes a deceitful, self-severing booklet, "Two Year Progress Report in St. Paul" containing this lie: "After fighting along with Councilmember Pat Harris to keep the Ford Plant open..."(page 6).
Neither Coleman nor Harris has fought to save the Ford Plant let alone keep it open and save the two-thousand jobs.
In fact, even though Mayor Chris Coleman mesmerized a recent townhall meeting with his knowledge and glowing adulation of former Communist Party USA Chair, Gus Hall; Mayor Chris Coleman has refused to even consider--- or even just explore--- the possibility of public ownership of the Ford Plant--- a concept that many governments, including in Canada, have used to save plants and entire industries. St. Paul Mayor forgot to mention is his tribute to the late Gus Hall one of Hall's most popular sayings, "Put people before corporate profits."
In fact, Mayor Coleman sent his trusty, corrupt, lying, little sidekick--- Council member Pat Harris--- to oppose S.F 607, the attempt by several well-meaning state legislators to save the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant.
How do we get "Beyond the New Deal" without being able to put forward alternatives to allowing a Plant like the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant to be shut down, then demolished, to make way for up-scale housing as thousands of good housing sits vacant and deteriorating because of the foreclosure mess? St. Paul doesn't need more homes... what it does need is a plan to get people back into their homes. On top of the foreclosure issue there are thousands of empty apartments people can not afford to live in within the City of Saint Paul.
I raise this question of casino workers, university adjuncts, and Ford workers because without a program that begins to come to grips with such very basic problems confronting working people, I question whether or not we can maintain the "New Deal," let alone move beyond the "New Deal."
We had a "Working Class Studies Association" holding its national conference in the Twin Cities and the closing of the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant wasn't even addressed by the President of the Association--- Peter Rachleff, or one of the major participants in the conference--- former UAW official Jerry Tucker who now says he is opposed to the present UAW contract; is Tucker in favor of saving the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant as part of the fight-back against this sell-out contract? If so, what does he advocate? We haven't heard from his group.
And, an outfit like "Freedom Road Socialist Organization" which publishes its "Fightback" newspaper out of the Twin Cities never mentions public ownership as a legitimate response to saving a perfectly good auto plant and two-thousand jobs through public ownership as it talks about "voting no" on a sell out contract--- part of which is the closing of the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant!
On top of this, we have professor "egg-head," Erwin Marquit, of the University of Minnesota going over to lecture the Chinese about the virtues of "market socialism" that everyone knows is a codeword for "capitalism;" then claiming in a lecture on "Chinese market socialism" delivered to the Twin Cities Chapter of the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom that capitalism is good for China and he sees no relationship between what is going on in China and the Ford Plant closing here in Minnesota.
It would seem to me that before we start talking about going "Beyond the New Deal" we need to understand how the "New Deal" really came to be and in the process get our "bearings" as to where we want to be headed and what "tools" we are going to have to use to think all of this through.
As far as I am concerned, on-the-job training is always the best training. If we want to get "Beyond the New Deal" we better start reading and studying Karl Marx and find out how the movement was built and came together to win the "New Deal," something we haven't been very successful in defending, let alone moving "beyond."
Howard Zinn might want to study a few books and re-write this essay... he might start out by reading "Always Bring A Crowd, The Story of Frank Lumpkin, Steelworker." Peter Rachleff and Michael Zweig might want to put it on their class' "must read" list, too. After that, maybe some reading from Wyndham Mortimer like his autobiography, "Organize." The left in general would do well to put Henry Kraus' book, "The Many and the Few" on the "must read" list.
I can't figure out how the anarchists who don't even believe in organization, the non-Marxist socialists and the latte-liberals have come to dominate the "left" in the United States. Must be the Communist Party USA is slacking off, bought off, or stuck in a revisionist rut--- maybe a little of each considering how corrupt capitalism is.
One thing for sure, we can forget about moving "Beyond the New Deal" as long as Howard Zinn can't even talk about the terrible situation of his "adjunct" colleagues and spit out the word "casino worker" from between his lips, nor mumble, "Save the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant and two-thousand jobs." Imagine... Zinn sends an actor playing Karl Marx to the Twin Cities and he never mentions the Ford Plant closing issue and now Zinn writes about moving "Beyond the New Deal."
The "New Deal" saved the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant, once.
Among the endorsers of the the "Center for Labor Renewal" I see many students of Howard Zinn school of thought. Perhaps if Zinn were to more honestly reflect upon Marxism in his writings rather than picking and choosing what is safest, most convenient and most comfortable for him many people would have a better handle on things and a better grasp of how to accomplish real change.
At some point we really need to consider some hard facts:
* Most people in the United States are not happy with the economy.
* Most people are not happy with no alternative to the Democrats and Republicans.
* Most people want this dirty war in Iraq to end.
* Most people are for health care reform.
* Most people are for the minimum wage being a real living--- non-poverty--- wage.
* Most people want clean air to breath, clean water to drink and healthy food to eat.
We get just the opposite of what everyone is for.
Howard Zinn sure hits the nail on the head as far as what most people are looking for... but, he sure isn't helping us figure out how to get there.
From: April 7, 2008 issue Nation Magazine
Beyond the New Deal
By: Howard Zinn
We might wonder why no Democratic Party contender for the presidency has invoked the memory of the New Deal and its unprecedented series of laws aimed at helping people in need. The New Deal was tentative, cautious, bold enough to shake the pillars of the system but not to replace them. It created many jobs but left 9 million unemployed. It built public housing but not nearly enough. It helped large commercial farmers but not tenant farmers. Excluded from its programs were the poorest of the poor, especially blacks. As farm laborers, migrants or domestic workers, they didn't qualify for unemployment insurance, a minimum wage, Social Security or farm subsidies.
Still, in today's climate of endless war and uncontrolled greed, drawing upon the heritage of the 1930s would be a huge step forward. Perhaps the momentum of such a project could carry the nation past the limits of FDR's reforms, especially if there were a popular upsurge that demanded it. A candidate who points to the New Deal as a model for innovative legislation would be drawing on the huge reputation Franklin Roosevelt and his policies enjoy in this country, an admiration matched by no President since Lincoln. Imagine the response a Democratic candidate would get from the electorate if he or she spoke as follows:"Our nation is in crisis, just as it was when Roosevelt took office. At that time, people desperately needed help, they needed jobs, decent housing, protection in old age. They needed to know that the government was for them and not just for the wealthy classes. This is what the American people need today.
"I will do what the New Deal did, to make up for the failure of the market system. It put millions of people to work through the Works Progress Administration, at all kinds of jobs, from building schools, hospitals, playgrounds, to repairing streets and bridges, to writing symphonies and painting murals and putting on plays. We can do that today for workers displaced by closed factories, for professionals downsized by a failed economy, for families needing two or three incomes to survive, for writers and musicians and other artists who struggle for security.
"The New Deal's Civilian Conservation Corps at its peak employed 500,000 young people. They lived in camps, planted millions of trees, reclaimed millions of acres of land, built 97,000 miles of fire roads, protected natural habitats, restocked fish and gave emergency help to people threatened by floods.
"We can do that today, by bringing our soldiers home from war and from the military bases we have in 130 countries. We will recruit young people not to fight but to clean up our lakes and rivers, build homes for people in need, make our cities beautiful, be ready to help with disasters like Katrina. The military is having a hard time recruiting young men and women for war, and with good reason. We will have no such problem enlisting the young to build rather than destroy.
"We can learn from the Social Security program and the GI Bill of Rights, which were efficient government programs, doing for older people and for veterans what private enterprise could not do. We can go beyond the New Deal, extending the principle of social security to health security with a totally free government-run health system. We can extend the GI Bill of Rights to a Civilian Bill of Rights, offering free higher education for all.
"We will have trillions of dollars to pay for these programs if we do two things: if we concentrate our taxes on the richest 1 percent of the population, not only their incomes but their accumulated wealth, and if we downsize our gigantic military machine, declaring ourselves a peaceful nation.
"We will not pay attention to those who complain that this is 'big government.' We have seen big government used for war and to give benefits to the wealthy. We will use big government for the people."
