Texas Longhorns with newborn calf in Bluebonnets

Texas Longhorns with newborn calf in Bluebonnets

Please note I have a new phone number...

512-517-2708

Alan Maki

Alan Maki
Doing research at the LBJ Library in Austin, Texas

It's time to claim our Peace Dividend

It's time to claim our Peace Dividend

We need to beat swords into plowshares.

We need to beat swords into plowshares.

A program for real change...

http://peaceandsocialjustice.blogspot.com/2013/03/a-progressive-program-for-real-change.html


What we need is a "21st Century Full Employment Act for Peace and Prosperity" which would make it a mandatory requirement that the president and Congress attain and maintain full employment.


"Voting is easy and marginally useful, but it is a poor substitute for democracy, which requires direct action by concerned citizens"

- Ben Franklin

Let's talk...

Let's talk...

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Why did the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party allow a racist Community Development Director to undermine and circumvent affirmative action?

October 20, 2009



Rita Albrecht,

Community Development Director, City of Bemidji. Minnesota

rita.albrecht@ci.bemidji.mn.us



Ms. Albrecht;



I would like to know why in all of your planning surrounding the Bemidji Regional Events Center (BREC)… from all the initial planning to the multi-cultural aspects of the ground-breaking ceremonies to the many intricate particulars you have considered from the art-work to adorn the BREC to its shrubbery, not once did you consider employment and affirmative action policies as to construction, maintenance and staffing the completed Bemidji Regional Events Center?



Now that this topic of jobs has been broached--- again; what do you intend to do to see to it that this most disgraceful, racist injustice is remedied?



Certainly you must see that there is something wrong when you promote multi-cultural awareness and appreciation as a cover for hiding racist hiring practices.



Now, what steps are going to be taken to see to it that Native Americans are going to be hired at all levels and paid real living wages and salaries in staffing the completed BREC?



I assume you think my questions are just as important as any of the minute detail you have been praised for considering by the likes of the Executive Director of the Minnesota Indian Gaming Association, John McCarthy who fronts for the interests of mobsters like the Fertitta family who are looking forward to increasing their already obscene wealth using the BREC in promoting the UFC--- Ultimate Fighting Championship scam being passed off as “sport.”



You have even worked out details about how to shuttle those attending BREC activities to the smoke-filled local casinos where workers are employed at poverty wages without any rights or protections provided by state or federal labor laws.



Could you not work out a way to transport and shuttle Native American workers for employment in the building and construction of this tax-payer financed Bemidji Regional Events Center? Did not John McCarthy offer the services of the casino shuttles? McCarthy must have furnished free food to the Beltrami County Democratic Farmer-Labor Party fundraiser expecting to get something in return… since John McCarthy and the DFL have refused all comment, let me suggest what McCarthy received in return for furnishing the walleye dinner was Democrats, once again, looking the other way as Native Americans were denied good-paying union construction jobs because the Minnesota Indian Gaming Association doesn’t want casino workers getting the idea that it is only through good union contracts combined with the protections offered by state and federal labor legislation that can provide a decent and healthy working environment at real living wages--- the only chance working people have to rise from poverty.



No doubt, Ms. Albrecht, you have earned the praises of John McCarthy and the Minnesota Indian Gaming Association because your intent is to deny Native Americans employment in staffing the Bemidji Regional Events Center in the very same way you connived to deny equal employment opportunities to those hired to build and construct the BREC.



Let us have answers to these questions at the same time you post all the jobs that will be available for hire in staffing and maintaining the Bemidji Regional Events Center. Hopefully these answers and the job postings from you will be forth-coming in time to prevent further racist injustices.



Since you have seen fit to use the news media and various list serves to tout your accomplishments regarding the Bemidji Regional Events Center, I assume you are not opposed to discussing this problem in the same public manner.



Perhaps you and Senator Mary Olson and all those who participated in the BREC groundbreaking ceremony would like to explain to the Native Americans who participated why they were welcome to perform drum and dance ceremonies but had the door closed on them when it came to employment?



