Sunday, June 1, 2014
Anishinaabeg are an economic force in Bemidji
From Bemidji Pioneer...
Anishinaabeg are an economic force in Bemidji
By Curtis and Nicole Buckanaga on May 31, 2014 at 11:16 p.m.
Bemidji is losing its sense of community.
Bemidji has become an economic hub that thrives on the poverty of the Anishinaabeg.
This city is essentially taking advantage of social service programs, low-income subsidies and fines from Anishinaabeg that have been criminalized by poverty by discrimination.
Racist discrimination stimulates a large portion of Bemidji's economy.
Thousands of us working class Anishinaabeg spend our hard-earned money within this city; therefore, we need to be conscious and dignified and entertain a comprehensive boycott that identifies workforces of certain businesses that do not reflect the demography of Bemidji.
Bemidji is a city in denial of its normalized, systematic and institutional racism. The tides of apathy are receding that have been contrived by corrupt and oppressive state, local and tribal politicians who sit shiftlessly in elected positions and are fundamentally manipulating our downtrodden, traumatized people.
We Anishinaabeg are an economic force here; therefore, we need to assert ourselves to achieve the quality of life we struggle for against the absurdities of racism and ignorance every day as we live and shop here in Bemidji.
We don't have to spend our money where they won't hire us, or even where they don't treat us with respect.
We should hit them in their pockets and support those businesses that do respect us as human beings.
Due to the three largest Ojibwe nations in this state surrounding the city of Bemidji, as well as the numerous Anishinaabeg who travel here to seek work and a better quality of life, Bemidji is a highly populated with us Anishinaabeg. Not to mention the thousands of surrounding reservation residents who venture into the city every day for goods and services only to witness that we are not equitably integrated into the workforce.
It is only reasonable that our people occupy one job for every four jobs here in Bemidji.
Why? Because we need jobs, too. We deserve a decent quality of life, too. We deserve a chance and opportunity, too.
After all, Bemidji is historically an indigenous community.
We shared this community with our white counterparts, taught them how to live off this land and shared our languages. We, Anishinaabeg, need to support one another to reclaim our dignity and our identity within our community here in Bemidji because to us, this is still our Bemichiigamaag, our home; where we need stand together to assert our right to living wage jobs.
Curtis and Nicole Buckanaga
Bemidji
http://www.bemidjipioneer.com/content/anishinaabeg-are-economic-force-bemidji
Thursday, May 29, 2014
Michigan workers get a better Minimum Wage out of Republicans than what they get from Democrats.
The Michigan Republican super-majority
approved a Minimum Wage, signed into law by Michigan Governor Rick
Snyder, far higher than most states with Democratic super-majorities and
was only 25 cents less than what the Dumb Donkeys here in Minnesota provided for workers. So, where is this great big difference between the two parties?
http://time.com/121917/michigans-governor-snyder-signs-bill-raising-minimum-wage/
So, we have Minnesota at $9.50 way into the future with prices rising; Michigan at $9.25 and Leech Lake Indian Reservation at $10.25 with Democrats in Seattle trying to give workers a big shaft claiming they support $15.00 (a decade into the future).
Except for a few people and organizations, no one is talking about a Minimum Wage that is a real living wage tied and adjusted to actual cost-of-living factors.
In the meantime, even fewer people are willing to talk about the "Cost-of-Living Crisis" the entire working class finds itself entangled and ensnared in.
http://time.com/121917/michigans-governor-snyder-signs-bill-raising-minimum-wage/
So, we have Minnesota at $9.50 way into the future with prices rising; Michigan at $9.25 and Leech Lake Indian Reservation at $10.25 with Democrats in Seattle trying to give workers a big shaft claiming they support $15.00 (a decade into the future).
Except for a few people and organizations, no one is talking about a Minimum Wage that is a real living wage tied and adjusted to actual cost-of-living factors.
In the meantime, even fewer people are willing to talk about the "Cost-of-Living Crisis" the entire working class finds itself entangled and ensnared in.
Wednesday, May 21, 2014
David Barron
David Barron... Obama's (and the Democrat's
[and the Republican's]) choice for an important federal 1st Circuit
Court of Appeals judge.
Is this the kind of judge you want to see appointed to the federal bench "defending" the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights? A judge who justifies murder and assassination without trial by drone.
And we are supposed to vote for these Dumb Donkeys out of fear who the Republicans might appoint to federal judgeships?
http://news.yahoo.com/ap-sources-justice-dept-reveal-drone-memo-214537996--politics.html
Even Judge Robert Bork ends up looking good compared to this evil-doer Barron who lacks any semblance of ethics and respect for human life... he has a complete disdain for the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights... Barron doesn't even understand the most basic and fundamental concepts of justice associated with Due Process.
Thomas Jefferson must be twisting in his grave on this one.
Is this the kind of judge you want to see appointed to the federal bench "defending" the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights? A judge who justifies murder and assassination without trial by drone.
And we are supposed to vote for these Dumb Donkeys out of fear who the Republicans might appoint to federal judgeships?
http://news.yahoo.com/ap-sources-justice-dept-reveal-drone-memo-214537996--politics.html
Even Judge Robert Bork ends up looking good compared to this evil-doer Barron who lacks any semblance of ethics and respect for human life... he has a complete disdain for the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights... Barron doesn't even understand the most basic and fundamental concepts of justice associated with Due Process.
Thomas Jefferson must be twisting in his grave on this one.
Tuesday, May 20, 2014
A letter to Wade Hudson, for Left Forum panelists and participants.
Mr. Wade Hudson,
First of all, allow me to thank you for your invitation to participate in this important discussion. As you are aware, many people, like myself, who would like to be present at the "Left Forum" are unable to attend for a variety of reasons. So, I am providing my input to this discussion here.
I would like to call to your attention my blog on full employment. You may want to share this information with the panelists. I would send this to them directly if I had their e-mail addresses:
I would also encourage you to check out the Uniting People blog:
I would also point out to you that working people struggling for their livelihoods and their rights confront a very significant hurdle in this country where "At-will Employment," instead of "Just Cause," is the "law-of-the-land" which for all practical purposes means that workers who participate in these campaigns for jobs and real living wages and for rights and a voice at work more often than not end up losing their jobs and their livelihoods in violation of their very rights supposedly protected by the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights and their rights so clearly articulated in the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights--- all kinds of "rights" on paper but these rights seldom enforced.
Most unions in our country today are mere paper unions presided over by millionaire labor leaders whose first priority lacking rank-and-file movements is dues collection with little to no responsibility for defending the rights and livelihoods, not to mention the jobs, of the workers they are collecting dues from to pay their big fat salaries.
Most unions in our country today are mere paper unions presided over by millionaire labor leaders whose first priority lacking rank-and-file movements is dues collection with little to no responsibility for defending the rights and livelihoods, not to mention the jobs, of the workers they are collecting dues from to pay their big fat salaries.
Here in Minnesota, there is the case of a Minnesota State Employee that has been hounded and harassed to no end by management simply for availing herself of the "Family and Medical Leave Act" who has now been fired. Her "crime" is that she appealed to the United States Department of Labor to enforce her rights... and, this woman is a member of a union whose leadership has done not one single thing to represent her after she has been paying union dues for years. The U.S. Department of Labor has written that the best they can do for her is see to make sure her employer, the State of Minnesota, has posted the proper signage while citing that she is now the target of harassment by her employer but claiming that defending her in court would be too taxing on the Department's resources. Again, all kinds of "rights" on paper but never any enforcement to protect workers' livelihoods--- their jobs.
Liberals like Eleanor and Franklin Roosevelt and those liberals like Hubert H. Humphrey and their modern-day counterparts like those in the Congressional Progressive Caucus such as Keith Ellison and all these foundation-funded outfits and the millionaire union leaders are real slick when it comes to articulating "support" for workers to get votes--- they play the "bait and switch" game; but, like Eleanor Roosevelt who pushed for passage of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights she moaned and cried when some nations insisted on including actual enforcement measures... the result being "rights" on paper and paper unions like AFSCME more concerned with collecting dues than defending workers' rights and livelihoods.
I am sure there must even be a law somewhere that declares unions must actually strive to enforce the contracts they negotiate with employers for which they collect dues, eh? But, who enforces such laws on paper?
Then you have the hideous Indian Gaming Industry which no Democrat or their "partners" dare to attack for fear of losing billions of dollars in campaign contributions even though almost two-million workers employed at over 350 of these casino operations spread out across the country are forced to work in these loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos at poverty wages and without any rights under state or federal labor laws which protect the rights (at least on paper) of all other workers in this country. This is an industry run by and for wealthy white mobsters which only leaves Native Americans mired in poverty causing massive debt as racist employment practices of businesses and corporations assure this hideous Indian Gaming Industry has a huge pool of impoverished and unemployed workers who have been forced to live on reservations creating a huge pool of cheap labor--- quite convenient, don't you think? Obviously no liberal Democrat could imagine such a set-up is intentional, unless of course one owns up to the fact that it was the great liberal humanitarian, Hubert H. Humphrey, who was the primary author of the "Communist Control Act" which assured business and industry a complacent and docile union leadership that would collaborate and become manageable.
Perhaps you would be interested in hearing the story of Nancy Beaulieu, a Native American woman with a family to feed, fired from her job at the huge Northern Lights Casino--- owned by the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe in Walker, Minnesota? I would note, that in spite of the Leech Lake Tribal Council's most despicable record in regard to workers' rights and livelihoods, the tribal council--- Leech Lake Business Organization (LLBO)--- was recently forced by the people to increase its Minimum Wage to $10.25 an hour, more than the Democrat's suggested $10.10 poverty Minimum Wage and the "raise" Minnesota's Democratic super-majority provided to workers of $9.50 in a long-term "installment plan" which only goes to prove that when people struggle they can win.
Democrats campaigned on the promise (the "bait") of a real living Minimum Wage; once elected workers got "the switch," another poverty Minimum Wage--- one big reason why we need a working class based progressive people's party as an alternative to these worthless Democrats.
Democrats campaigned on the promise (the "bait") of a real living Minimum Wage; once elected workers got "the switch," another poverty Minimum Wage--- one big reason why we need a working class based progressive people's party as an alternative to these worthless Democrats.
In my opinion, jobs and a Minimum Wage that is a real living wage will only be won when we come to grips with the fact that we must struggle to free ourselves from this two-party trap as part of the struggle to better the lives and livelihoods of working people. These Dumb Donkeys provide us with no protection from Wall Street parasites who further enrich themselves from the super-profits they reap from poverty wages and the suppression of all wages by using both unemployment and poverty wages as a lever of government.
I am taking the liberty of posting this letter to you on my blog: http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/
I would note that here in Minnesota we have two very important rank-and-file formations. One in the United Steelworkers Union (USW): "Hard Rock Miners." The other in AFSCME: "Our AFSCME."
Again, I do hope you will share my thoughts with the panelists participating in your "Left Forum" presentation which I am attaching here as you request it to be circulated widely:
I am taking the liberty of posting this letter to you on my blog: http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/
I would note that here in Minnesota we have two very important rank-and-file formations. One in the United Steelworkers Union (USW): "Hard Rock Miners." The other in AFSCME: "Our AFSCME."
Again, I do hope you will share my thoughts with the panelists participating in your "Left Forum" presentation which I am attaching here as you request it to be circulated widely:
a National Jobs for All Coalition
Invitation to discussion on
An Economic Bill of Rights: Reform or Revolution?