How refreshing it would be if a presidential candidate reminded us of the experience of the New Deal and defied the corporate elite as Roosevelt did, on the eve of his 1936 re-election. Referring to the determination of the wealthy classes to defeat him, he told a huge crowd at Madison Square Garden: "They are unanimous in their hatred for me--and I welcome their hatred." I believe that a candidate who showed such boldness would win a smashing victory at the polls.
The innovations of the New Deal were fueled by the militant demands for change that swept the country as FDR began his presidency: the tenants' groups; the Unemployed Councils; the millions on strike on the West Coast, in the Midwest and the South; the disruptive actions of desperate people seeking food, housing, jobs--the turmoil threatening the foundations of American capitalism. We will need a similar mobilization of citizens today, to unmoor from corporate control whoever becomes President. To match the New Deal, to go beyond it, is an idea whose time has come.
Saturday, March 8, 2008
Kennecott and Sulfide Mining in Michigan's Upper Peninsula
Jobs, Jobs, Jobs... or--- Profits, Profits, Profits
Every time there is a very legitimate environmental concern, as there definitely is with this sulfide mining operation, someone starts yelling, "Jobs, Jobs, Jobs."
There are plenty of jobs.
All across the U.P. thousands of workers are employed in loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos receiving poverty wages while working long hours without any rights under State or Federal Labor Laws in the Indian Gaming Industry, which is nothing but a front for organized crime and mobsters.
The problem is corporations are dictating the terms of these jobs.
Cut the work week to 32 hours... pay everyone for 40 hours based on a real living wage.
Make every job a good job, either through a union contract; or, raise the minimum wage to a real living wage based on what the United States Department of Labor calculates a living annual income to be, together with good social programs like socialized health care and free public education right through college.
I never heard of a boss yet who didn't want workers to work more hours for less pay.
Its time that the working class gets organized and fights for real social and economic justice for all workers.
If employers don't want to treat workers right--- with respect--- and pay decent wages and provide good working conditions and benefits along with shorter hours, then let them do the jobs themselves.
At some point we need to look at this situation and become aware that a job doesn't mean anything if the results of what you do--- and how you do it--- are going to destroy our living environment and us right along with it.
Kennecott doesn't do anything for the good of workers or the good of communities. This multi-national corporation has a proven track record of leaving behind environmental disasters and injured workers.
What is really at issue is not--- "Jobs, Jobs, Jobs;" but, "Profits, Profits, Profits."
If government can't be trusted to work for the good of the community and the environment than people are going to have to step forward and take the kind of direct action required... this is what democracy is all about.
As I travel through Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan all I see is our living environment and ecosystems being destroyed and huge pits and messes along with massive clear-cuts along with joblessness, poverty and despair--- continuing to do things in the same way by giving these corporations complete control to come in and truck away the profits while we end up paying to clean up the messes--- when they can be cleaned up--- is no solution.
Any government that will allow thousands of people to go to work in smoke-filled casinos without any rights isn't going to give two hoots about making sure a corporation like Kennecott is a "good corporate citizen."
Abraham Lincoln said it best on November 21, 1864, "Corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow." This sulfide mining dispute sure substantiates Lincoln's observation.
Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
Warroad, Minnesota
http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/
Every time there is a very legitimate environmental concern, as there definitely is with this sulfide mining operation, someone starts yelling, "Jobs, Jobs, Jobs."
There are plenty of jobs.
All across the U.P. thousands of workers are employed in loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos receiving poverty wages while working long hours without any rights under State or Federal Labor Laws in the Indian Gaming Industry, which is nothing but a front for organized crime and mobsters.
The problem is corporations are dictating the terms of these jobs.
Cut the work week to 32 hours... pay everyone for 40 hours based on a real living wage.
Make every job a good job, either through a union contract; or, raise the minimum wage to a real living wage based on what the United States Department of Labor calculates a living annual income to be, together with good social programs like socialized health care and free public education right through college.
I never heard of a boss yet who didn't want workers to work more hours for less pay.
Its time that the working class gets organized and fights for real social and economic justice for all workers.
If employers don't want to treat workers right--- with respect--- and pay decent wages and provide good working conditions and benefits along with shorter hours, then let them do the jobs themselves.
At some point we need to look at this situation and become aware that a job doesn't mean anything if the results of what you do--- and how you do it--- are going to destroy our living environment and us right along with it.
Kennecott doesn't do anything for the good of workers or the good of communities. This multi-national corporation has a proven track record of leaving behind environmental disasters and injured workers.
What is really at issue is not--- "Jobs, Jobs, Jobs;" but, "Profits, Profits, Profits."
If government can't be trusted to work for the good of the community and the environment than people are going to have to step forward and take the kind of direct action required... this is what democracy is all about.
As I travel through Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan all I see is our living environment and ecosystems being destroyed and huge pits and messes along with massive clear-cuts along with joblessness, poverty and despair--- continuing to do things in the same way by giving these corporations complete control to come in and truck away the profits while we end up paying to clean up the messes--- when they can be cleaned up--- is no solution.
Any government that will allow thousands of people to go to work in smoke-filled casinos without any rights isn't going to give two hoots about making sure a corporation like Kennecott is a "good corporate citizen."
Abraham Lincoln said it best on November 21, 1864, "Corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow." This sulfide mining dispute sure substantiates Lincoln's observation.
Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
Warroad, Minnesota
http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
More FBI privacy violations confirmed
I find this a very interesting story because, according to Floyd "Buck" Jourdain the Chair of the Red Lake Nation and the head of Red Lake Gaming Enterprises, and his cousin who was in management of Red Lake Gaming Enterprises--- Chris Jourdain, USIS (United States Information Services)--- the union busting outfit the Indian Gaming Industry has hired to try to thwart our organizing efforts across the Midwest at some two-dozen casinos, USIS agents collaborated with FBI agents and Homeland Security to obtain this information on me.
These scoundrels not only obtained these records, then, in the name of "National Security," they tapped my phone, intercepted and opened my mail, and hacked into my account at Wiktel Communications with the full knowledge of the Chief Executive and Operating Officers of the company and went so far as to send out the most filthy and disgusting e-mails imaginable to public officials purporting to be in my name.
They also used--- abused--- this information to inform casino managements about my organizing activities... going so far as to deliver "Letters to the Editors" I had written to casino managements in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan and Iowa as if they were engaged in bringing a halt to terrorist activity.
In doing this, the FBI and Homeland Security, working with this quasi-governmental bunch of thugs from USIS, which employs active and former FBI and CIA agents as well as those murdering creeps who have been trained by the Blackwater Agency... they intentionally set out to violate my democratic rights to be engaged in perfectly legal union organizing campaigns involving some two-hundred thousand casino workers who are employed in loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos at poverty wages without any rights under state or federal labor laws, forced to endure the most disrespectful and disgusting treatment from managements comprised of mobsters wearing the most expensive designer suits who have created the most oppressive and repressive working environment in North America using the most Draconian management techniques and methods to keep unions out.
But, not only did they violate my democratic rights, supposedly protected by the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights along with the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights... they went goose-stepping backwards in the foot-prints of Joe McCarthy as they trampled over the rights of not only casino workers; but, ironically, the rights of public officials, too.
And this is what these two-bit, half-assed, fascist bastards tout to the world as a "great bastion of democracy."
We need to have all these files opened for the public to see what has been done in their name.
I should not have to go to court, as I did in 1974, to have to ask a Judge to find that such activity on the part of the FBI and other "law enforcement agencies" is unconstitutional.
In my deportation from Canada, none other then United States Attorney General Janet Reno, signed an affidavit to Canadian authorities stating in no uncertain terms that she agreed that all of my activities were completely legal and I would not be subjected to these kinds of dirty deeds should the Canadians deport me... and, upon her word I was deported from Canada... and here we go all over again.
I think if there is one thing the Conrad Black case proves is that the FBI should be tapping the phones and opening the mail of the corporate executives, who not only exploit workers, but then steal from each other.
Look at these dirty birds sitting there squirming as they try to figure out what lie should come out of their mouths next:

National security officials testify at the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on Capitol Hill in Washington, February 5, 2008. Seated (L-R) are: Director of the FBI Robert Mueller, Director of National Security Admiral Michael McConnell, and Director of the CIA General Mike Hayden.
