Are you willing to pay the price to protect Wall Street's interests in Africa?
What is the price we pay?
Do we forgo health care and child care and jobs along with decent pay and a just Minimum Wage in line with the actual cost-of-living?
Are we prepared to pay for Wall Street's imperialism with the blood and lives of our children and grandchildren who are used as cannon fodder to fight these dirty wars? 
We pay for this insanity and the Wall Street parasites profit.
Something to think about... it seems the imperialist countries, notably 
the G-20 led by Wall Street (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, 
China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, 
Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom and 
the United States—along with the European Union) have set their sights 
on Africa. Cheap resources obtained using cheap labor. War after war 
will be the result as the people resist theses greedy imperialist 
beasts:
V.I. Lenin explained it all in this pamphlet available for free here:
 http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/
http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/U.S.
 trade union leader and Communist, William Z. Foster, explained the nature
 of imperialism even further in this book available for order on the 
internet:
Gus Hall, the longtime Chair of the Communist Party USA, provides more insight in this book also available from Internet book sellers:
 
Mark Twain became a fervent anti-imperialist; here are a few excerpts from his writings:
Although born Samuel Langhorne Clemens, he adopted what is 
one of the most famous pen names in literature, Mark Twain, from a 
Mississippi river slang phrase.  Twain is famous as an author, satirist,
 essayist, newspaper contributor, and lecturer.  He wrote about a myriad
 of topics, ranging from life along the Mississippi River, detailed in 
famous works such as 
The Adventures of Tom Sawyer (1872) and 
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
 (1884), to a collection of essays written while abroad, to political 
essays. Twain was an influential writer of his time and remains so 
today.  During the Spanish-American War, Twain became a fervent 
anti-imperialist, even joining the Anti-Imperialist League. His sentiments about the war and the war in the Philippines were published nationwide. 
      
Works of related interest
- Twain, Mark. Mark Twain's Autobiography.
- Paine, Albert Bigelow (ed). Mark Twain's Letters. New York: Harper & Bros., 1917. LCCN: 17-30756 r94.
- Zwick, Jim (ed). Mark Twain's weapons of satire: anti-imperialist writings on the Philippine-American War. New York: Syracuse University Press, 1992.
Excerpts
From the New York Herald, October 15, 1900:
      I left these shores, at Vancouver, a red-hot imperialist.  I 
wanted the American eagle to go screaming into the Pacific.  It seemed 
tiresome and tame for it to content itself with he Rockies.  Why not 
spread its wings over the Phillippines, I asked myself?  And I thought 
it would be a real good thing to do
      I said to myself, here are a people who have suffered for three
 centuries.  We can make them as free as ourselves, give them a 
government and country of their own, put a miniature of the American 
constitution afloat in the Pacific, start a brand new republic to take 
its place among the free nations of the world.  It seemed to me a great 
task to which had addressed ourselves.
      But I have thought some more, since then, and I have read 
carefully the treaty of Paris, and I have seen that we do not intend to 
free, but to subjugate the people of the Phillippines.  We have gone 
there to conquer, not to redeem. . .
      It should, it seems to me, be our pleasure and duty to make 
those people free, and let them deal with their own domestic questions 
in their own way.  And so I am an anti-imperialist.  I am opposed to 
having the eagle put its talons on any other land.
      
A Boston Herald transcript of a speech he gave in 1900 began thus:
      Oh, you have been doing many things in this time that I have 
been absent; you have done lots of things, some that are well worth 
remembering, too.  Now, we have fought a righteous war since I have been
 gone, and that is rare in history--a righteous war is so rare that it 
is almost unknown in history; but by the grace of that war we set Cuba 
free, and we joined her to those three or four free nations that exist 
on this earth; and we started out to set those poor Filipinos free too, 
and why, why, why that most righteous purpose of ours has apparently 
miscarried I suppose I never shall know.
      In a 1906 essay about the Moro massacre in the Phillippines, 
which was not published until after his death, Twain criticized the 
military:
      General Wood was present and looking on.  His order had been, 
"Kill or capture those savages." Apparently our little army considered 
that the "or" left them authorized to kill or capture according to 
taste, and that their taste had remained what it had been for eight 
years in our army out there--the taste of Christian butchers.
      
In a February 1901 article titled, "To the Person Sitting in Darkness," he continued to criticize the U.S.:
      There must be two Americas: one that sets the captive free, and
 one that takes a once-captive's new freedom away from him, and picks a 
quarrel with him with nothing to found it on; then kills him to get his 
land. . .
      True, we have crushed a deceived and confiding people; we have 
turned against the weak and the friendless who trusted us; we have 
stamped out a just and intelligent and well-ordered republic; we have 
stabbed an ally in the back and slapped the face of a guest; we have 
bought a Shadow from an enemy that hadn't it to sell; we have robbed a 
trusting friend of his land and his liberty; we have invited clean young
 men to shoulder a discredited musket and do bandit's work under a flag 
which bandits have been accustomed to fear, not to follow; we have 
debauched America's honor and blackened her face before the world. . .
      And as for a flag for the Philippine Province, it is easily 
managed.  We can have a special one--our States do it: we can have just 
our usual flag, with the white stripes painted black and the stars 
replaced by the skull and cross-bones.
      
And another essay on the American flag, also from 1901:
      I am not finding fault with this use of our flag; for in order 
not to seem eccentric I have swung around, now, and joined the nation in
 the conviction that nothing can sully a flag.  I was not properly 
reared, and the illusion that a flag was a thing which must be sacredly 
guarded against shameful uses and unclean contacts, lest it suffer 
pollution; and so when it was sent out to the Philippines to float over
 a wanton war and a robbing expedition I supposed it was polluted, and 
in an ignorant moment I said so.  But I stand corrected.  I conceded and
 acknowledge that it was only the government that sent it on such an 
errand that was polluted.  Let us compromise on that.  I am glad to have
 it that way.  For our flag could not well stand pollution, never having
 been used to it, but it is different with the administration.
Nelson Mandela, like Lenin, Mark Twain, William Z. Foster, W.E.B. DuBois, and Gus Hall was, too, a fervent anti-imperialist.
The age of imperialism:http://www.smplanet.com/teaching/imperialism/