At
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, 52 West 59th St., NYC
Saturday, May 31, 2014, 3:10-4:50PM, Room 9681, John Jay College
Abstract: In his Annual Message to Congress in 1944, President Franklin Roosevelt held that under modern economic conditions the traditional Constitutional guarantees of political and civil rights were insufficient “to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.” It was necessary therefore to add a Second or Economic Bill of Rights whose guarantees would include employment at living wages, housing, medical care, education and old age security, among others. At the time this was a comprehensive set of rights, but it is incomplete in this time of environmental crisis. The rights framework has important political advantages: at once compatible with traditional American values and Constitutional guarantees and at the same time encouraging demands on the part of the people for unattained rights. FDR held that useful, living-wage work was “the most fundamental [right], and the one on which the fulfillment of the others in large degree depends.” On the one hand, employment assurance can be seen as an extension of traditional Constitutional guarantees and compatible with the vaunted American work ethic, hence reformist. At the same time, full employment—especially if it is tied to the necessity of greening the economy--has the potential for altering relationships between labor and capital, hence for transforming or revolutionizing the nation's political economy.
Panelists: Sheila Collins; Philip Harvey; David Woolner; Trudy Goldberg; Chair, Gregory N. Heires
Sheila D. Collins -- Executive Committee, National Jobs for All Coalition; Professor Emerita of Political Science, William Paterson University
Gregory N. Heires -- Sr. Assoc. Ed., Public Employee Press, DC 37, AFSCM; blogger atwww.thenewcrossroads.com , and a Portside labor moderator
Gertrude Schaffner Goldberg -- Chair, National Jobs for All Coalition; Professor Emerita of Social Policy, Adelphi University
Philip Harvey, Professor of Law and Economics, Rutgers School of Law; Executive Committee, National Jobs for All Coalition
David B. Woolner -- Senior Fellow and Hyde Park Resident Historian, The Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute
Left Forum is the largest annual conference of the broad Left in the United States. Each spring thousands of conference participants
leftforum.org | left forum is on facebook and Twitter | mailto:leftforum@leftforum.org | 212-817-2003
come together to discuss pressing local, national and global issues; to better understand commonalities and differences, and alternatives to current predicaments; or to share ideas to help build social movements to transform the world.
This year's theme of Left Forum is "Reform and/or Revolution: Imagine a World of Transformative Justice.” Speakers include Harry Belafonte, Angela Davis, Cornel West, and over 1,000 more.
Please register online at www.leftforum.org
*** Please forward widely ****
--
--
Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell: 651-587-5541
Primary E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net
E-mail: alan.maki1951mn@gmail.com
Monday, May 12, 2014
Casino workers stabbed in the back by the Michigan AFL-CIO and their Democratic Party partners
I
can't help but wonder what Mother Jones would have thought about a group
of unions in West Michigan raising funds for "Labor Fest" by organizing
bus tours to the Little River Casino where casino workers are forced to
work in a loud, noisy, smoke-filled casino at poverty wages without any
rights under state or federal labor laws and then to see an
advertisement for this fund-raising venture published in a labor newspaper, "Progress," edited by a Democratic Party candidate for public office, Michael Johnston?
I will be going to the meeting of the Labor Fest organizing committee today at 5:30 pm being held at the Kent-Ionia Labor Council Hall at 918 Benjamin N.E. in Grand Rapids, Michigan seeking an explanation.
So far, the head of this despicable "fund-raising venture" told me that if we didn't like it we, the Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council, should put up the funding for Labor Fest.
Now, why would we even consider consider donating a penny to a bunch of trade unionists whose only goals and objectives are to elect a bunch of worthless Democrats who placed workers in this mobster infested and controlled Indian Gaming Industry in this position in the first place?
The Indian Gaming Industry is a perfect example of what workers get from Wall Street's two-party trap where the Democrats and Republicans collude and connive to destroy the rights and the livelihoods of working people from which the employers reap super-profits.
Not once has the "labor" newspaper--- Progress, formerly the Grand Valley Labor News--- ever so much as mentioned one single problem workers in the Indian Gaming Industry are experiencing.
Why do we get no better from a "labor" newspaper than what we get from the corporate dominated mainstream media?
And why do we find a huge advertisement for this sickening "fund-raising" venture in this "labor" newspaper which hides its reactionary agenda behind articles supporting Mother Jones?
It is just this kind of hypocritical duplicity which has given labor unions a black eye making organizing in this period so difficult... no understanding of solidarity or an injury to one is an injury to all.
I invite Patty Kramer, a UAW member and one of the leads in promoting this hideous fund-raising event along with the Editor of "Progress," Michael Johnston a retired member of the Michigan Education Association, to respond and explain.
"West Michigan Labor Fest" is typically nothing more than a cheer-leading even for the Democrats.
The AFL-CIO, Democrats and the Indian Gaming Industry enjoy a partnership--- a partnership from which workers get nothing but a kick-in-the-ass as Democrats reap huge campaign contributions from the Indian Gaming Industry and the Indian Gaming Industry reaps huge super-profits from exploiting the workers employed in this hideous industry.
I will be going to the meeting of the Labor Fest organizing committee today at 5:30 pm being held at the Kent-Ionia Labor Council Hall at 918 Benjamin N.E. in Grand Rapids, Michigan seeking an explanation.
So far, the head of this despicable "fund-raising venture" told me that if we didn't like it we, the Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council, should put up the funding for Labor Fest.
Now, why would we even consider consider donating a penny to a bunch of trade unionists whose only goals and objectives are to elect a bunch of worthless Democrats who placed workers in this mobster infested and controlled Indian Gaming Industry in this position in the first place?
The Indian Gaming Industry is a perfect example of what workers get from Wall Street's two-party trap where the Democrats and Republicans collude and connive to destroy the rights and the livelihoods of working people from which the employers reap super-profits.
Not once has the "labor" newspaper--- Progress, formerly the Grand Valley Labor News--- ever so much as mentioned one single problem workers in the Indian Gaming Industry are experiencing.
Why do we get no better from a "labor" newspaper than what we get from the corporate dominated mainstream media?
And why do we find a huge advertisement for this sickening "fund-raising" venture in this "labor" newspaper which hides its reactionary agenda behind articles supporting Mother Jones?
It is just this kind of hypocritical duplicity which has given labor unions a black eye making organizing in this period so difficult... no understanding of solidarity or an injury to one is an injury to all.
I invite Patty Kramer, a UAW member and one of the leads in promoting this hideous fund-raising event along with the Editor of "Progress," Michael Johnston a retired member of the Michigan Education Association, to respond and explain.
"West Michigan Labor Fest" is typically nothing more than a cheer-leading even for the Democrats.
The AFL-CIO, Democrats and the Indian Gaming Industry enjoy a partnership--- a partnership from which workers get nothing but a kick-in-the-ass as Democrats reap huge campaign contributions from the Indian Gaming Industry and the Indian Gaming Industry reaps huge super-profits from exploiting the workers employed in this hideous industry.
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
Tell the Dumb Donkeys to go to hell.
The Democrats have become very adept at perverting the meaning of very basic words in the English language like "progressive" and even "peace."
Give these people a dictionary not your votes.
Give these people a dictionary not your votes.
Perverting and distorting the meanings of words fits in very well with their "bait-and-switch" scams.
They say they are for single-payer universal health care; they deliver Obamacare, the "Health Insurance and Pharmaceutical Industry Bailout and Profit Maximization Act of 2010."
They ran on a platform of making the Minimum Wage a real living wage; we got another poverty wage.
Obama and the Democrats promised to help Main Street; they bailed out Wall Street as home foreclosures continue to soar.
Every single working class family in this country is the victim of "cost-of-living crisis;" Obama and the Democrats allow and encourage the prices of everything from food to gas, home heating fuels to soar as the only thing they use the economic levers of government to control (depress) are wages while corporate profits reach unregulated and under-taxed record levels.
Then there was the promise of "jobs, jobs, jobs;" what we got was more unemployment and jobs with lower wages and less benefits as the Democrats refuse to rescind and repeal this hideous "At-Will Employment;" refuse to ban scabbing and employer lock-outs with massive cuts in unemployment compensation and food stamps.
Protection of the environment was another promise--- militarism and these dirty imperialist wars are leaving behind the largest carbon footprint destroying our living environment.
We were promised by Obama an open and transparent government--- what we got was a government cloaking its undemocratic and murderous schemes in secrecy combined with the most outrageous litany of never-ending lies, deceit, cover-up and political repression.
The worst "BAIT-AND-SWITCH" scheme we got from the Democrats has been the promise of peace; all we get is increased militarism and war on top of war.
I wouldn't bother to walk across the street to vote for another Democrat.
These "progressive" Democrats are just a bunch of phonies and scam artists just like Obama who they supported.
Now they will be trying to pass off Hillary Clinton as a "progressive" pushing the politics of the country so far to the right that it provides a political atmosphere where it is impossible to tell a Democrat from a Republican.
Our only hope is to break free from this two-party trap in challenging Wall Street for political and economic power.
In my opinion, what real progressives, liberals and the left need to unite around is a "21st Century Full-Employment Act for Peace and Prosperity" based on the promises so eloquently articulated in the "United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights," but never delivered.
The time has come to build a new working class based progressive people's party that will bring forward, and deliver, peace, jobs, equality and justice for all.
Capitalism and its most corrupt advanced imperialist stage is done for... only socialism, people working together for the common good placing people and the environment before profits will save us.
Just tell these Dumb Donkeys to go to hell.
Alan L. Maki
Monday, April 28, 2014
Friday, April 25, 2014
A National Approach for Making the Minimum Wage a Living Wage Join Us for a 2-Hour Conference Call Discussion Sunday, April 27, 2014 8-10pm ET / 7-9pm CT / 6-8pm MT / 5-7pm PT Telephone Call-in: 857-232-0157 • Access Code: 353711 Panel Cindy Sheehan, California Peace & Freedom Party Gubernatorial Candidate Lena Buggs, Minnesota Green Party, State House District 65-A Legislative Candidate Alan Maki, Director of Organizing, Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council Theresa Sanchez, Union Steward, Local #1, Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union Frank “Pancho” Valdez, retired trade unionist, Green Party activist Curtis Buckanaga, Asst. to District III Rep. for Leech Lake, Ojibwe Reservation Bill Leumer, former President IAM Local 565, Labor Fightback Network Steering Committee member Mel Rothenberg, founding member of Chicago Political Economy Group, co-author of "A Permanent Jobs Program for the U.S.: Economic Restructuring to Meet Human Needs." Moderator: Devon Nola, Justice Party of New York Each panelist will give a 5-minute presentation during the first hour. The second hour will be open to discussion with Q&A between callers and panelists. Sponsored by: Uniting People for Peace, Equality, Full Employment, Universal Healthcare and Environmental Protection Contact info: Tel: (203) 402-8745 E-mail: unitingpeople1@gmail.com Blog: www.unitingpeopleworks4us.blogspot.com FaceBook: www.facebook.com/USlivablewage A bold livable wage policy must be viewed as a “keystone” fiscal mechanism that will trigger subsequent structural changes in the U.S. economic system to achieve an equitable distribution of wealth and income for all members of our society.
This Sunday evening...
A National Approach for Making the Minimum Wage a Living Wage
Sunday, April 27, 2014
8-10pm ET / 7-9pm CT / 6-8pm MT / 5-7pm PT
Telephone Call-in: 857-232-0157 • Access Code: 353711
Panel
Cindy Sheehan, California Peace & Freedom Party
Gubernatorial Candidate
Lena Buggs, Minnesota Green Party, State House District 65-A Legislative Candidate
Alan Maki, Director of Organizing, Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
Theresa Sanchez, Union Steward, Local #1, Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union
Frank “Pancho” Valdez, retired trade unionist, Green Party activist
Curtis Buckanaga, Asst. to District III Rep. for Leech Lake, Ojibwe Reservation
Bill Leumer, former President IAM Local 565, Labor Fightback Network Steering Committee member
Mel Rothenberg, founding member of Chicago Political Economy Group, co-author of "A Permanent Jobs Program for the U.S.: Economic Restructuring to Meet Human Needs."
Moderator:
Devon Nola, Justice Party of New York
Each panelist will give a 5-minute presentation during the first hour. The second hour will be open to discussion with Q&A between callers and panelists.