The entire bunch of them nothing but a bunch of Hitlers in high-priced suits. All brought into power through the lobbying efforts of this country's most influential lawyers/lobbyists representing every creep from two-bit hoods and gangsters right on up the corporate ladder--- Brownstein/Hyatt/Farber/Schreck
More FBI privacy violations confirmed
By LARA JAKES JORDAN, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - The FBI improperly used national security letters in 2006 to obtain personal data on Americans during terror and spy investigations, Director Robert Mueller said Wednesday.
Mueller told the Senate Judiciary Committee that the privacy breach by FBI agents and lawyers occurred a year before the bureau enacted sweeping new reforms to prevent future lapses.
Details on the abuses will be outlined in the coming days in a report by the Justice Department's inspector general.
The report is a follow-up to an audit by the inspector general a year ago that found the FBI demanded personal data on people from banks, telephone and Internet providers and credit bureaus without official authorization and in non-emergency circumstances between 2003 and 2005.
Mueller, noting senators' concerns about Americans' civil and privacy rights, said the new report "will identify issues similar to those in the report issued last March." The similarities, he said, are because the time period of the two studies "predates the reforms we now have in place."
He added: "We are committed to ensuring that we not only get this right, but maintain the vital trust of the American people."
Mueller offered no additional details. Several other Justice Department and FBI officials familiar with this year's findings have said privately the upcoming report will show the letters were wrongly used at a similar rate as during the previous three years.
In contrast to the outrage by Congress and civil liberties groups after last year's report was issued, Mueller's disclosure drew no initial criticism from senators at Wednesday's hearing.
Speaking before the FBI chief, Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., urged Mueller to be more vigilant in correcting what he called "widespread illegal and improper use of national security letters."
"Everybody wants to stop terrorists. But we also, though, as Americans, we believe in our privacy rights and we want those protected," Leahy said. "There has to be a better chain of command for this. You cannot just have an FBI agent who decides he'd like to obtain Americans' records, bank records or anything else and do it just because they want to."
National security letters are administrative subpoenas that can be issued under the USA Patriot Act in terror and spy investigations.
These scoundrels not only obtained these records, then, in the name of "National Security," they tapped my phone, intercepted and opened my mail, and hacked into my account at Wiktel Communications with the full knowledge of the Chief Executive and Operating Officers of the company and went so far as to send out the most filthy and disgusting e-mails imaginable to public officials purporting to be in my name.
They also used--- abused--- this information to inform casino managements about my organizing activities... going so far as to deliver "Letters to the Editors" I had written to casino managements in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan and Iowa as if they were engaged in bringing a halt to terrorist activity.
In doing this, the FBI and Homeland Security, working with this quasi-governmental bunch of thugs from USIS, which employs active and former FBI and CIA agents as well as those murdering creeps who have been trained by the Blackwater Agency... they intentionally set out to violate my democratic rights to be engaged in perfectly legal union organizing campaigns involving some two-hundred thousand casino workers who are employed in loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos at poverty wages without any rights under state or federal labor laws, forced to endure the most disrespectful and disgusting treatment from managements comprised of mobsters wearing the most expensive designer suits who have created the most oppressive and repressive working environment in North America using the most Draconian management techniques and methods to keep unions out.
But, not only did they violate my democratic rights, supposedly protected by the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights along with the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights... they went goose-stepping backwards in the foot-prints of Joe McCarthy as they trampled over the rights of not only casino workers; but, ironically, the rights of public officials, too.
And this is what these two-bit, half-assed, fascist bastards tout to the world as a "great bastion of democracy."
We need to have all these files opened for the public to see what has been done in their name.
I should not have to go to court, as I did in 1974, to have to ask a Judge to find that such activity on the part of the FBI and other "law enforcement agencies" is unconstitutional.
In my deportation from Canada, none other then United States Attorney General Janet Reno, signed an affidavit to Canadian authorities stating in no uncertain terms that she agreed that all of my activities were completely legal and I would not be subjected to these kinds of dirty deeds should the Canadians deport me... and, upon her word I was deported from Canada... and here we go all over again.
I think if there is one thing the Conrad Black case proves is that the FBI should be tapping the phones and opening the mail of the corporate executives, who not only exploit workers, but then steal from each other.
Look at these dirty birds sitting there squirming as they try to figure out what lie should come out of their mouths next:

National security officials testify at the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on Capitol Hill in Washington, February 5, 2008. Seated (L-R) are: Director of the FBI Robert Mueller, Director of National Security Admiral Michael McConnell, and Director of the CIA General Mike Hayden.
The entire bunch of them nothing but a bunch of Hitlers in high-priced suits. All brought into power through the lobbying efforts of this country's most influential lawyers/lobbyists representing every creep from two-bit hoods and gangsters right on up the corporate ladder--- Brownstein/Hyatt/Farber/Schreck
More FBI privacy violations confirmed
By LARA JAKES JORDAN, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - The FBI improperly used national security letters in 2006 to obtain personal data on Americans during terror and spy investigations, Director Robert Mueller said Wednesday.
Mueller told the Senate Judiciary Committee that the privacy breach by FBI agents and lawyers occurred a year before the bureau enacted sweeping new reforms to prevent future lapses.
Details on the abuses will be outlined in the coming days in a report by the Justice Department's inspector general.
The report is a follow-up to an audit by the inspector general a year ago that found the FBI demanded personal data on people from banks, telephone and Internet providers and credit bureaus without official authorization and in non-emergency circumstances between 2003 and 2005.
Mueller, noting senators' concerns about Americans' civil and privacy rights, said the new report "will identify issues similar to those in the report issued last March." The similarities, he said, are because the time period of the two studies "predates the reforms we now have in place."
He added: "We are committed to ensuring that we not only get this right, but maintain the vital trust of the American people."
Mueller offered no additional details. Several other Justice Department and FBI officials familiar with this year's findings have said privately the upcoming report will show the letters were wrongly used at a similar rate as during the previous three years.
In contrast to the outrage by Congress and civil liberties groups after last year's report was issued, Mueller's disclosure drew no initial criticism from senators at Wednesday's hearing.
Speaking before the FBI chief, Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., urged Mueller to be more vigilant in correcting what he called "widespread illegal and improper use of national security letters."
"Everybody wants to stop terrorists. But we also, though, as Americans, we believe in our privacy rights and we want those protected," Leahy said. "There has to be a better chain of command for this. You cannot just have an FBI agent who decides he'd like to obtain Americans' records, bank records or anything else and do it just because they want to."
National security letters are administrative subpoenas that can be issued under the USA Patriot Act in terror and spy investigations.
Monday, March 3, 2008
Conrad Black
Thursday, February 28, 2008
President Buffenbarger Rips into Obama
International Association of Machinist President Tom Buffenbarger ripped into Barack Obama; it's about time someone did this. Buffenbarger is now being attacked for his remarks; however, those attacking Buffenbarger are not telling the truth about what he said, or why he attacked Obama--- a very justified and long-overdue attack in my opinion.
Buffenbarger's very scathing attack on Barack Obama is much more than support for Hillary Clinton. It is the reason for this attack which discussion of Buffenbarger's remarks should focus on: defense of the rights of working people, the right to a job, plant closures; and something not too often discussed: this moribund capitalist system that has reached its most cannibalistic, decadent and deadly imperialist stage; held in place by state-monopoly capitalism which has spun a web of corruption creating the most undemocratic, racist, anti-labor political and governmental structures in history; make no mistake, there has never been a government more arrogant and corrupt than that which we have in the United States of America today, and it is quickly headed into becoming the most repressive.
For quite some time the United States has been propping up some of the worst and most brutal fascist dictatorships around the globe in protecting the multi-national corporations in their quest for ever greater profits; profits derived from stealing resources through the brutal exploitation of human labor--- and, now, this quest for super-profits has extended to driving human labor in these other countries at a deadly pace in the industrial manufacturing process--- subsidized by the American tax-payer along with the enormous profits which have been squeezed from, and accumulated through, the exploitation of American workers.