Maybe I should ask you, also; are you aware of affirmative action laws regarding hiring here in Minnesota?



You might not find this discussion as thrilling as to what kind of shrubbery will adorn the BREC but, I would appreciate you indulging me just the same.



Sincerely,



Alan L. Maki

Director of Organizing,

Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council



58891 County Road 13

Warroad, Minnesota 56763

Phone: 218-386-2432

Cell phone: 651-587-5541

E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net



Check out my blog:



Thoughts From Podunk



http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/

Canada sends a socialist, working class union leader and NDP politician to Washington as its Ambassador


Canada's most reactionary ever politician, Prime minister Stephen Harper, has been forced to send Manitoba's Gary Doer, a socialist working class union leader and NDP politician to Washington as its Ambassador because of mounting pressure from the labor, peace and progressive movements in Canada looking for more sane international relations and complementing the international hopes for a new U.S. foreign policy--- which has not yet materialized under the Obama Administration; but, which, is sure to be given a great big push with the arrival of Gary Doer in Washington D.C. as Canada's new Ambassador to the United States.

U.S. peace, labor, health care and environmental activists should start beating a path to Gary Doer's door before the multi-national corporations have a chance to mount their campaign, which they are sure to do in attempt to keep Canada within the fold of U.S. imperialism.

Gary Doer has proven to be North America's most popular progressive politician in decades as he headed up the Manitoba New Democratic Party for many years leading to becoming Manitoba's Premier where he led the efforts to substantially improve the lives, living conditions and standard of living for the working class.

Gary Doer, a rank-and-file worker, is a past president of the powerful Manitoba Government Employees Union.

Americans should seek to learn from Gary Doer about Canada's health care system and working people would do well to learn from Gary Doer what kind of political movement it takes to bring workers to power--- even if that power is only limited to political power at this stage of the class struggle within the capitalist economic system and does not yet include economic power.

For working people in the United States... the arrival of Canada's new Ambassador, Gary Doer, is much more important than the election of Barack Obama because Doer has demonstrated the ability to lead--- and win--- struggles against capitalist corporate power and imperialist domination.

Ironically, the American people, working people, now really do have a real representative in Washington D.C.--- even if he is from Canada... now, there is something to think about!

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Stalled agenda irks labor leaders; Unions see little action from Democrats in D.C.

This is a comment I made in response to the posting of this article which appeared in the Boston Globe.

This statement here, quoted in this article---below, needs to be emphasized over and over again; it should be put on blogs and websites and in leaflets and quoted in letters to the editor and posted on every single union bulletin board in this country:

“It’s beyond belief to me,’’ said Robert Haynes, president of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO. While Obama and Congress inherited “a big mess’’ from Bush, Haynes said, “there aren’t any excuses anymore. If you can’t deliver health care, and you can’t deliver jobs, and if you can’t deliver [card check legislation] , and you can’t figure out how to take care of the working people of this great city and country, you don’t deserve to stay in office.’’


Ok, sounds great; real militant... but, why hasn't anyone taken the next step and said to Obama and the Democrats:

If you don't deliver peace, real progressive health care reform, jobs at real living wages and card check; you will not be getting our votes?

This would be the very simple and common sense thing for anyone with the least little bit of organizing knowledge to bring forward because we all know that most people did not vote for Obama and the Democrats or for any of what they are presently doing--- all of which is against the interests of the working class, because Obama and the Democrats never articulated their agenda when seeking votes from working people which pretty much makes a mockery out of what is passing in this country for democracy.

Really, people were led to believe they would get one thing from Barack Obama and the Democrats and all they have received is a kick in the ass.

Even the Progressive Democrats of America in their statement released today, conceded defeat on single-payer and the Kucinich amendment and then go on to say... we will be back in several years... how convenient; "several" just happens to be three; just in time for these "progressives" for Obama to drum up a campaign in support of Barack Obama for his second term.