Sponsored by:
Uniting People for Peace, Equality, Full Employment, Universal Healthcare and Environmental Protection
Contact info:
Tel: (203) 402-8745
E-mail: unitingpeople1@gmail.com
Blog: www.unitingpeopleworks4us.blogspot.com
FaceBook: www.facebook.com/USlivablewage
A bold livable wage policy must be viewed as a “keystone” fiscal mechanism that will trigger subsequent structural changes in the U.S. economic system to achieve an equitable distribution of wealth and income for all members of our society.
Help launch a national campaign to make the Minimum Wage a real living wage.
Politicians, employers and unions have banded together in Seattle just like the Democrats, unions, foundation-funded outfits and church groups here in Minnesota joined with the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce (the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party's "Business Caucus" or Summit Hill Club) to rob workers of a real living Minimum Wage that was promised in return for workers voting for these Democrats... workers have been the victims of an elaborately concocted "bait-and-switch" scheme.
Since this Democratic Party coalition is now insisting that any employer paid compensation packages like health care, dental care, eyes and hearing, child care and higher education subsidies be considered part of the Minimum Wage we need to talk about the need for all of this to become legislation for government universal social programs rather continuing to be ripped off by the for-profit sectors providing these services to workers while gouging workers thus turning this struggle for a living Minimum Wage into a farce and a sham where employers continue to reap super-profits from poverty wages as these other service providers also reap super-profits from this trough of poverty wages--- what a scam these employers are scheming to plan.
It would seem to me that this would be a good time to bring forward the need for universal social programs as the way to counter what the employers (and apparently unions?) are demanding in the way of health, etc. care being considered part of the Minimum Wage.
For example, there is no way a Public Health Care System--- socialized health care should cost any more a month than Social Security. A Public Child Care System, too. Both working just like our public schools--- publicly financed, publicly administered and publicly delivered. Way cheaper than the present for profit health care system.
Since this Democratic Party coalition is now insisting that any employer paid compensation packages like health care, dental care, eyes and hearing, child care and higher education subsidies be considered part of the Minimum Wage we need to talk about the need for all of this to become legislation for government universal social programs rather continuing to be ripped off by the for-profit sectors providing these services to workers while gouging workers thus turning this struggle for a living Minimum Wage into a farce and a sham where employers continue to reap super-profits from poverty wages as these other service providers also reap super-profits from this trough of poverty wages--- what a scam these employers are scheming to plan.
It would seem to me that this would be a good time to bring forward the need for universal social programs as the way to counter what the employers (and apparently unions?) are demanding in the way of health, etc. care being considered part of the Minimum Wage.
For example, there is no way a Public Health Care System--- socialized health care should cost any more a month than Social Security. A Public Child Care System, too. Both working just like our public schools--- publicly financed, publicly administered and publicly delivered. Way cheaper than the present for profit health care system.
So, you tell them to institute public universal social programs (everyone in) for each type of "compensation package" they want deducted from the $15.00.
But, this is where the "$15.00" movement has been very short sighted. This movement is working with a false figure derived from the U.S. Census Bureau (which only use four cost-of-living categories) instead of the Consumer Price Index of the United States Department of Labors' Bureau of Labor Statistics (which monitors EIGHT categories and 200 sub-categories).
It won't surprise me if all the union "leaders" don't agree with the employers on this because they have worked hand-in-hand with these same employers to force concession contracts down their own member's throats and SEIU has engaged in the practice of offering employers sweetheart contracts in return for union dues.
Here in Minnesota, ALL of the AFL-CIO and Change To Win affiliated unions supported the switch pulled by the Democrats for $9.50 an hour and they were even going to bring in Richard Trumka to support this but Trumka backed out when he knew there was going to be resistance at the rally they had planned for the Humphrey Center at the university of Minnesota where he was going to be greeted by demonstrators exposing the "bait and switch" pulled by the Democrats, the foundation-funded outfits, labor leaders and the churches... most likely the "$15.00" movement will face the exact same coalition in Seattle and elsewhere.
It won't surprise me if all the union "leaders" don't agree with the employers on this because they have worked hand-in-hand with these same employers to force concession contracts down their own member's throats and SEIU has engaged in the practice of offering employers sweetheart contracts in return for union dues.
Here in Minnesota, ALL of the AFL-CIO and Change To Win affiliated unions supported the switch pulled by the Democrats for $9.50 an hour and they were even going to bring in Richard Trumka to support this but Trumka backed out when he knew there was going to be resistance at the rally they had planned for the Humphrey Center at the university of Minnesota where he was going to be greeted by demonstrators exposing the "bait and switch" pulled by the Democrats, the foundation-funded outfits, labor leaders and the churches... most likely the "$15.00" movement will face the exact same coalition in Seattle and elsewhere.
To win a real living Minimum Wage is going to take a campaign that is willing to educate workers about what the real "cost-of-living" actually is based on the fact working class families are experiencing a "cost-of-living crisis" and that the Minimum Wage needs to be tied to both increases in the "cost-of-living" and to inflation which are not the same... monopoly price-fixing is the main reason prices rise and the spending on militarism and wars is the main reason for inflation.
The prices of the basic necessities of life are now under the pretty much complete control of the monopolies.
Obviously the Democrats and their partners, the coalition mentioned above, with their wars on the one hand and "economic populism" full of "bait-and-switch" (single-payer deliver Obamacare; living wage deliver poverty wages, etc.) on the other hand don't want to talk about "cost-of-living," "cost-of-living crisis" or militarism and wars which are making us all poor as austerity measures are being shoved down our throats to pay for all this militarism and wars instead of Public Health Care and Child Care Programs, CCC, WPA and CETA as well as a Conyers type job creation program.
Not coincidentally, this same Democratic Party coalition which stood opposed to single-payer and smashed the single-payer movement is now using the same strategy to smash the $15.00 movement.
Notice that the people's movements were sucked into supporting half-measure reforms in both situations when the demands should have been very clear--- a National Public Health Care System and a Minimum Wage legislatively tied to the "cost-of-living" automatically increased for rising prices and inflation with periodic increases providing for an improved standard-of-living.
We have also failed to define small business as distinct from big-business and family owned businesses like the mom-and-pop convenience store--- there is no way an employer of 15 or more people can't afford a real living wage of between $22.00 and $26.00 an hour which the Minimum Wage would be if using the BLS' CPI. The solution should be obvious for the legitimate small business which employs mostly family members--- just eliminate Minimum Wage enforcement; if someone wants to pay their spouse, children, aunts, uncles, cousins, grandpa and grandma $1.00 an hour let them. But all this crap with wealthy people buying franchises and then claiming they can't pay a living wage is a bunch of bullshit. Here in Minnesota, the main opponent to raising the Minimum Wage was State Senator Tom Bakk, a building trades union official in his past life, who cried big crocodile tears for the group homes, hotels, motels bars and restaurants.
What is a small business? Does anyone really know except the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (LOL!):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Small_business
A little sarcasm to make a point:
If any industry or business legitimately can't pay the Minimum Wage, certainly no union has any business trying to organize them--- using the logic being pushed by the AFL-CIO. If Target and Wal-mart along with McDonald's and Taco Bell can't afford to pay employees real living Minimum Wages this means unionization would kill them, too--- and this of course is the argument used by big business all the time. So, hey; just phase out unions and implement a government social contract covering all workers except those employed in legitimate family operated small businesses of under 15 employees.
Should a union even be allowed to organize any company defined as a "small business" that can't afford to pay a real living Minimum Wage because using this logic of exempting small business from the full Minimum Wage would lead anyone pushing this notion that unionization of that business would for sure kill the business just like management would surely claim--- and always does; but somehow miracles always happen and the business survives unionization.
I can show you hundreds of businesses with fewer than 25 employees that are unionized--- each of the managements claimed unionization would kill their business; and here they are celebrating 25th and 50 years and longer of being in business.
Unionization of a small business is going to cost that business well over $35.00 an hour and if this doesn't kill a small business how would paying employees a Minimum Wage of $22.00 to $26.00 an hour kill these small businesses?
What we are facing is a union leadership that is demanding dues for raising the living standards of the entire working class--- these union "leaders" in pushing these poverty Minimum Wages of $9.50 and $10.10 are essentially saying, "If we don't get a cut of rising wages, we don't give a fuck if you people stay poor."
Look at who we had pushing the poverty Minimum Wage of $9.50 through the Minnesota legislature and signed into law by the governor:
All Democrats with a Democratic super-majority where Republicans had no say and could only cry:
A corporate/business lawyer in the State House, Representative Paul Thiessen.
A big-shot from the building trades union in the State Senate, Tom Bakk.
And a billionaire Governor, Mark Dayton, whose wealth is derived from the poverty wages of the Dayton-Hudson Company, now Target Stores.
Of course, the millionaire labor leaders of the AFL-CIO's Executive Council and their state counterparts, millionaires like Eliot Seide of AFSCME, wouldn't be able to shove all these concession contracts down their members throats if there was a focus on "cost-of-living" and the true state of affairs where every single working class family is experiencing a "cost-of-living crisis."
Did you ever hear Richard Trumka so much as mention this "cost-of-living crisis" that is a reality for every single working class family?
Are we just supposed to keep our mouths shut in the name of some kind of desired "unity" as to what is really going on as these Democrats and their hacks jerk us around?
We need to get this all figured out... join the National Conference Call...
https://www.facebook.com/ events/763527720348169/?notif_ t=plan_user_joined
https://www.facebook.com/ USlivablewage?notif_t=fbpage_ fan_invite
Notice that the people's movements were sucked into supporting half-measure reforms in both situations when the demands should have been very clear--- a National Public Health Care System and a Minimum Wage legislatively tied to the "cost-of-living" automatically increased for rising prices and inflation with periodic increases providing for an improved standard-of-living.
We have also failed to define small business as distinct from big-business and family owned businesses like the mom-and-pop convenience store--- there is no way an employer of 15 or more people can't afford a real living wage of between $22.00 and $26.00 an hour which the Minimum Wage would be if using the BLS' CPI. The solution should be obvious for the legitimate small business which employs mostly family members--- just eliminate Minimum Wage enforcement; if someone wants to pay their spouse, children, aunts, uncles, cousins, grandpa and grandma $1.00 an hour let them. But all this crap with wealthy people buying franchises and then claiming they can't pay a living wage is a bunch of bullshit. Here in Minnesota, the main opponent to raising the Minimum Wage was State Senator Tom Bakk, a building trades union official in his past life, who cried big crocodile tears for the group homes, hotels, motels bars and restaurants.
What is a small business? Does anyone really know except the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (LOL!):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
A little sarcasm to make a point:
If any industry or business legitimately can't pay the Minimum Wage, certainly no union has any business trying to organize them--- using the logic being pushed by the AFL-CIO. If Target and Wal-mart along with McDonald's and Taco Bell can't afford to pay employees real living Minimum Wages this means unionization would kill them, too--- and this of course is the argument used by big business all the time. So, hey; just phase out unions and implement a government social contract covering all workers except those employed in legitimate family operated small businesses of under 15 employees.
Should a union even be allowed to organize any company defined as a "small business" that can't afford to pay a real living Minimum Wage because using this logic of exempting small business from the full Minimum Wage would lead anyone pushing this notion that unionization of that business would for sure kill the business just like management would surely claim--- and always does; but somehow miracles always happen and the business survives unionization.
I can show you hundreds of businesses with fewer than 25 employees that are unionized--- each of the managements claimed unionization would kill their business; and here they are celebrating 25th and 50 years and longer of being in business.
Unionization of a small business is going to cost that business well over $35.00 an hour and if this doesn't kill a small business how would paying employees a Minimum Wage of $22.00 to $26.00 an hour kill these small businesses?
What we are facing is a union leadership that is demanding dues for raising the living standards of the entire working class--- these union "leaders" in pushing these poverty Minimum Wages of $9.50 and $10.10 are essentially saying, "If we don't get a cut of rising wages, we don't give a fuck if you people stay poor."
Look at who we had pushing the poverty Minimum Wage of $9.50 through the Minnesota legislature and signed into law by the governor:
All Democrats with a Democratic super-majority where Republicans had no say and could only cry:
A corporate/business lawyer in the State House, Representative Paul Thiessen.