For some reason Tom Buffenbarger thinks Hillary Clinton is part of the solution; I don't know why he would think this--- I certainly disagree with him. Hillary Clinton has never been a fighter for working people--- as Buffenbarger is suggesting; although, given the choice between Obama and Clinton, I don't know why one would choose Obama... but then again, why are we in the position of having such a pathetic choice? An issue which no one seems to want to address.
With this said, Buffenbarger's remarks raise another very important question, and problem, confronting working people--- and the American people in general, which I have alluded to above that I would like to discuss after you listen to Buffenbarger's remarks; or, at least read the digested version of his remarks... links to both follow.
I am providing the reader the opportunity to watch and listen to Buffenbarger's speech for yourself so we can discuss what I see as a much larger problem and the trap Buffenbarger has stepped into.
This is the link to Buffenbarger's actual speech--- it is well worthwhile to watch and listen to this entire video:
VIDEO: Clinton supporter Tom Buffenbarger attacks Sen. Barack Obama during a campaign event in Youngstown, Ohio.
Note: You might have to copy and paste this link in the address bar of your browser to get it to work.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23255540#23255540
Here is the highlight of Buffenbarger's speech from the IAM website:
Link:
http://www.goiam.org/content.cfm?cID=12490
President Buffenbarger Rips into Obama
Before a raucous crowd of Hillary Clinton supporters in Youngstown, OH Tuesday night, IAM President Tom Buffenbarger ripped into Senator Barack Obama, taking aim at Obama’s lackluster record as a state Senator and his unwillingness to fight for working families.
“He took a walk every time there was a tough vote in the Illinois state senate. Took a walk more than 130 times! That’s what a shadow boxer does. All the right moves, all the right combinations, all the right footwork --- but never steps into the ring. He walks away from the fight,” said Buffenbarger.
Buffenbarger also spoke at length about Obama’s trip to Galesburg, IL in 2004, in which Obama spoke to Machinists at Maytag who were fighting to keep their factory open. The Maytag plant would eventually close and Obama did little as more than 1,600 Machinists saw their jobs shipped to Mexico. In fact, before speaking to IAM members, he accepted more than $120,000 in campaign contributions from the Crown family, including Maytag’s single largest stockholder, Lester Crown.
“Barack so loved his own performance that he made Galesburg part of his presidential stump speech,” said Buffenbarger. “All he proved is that like Janus, the two-faced Roman god, he could ACT like a friend of the working man as he DANCED to the tune dictated by billionaires.”
The criticism of Obama comes as Machinists and working families throughout the country find their livelihoods at stake heading into the 2008 presidential election, struggling to deal with a rapidly spreading mortgage crisis, skyrocketing unemployment, hefty retirement costs and the continued loss of jobs.
“Hillary Clinton is a fighter. She’s our kind of fighter. All her life she’s fought our battles. For our jobs, for our health care, for our kids and for our country,” said Buffenbarger. “The Republican attack machine has taken its best shot at her time and time again and she’s still standing – and she’s still fighting for us.”
Lester Crown (left) and buddy Shimon Peres (center):

Lester Crown is worth over FOUR BILLION DOLLARS making him one of the wealthiest men in the world and he needed to close a plant and ship almost two-thousand jobs to Mexico because he is so greedy he wants more, more, more.
So, Buffenbarger's remarks do not center on Barack Obama for his "speaking style;" but, because Barack Obama betrayed the workers Buffenbarger is paid to represent. And, I for one, think Buffenbarger did one heck of a job stating why he has no use for Obama.
The issues involved:
1. Workers were struggling to defend their livelihoods;
2. The huge Maytag Corporation was moving the jobs of these workers to Mexico;
3. Barack Obama sold these workers out in order to get campaign funding from Lester Crown and his family--- one of the wealthiest, most reactionary and viciously anti-labor families in America, who are major stockholders in the Maytag Corporation;
4. The Crown family made billions when Maytag shipped the jobs of 1,500 workers to Mexico.
For the Crown Family and the Maytag Corporation shipping jobs across borders and overseas is no different than sticking washing machines or a dryers in cardboard cartons and shipping them around the world. Jobs are shipped off to the lowest wage areas in the world in the same uncaring and a callous manner; the washers and dryers manufactured as cheaply as possible are shipped off to where they can be sold for the highest prices; manufacturing takes place where resources and labor are the cheapest... today with computer technology, entire manufacturing operations can be shipped almost as quickly as the cost/analysis can be performed by the "whiz kids"--- this is simple to understand, it is what "free enterprise," "the market system," "free markets" are all about; call it what you will; it is capitalism, plain and simple, in its highest and most advanced stage: imperialism.
State-monopoly capitalism is the structure which enables all this to take place smoothly as the Wall Street coupon clippers stuff their pockets while the capitalist sooth-sayers "explain," and "justify," it all.
Of course, we must never mention that there is an alternative to all of this.
A former head of the IAM, William Winpisinger, who once occupied Tom Buffenbarger's position as the President of the IAM, brought forward this alternative--- Winpisinger called the alternative socialism.
And this is where we, working people--- like Buffenbarger, have stuck ourselves in a trap--- we don't have socialist candidates who are alternatives to the Obamas and the Clintons.
In just about every country in the world, working people have strong socialist and communist parties which they rely upon to take their fight with the bosses into the political arena to try to make government serve the interests of the working class, rather than, the interests of the wealthy few.
A few examples...
Canadian workers have the socialist New Democratic Party (NDP), which has held the dominant power in the Provinces of Manitoba and Saskatchewan for much of the last sixty years through which the powerful Canadian Labour Congress and its affiliated unions carry forward their political activity; in South Africa, the South African Communist Party is part of a powerful coalition influencing the Congress of South African Trade Unions and the African National Congress... this powerful alliance was able to break the back of racist apartheid system which was put in place to brutally control and exploit labor; this powerful alliance with workers at the helm now governs South Africa. Just days ago, the working people of Cyprus came to power through their Party, AKEL--- the Communist Party of Cyprus.
As the Director of Organizing for the Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council, I can appreciate Buffenbarger ripping into Obama the way he has done, and justifiably so. On the other hand, I find his support for Hillary Clinton to be less than appropriate since the casino workers I represent, over 200,000 casino workers in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan and Iowa are working in loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos at poverty wages without any rights under state, federal or tribal laws protecting all other workers. In fact, some two-million American workers are going to work under these very same Draconian conditions at some four-hundred such casinos in the Indian Gaming Industry spread out across the United States... and Hillary Clinton is supported by the notorious mobster and front man for the Kansas City mob, which is known for its casino skimming operations, Mr. Frank Fertitta and his "boys."
Melanie Benjamin, who oversees the huge Grand Casino empire, is one of the most vicious anti-labor reactionaries in Minnesota, and is one of Hillary Clinton's primary backers.
The lawfirm of Brownstein/Hyatt/Farber/Schreck, which is also one of the most important lobbying firms and peddler of the most reactionary, most racist, most environmentally destructive, most anti-labor agenda on behalf of a bunch of mobsters who now occupy many of the corporate boardrooms in America in addition to overseeing this huge, huge casino/hotel/restaurant/resort/theme park empire controls many union pension funds including the grand-daddy of them all, the teachers' union pension fund.
So, I am wondering, why I, and casino workers, should not feel as insulted towards Clinton, as Buffenbarger is towards Obama? As a worker, as a union organizer, I am offended that anyone would support Obama after the way Buffenbarger articulated his union's grievances with Obama because an injury to one is an injury to all; and, as casino workers, we can identify with the corporate assault on Maytag workers. Why any union would be supporting Obama after Buffenbarger's very justifiably emotional attack on Obama needs to be explained by those who continue their support for Obama.
On the other hand, I would like to hear from Tom Buffenbarger why he would support Hillary Clinton knowing what is taking place under the terms of these "Compacts," which have created some four-hundred "right-to-work colonies" where American workers are forced to endure such Draconian conditions?
I think I have asked Tom Buffenbarger and the rest of the American labor movement which is squabbling over the backing of Obama or Clinton a very legitimate question: Why would any union back either candidate when organized labor could be running a fighter from among its own ranks? Perhaps Tom Buffenbarger?
How much longer will U.S. unions continue to step into the same trap before learning the lesson that labor needs its own political party?
More than just a "political party;" labor needs a party putting forward the socialist solution to this corrupt, exploiting capitalist system.
The time has come to create a working class political party that puts the needs of working people before corporate profits--- this is the solution... not Hillary Clinton; for sure not Barack Obama.
I wouldn't walk across the street to vote for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.
Something to talk about around the kitchen table.
I hope if Tom Buffenbarger reads this he will give some thought as to why two-million casino workers and the Draconian conditions they are forced to endure are being ignored by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton because I think he will find a clue as to why those IAM jobs have been shipped south of the border to Mexico... perhaps some of those workers who had been employed in Galesburg, Illinois at Maytag are now working someplace in a loud, noisy, smoke-filled casino without any rights--- much like workers in the maquiladoras in Mexico--- although these sweatshop workers, have a few "rights;" casino workers employed in the Indian Gaming Industry in the United States have no rights... how would you like to have a mobster like Frank Fertitta for your boss?

At least the Maytag repairman appears to be thinking, since, as we know from the advertisements, he has nothing better to do.
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Minnesota DFL spins web of corruption: Jourdain, Ciresi, Nelson-Pallmeyer, Franken
The Indian Gaming Industry begins to set the standards for workers' rights and human rights.
Big-business doesn't need the Republicans to step on the necks of working people in quashing their rights as Minnesota's DFL politicians make their way towards those grocery bags filled with cash in the offices of Floyd "Buck" Jourdain, the folksy Chair of the Red Lake Nation, which the Kansas City mob has entrusted to look out for their high-stakes interest in Red Lake Gaming Enterprises three Seven Clans Casino operations which have become the "model" of the United States Chamber of Commerce for Labor/Management Relations in the United States.
Former DFL leader Roger Moe who helped bring the notoriously corrupt--- anti-labor--- Indian Gaming Industry into Minnesota to help the Democrats rake in campaign contributions has personally taken his star United States Senate candidate, Mike Ciresi to the Red Lake Nation courting endorsement--- and, of course, campaign funds--- from the mobbed-up, corrupt "leaders" of the Red Lake Nation Tribal Council.
In hot pursuit, too, of this dirty money are Senate candidates Al Franken, comedian turned politician; and, Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, the darling of the well-heeled, "latte liberal" crowd.
Ciresi is no stranger to corruption and politics.
For these politicians, from bootlegging to illegal gambling to the Indian Gaming Industry, its all just part of the American experience--- befitting a Howard Fast novel.
The employers and the Democratic and Republican politicians they buy have a set goal in mind for what they want to achieve in the way of what rights working people in this country should have. They have a United States Supreme Court whose primary role throughout history has always been to control the working class for the capitalist class. This has been the primary function and role of the United States Supreme Court since the Constitution created the Supreme Court; one need only spend a few days in any law library going through the case histories of the United States Supreme Court to find this little tid-bit of history out, which historians have tried to conceal.
Anyone who wants to see what goals and objectives the employers have in mind should closely analyze the 400 or so “right-to-work colonies” created by the “Compacts,” which created the Indian Gaming Industry--- an industry now spread out across this country because these “Compacts” clearly demonstrate and provide a working model of what employers hope to achieve and make universal instead of health care.
These are the more than four-hundred casino/resort/hotel/motel/restaurant/theme-park “enterprises” operated by some of the most powerful mobsters in the country who have donned the finest designer suits in operating these casinos through these complex “Compacts” created to establish the so-called Indian Gaming Industry.
Take a good close look at the lives of some two-million of your fellow workers who have been deprived of the most basic and fundamental human rights that you have closed your eyes to for twenty-years now who work in these loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos at poverty wages without any rights under state, federal or tribal labor laws--- all created compliments of elected officials who have been handsomely paid off by the likes of the crooked and corrupt Jack Abramoff and Brownstein/Hyatt/Farber/Schreck the lobbying firm of choice for the mobsters who inherited the “evil empire” of some of the most vicious, most violent, most debased, most anti-human elements “related” by “family ties” to Bugsy Siegel, Lucky Luciano and Meyer Lansky “families.”
It is very interesting that Mike Meurers the MN DFL party hack who works to try to keep the mobsters in the background while hired to create a clean image for some of the nastiest excuses passing themselves off as human beings would not take his "guests" to visit the casinos where Red Lake Enterprises employs hundreds of workers under some of the most Draconian conditions imaginable. In a lengthy meeting I had with Jourdain in his office concerning the plight of casino workers he kept asking me to define "Draconian." In fact, Jourdain, who will talk at length about the abuses of workers employed at Wal-marts or McDonalds doesn't want to address the plight of those workers employed by Red Lake Gaming Enterprises and it is Mike Meuer's job to make sure the DFL politicians he brings around looking for handouts never broach the subject of casino workers' rights and the deplorable conditions they labor under.
Quite literally, in these casinos, management has the “right” to rape employees in these casinos; feed patrons hamburgers made from meat of diseased cows and spare-ribs (all-you-can-eat) from old crippled sows, and boars that have become so fat and sick they can no longer get any action to fish which were “caught” belly-up floating in the polluted Dutch canals passed off as “fresh walleye.” Managers have done it all, and much more, including selling illegal booze to running loan shark businesses and drug deals along with illegal gambling, which includes taking in bets on everything from high school sporting events to professional sports with other management staff specializing in prostitution.
Mike Ciresi, Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, and Al Franken should have asked Minnesota State Representative, Dave Olin--- the former Pennington County Prosecutor--- to give them the real briefing about the corruption taking place through Red Lakes' casino empire.
Not one single politician in this country has had the moral or political courage to address this issue; even the great “progressive,” Dennis Kucinich, has lauded the “accomplishments” of the Indian Gaming Industry, rather than giving these parasites the thrashing deserved.
The major “accomplishment” of the Indian Gaming Industry has been to create these “right-to-work-colonies” raking in billions of dollars for mobsters while leaving Native American communities and reservations even deeper in debt, wallowing in poverty and despair like just so many old, diseased and dying milk cows at the slaughterhouse waiting to be butchered and fed to small school children.
I am sure the Justices of the United States Supreme Court, most all of whom, have been put on the Court with help and arm-twisting of Brownstein/Hyatt/Farber/Schreck (check it out--- this bunch who has its “humble” beginnings defending the Kansas City mob’s cronies) has created the present United States Supreme Court will be looking very favorably upon employers seeking to “level” their “playing fields” through depriving working people of their rights… especially those rights attained in the “New Deal” period which have hobbled employers so.
And now, the United Auto Workers union has conducted a successful “card signing campaign” among casino workers at the largest casino in the United States and they will never attain a union contract because these “Compacts” provide the legal and constitutional basis to keep the union out and a union leadership who would spit in the faces of its present members by subjecting auto workers to pre-1950 wages and benefits sure isn’t going to initiate the kind of fight required to win a contract for casino workers at Foxwoods, the largest casino/resort complex in the United States.
We were the first in the Nation to initiate union organizing activities in the Indian Gaming Industry at the Red Lake Nation’s three Seven Clans Casinos in Northern Minnesota, not one single union would support our efforts because the AFL-CIO is so wedded to the Democratic Party which gets major campaign contributions from these casino managements.
In spite of all of this, eighty-six percent of the workers signed union cards authorizing our union organizing committee--- Red Lake Casino, Hotel and Restaurant Employees’ Union Organizing Committee--- to represent them. The first time I met with Red Lake Nation tribal Chair Butch Brun I was attacked and beaten by Red Lake Nation Tribal Police. The next time I met with Red Lake Nation Chair Floyd “Buck” Jourdain for over three hours and as a result of this meeting several of our organizers were beaten to a pulp.
Today we have organizing campaigns in each of the casinos in Minnesota, casinos in Wisconsin, Michigan and Iowa and we are now working to represent a number of workers in the entertainment/hospitality industry in Branson, Missouri hoping to link the struggles of workers with no rights to workers with limited rights. I would note: The Fertitta Family and their Colony Enterprises operating the Station Casino empire was thrown out of Missouri after trying to bribe a high public official for which they were fined a mere one million dollars. Corruption, bribery and the ruthless and Draconian exploitation of workers is the name of the real “game.”