A big-shot from the building trades union in the State Senate, Tom Bakk.
And a billionaire Governor, Mark Dayton, whose wealth is derived from the poverty wages of the Dayton-Hudson Company, now Target Stores.
Of course, the millionaire labor leaders of the AFL-CIO's Executive Council and their state counterparts, millionaires like Eliot Seide of AFSCME, wouldn't be able to shove all these concession contracts down their members throats if there was a focus on "cost-of-living" and the true state of affairs where every single working class family is experiencing a "cost-of-living crisis."
Did you ever hear Richard Trumka so much as mention this "cost-of-living crisis" that is a reality for every single working class family?
Are we just supposed to keep our mouths shut in the name of some kind of desired "unity" as to what is really going on as these Democrats and their hacks jerk us around?
We need to get this all figured out... join the National Conference Call...
Don't forget to check out and join the FaceBook pages, also:
https://www.facebook.com/
https://www.facebook.com/
Check out my "Letter to the Editor" on the "Bait-and-Switch" politics of the Democrats:
http://www.ifallsjournal.com/ opinion/letters_to_the_editor/ beware-of-the-bait-and-switch/ article_cfd312be-7955-57eb- 8120-fa4b44cb4e3d.html
Did anyone really believe that Seattle's employers would not come back fighting this proposed increase in the Minimum Wage to $15.00 an hour? Is this not the same community where the police were turned loose to savage working people who came out to peacefully protest against these trade agreements and the same city where the police beat the hell out of the Communist-led unemployed demonstrations of the 1930's and sent the police out to viciously attack the IWW soap-box speakers who tried to explain the need for the working class to fight for their rights and livelihoods and the same politicians who tried to have the police beat into submission the longshore workers led by Harry Bridges and the city that turned the HUAC hearings into a vicious attack on the CPUSA, organized labor and students? And isn't Seattle the same city that sent police thugs out to try to bust the organizing efforts of Boeing workers initially led by Wyndham Mortimer who had led the organizing drive that forced General Motors to sign a contract with the UAW?
What was expected from Seattle's ruling class when it was suggested the Minimum Wage should be $15.00?
Isn't it obvious to anyone that this struggle to raise the Minimum Wage to a real living wage is going to have to be a well thought out, coordinated national struggle in which the leadership arises from the grassroots working class communities and rank-and-file activists?
That the struggle for a living Minimum Wage is connected first and foremost to "cost-of-living" and the "cost-of-living crisis" for working class families is the most important aspect of this struggle... what the Minimum Wage dollar figure will be established at follows from this and not the other way around.
In fact, for many cities across this country, cities are not even allowed to enact Minimum Wage legislation.
Already, most of the states with Democratic super-majorities have enacted Minimum Wage "increases" which once again makes government the enforcer of poverty for millions of working class families. This also needs to be exposed that these Democrats, no different from the Republicans are using the levers of government (legislation) to enforce poverty--- thus assuring not only the poverty of millions; but a huge pool of impoverished workers intended to pressure all wages. down.
Going at this rate it won't be long before all workers are in the same boat as workers employed in the loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos of the Indian Gaming Industry at exclusively poverty wages without any rights or any voice at work.
Of course, all workers in this country are employed under terms of "At-Will Employment except for the 13% employed under union contract although even these workers are finding that these same millionaire union "leaders" who shove concession after concession contract down their throats are finding their contract rights failing to be enforced through grievance procedures. here in Minnesota, where AFSCME kicked off the drive for a $9.50 Minimum Wage is now telling members who are victims of discrimination and harassment on the job to "go hire your own attorney we don't go beyond the two step grievance process."
http://www.ifallsjournal.com/
Did anyone really believe that Seattle's employers would not come back fighting this proposed increase in the Minimum Wage to $15.00 an hour? Is this not the same community where the police were turned loose to savage working people who came out to peacefully protest against these trade agreements and the same city where the police beat the hell out of the Communist-led unemployed demonstrations of the 1930's and sent the police out to viciously attack the IWW soap-box speakers who tried to explain the need for the working class to fight for their rights and livelihoods and the same politicians who tried to have the police beat into submission the longshore workers led by Harry Bridges and the city that turned the HUAC hearings into a vicious attack on the CPUSA, organized labor and students? And isn't Seattle the same city that sent police thugs out to try to bust the organizing efforts of Boeing workers initially led by Wyndham Mortimer who had led the organizing drive that forced General Motors to sign a contract with the UAW?
What was expected from Seattle's ruling class when it was suggested the Minimum Wage should be $15.00?
Isn't it obvious to anyone that this struggle to raise the Minimum Wage to a real living wage is going to have to be a well thought out, coordinated national struggle in which the leadership arises from the grassroots working class communities and rank-and-file activists?
That the struggle for a living Minimum Wage is connected first and foremost to "cost-of-living" and the "cost-of-living crisis" for working class families is the most important aspect of this struggle... what the Minimum Wage dollar figure will be established at follows from this and not the other way around.
In fact, for many cities across this country, cities are not even allowed to enact Minimum Wage legislation.
Already, most of the states with Democratic super-majorities have enacted Minimum Wage "increases" which once again makes government the enforcer of poverty for millions of working class families. This also needs to be exposed that these Democrats, no different from the Republicans are using the levers of government (legislation) to enforce poverty--- thus assuring not only the poverty of millions; but a huge pool of impoverished workers intended to pressure all wages. down.
Going at this rate it won't be long before all workers are in the same boat as workers employed in the loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos of the Indian Gaming Industry at exclusively poverty wages without any rights or any voice at work.
Of course, all workers in this country are employed under terms of "At-Will Employment except for the 13% employed under union contract although even these workers are finding that these same millionaire union "leaders" who shove concession after concession contract down their throats are finding their contract rights failing to be enforced through grievance procedures. here in Minnesota, where AFSCME kicked off the drive for a $9.50 Minimum Wage is now telling members who are victims of discrimination and harassment on the job to "go hire your own attorney we don't go beyond the two step grievance process."
Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell: 651-587-5541
Primary E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net
E-mail: alan.maki1951mn@gmail.com
Sunday, April 20, 2014
Workers paid poverty wages are going to be poor.
Does
anyone else but me think that it is strange that these AFL-CIO unions
claim they are supporting workers in the fast food industry, Wal-mart
and Target workers in their struggles to get better wages when these
same unions come along and support these poverty Minimum Wages like
$9.50, $10.10 or like in Wisconsin where the Democrats were pushing for
$7.60?
If the Minimum Wage was a real living wage directly tied to all cost-of-living factors the wages of these workers would rise to providing a decent standard of living... all of which begs the question, why haven't all of these workers been brought into the struggle to increase the Minimum Wage to a real living wage?
Then the working class would be struggling united, together.
How does it make sense to split the working class as the AFL-CIO has done?
Let's have one great big push to raise the national Minimum Wage so it is legislatively tied to all cost of living factors tracked by the United States Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics, then index this to inflation with periodic increases to improve the standard of living of working class families.
The Democrats and their AFL-CIO partners are making these ridiculous claims that $9.50 and $10.10 are lifting millions of workers out of poverty. How can this possibly be when $9.50 and $10.10 are poverty wages? Workers are going to remain in poverty if paid a poverty wage.
Here we are with corporations boasting higher profits than ever and the Democrats and the unions refuse to fight and struggle for making the Minimum Wage a real living wage. This is disgraceful.
If the Minimum Wage was a real living wage directly tied to all cost-of-living factors the wages of these workers would rise to providing a decent standard of living... all of which begs the question, why haven't all of these workers been brought into the struggle to increase the Minimum Wage to a real living wage?
Then the working class would be struggling united, together.
How does it make sense to split the working class as the AFL-CIO has done?
Let's have one great big push to raise the national Minimum Wage so it is legislatively tied to all cost of living factors tracked by the United States Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics, then index this to inflation with periodic increases to improve the standard of living of working class families.
The Democrats and their AFL-CIO partners are making these ridiculous claims that $9.50 and $10.10 are lifting millions of workers out of poverty. How can this possibly be when $9.50 and $10.10 are poverty wages? Workers are going to remain in poverty if paid a poverty wage.
Here we are with corporations boasting higher profits than ever and the Democrats and the unions refuse to fight and struggle for making the Minimum Wage a real living wage. This is disgraceful.
Saturday, April 19, 2014
It's time for grassroots and rank-and-file activists to step forward and take control on the movement for making the Minimum Wage a real living wage.
The movement for a real living Minimum Wage continues to run into snags---
Politicians, employers and unions have banded together in Seattle just like the Democrats, unions, foundation-funded outfits and church groups here in Minnesota joined with the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce (the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party's "Business Caucus" or Summit Hill Club) to rob workers of a real living Minimum Wage that was promised in return for workers voting for these Democrats... workers have been the victims of an elaborately concocted "bait-and-switch" scheme.
Since this Democratic Party coalition is now insisting that any employer paid compensation packages like health care, dental care, eyes and hearing, child care and higher education subsidies be considered part of the Minimum Wage we need to talk about the need for all of this to become legislation for government universal social programs rather continuing to be ripped off by the for-profit sectors providing these services to workers while gouging workers thus turning this struggle for a living Minimum Wage into a farce and a sham where employers continue to reap super-profits from poverty wages as these other service providers also reap super-profits from this trough of poverty wages--- what a scam these employers are scheming to plan.
It would seem to me that this would be a good time to bring forward the need for universal social programs as the way to counter what the employers (and apparently unions?) are demanding in the way of health, etc. care being considered part of the Minimum Wage.
For example, there is no way a Public Health Care System--- socialized health care should cost any more a month than Social Security. A Public Child Care System, too. Both working just like our public schools--- publicly financed, publicly administered and publicly delivered. Way cheaper than the present for profit health care system.
So, you tell them to institute public universal social programs (everyone in) for each type of "compensation package" they want deducted from the $15.00.
But, this is where the "$15.00" movement has been very short sighted. This movement is working with a false figure derived from the U.S. Census Bureau (which only use four cost-of-living categories) instead of the Consumer Price Index of the United States Department of Labors' Bureau of Labor Statistics (which monitors EIGHT categories and 200 sub-categories).
It won't surprise me if all the union "leaders" don't agree with the employers on this because they have worked hand-in-hand with these same employers to force concession contracts down their own member's throats and SEIU has engaged in the practice of offering employers sweetheart contracts in return for union dues.
Here in Minnesota, ALL of the AFL-CIO and Change To Win affiliated unions supported the switch pulled by the Democrats for $9.50 an hour and they were even going to bring in Richard Trumka to support this but Trumka backed out when he knew there was going to be resistance at the rally they had planned for the Humphrey Center at the university of Minnesota where he was going to be greeted by demonstrators exposing the "bait and switch" pulled by the Democrats, the foundation-funded outfits, labor leaders and the churches... most likely the "$15.00" movement will face the exact same coalition in Seattle and elsewhere.
To win a real living Minimum Wage is going to take a campaign that is willing to educate workers about what the real "cost-of-living" actually is based on the fact working class families are experiencing a "cost-of-living crisis" and that the Minimum Wage needs to be tied to both increases in the "cost-of-living" and to inflation which are not the same... monopoly price-fixing is the main reason prices rise and the spending on militarism and wars is the main reason for inflation.
The prices of the basic necessities of life are now under the pretty much complete control of the monopolies.
Obviously the Democrats and their partners, the coalition mentioned above, with their wars on the one hand and "economic populism" full of "bait-and-switch" (single-payer deliver Obamacare; living wage deliver poverty wages, etc.) on the other hand don't want to talk about "cost-of-living," "cost-of-living crisis" or militarism and wars which are making us all poor as austerity measures are being shoved down our throats to pay for all this militarism and wars instead of Public Health Care and Child Care Programs, CCC, WPA and CETA as well as a Conyers type job creation program.