However, until progressives, in and outside the labor movement, decide to consider the circumstances created by the “Compacts” employers are going to be demanding “equal treatment;” here in Minnesota this has already happened where bar owners are insisting they have a right to a “level playing field” with the Indian Gaming Industry when it comes to the rights of their employees to be free of second-hand smoke. Before long, we will probably see Minnesota’s “Freedom to Breath” (No Smoking in the workplace) challenged in the United States Supreme Court. And if these judges rule that bar owners in Minnesota have a “right” to a “level playing field” the door will be opened to challenge just about any labor law on the books along with a number of social programs like Social Security.
Just thought I would give all of you something to think about.
Oh, both Hillary Clinton and Obama receive big-time campaign contributions from this Indian Gaming Industry and the notorious Fertitta Family whose attorneys--- Brownstein/Hyatt/Farber/Schreck cited my postings on the Working Class Studies list serve in their pending actions aimed at silencing me on this issue.
It is very interesting indeed that the UAW, United Steel Workers, Teamsters, UFCW and SEIU who all now want a “piece of the action” (dues and pension monies) in the Indian Gaming Industry as they try to prevent the rebirth of a “red” union, are unwilling to join me in speaking out against the injustices of these “Compacts” which have created over four-hundred “right-to-work colonies” here in the United States systematically through institutionalized methods deprived so many working people of their basic human rights and dignity, not to mention their rights to have a voice in the workplace.
There is a real sad irony to all of this… on the eve of a strike by security guards affiliated with the SEIU, the officers of this union have contacted me to help them convince the “casino cops” not to work as scabs when they go on strike in the Twin Cities! For twenty years this union has sat in silence and watched without uttering a single word of protest as casino workers are brutally exploited, abused and misused in every conceivable manner by these mobsters, and now SEIU leaders come crying to me that they want our help.
It is very sad to see the chickens coming home to roost.
Mr. Dubovich, the head of the United Steel Workers organizing department in Minnesota, asked to meet with me to inform me that his union was going to be horning in on our organizing campaigns here in Minnesota as the USW has sat without struggling while more than 50,000 iron ore miners have lost their jobs on the Iron Range and the USW has castrated its present membership with its attacks on rank and file committees and rank and file activists. And Mr. Dubovich, whose boss--- Mr. Bob Bratulich--- sits in his office with his feet up on his desk playing computer games all day long complains that he has a two foot high stack of unresolved grievances from the taconite plants.
The entire scenario would be laughable, if not so pathetically sad, with so many working people suffering--- over thirty-thousand in Minnesota alone not to mention their entire families--- as their standards of living is constantly being driven down, down, down.
As any school child knows, poverty will never be eliminated as long as working people are paid poverty wages. Apparently this little nugget and kernel of truth hasn't made it into the campaigns of Mike Ciresi, Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer and Al Franken.
How low can the standards of American workers go? Right down to where two-million casino workers are at.
What is that song Utah Phillips enjoys singing, “They kicked the reds out of the unions?” And the working class is paying the price for the dumbing down of the U.S. labor movement.
Yes, Professor Martin Zweig would also prefer that this issue involving the rights of casino workers not be talked about because he forgot to include this issue in the expensive books he sells to his students, which are supposed to be educating working people who enroll in his working class studies programs. These programs come up short in teaching about rank and file initiated action, as he tries to keep the working class tethered to the current crop of labor fakers like John Sweeney and that anti-communist phony Leo Girard, who would rather no one knows about how he and his dad orchestrated an anti-communist campaign of terror on behalf of the employers and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police working together with the FBI to divide the working class community of hard rock miners in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Anyways, just thought I would add a few comments on the U.S. Supreme Court and workers’ rights.
Here are photos of three Democratic United States Senate Candidates happily meeting with Floyd “Buck” Jourdain, one of the most depraved elements the human race has ever created, as they beg for his endorsement and pander like prostitutes for campaign contributions for the upcoming election.
Neither Al Franken, Mike Ciresi, nor Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, all pictured below, had the moral or political courage to address the violation of the human rights of hundreds of casino workers employed by Red Lake Gaming Enterprises, even though the liberal professor--- Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer turned Democratic politician--- boasts that he has the support of “the real Norma Rae,” and his written widely about “Christian ethics and morality” in politics and the economy. For some reason making the link from words on the pages of his books to the real life situation of casino workers evades comprehension for this enlightened humanist professor.

Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer meets with corrupt Red Lake Band Members who have sacrificed the Red Lake Nation’s historic sovereignty in a number of casino ventures; destroying a once proud, vibrant community built in the best socialist and cooperative traditions.

In this photograph United States Senate Candidate Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer and his staff person Kathleen Blake--- both of whom are fully aware of the repressive conditions enforcing the poverty of employees of Red Lakes’ three Seven Clans Casinos are forced to endure--- remain silent as they beg for support from Band Secretary Beaulieu and another corrupt Band Council member, Billy King.
Below, Floyd “Buck” Jourdain, one of the most violent and corrupt Tribal Chairs in the Nation, who the New York Times has tied in with drug dealers using the three Seven Clans Casinos as distribution centers for everything from meth to cocaine, yacks it up with comedian turned politician, Al Franken who came looking for support to buoy his floundering campaign as onlookers suck it all up--- DFL Party hack Michael Meuers, and Mr. Barrett (red an black coat) responsible for helping to manipulate the “internet news service” and works in Red Lakes Health Services but can't figure out the dangers of second-hand smoke each work on behalf of Floyd “Buck” Jourdain who runs the Red Lake Nation like an old Finnish Feudal Lord; depriving people who dare to speak up of their right to their jobs, and even takes away their homes. Jourdain “explains” to Franken the dire poverty conditions of the Indian people living on the Red Lake Reservation. Al Franken doesn’t think to ask Jourdain how people being paid poverty wages working in these casinos might escape poverty. As Jourdain is explaining the dire “poverty of my people,” the Red Lake Nation has announced that it will spend over sixty-million dollars in casino expansion projects so the mobsters who own the slot machines can live in luxury. Floyd “Buck” Jourdain is responsible for one of the most corrupt politicians in Minnesota history being elected to public office, DFL State Representative Brita Sailer who represents the most “mobbed-up” union pension fund in America teamed up with the Fertitta Family.
It must be noted that when Floyd “Buck” Jourdain came to power supported by the mobsters who really own Red Lake’s Casino empire, he took on as economic adviser the man responsible for destroying all of Red Lakes publicly owned industries that paid Red Lakers wages higher than the best union contracts in Minnesota… in return Red Lakers are now getting the poverty wages of the casino industry while getting treated less than human.
It was Roger Moe who helped bring organized crime into Minnesota so he felt right at home working the "crowd" for Mike Ciresi.

In this photo Roger Moe chums it up with the man who keeps his cash in brown paper shopping bags...

Jourdain and George Bush carried on a conversation for the world to hear shortly after the mass killings at Red Lake High School; Jourdain got along famously with Bush as the two of them discussed the need for “parental responsibilities;” a few days later Jourdain’s own son was implicated for having a role in the murderous killing spree, found to have known about the killing spree in advance but didn’t tell his dad or anyone in authority… today, the young Jourdain is incarcerated in a place where his father should be.
Democrat or Republican, Jourdain gets along with them all... this is what the Kansas City Mob has put him in charge to do.
On the evening before the Red Lake killing spree, Jourdain sat in his office talking with officials of the United States Department of Justice, the FBI, the Minnesota Attorney Generals Office and the Minnesota Department of Public Safety trying to figure out how to keep me out of their casinos and out of the reservation. Had Jourdain cared about his son’s well-being and mental health as much as he cared about the profits of these mobsters who have taken control of the Red Lake Nation, this killing spree could have been prevented.
In fact, someplace, Jourdain's son learned to admire Adolf Hitler.
In fact, the violence that these mobsters has introduced to the once peaceful Red Lake Nation is responsible for the violence the Red Lake Nation is experiencing; the drug dealing, the illegal gambling and the prostitution which have become the major “industries” having replace the home building and lumber mill industries and water bottling plant.
Jack Abramoff and his gang “laundered” millions of dollars destined for bribes and payoffs of politicians, which they transported in brown paper shopping bags, through Red Lake Nation businesses and agencies.