Not coincidentally, this same Democratic Party coalition which stood opposed to single-payer and smashed the single-payer movement is now using the same strategy to smash the $15.00 movement.
Notice that the people's movements were sucked into supporting half-measure reforms in both situations when the demands should have been very clear--- a National Public Health Care System and a Minimum Wage legislatively tied to the "cost-of-living" automatically increased for rising prices and inflation with periodic increases providing for an improved standard-of-living.
We have also failed to define small business as distinct from big-business and family owned businesses like the mom-and-pop convenience store--- there is no way an employer of 15 or more people can't afford a real living wage of between $22.00 and $26.00 an hour which the Minimum Wage would be if using the BLS' CPI. The solution should be obvious for the legitimate small business which employs mostly family members--- just eliminate Minimum Wage enforcement; if someone wants to pay their spouse, children, aunts, uncles, cousins, grandpa and grandma $1.00 an hour let them. But all this crap with wealthy people buying franchises and then claiming they can't pay a living wage is a bunch of bullshit. Here in Minnesota, the main opponent to raising the Minimum Wage was State Senator Tom Bakk, a building trades union official in his past life, who cried big crocodile tears for the group homes, hotels, motels bars and restaurants.
What is a small business? Does anyone really know except the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (LOL!):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_business
A little sarcasm to make a point:
If any industry or business legitimately can't pay the Minimum Wage, certainly no union has any business trying to organize them--- using the logic being pushed by the AFL-CIO. If Target and Wal-mart along with McDonald's and Taco Bell can't afford to pay employees real living Minimum Wages this means unionization would kill them, too--- and this of course is the argument used by big business all the time. So, hey; just phase out unions and implement a government social contract covering all workers except those employed in legitimate family operated small businesses of under 15 employees.
Should a union even be allowed to organize any company defined as a "small business" that can't afford to pay a real living Minimum Wage because using this logic of exempting small business from the full Minimum Wage would lead anyone pushing this notion that unionization of that business would for sure kill the business just like management would surely claim--- and always does; but somehow miracles always happen and the business survives unionization.
I can show you hundreds of businesses with fewer than 25 employees that are unionized--- each of the managements claimed unionization would kill their business; and here they are celebrating 25th and 50 years and longer of being in business.
Unionization of a small business is going to cost that business well over $35.00 an hour and if this doesn't kill a small business how would paying employees a Minimum Wage of $22.00 to $26.00 an hour kill these small businesses?
What we are facing is a union leadership that is demanding dues for raising the living standards of the entire working class--- these union "leaders" in pushing these poverty Minimum Wages of $9.50 and $10.10 are essentially saying, "If we don't get a cut of rising wages, we don't give a fuck if you people stay poor."
Look at who we had pushing the poverty Minimum Wage of $9.50 through the Minnesota legislature and signed into law by the governor:
All Democrats with a Democratic super-majority where Republicans had no say and could only cry:
A corporate/business lawyer in the State House, Representative Paul Thiessen.
A big-shot from the building trades union in the State Senate, Tom Bakk.
And a billionaire Governor, Mark Dayton, whose wealth is derived from the poverty wages of the Dayton-Hudson Company, now Target Stores.
Of course, the millionaire labor leaders of the AFL-CIO's Executive Council and their state counterparts, millionaires like Eliot Seide of AFSCME, wouldn't be able to shove all these concession contracts down their members throats if there was a focus on "cost-of-living" and the true state of affairs where every single working class family is experiencing a "cost-of-living crisis."
Did you ever hear Richard Trumka so much as mention this "cost-of-living crisis" that is a reality for every single working class family?
Are we just supposed to keep our mouths shut in the name of some kind of desired "unity" as to what is really going on as these Democrats and their hacks jerk us around?
We need to get this all figured out... join the National Conference Call...
http://unitingpeopleworks4us.blogspot.com/2014/04/a-national-approach-for-making-minimum.html
Don't forget to check out and join the FaceBook pages, also:
https://www.facebook.com/events/763527720348169/?notif_t=plan_user_joined
https://www.facebook.com/USlivablewage?notif_t=fbpage_fan_invite
Check out my "Letter to the Editor" on the "Bait-and-Switch" politics of the Democrats:
http://www.ifallsjournal.com/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/beware-of-the-bait-and-switch/article_cfd312be-7955-57eb-8120-fa4b44cb4e3d.html
Did anyone really believe that Seattle's employers would not come back fighting this proposed increase in the Minimum Wage to $15.00 an hour? Is this not the same community where the police were turned loose to savage working people who came out to peacefully protest against these trade agreements and the same city where the police beat the hell out of the Communist-led unemployed demonstrations of the 1930's and sent the police out to viciously attack the IWW soap-box speakers who tried to explain the need for the working class to fight for their rights and livelihoods and the same politicians who tried to have the police beat into submission the longshore workers led by Harry Bridges and the city that turned the HUAC hearings into a vicious attack on the CPUSA, organized labor and students? And isn't Seattle the same city that sent police thugs out to try to bust the organizing efforts of Boeing workers initially led by Wyndham Mortimer who had led the organizing drive that forced General Motors to sign a contract with the UAW?
What was expected from Seattle's ruling class when it was suggested the Minimum Wage should be $15.00?
Isn't it obvious to anyone that this struggle to raise the Minimum Wage to a real living wage is going to have to be a well thought out, coordinated national struggle in which the leadership arises from the grassroots working class communities and rank-and-file activists?
That the struggle for a living Minimum Wage is connected first and foremost to "cost-of-living" and the "cost-of-living crisis" for working class families is the most important aspect of this struggle... what the Minimum Wage dollar figure will be established at follows from this and not the other way around.
In fact, for many cities across this country, cities are not even allowed to enact Minimum Wage legislation.
Already, most of the states with Democratic super-majorities have enacted Minimum Wage "increases" which once again makes government the enforcer of poverty for millions of working class families. This also needs to be exposed that these Democrats, no different from the Republicans are using the levers of government (legislation) to enforce poverty--- thus assuring not only the poverty of millions; but a huge pool of impoverished workers intended to pressure all wages. down.
Going at this rate it won't be long before all workers are in the same boat as workers employed in the loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos of the Indian Gaming Industry at exclusively poverty wages without any rights or any voice at work.
Of course, all workers in this country are employed under terms of "At-Will Employment except for the 13% employed under union contract although even these workers are finding that these same millionaire union "leaders" who shove concession after concession contract down their throats are finding their contract rights failing to be enforced through grievance procedures. here in Minnesota, where AFSCME shamefully kicked off the drive for a $9.50 Minimum Wage and is now telling members who are victims of discrimination and harassment on the job to "go hire your own attorney we don't go beyond the two step grievance process." And even during the grievance process next to nothing is done by the union grievers who often even go into the grievance process never having talked with the worker they are supposed to be representing--- they simply get the "details" from management.
Is it logical to expect that union "leaders" who refuse to even adequately represent their own members can be expected to lead the struggle for a real living Minimum Wage?
--
Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell: 651-587-5541
Primary E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net
E-mail: alan.maki1951mn@gmail.com
Blog: http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/
Politicians, employers and unions have banded together in Seattle just like the Democrats, unions, foundation-funded outfits and church groups here in Minnesota joined with the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce (the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party's "Business Caucus" or Summit Hill Club) to rob workers of a real living Minimum Wage that was promised in return for workers voting for these Democrats... workers have been the victims of an elaborately concocted "bait-and-switch" scheme.
Since this Democratic Party coalition is now insisting that any employer paid compensation packages like health care, dental care, eyes and hearing, child care and higher education subsidies be considered part of the Minimum Wage we need to talk about the need for all of this to become legislation for government universal social programs rather continuing to be ripped off by the for-profit sectors providing these services to workers while gouging workers thus turning this struggle for a living Minimum Wage into a farce and a sham where employers continue to reap super-profits from poverty wages as these other service providers also reap super-profits from this trough of poverty wages--- what a scam these employers are scheming to plan.
It would seem to me that this would be a good time to bring forward the need for universal social programs as the way to counter what the employers (and apparently unions?) are demanding in the way of health, etc. care being considered part of the Minimum Wage.
For example, there is no way a Public Health Care System--- socialized health care should cost any more a month than Social Security. A Public Child Care System, too. Both working just like our public schools--- publicly financed, publicly administered and publicly delivered. Way cheaper than the present for profit health care system.
So, you tell them to institute public universal social programs (everyone in) for each type of "compensation package" they want deducted from the $15.00.
But, this is where the "$15.00" movement has been very short sighted. This movement is working with a false figure derived from the U.S. Census Bureau (which only use four cost-of-living categories) instead of the Consumer Price Index of the United States Department of Labors' Bureau of Labor Statistics (which monitors EIGHT categories and 200 sub-categories).
It won't surprise me if all the union "leaders" don't agree with the employers on this because they have worked hand-in-hand with these same employers to force concession contracts down their own member's throats and SEIU has engaged in the practice of offering employers sweetheart contracts in return for union dues.
Here in Minnesota, ALL of the AFL-CIO and Change To Win affiliated unions supported the switch pulled by the Democrats for $9.50 an hour and they were even going to bring in Richard Trumka to support this but Trumka backed out when he knew there was going to be resistance at the rally they had planned for the Humphrey Center at the university of Minnesota where he was going to be greeted by demonstrators exposing the "bait and switch" pulled by the Democrats, the foundation-funded outfits, labor leaders and the churches... most likely the "$15.00" movement will face the exact same coalition in Seattle and elsewhere.
To win a real living Minimum Wage is going to take a campaign that is willing to educate workers about what the real "cost-of-living" actually is based on the fact working class families are experiencing a "cost-of-living crisis" and that the Minimum Wage needs to be tied to both increases in the "cost-of-living" and to inflation which are not the same... monopoly price-fixing is the main reason prices rise and the spending on militarism and wars is the main reason for inflation.
The prices of the basic necessities of life are now under the pretty much complete control of the monopolies.
Obviously the Democrats and their partners, the coalition mentioned above, with their wars on the one hand and "economic populism" full of "bait-and-switch" (single-payer deliver Obamacare; living wage deliver poverty wages, etc.) on the other hand don't want to talk about "cost-of-living," "cost-of-living crisis" or militarism and wars which are making us all poor as austerity measures are being shoved down our throats to pay for all this militarism and wars instead of Public Health Care and Child Care Programs, CCC, WPA and CETA as well as a Conyers type job creation program.
Not coincidentally, this same Democratic Party coalition which stood opposed to single-payer and smashed the single-payer movement is now using the same strategy to smash the $15.00 movement.
Notice that the people's movements were sucked into supporting half-measure reforms in both situations when the demands should have been very clear--- a National Public Health Care System and a Minimum Wage legislatively tied to the "cost-of-living" automatically increased for rising prices and inflation with periodic increases providing for an improved standard-of-living.
We have also failed to define small business as distinct from big-business and family owned businesses like the mom-and-pop convenience store--- there is no way an employer of 15 or more people can't afford a real living wage of between $22.00 and $26.00 an hour which the Minimum Wage would be if using the BLS' CPI. The solution should be obvious for the legitimate small business which employs mostly family members--- just eliminate Minimum Wage enforcement; if someone wants to pay their spouse, children, aunts, uncles, cousins, grandpa and grandma $1.00 an hour let them. But all this crap with wealthy people buying franchises and then claiming they can't pay a living wage is a bunch of bullshit. Here in Minnesota, the main opponent to raising the Minimum Wage was State Senator Tom Bakk, a building trades union official in his past life, who cried big crocodile tears for the group homes, hotels, motels bars and restaurants.
What is a small business? Does anyone really know except the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (LOL!):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_business
A little sarcasm to make a point:
If any industry or business legitimately can't pay the Minimum Wage, certainly no union has any business trying to organize them--- using the logic being pushed by the AFL-CIO. If Target and Wal-mart along with McDonald's and Taco Bell can't afford to pay employees real living Minimum Wages this means unionization would kill them, too--- and this of course is the argument used by big business all the time. So, hey; just phase out unions and implement a government social contract covering all workers except those employed in legitimate family operated small businesses of under 15 employees.
Should a union even be allowed to organize any company defined as a "small business" that can't afford to pay a real living Minimum Wage because using this logic of exempting small business from the full Minimum Wage would lead anyone pushing this notion that unionization of that business would for sure kill the business just like management would surely claim--- and always does; but somehow miracles always happen and the business survives unionization.
I can show you hundreds of businesses with fewer than 25 employees that are unionized--- each of the managements claimed unionization would kill their business; and here they are celebrating 25th and 50 years and longer of being in business.
Unionization of a small business is going to cost that business well over $35.00 an hour and if this doesn't kill a small business how would paying employees a Minimum Wage of $22.00 to $26.00 an hour kill these small businesses?
What we are facing is a union leadership that is demanding dues for raising the living standards of the entire working class--- these union "leaders" in pushing these poverty Minimum Wages of $9.50 and $10.10 are essentially saying, "If we don't get a cut of rising wages, we don't give a fuck if you people stay poor."
Look at who we had pushing the poverty Minimum Wage of $9.50 through the Minnesota legislature and signed into law by the governor:
All Democrats with a Democratic super-majority where Republicans had no say and could only cry:
A corporate/business lawyer in the State House, Representative Paul Thiessen.
A big-shot from the building trades union in the State Senate, Tom Bakk.
And a billionaire Governor, Mark Dayton, whose wealth is derived from the poverty wages of the Dayton-Hudson Company, now Target Stores.
Of course, the millionaire labor leaders of the AFL-CIO's Executive Council and their state counterparts, millionaires like Eliot Seide of AFSCME, wouldn't be able to shove all these concession contracts down their members throats if there was a focus on "cost-of-living" and the true state of affairs where every single working class family is experiencing a "cost-of-living crisis."
Did you ever hear Richard Trumka so much as mention this "cost-of-living crisis" that is a reality for every single working class family?
Are we just supposed to keep our mouths shut in the name of some kind of desired "unity" as to what is really going on as these Democrats and their hacks jerk us around?
We need to get this all figured out... join the National Conference Call...
http://unitingpeopleworks4us.blogspot.com/2014/04/a-national-approach-for-making-minimum.html
Don't forget to check out and join the FaceBook pages, also:
https://www.facebook.com/events/763527720348169/?notif_t=plan_user_joined
https://www.facebook.com/USlivablewage?notif_t=fbpage_fan_invite
Check out my "Letter to the Editor" on the "Bait-and-Switch" politics of the Democrats:
http://www.ifallsjournal.com/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/beware-of-the-bait-and-switch/article_cfd312be-7955-57eb-8120-fa4b44cb4e3d.html
Did anyone really believe that Seattle's employers would not come back fighting this proposed increase in the Minimum Wage to $15.00 an hour? Is this not the same community where the police were turned loose to savage working people who came out to peacefully protest against these trade agreements and the same city where the police beat the hell out of the Communist-led unemployed demonstrations of the 1930's and sent the police out to viciously attack the IWW soap-box speakers who tried to explain the need for the working class to fight for their rights and livelihoods and the same politicians who tried to have the police beat into submission the longshore workers led by Harry Bridges and the city that turned the HUAC hearings into a vicious attack on the CPUSA, organized labor and students? And isn't Seattle the same city that sent police thugs out to try to bust the organizing efforts of Boeing workers initially led by Wyndham Mortimer who had led the organizing drive that forced General Motors to sign a contract with the UAW?
What was expected from Seattle's ruling class when it was suggested the Minimum Wage should be $15.00?
Isn't it obvious to anyone that this struggle to raise the Minimum Wage to a real living wage is going to have to be a well thought out, coordinated national struggle in which the leadership arises from the grassroots working class communities and rank-and-file activists?
That the struggle for a living Minimum Wage is connected first and foremost to "cost-of-living" and the "cost-of-living crisis" for working class families is the most important aspect of this struggle... what the Minimum Wage dollar figure will be established at follows from this and not the other way around.
In fact, for many cities across this country, cities are not even allowed to enact Minimum Wage legislation.
Already, most of the states with Democratic super-majorities have enacted Minimum Wage "increases" which once again makes government the enforcer of poverty for millions of working class families. This also needs to be exposed that these Democrats, no different from the Republicans are using the levers of government (legislation) to enforce poverty--- thus assuring not only the poverty of millions; but a huge pool of impoverished workers intended to pressure all wages. down.
Going at this rate it won't be long before all workers are in the same boat as workers employed in the loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos of the Indian Gaming Industry at exclusively poverty wages without any rights or any voice at work.
Of course, all workers in this country are employed under terms of "At-Will Employment except for the 13% employed under union contract although even these workers are finding that these same millionaire union "leaders" who shove concession after concession contract down their throats are finding their contract rights failing to be enforced through grievance procedures. here in Minnesota, where AFSCME shamefully kicked off the drive for a $9.50 Minimum Wage and is now telling members who are victims of discrimination and harassment on the job to "go hire your own attorney we don't go beyond the two step grievance process." And even during the grievance process next to nothing is done by the union grievers who often even go into the grievance process never having talked with the worker they are supposed to be representing--- they simply get the "details" from management.
Is it logical to expect that union "leaders" who refuse to even adequately represent their own members can be expected to lead the struggle for a real living Minimum Wage?
--
Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell: 651-587-5541
Primary E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net
E-mail: alan.maki1951mn@gmail.com
Blog: http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
Obama's "vision."
U.S. Labor Secretary Thomas Perez made a speech. In just these two paragraphs of his speech are lie upon lie that are such big lies it would take an entire book to refute these lies. Here is what he said:
"I can assure you of this: your issues and your work are receiving unprecedented attention at the very highest levels of the federal government. President Obama has laid out a vision based on the fundamental principle of opportunity for all. No matter the circumstances of your birth or the zip code you live in, you should have a chance to live out your highest and best dreams. How far you get should depend on how hard you work.
There are a few pillars of this opportunity agenda. First, it means creating good jobs that pay good wages. It means access to a world-class education for everyone, beginning in early childhood. And opportunity also means making sure hard work is rewarded — with a wage you can live on, savings you can retire on and health care that's there when you need it."
In a way, I feel sorry for people who believe this; but, who are the people who believe this? They are the muddle-headed, self-serving, well-heeled upper-middle class intellectuals who have never worked a day in their lives and have no concept of what life is like for working class families now caught up in the crisis of everyday living, struggling to make ends meet, many from day-to-day, others from pay-check to pay-check because for all working people there is a "cost-of-living crisis" Secretary Perez, in spite of being the United States Secretary of Labor--- like Obama and the rest of these Dumb Donkeys--- will not even acknowledge.
What "opportunity" is there for any of the more than forty-million Americans, working class Americans, now living in poverty?
What "opportunity" is there for the more than 90-million workers in this country struggling to survive who are only a pay-check or two away from poverty according to the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal?
We have a Secretary of Labor talking about "a wage you can live on" who has refused to acknowledge that the only measurement of whether or not a wage is a "living wage" is how it compares to the actual cost-of-living using the figure from his own department's Consumer Price Index (CPI).
"Health care?" Perhaps the biggest sick joke of all is Obamacare--- with it, one major illness will wipe out any working class family.
"Retirement?" The Social Security Trust Fund has been looted by a bunch of thieves--- the thieves are our own government.
"World-class education for everyone?" Yes; Finland has it and the United States ranks below the country U.S. imperialism has forced into poverty--- Cuba.
Cuba and Finland come out ahead of the United States in both education AND health care.
"President Obama has laid out a vision based on the fundamental principle of opportunity for all."
Yes, Obama is very good at "laying out visions." In fact, Obama is the all-time master of "laying out visions."
The problem is, Obama's "visions" never materialize into programs--- except for programs that continue to redistribute the wealth to the elite super-wealthy .25%.
Kind of ironic, but the Koch brothers who pretend to hate the Democrats even as they contribute to their campaigns, have done better than anyone because of Obama's programs for "change."
The Koch brothers now own and control more wealth than the bottom 40% of our entire population.
The 1% accumulated over 34-trillion dollars in capital (from exploiting the workers in the mines, mills and factories who created this wealth) just since economic hard times--- when Obama came to office--- hit the world.
Obama jokes about redistributing wealth as being on par with his having shared his peanut butter sandwich with another child in school.
No doubt Obama gave his peanut butter sandwich to a a child who was allergic to peanuts because his Wall Street "vision" of the world is killing the rest of us.
All of this begs the question:
In future elections, what should we be supporting and organizing for?
In my opinion, we should be participating in the electoral arena fighting for peace and an end to these dirty imperialist wars making most of us poor while enriching the 1% (the Wall Street merchants of death and destruction)--- the masters of war (the Military-Industrial Complex); making the "living wage" Obama and the Democrats promised but refused to deliver when they had the opportunity a reality; we should place legislation on the table for a National Public Health Care System--- socialized health care; we need to bring before the American people a "21st Century Full Employment Act for Peace and Prosperity;" we should participate in the elections with the intent of challenging Wall Street for political and economic power.
When all is said and done, we need a new "vision" backed by real programs that will improve the standard-of-living for the many instead of the few.
To accomplish this we are going to need to free ourselves from Wall Street's two-party trap.
We need to build a working class based progressive people's party that is anti-monopoly and anti-imperialist with a working class agenda led by grassroots and rank-and-file activists as free from the manipulation and control of the foundation-funded outfits and the millionaire labor leaders as from Wall Street.
We need to organize local, state, regional and national conferences all across this country to discuss all of this... the sooner the better; later may be too late because Wall Street's insatiable greedy drive for profits just might end up killing us all because it appears the wrath of an angry Mother Nature has had enough.
"I can assure you of this: your issues and your work are receiving unprecedented attention at the very highest levels of the federal government. President Obama has laid out a vision based on the fundamental principle of opportunity for all. No matter the circumstances of your birth or the zip code you live in, you should have a chance to live out your highest and best dreams. How far you get should depend on how hard you work.
There are a few pillars of this opportunity agenda. First, it means creating good jobs that pay good wages. It means access to a world-class education for everyone, beginning in early childhood. And opportunity also means making sure hard work is rewarded — with a wage you can live on, savings you can retire on and health care that's there when you need it."
In a way, I feel sorry for people who believe this; but, who are the people who believe this? They are the muddle-headed, self-serving, well-heeled upper-middle class intellectuals who have never worked a day in their lives and have no concept of what life is like for working class families now caught up in the crisis of everyday living, struggling to make ends meet, many from day-to-day, others from pay-check to pay-check because for all working people there is a "cost-of-living crisis" Secretary Perez, in spite of being the United States Secretary of Labor--- like Obama and the rest of these Dumb Donkeys--- will not even acknowledge.
What "opportunity" is there for any of the more than forty-million Americans, working class Americans, now living in poverty?
What "opportunity" is there for the more than 90-million workers in this country struggling to survive who are only a pay-check or two away from poverty according to the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal?
We have a Secretary of Labor talking about "a wage you can live on" who has refused to acknowledge that the only measurement of whether or not a wage is a "living wage" is how it compares to the actual cost-of-living using the figure from his own department's Consumer Price Index (CPI).
"Health care?" Perhaps the biggest sick joke of all is Obamacare--- with it, one major illness will wipe out any working class family.
"Retirement?" The Social Security Trust Fund has been looted by a bunch of thieves--- the thieves are our own government.
"World-class education for everyone?" Yes; Finland has it and the United States ranks below the country U.S. imperialism has forced into poverty--- Cuba.
Cuba and Finland come out ahead of the United States in both education AND health care.
"President Obama has laid out a vision based on the fundamental principle of opportunity for all."
Yes, Obama is very good at "laying out visions." In fact, Obama is the all-time master of "laying out visions."
The problem is, Obama's "visions" never materialize into programs--- except for programs that continue to redistribute the wealth to the elite super-wealthy .25%.