The employers’ next argument for the United States Supreme Court? Give us a “level playing field” with the Indian Gaming Industry… I predict these employers will cry, “It’s our constitutional right.” Far fetched? Bar owners and the Chamber of Commerce in Minnesota are already making the plans with the help of the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party.
Mike Ciresi, Al Franken and Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer have asked for my endorsement. I will leave it to your imagination what my response was to each of them.
Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
The U.S. Supreme Court appears more hostile to workers' discrimination
complaints
Job discrimination cases hit new opposition
By Joan Biskupic, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON - Two new job discrimination cases have Supreme Court justices
considering how broadly federal law protects workers from retaliation after
they complain about bias.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2008-02-24-court_N.htm
Big-business doesn't need the Republicans to step on the necks of working people in quashing their rights as Minnesota's DFL politicians make their way towards those grocery bags filled with cash in the offices of Floyd "Buck" Jourdain, the folksy Chair of the Red Lake Nation, which the Kansas City mob has entrusted to look out for their high-stakes interest in Red Lake Gaming Enterprises three Seven Clans Casino operations which have become the "model" of the United States Chamber of Commerce for Labor/Management Relations in the United States.
Former DFL leader Roger Moe who helped bring the notoriously corrupt--- anti-labor--- Indian Gaming Industry into Minnesota to help the Democrats rake in campaign contributions has personally taken his star United States Senate candidate, Mike Ciresi to the Red Lake Nation courting endorsement--- and, of course, campaign funds--- from the mobbed-up, corrupt "leaders" of the Red Lake Nation Tribal Council.
In hot pursuit, too, of this dirty money are Senate candidates Al Franken, comedian turned politician; and, Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, the darling of the well-heeled, "latte liberal" crowd.
Ciresi is no stranger to corruption and politics.
For these politicians, from bootlegging to illegal gambling to the Indian Gaming Industry, its all just part of the American experience--- befitting a Howard Fast novel.
The employers and the Democratic and Republican politicians they buy have a set goal in mind for what they want to achieve in the way of what rights working people in this country should have. They have a United States Supreme Court whose primary role throughout history has always been to control the working class for the capitalist class. This has been the primary function and role of the United States Supreme Court since the Constitution created the Supreme Court; one need only spend a few days in any law library going through the case histories of the United States Supreme Court to find this little tid-bit of history out, which historians have tried to conceal.
Anyone who wants to see what goals and objectives the employers have in mind should closely analyze the 400 or so “right-to-work colonies” created by the “Compacts,” which created the Indian Gaming Industry--- an industry now spread out across this country because these “Compacts” clearly demonstrate and provide a working model of what employers hope to achieve and make universal instead of health care.
These are the more than four-hundred casino/resort/hotel/motel/restaurant/theme-park “enterprises” operated by some of the most powerful mobsters in the country who have donned the finest designer suits in operating these casinos through these complex “Compacts” created to establish the so-called Indian Gaming Industry.
Take a good close look at the lives of some two-million of your fellow workers who have been deprived of the most basic and fundamental human rights that you have closed your eyes to for twenty-years now who work in these loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos at poverty wages without any rights under state, federal or tribal labor laws--- all created compliments of elected officials who have been handsomely paid off by the likes of the crooked and corrupt Jack Abramoff and Brownstein/Hyatt/Farber/Schreck the lobbying firm of choice for the mobsters who inherited the “evil empire” of some of the most vicious, most violent, most debased, most anti-human elements “related” by “family ties” to Bugsy Siegel, Lucky Luciano and Meyer Lansky “families.”
It is very interesting that Mike Meurers the MN DFL party hack who works to try to keep the mobsters in the background while hired to create a clean image for some of the nastiest excuses passing themselves off as human beings would not take his "guests" to visit the casinos where Red Lake Enterprises employs hundreds of workers under some of the most Draconian conditions imaginable. In a lengthy meeting I had with Jourdain in his office concerning the plight of casino workers he kept asking me to define "Draconian." In fact, Jourdain, who will talk at length about the abuses of workers employed at Wal-marts or McDonalds doesn't want to address the plight of those workers employed by Red Lake Gaming Enterprises and it is Mike Meuer's job to make sure the DFL politicians he brings around looking for handouts never broach the subject of casino workers' rights and the deplorable conditions they labor under.
Quite literally, in these casinos, management has the “right” to rape employees in these casinos; feed patrons hamburgers made from meat of diseased cows and spare-ribs (all-you-can-eat) from old crippled sows, and boars that have become so fat and sick they can no longer get any action to fish which were “caught” belly-up floating in the polluted Dutch canals passed off as “fresh walleye.” Managers have done it all, and much more, including selling illegal booze to running loan shark businesses and drug deals along with illegal gambling, which includes taking in bets on everything from high school sporting events to professional sports with other management staff specializing in prostitution.
Mike Ciresi, Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, and Al Franken should have asked Minnesota State Representative, Dave Olin--- the former Pennington County Prosecutor--- to give them the real briefing about the corruption taking place through Red Lakes' casino empire.
Not one single politician in this country has had the moral or political courage to address this issue; even the great “progressive,” Dennis Kucinich, has lauded the “accomplishments” of the Indian Gaming Industry, rather than giving these parasites the thrashing deserved.
The major “accomplishment” of the Indian Gaming Industry has been to create these “right-to-work-colonies” raking in billions of dollars for mobsters while leaving Native American communities and reservations even deeper in debt, wallowing in poverty and despair like just so many old, diseased and dying milk cows at the slaughterhouse waiting to be butchered and fed to small school children.
I am sure the Justices of the United States Supreme Court, most all of whom, have been put on the Court with help and arm-twisting of Brownstein/Hyatt/Farber/Schreck (check it out--- this bunch who has its “humble” beginnings defending the Kansas City mob’s cronies) has created the present United States Supreme Court will be looking very favorably upon employers seeking to “level” their “playing fields” through depriving working people of their rights… especially those rights attained in the “New Deal” period which have hobbled employers so.
And now, the United Auto Workers union has conducted a successful “card signing campaign” among casino workers at the largest casino in the United States and they will never attain a union contract because these “Compacts” provide the legal and constitutional basis to keep the union out and a union leadership who would spit in the faces of its present members by subjecting auto workers to pre-1950 wages and benefits sure isn’t going to initiate the kind of fight required to win a contract for casino workers at Foxwoods, the largest casino/resort complex in the United States.
We were the first in the Nation to initiate union organizing activities in the Indian Gaming Industry at the Red Lake Nation’s three Seven Clans Casinos in Northern Minnesota, not one single union would support our efforts because the AFL-CIO is so wedded to the Democratic Party which gets major campaign contributions from these casino managements.
In spite of all of this, eighty-six percent of the workers signed union cards authorizing our union organizing committee--- Red Lake Casino, Hotel and Restaurant Employees’ Union Organizing Committee--- to represent them. The first time I met with Red Lake Nation tribal Chair Butch Brun I was attacked and beaten by Red Lake Nation Tribal Police. The next time I met with Red Lake Nation Chair Floyd “Buck” Jourdain for over three hours and as a result of this meeting several of our organizers were beaten to a pulp.
Today we have organizing campaigns in each of the casinos in Minnesota, casinos in Wisconsin, Michigan and Iowa and we are now working to represent a number of workers in the entertainment/hospitality industry in Branson, Missouri hoping to link the struggles of workers with no rights to workers with limited rights. I would note: The Fertitta Family and their Colony Enterprises operating the Station Casino empire was thrown out of Missouri after trying to bribe a high public official for which they were fined a mere one million dollars. Corruption, bribery and the ruthless and Draconian exploitation of workers is the name of the real “game.”
However, until progressives, in and outside the labor movement, decide to consider the circumstances created by the “Compacts” employers are going to be demanding “equal treatment;” here in Minnesota this has already happened where bar owners are insisting they have a right to a “level playing field” with the Indian Gaming Industry when it comes to the rights of their employees to be free of second-hand smoke. Before long, we will probably see Minnesota’s “Freedom to Breath” (No Smoking in the workplace) challenged in the United States Supreme Court. And if these judges rule that bar owners in Minnesota have a “right” to a “level playing field” the door will be opened to challenge just about any labor law on the books along with a number of social programs like Social Security.