Kind of ironic, but the Koch brothers who pretend to hate the Democrats even as they contribute to their campaigns, have done better than anyone because of Obama's programs for "change."
The Koch brothers now own and control more wealth than the bottom 40% of our entire population.
The 1% accumulated over 34-trillion dollars in capital (from exploiting the workers in the mines, mills and factories who created this wealth) just since economic hard times--- when Obama came to office--- hit the world.
Obama jokes about redistributing wealth as being on par with his having shared his peanut butter sandwich with another child in school.
No doubt Obama gave his peanut butter sandwich to a a child who was allergic to peanuts because his Wall Street "vision" of the world is killing the rest of us.
All of this begs the question:
In future elections, what should we be supporting and organizing for?
In my opinion, we should be participating in the electoral arena fighting for peace and an end to these dirty imperialist wars making most of us poor while enriching the 1% (the Wall Street merchants of death and destruction)--- the masters of war (the Military-Industrial Complex); making the "living wage" Obama and the Democrats promised but refused to deliver when they had the opportunity a reality; we should place legislation on the table for a National Public Health Care System--- socialized health care; we need to bring before the American people a "21st Century Full Employment Act for Peace and Prosperity;" we should participate in the elections with the intent of challenging Wall Street for political and economic power.
When all is said and done, we need a new "vision" backed by real programs that will improve the standard-of-living for the many instead of the few.
To accomplish this we are going to need to free ourselves from Wall Street's two-party trap.
We need to build a working class based progressive people's party that is anti-monopoly and anti-imperialist with a working class agenda led by grassroots and rank-and-file activists as free from the manipulation and control of the foundation-funded outfits and the millionaire labor leaders as from Wall Street.
We need to organize local, state, regional and national conferences all across this country to discuss all of this... the sooner the better; later may be too late because Wall Street's insatiable greedy drive for profits just might end up killing us all because it appears the wrath of an angry Mother Nature has had enough.
Monday, April 14, 2014
Keynesian hypocrisy.
My thought for the day...
Does anyone see the pattern developing here?
All of a sudden Robert Reich comes out saying he is for a $15.00 an hour Minimum Wage while not so much as suggesting working class families are experiencing a "cost-of-living crisis."
http://www.aflcio.org/Blog/Political-Action-Legislation/Why-the-Minimum-Wage-Should-Really-Be-Raised-to-15-an-Hour
I never heard such a hypocritical crock of shit.
Will even $15.00 an hour solve the "cost-of-living crisis" for any working class family, in spite of this being a hefty increase in the Minimum Wage? No; and Robert Reich more than anyone knows this.
What we have here is these Democratic Party hacks and the millionaire labor leaders along with the foundation-funded outfits comprising the "partnership" between them kept in line by the hacks on the one hand before legislation is passed using their name recognition "influence" to undermine the struggle advocating real and specific solutions to problems to buy the Democrats time to get their Wall Street approved legislation through and then after its a "done deal" these shit-asses come talking about "it really wasn't enough" as if these Dumb Donkeys are going to go back and rescind the bad legislation and do what is right by the people.
We got the same shit with single-payer; now we get the same shit with the Minimum Wage.
We get the same shit with these people saying there is a need for a new political party but their utterances are only deception intended to make people think they are planning a new political party so grassroots and rank-and-file working class activists will not take the initiative on their own to become the catalysts for organizing a working class based progressive people's party.
Well, any raise is always better than no raise at all, workers understands this--- especially in the era of millionaire labor "leaders" negotiating nothing but concessions for the members paying the dues--- but this isn't the point.
And who asked these millionaire labor "leaders" who can't negotiate an improved standard-of-living for their own members to be the voice of poverty-waged unorganized workers who these union leaders have never offered assistance to organize?
The point is, these Democrats promised a living--- non-poverty--- wage and they should have kept their promise.
A living wage is not the same as "a raise."
Typical "bait and switch" bullshit we get from the Democrats and their partners.
As for this idea of Robert Reich's that there are "lousy jobs" this is just outright bullshit, too.
Any job that needs to be done is a good job provided it pays a real living wage, the health and safety of workers doing the job is protected, workers have rights and a voice at work and when there are decent benefits like adequate vacations, etc.
I don't include health care benefits because these same worthless millionaire labor leaders are the ones who hoodwinked workers into believing that health care should be part of collectively bargained agreements instead of fighting for what we really need: a National Public Health Care System.
We see what this bargaining for health care with individual employers has resulted in--- the health care mess we have now.
What these worthless millionaire labor leaders who now are nothing but negotiators of concessions did was to divide the working class over the health care issues when the struggle for real health care reform should have remained a point of unity as the left-led CIO was pushing for.
Not having decent pay and benefits with rights on the job and a voice at work is what makes a job "lousy."
Workers being forced to work under the "Doctrine of At-will Employment" is what makes a job "lousy."
Of course, Robert Reich did his part in the Clinton Administration to make sure millions of workers in other countries got "lousy jobs"--- low pay without any rights--- while making sure the jobs that remained here in the United States became "lousy jobs"--- poverty wages without many or any rights.
Come on, really; what kind of rights can a worker forced to be employed under terms of "At-will Employment" have? None.
What excuse is there here in Minnesota that the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party doesn't use its super-majority status to make every job a good job with real living wages as they promised to get the votes of workers? I would really like an answer, not excuses, to this question.
What excuse is there for the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party not to rescind and repeal "At-Will Employment" replacing this Draconian, repressive, anti-labor legislation with "Just Employment" legislation protecting workers from unjust and unfair terminations?
What excuse does the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party have for not passing anti-scab and anti-lockout legislation?
Is there any excuse for the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party failing to lobby Congress to enact real full employment legislation with teeth?
Robert Reich has now come forward supporting a $15.00 an hour Minimum Wage. Where has his voice been since 2008 when it was needed?
Good for Robert Reich; he know comes out for a $15.00 an hour Minimum Wage knowing this will not resolve the "cost-of-living crisis;" not some, but all working class families are experiencing and being subjected to by politicians bribed by Wall Street employers using the levers of government (legislation) to keep all wages down--- thus creating poverty instead of eliminating poverty as promised... again, "bait-and-switch."
The only problem is, this guy, Robert Reich, if anyone, should know what a real living wage is--- after all, he was Secretary of Labor and completely understands the idea of what it means for wages to be living wages those wages must correspond to, and be in line with, all cost-of-living factors.
Robert Reich and the rest of these well-heeled, over-paid, muddle-headed upper-middle class intellectuals have not one iota of the fact of life that finds every single working class family in this country caught up in a "cost-of-living crisis" struggling just to make ends meet--- many struggling from day-to-day, others struggling from pay-check to pay-check with some 90 million workers being one or two pay-checks from poverty with some forty-million working class people living in poverty during a period when their labor has created the very wealth resulting in record high corporate profits for Wall Street money-bags--- greedy shit-bags.
It was Robert Reich's job as Secretary of Labor to make sure the Bureau of Labor Statistics was compiling the facts accurately for the Consumer Price Index which is the one and only valid set of statistics on which to base a real living wage in line with cost-of-living.
So, this begs the questions:
Why would Robert Reich keep proposing Minimum Wages that are substantially less than what it costs working class families to survive?
Why would Robert Reich, or anyone else for that matter, expect any worker to work for less than what it costs to live?
Robert Reich was silent on the Minimum Wage issue for years into the Obama Administration. Only a few short months ago, Reich was pushing a $9.50 Minimum Wage. Then he supported Obama's $10.10. Now he is backing $15.00 at the very time he lauds Minnesota's super-majority for passing a miserly pathetic poverty wage of $9.50 after Minnesota politicians refused to raise the Minimum Wage from $6.15 an hour for ten years.
Had these same politicians in Minnesota pushed for a yearly Minimum Wage increase of just 25-cents an hour tied to a measly 2.5% capped inflation adjustment, workers would have a Minimum Wage higher than the present $9.50 they just passed if we want to really put things in perspective.
Here we have a former Secretary of Labor, playing games with the lives of working class families when all he has to do is stand up and say, "Here is the empirical data on cost-of-living so here is what the Minimum Wage should be and we should keep the Minimum Wage legislatively tied to this data."
It is very simple; no guessing; no pulling figures randomly from a hat for self-serving political expediency.
Let Robert Reich have the courage to bring these figures forward--- when he does this I will be satisfied; until then, he is nothing but one more worthless Democratic Party hack enabling these Democrats to carry out "bait-and-switch."
Simple honesty requires Robert Reich to stop playing around with this important issue.
Let Robert Reich produce a video with his scribblings, doodlings, drawings and graphs based on the actual figures from the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index.
Also, notice that Reich sidesteps the fact that these Minimum Wage "increases" won't take effect until future years which means all the purchasing power of these increases will have already been eaten up by rising costs of goods and services together with inflation at the time they come into effect.
And what is with Reich's refusal to call a poverty wage just what it is: A POVERTY WAGE?
A worker paid a poverty wage will be living in poverty along with their family.
And, Reich--- while mentioning Minnesota--- doesn't mention that here in Minnesota, and he did mention Minnesota increasing the Minimum Wage, that the maximum inflation increase is only 2.5%--- get out your calculator and figure out what this comes to at $9.50 an hour.
Plus, this inflation indexing, as pathetic as the $9.50 itself is miserly, doesn't even kick in until 2018!
The $9.50 doesn't kick in until 2016!
Of course, Reich never mentions that he sat in cowardly silence as Bill Clinton knocked millions of impoverished working class families off welfare to make sure there was a huge pool of poverty workers that would be "eager" (read: forced) to work in lousy poverty waged jobs from which Wall Street has reaped trillions upon trillions in super-profits; nor does Reich mention that this Clinton "welfare reform" set back people of color and women many decades as Clinton also gutted Affirmative Action--- another "little" fact Robert Reich with his "populist economic message" which also omits how militarization and these dirty imperialist wars are making us all poor.
Robert Reich peddles this Wall Street Keynesian bullshit as "economic populism."
President Franklin D. Roosevelt called John Maynard Keynes a "quack."
Instead of buying tickets to Reich's movie, working people would be better off taking the time to study a little Karl Marx.
Graphic artist Hugo Gellert made studying Karl Marx very easy to do--- maybe someone should turn these lithographs into an animated movie with background music from Nina Simone, Woody Guthrie and Leonard Cohen's "Democracy Is Coming to the U.S.A."
Here are the Hugo Gellert lithographs making Karl Marx very easy for anyone to understand:
http://www.graphicwitness.org/contemp/marxtitle.htm
We don't need Robert Reich to confuse things more than they already are when we have Karl Marx to explain in very simple everyday common language why what is happening is happening.
Something you might want to think about:
Any job paying a wage that isn't a real living wage in line with all cost-of-living factors is going to be a "lousy" job.
And, by the way; I do think "flipping burgers" should pay a real living wage which would make jobs at McDonald's and Burger King good jobs.
Any employers who don't want to pay workers a real living wage should just do the lousy job themselves instead of living as parasites off the labor of others.
What we need is a national campaign of united struggle in the streets, at places of employment and at the ballot box to make the Minimum Wage a real living wage.
Employers will never increase wages one single penny without a struggle.
The Bait:
FROM THE MINNESOTA DEMOCRATIC FARMER-LABOR PARTY PLATFORM...
LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT
Does anyone see the pattern developing here?
All of a sudden Robert Reich comes out saying he is for a $15.00 an hour Minimum Wage while not so much as suggesting working class families are experiencing a "cost-of-living crisis."
http://www.aflcio.org/Blog/Political-Action-Legislation/Why-the-Minimum-Wage-Should-Really-Be-Raised-to-15-an-Hour
I never heard such a hypocritical crock of shit.
Will even $15.00 an hour solve the "cost-of-living crisis" for any working class family, in spite of this being a hefty increase in the Minimum Wage? No; and Robert Reich more than anyone knows this.
What we have here is these Democratic Party hacks and the millionaire labor leaders along with the foundation-funded outfits comprising the "partnership" between them kept in line by the hacks on the one hand before legislation is passed using their name recognition "influence" to undermine the struggle advocating real and specific solutions to problems to buy the Democrats time to get their Wall Street approved legislation through and then after its a "done deal" these shit-asses come talking about "it really wasn't enough" as if these Dumb Donkeys are going to go back and rescind the bad legislation and do what is right by the people.
We got the same shit with single-payer; now we get the same shit with the Minimum Wage.
We get the same shit with these people saying there is a need for a new political party but their utterances are only deception intended to make people think they are planning a new political party so grassroots and rank-and-file working class activists will not take the initiative on their own to become the catalysts for organizing a working class based progressive people's party.
Well, any raise is always better than no raise at all, workers understands this--- especially in the era of millionaire labor "leaders" negotiating nothing but concessions for the members paying the dues--- but this isn't the point.
And who asked these millionaire labor "leaders" who can't negotiate an improved standard-of-living for their own members to be the voice of poverty-waged unorganized workers who these union leaders have never offered assistance to organize?
The point is, these Democrats promised a living--- non-poverty--- wage and they should have kept their promise.
A living wage is not the same as "a raise."
Typical "bait and switch" bullshit we get from the Democrats and their partners.
As for this idea of Robert Reich's that there are "lousy jobs" this is just outright bullshit, too.
Any job that needs to be done is a good job provided it pays a real living wage, the health and safety of workers doing the job is protected, workers have rights and a voice at work and when there are decent benefits like adequate vacations, etc.
I don't include health care benefits because these same worthless millionaire labor leaders are the ones who hoodwinked workers into believing that health care should be part of collectively bargained agreements instead of fighting for what we really need: a National Public Health Care System.
We see what this bargaining for health care with individual employers has resulted in--- the health care mess we have now.
What these worthless millionaire labor leaders who now are nothing but negotiators of concessions did was to divide the working class over the health care issues when the struggle for real health care reform should have remained a point of unity as the left-led CIO was pushing for.
Not having decent pay and benefits with rights on the job and a voice at work is what makes a job "lousy."
Workers being forced to work under the "Doctrine of At-will Employment" is what makes a job "lousy."
Of course, Robert Reich did his part in the Clinton Administration to make sure millions of workers in other countries got "lousy jobs"--- low pay without any rights--- while making sure the jobs that remained here in the United States became "lousy jobs"--- poverty wages without many or any rights.
Come on, really; what kind of rights can a worker forced to be employed under terms of "At-will Employment" have? None.
What excuse is there here in Minnesota that the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party doesn't use its super-majority status to make every job a good job with real living wages as they promised to get the votes of workers? I would really like an answer, not excuses, to this question.
What excuse is there for the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party not to rescind and repeal "At-Will Employment" replacing this Draconian, repressive, anti-labor legislation with "Just Employment" legislation protecting workers from unjust and unfair terminations?
What excuse does the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party have for not passing anti-scab and anti-lockout legislation?
Is there any excuse for the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party failing to lobby Congress to enact real full employment legislation with teeth?
Robert Reich has now come forward supporting a $15.00 an hour Minimum Wage. Where has his voice been since 2008 when it was needed?
Good for Robert Reich; he know comes out for a $15.00 an hour Minimum Wage knowing this will not resolve the "cost-of-living crisis;" not some, but all working class families are experiencing and being subjected to by politicians bribed by Wall Street employers using the levers of government (legislation) to keep all wages down--- thus creating poverty instead of eliminating poverty as promised... again, "bait-and-switch."
The only problem is, this guy, Robert Reich, if anyone, should know what a real living wage is--- after all, he was Secretary of Labor and completely understands the idea of what it means for wages to be living wages those wages must correspond to, and be in line with, all cost-of-living factors.
Robert Reich and the rest of these well-heeled, over-paid, muddle-headed upper-middle class intellectuals have not one iota of the fact of life that finds every single working class family in this country caught up in a "cost-of-living crisis" struggling just to make ends meet--- many struggling from day-to-day, others struggling from pay-check to pay-check with some 90 million workers being one or two pay-checks from poverty with some forty-million working class people living in poverty during a period when their labor has created the very wealth resulting in record high corporate profits for Wall Street money-bags--- greedy shit-bags.
It was Robert Reich's job as Secretary of Labor to make sure the Bureau of Labor Statistics was compiling the facts accurately for the Consumer Price Index which is the one and only valid set of statistics on which to base a real living wage in line with cost-of-living.
So, this begs the questions:
Why would Robert Reich keep proposing Minimum Wages that are substantially less than what it costs working class families to survive?
Why would Robert Reich, or anyone else for that matter, expect any worker to work for less than what it costs to live?
Robert Reich was silent on the Minimum Wage issue for years into the Obama Administration. Only a few short months ago, Reich was pushing a $9.50 Minimum Wage. Then he supported Obama's $10.10. Now he is backing $15.00 at the very time he lauds Minnesota's super-majority for passing a miserly pathetic poverty wage of $9.50 after Minnesota politicians refused to raise the Minimum Wage from $6.15 an hour for ten years.
Had these same politicians in Minnesota pushed for a yearly Minimum Wage increase of just 25-cents an hour tied to a measly 2.5% capped inflation adjustment, workers would have a Minimum Wage higher than the present $9.50 they just passed if we want to really put things in perspective.
Here we have a former Secretary of Labor, playing games with the lives of working class families when all he has to do is stand up and say, "Here is the empirical data on cost-of-living so here is what the Minimum Wage should be and we should keep the Minimum Wage legislatively tied to this data."
It is very simple; no guessing; no pulling figures randomly from a hat for self-serving political expediency.
Let Robert Reich have the courage to bring these figures forward--- when he does this I will be satisfied; until then, he is nothing but one more worthless Democratic Party hack enabling these Democrats to carry out "bait-and-switch."
Simple honesty requires Robert Reich to stop playing around with this important issue.
Let Robert Reich produce a video with his scribblings, doodlings, drawings and graphs based on the actual figures from the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index.
Also, notice that Reich sidesteps the fact that these Minimum Wage "increases" won't take effect until future years which means all the purchasing power of these increases will have already been eaten up by rising costs of goods and services together with inflation at the time they come into effect.
And what is with Reich's refusal to call a poverty wage just what it is: A POVERTY WAGE?
A worker paid a poverty wage will be living in poverty along with their family.
And, Reich--- while mentioning Minnesota--- doesn't mention that here in Minnesota, and he did mention Minnesota increasing the Minimum Wage, that the maximum inflation increase is only 2.5%--- get out your calculator and figure out what this comes to at $9.50 an hour.
Plus, this inflation indexing, as pathetic as the $9.50 itself is miserly, doesn't even kick in until 2018!
The $9.50 doesn't kick in until 2016!
Of course, Reich never mentions that he sat in cowardly silence as Bill Clinton knocked millions of impoverished working class families off welfare to make sure there was a huge pool of poverty workers that would be "eager" (read: forced) to work in lousy poverty waged jobs from which Wall Street has reaped trillions upon trillions in super-profits; nor does Reich mention that this Clinton "welfare reform" set back people of color and women many decades as Clinton also gutted Affirmative Action--- another "little" fact Robert Reich with his "populist economic message" which also omits how militarization and these dirty imperialist wars are making us all poor.
Robert Reich peddles this Wall Street Keynesian bullshit as "economic populism."
President Franklin D. Roosevelt called John Maynard Keynes a "quack."
Instead of buying tickets to Reich's movie, working people would be better off taking the time to study a little Karl Marx.
Graphic artist Hugo Gellert made studying Karl Marx very easy to do--- maybe someone should turn these lithographs into an animated movie with background music from Nina Simone, Woody Guthrie and Leonard Cohen's "Democracy Is Coming to the U.S.A."
Here are the Hugo Gellert lithographs making Karl Marx very easy for anyone to understand:
http://www.graphicwitness.org/contemp/marxtitle.htm
We don't need Robert Reich to confuse things more than they already are when we have Karl Marx to explain in very simple everyday common language why what is happening is happening.
Something you might want to think about:
Any job paying a wage that isn't a real living wage in line with all cost-of-living factors is going to be a "lousy" job.
And, by the way; I do think "flipping burgers" should pay a real living wage which would make jobs at McDonald's and Burger King good jobs.
Any employers who don't want to pay workers a real living wage should just do the lousy job themselves instead of living as parasites off the labor of others.
What we need is a national campaign of united struggle in the streets, at places of employment and at the ballot box to make the Minimum Wage a real living wage.
Employers will never increase wages one single penny without a struggle.
"Bait-and-switch" politics we get from the Democrats...
What Governor Mark Dayton and the DFL state legislative candidates campaigned for while seeking our votes:
What Governor Mark Dayton and the DFL state legislative candidates campaigned for while seeking our votes:
The Bait:
FROM THE MINNESOTA DEMOCRATIC FARMER-LABOR PARTY PLATFORM...
LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT
We promote the American labor movement and the rights of all workers.
We Support:
* A Minimum Wage that keeps pace with inflation and provides full time workers with an income above the poverty level.
The Switch:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton's statement on raising the Minimum Wage:
http://mn.gov/governor/blog/the-office-of-the-governor-blog-entry-detail.jsp?id=102-126316
The Governor's "Fact Sheet:"
http://mn.gov/governor/images/2014_04_13_adv_fact_sheet_min_wage.pdf
Fact: Minnesota Democrats campaigned for a "living--- non-poverty--- wage;" not a "raise" that is another poverty wage.
Fact: Democrats did raise the Minimum Wage.
Fact: Democrats did not raise the Minimum Wage as promised to a real living wage.
Quote: "No worker should have to live in poverty." Governor Mark Dayton
Question: Why did Governor Mark Dayton sign into law a Minimum Wage leaving workers mired in poverty?
Comment: This is the epitome of hypocrisy laying bare everything that is wrong with the political and economic system in the United States today.
The Keynesian economists work for Wall Street not the working class.
The Keynesian economists want workers with just enough money to spend in their pockets to keep the economy humming along but do not want wages to increase to the point where workers will have a decent standard-of-living.
Wages down = profits up.
Thus, the Keynesian economists want millions of workers languishing in poverty as a club used to keep most workers' wages down with the majority of working class families living pay-check to pay-check, always a pay-check or two away from poverty.
The Keynesian economists fail to recognize the "cost-of-living crisis" all working class families are experiencing because this is just what these mean-spirited, over-paid economists want for their Wall Street employers.
* A Minimum Wage that keeps pace with inflation and provides full time workers with an income above the poverty level.
The Switch:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton's statement on raising the Minimum Wage:
http://mn.gov/governor/blog/the-office-of-the-governor-blog-entry-detail.jsp?id=102-126316
The Governor's "Fact Sheet:"
http://mn.gov/governor/images/2014_04_13_adv_fact_sheet_min_wage.pdf
Fact: Minnesota Democrats campaigned for a "living--- non-poverty--- wage;" not a "raise" that is another poverty wage.
Fact: Democrats did raise the Minimum Wage.
Fact: Democrats did not raise the Minimum Wage as promised to a real living wage.
Quote: "No worker should have to live in poverty." Governor Mark Dayton
Question: Why did Governor Mark Dayton sign into law a Minimum Wage leaving workers mired in poverty?
Comment: This is the epitome of hypocrisy laying bare everything that is wrong with the political and economic system in the United States today.
The Keynesian economists work for Wall Street not the working class.
The Keynesian economists want workers with just enough money to spend in their pockets to keep the economy humming along but do not want wages to increase to the point where workers will have a decent standard-of-living.
Wages down = profits up.
Thus, the Keynesian economists want millions of workers languishing in poverty as a club used to keep most workers' wages down with the majority of working class families living pay-check to pay-check, always a pay-check or two away from poverty.
The Keynesian economists fail to recognize the "cost-of-living crisis" all working class families are experiencing because this is just what these mean-spirited, over-paid economists want for their Wall Street employers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