Just thought I would give all of you something to think about.
Oh, both Hillary Clinton and Obama receive big-time campaign contributions from this Indian Gaming Industry and the notorious Fertitta Family whose attorneys--- Brownstein/Hyatt/Farber/Schreck cited my postings on the Working Class Studies list serve in their pending actions aimed at silencing me on this issue.
It is very interesting indeed that the UAW, United Steel Workers, Teamsters, UFCW and SEIU who all now want a “piece of the action” (dues and pension monies) in the Indian Gaming Industry as they try to prevent the rebirth of a “red” union, are unwilling to join me in speaking out against the injustices of these “Compacts” which have created over four-hundred “right-to-work colonies” here in the United States systematically through institutionalized methods deprived so many working people of their basic human rights and dignity, not to mention their rights to have a voice in the workplace.
There is a real sad irony to all of this… on the eve of a strike by security guards affiliated with the SEIU, the officers of this union have contacted me to help them convince the “casino cops” not to work as scabs when they go on strike in the Twin Cities! For twenty years this union has sat in silence and watched without uttering a single word of protest as casino workers are brutally exploited, abused and misused in every conceivable manner by these mobsters, and now SEIU leaders come crying to me that they want our help.
It is very sad to see the chickens coming home to roost.
Mr. Dubovich, the head of the United Steel Workers organizing department in Minnesota, asked to meet with me to inform me that his union was going to be horning in on our organizing campaigns here in Minnesota as the USW has sat without struggling while more than 50,000 iron ore miners have lost their jobs on the Iron Range and the USW has castrated its present membership with its attacks on rank and file committees and rank and file activists. And Mr. Dubovich, whose boss--- Mr. Bob Bratulich--- sits in his office with his feet up on his desk playing computer games all day long complains that he has a two foot high stack of unresolved grievances from the taconite plants.
The entire scenario would be laughable, if not so pathetically sad, with so many working people suffering--- over thirty-thousand in Minnesota alone not to mention their entire families--- as their standards of living is constantly being driven down, down, down.
As any school child knows, poverty will never be eliminated as long as working people are paid poverty wages. Apparently this little nugget and kernel of truth hasn't made it into the campaigns of Mike Ciresi, Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer and Al Franken.
How low can the standards of American workers go? Right down to where two-million casino workers are at.
What is that song Utah Phillips enjoys singing, “They kicked the reds out of the unions?” And the working class is paying the price for the dumbing down of the U.S. labor movement.
Yes, Professor Martin Zweig would also prefer that this issue involving the rights of casino workers not be talked about because he forgot to include this issue in the expensive books he sells to his students, which are supposed to be educating working people who enroll in his working class studies programs. These programs come up short in teaching about rank and file initiated action, as he tries to keep the working class tethered to the current crop of labor fakers like John Sweeney and that anti-communist phony Leo Girard, who would rather no one knows about how he and his dad orchestrated an anti-communist campaign of terror on behalf of the employers and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police working together with the FBI to divide the working class community of hard rock miners in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Anyways, just thought I would add a few comments on the U.S. Supreme Court and workers’ rights.
Here are photos of three Democratic United States Senate Candidates happily meeting with Floyd “Buck” Jourdain, one of the most depraved elements the human race has ever created, as they beg for his endorsement and pander like prostitutes for campaign contributions for the upcoming election.
Neither Al Franken, Mike Ciresi, nor Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, all pictured below, had the moral or political courage to address the violation of the human rights of hundreds of casino workers employed by Red Lake Gaming Enterprises, even though the liberal professor--- Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer turned Democratic politician--- boasts that he has the support of “the real Norma Rae,” and his written widely about “Christian ethics and morality” in politics and the economy. For some reason making the link from words on the pages of his books to the real life situation of casino workers evades comprehension for this enlightened humanist professor.

Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer meets with corrupt Red Lake Band Members who have sacrificed the Red Lake Nation’s historic sovereignty in a number of casino ventures; destroying a once proud, vibrant community built in the best socialist and cooperative traditions.

In this photograph United States Senate Candidate Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer and his staff person Kathleen Blake--- both of whom are fully aware of the repressive conditions enforcing the poverty of employees of Red Lakes’ three Seven Clans Casinos are forced to endure--- remain silent as they beg for support from Band Secretary Beaulieu and another corrupt Band Council member, Billy King.
Below, Floyd “Buck” Jourdain, one of the most violent and corrupt Tribal Chairs in the Nation, who the New York Times has tied in with drug dealers using the three Seven Clans Casinos as distribution centers for everything from meth to cocaine, yacks it up with comedian turned politician, Al Franken who came looking for support to buoy his floundering campaign as onlookers suck it all up--- DFL Party hack Michael Meuers, and Mr. Barrett (red an black coat) responsible for helping to manipulate the “internet news service” and works in Red Lakes Health Services but can't figure out the dangers of second-hand smoke each work on behalf of Floyd “Buck” Jourdain who runs the Red Lake Nation like an old Finnish Feudal Lord; depriving people who dare to speak up of their right to their jobs, and even takes away their homes. Jourdain “explains” to Franken the dire poverty conditions of the Indian people living on the Red Lake Reservation. Al Franken doesn’t think to ask Jourdain how people being paid poverty wages working in these casinos might escape poverty. As Jourdain is explaining the dire “poverty of my people,” the Red Lake Nation has announced that it will spend over sixty-million dollars in casino expansion projects so the mobsters who own the slot machines can live in luxury. Floyd “Buck” Jourdain is responsible for one of the most corrupt politicians in Minnesota history being elected to public office, DFL State Representative Brita Sailer who represents the most “mobbed-up” union pension fund in America teamed up with the Fertitta Family.
It must be noted that when Floyd “Buck” Jourdain came to power supported by the mobsters who really own Red Lake’s Casino empire, he took on as economic adviser the man responsible for destroying all of Red Lakes publicly owned industries that paid Red Lakers wages higher than the best union contracts in Minnesota… in return Red Lakers are now getting the poverty wages of the casino industry while getting treated less than human.
It was Roger Moe who helped bring organized crime into Minnesota so he felt right at home working the "crowd" for Mike Ciresi.
In this photo Roger Moe chums it up with the man who keeps his cash in brown paper shopping bags...
Jourdain and George Bush carried on a conversation for the world to hear shortly after the mass killings at Red Lake High School; Jourdain got along famously with Bush as the two of them discussed the need for “parental responsibilities;” a few days later Jourdain’s own son was implicated for having a role in the murderous killing spree, found to have known about the killing spree in advance but didn’t tell his dad or anyone in authority… today, the young Jourdain is incarcerated in a place where his father should be.
Democrat or Republican, Jourdain gets along with them all... this is what the Kansas City Mob has put him in charge to do.
On the evening before the Red Lake killing spree, Jourdain sat in his office talking with officials of the United States Department of Justice, the FBI, the Minnesota Attorney Generals Office and the Minnesota Department of Public Safety trying to figure out how to keep me out of their casinos and out of the reservation. Had Jourdain cared about his son’s well-being and mental health as much as he cared about the profits of these mobsters who have taken control of the Red Lake Nation, this killing spree could have been prevented.
In fact, someplace, Jourdain's son learned to admire Adolf Hitler.
In fact, the violence that these mobsters has introduced to the once peaceful Red Lake Nation is responsible for the violence the Red Lake Nation is experiencing; the drug dealing, the illegal gambling and the prostitution which have become the major “industries” having replace the home building and lumber mill industries and water bottling plant.
Jack Abramoff and his gang “laundered” millions of dollars destined for bribes and payoffs of politicians, which they transported in brown paper shopping bags, through Red Lake Nation businesses and agencies.
The employers’ next argument for the United States Supreme Court? Give us a “level playing field” with the Indian Gaming Industry… I predict these employers will cry, “It’s our constitutional right.” Far fetched? Bar owners and the Chamber of Commerce in Minnesota are already making the plans with the help of the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party.
Mike Ciresi, Al Franken and Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer have asked for my endorsement. I will leave it to your imagination what my response was to each of them.
Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