Again, we need to ask: Why wouldn't Tim Carpenter and the Progressive Democrats of America declare: We are organizing for the next three years--- organizing to make sure not one single Democrat who betrayed us doesn't get a single progressive vote.

Why the hesitancy to organize people around the issue: In a democracy, people are entitled to get what they need for a better life in return for their votes--- no peace, no health care, no jobs, no card check... no vote.

And, on top of this, the AFL-CIO and other unions, just today "released"--- it was supposedly leaked from UAW Region 8--- a letter stating that they would be backing Obama by essentially giving in to him by trying to pass off anything Obama and the Democrats do as some kind of victory for labor.

Well, if you keep agreeing to whatever Obama and the Democrats dish out to you, you kind of have to call this a victory.

The AFL-CIO leadership obviously doesn't have the back-bone to stand up for its members who overwhelmingly insist that nothing less than single-payer is acceptable--- and most Americans want an expanded public health care sector. People are not stupid; they know that any government spending so much money on these dirty wars can cough-up with the funds for free health care for everyone.

Just stop the wars and spend the money on health care.

Why is it so hard for the leadership of the AFL-CIO to take a stand for peace and reordering this country's priorities... do they think their members will not support this kind of leadership, or what?

And the entire process of sucking up to the Democrats who are nothing but a bunch of dumb donkeys starts all over again beginning in 2010, leading up to 2012.

With this kind of "strategy" it is no surprise that labor is at such a low point organizationally... here they are talking about organizing un-organized workers and how the labor movement needs "warriors for justice" and these very "leaders" can't even come up with something so basic as telling Obama and the Democrats, "Either come through for us or forget our votes; we will organize our own party."

Furthermore, it is the epitome of arrogance for the Democrats to keep blaming everything on Bush and the Republicans because they either supported everything the Republicans did or at least refused to try to stop them... usually it was support.

There is only one solution to putting an end to all of this crap: grassroots/rank-and-file organizing around a progressive agenda aimed at getting people to with-hold their votes from these politicians unless they get something that will make their lives better.

Health care is a very important issue because it unites all working people and the left should jump all over this issue.

In fact, I don't understand why Michael Zweig and Bill Fletcher didn't take this tact when they had the opportunity on Bill Moyer's nationally syndicated PBS program.

We keep hearing these people say that they are going to lean on Obama and the Democrats... well, what more appropriate way to "lean" than to tell them they will not be getting the votes from progressives; and then proceed to organize to demonstrate that they mean business.

What other accountability is there if we don't wrest this accountability through our votes. Our votes were important when Obama and the Democrats needed them to be elected; don't we have the right to now use these very same votes to hold them accountable? If we don't have this right and aren't prepared to exercise this right, elections mean absolutely nothing.

Maybe Howard Zinn would care to comment?

These labor leaders are "irked;" working people are suffering and people, mostly working people, are dying.

Alan L. Maki
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Check out my blog:
http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/


Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 3:20 AM

Another comment on this article by someone else from a post on a list server:

(The real question is why should anyone be surprised? As – since 1948 - NO Democrat President has ever delivered on his campaign promises.

(What Dennis Kucinich says below is correct, except – as usual - he doesn't draw the necessary conclusions.)


Stalled agenda irks labor leaders
Unions see little action from Democrats in D.C.


http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/10/12/stalled_agenda_in_washington_irks_labor_leaders/

By Susan Milligan
The Boston Globe
October 12, 2009

WASHINGTON - With Democrats in control of Congress and the White House, organized labor had hoped to be celebrating a long list of legislative successes this year. Instead, labor’s agenda has been pushed down on the priority list by the very lawmakers they helped elect, leaving some union backers frustrated.

Labor is eager to win passage of a “card check’’ bill, a measure that would make it easier for workers to form unions, but the White House and Congress took up a Wall Street bailout plan first.

In the health care debate, labor is seeking to avoid a tax on expensive health care benefits. But President Obama, who slammed the idea during the campaign, this summer indicated he might be open to such an idea.

The Obama administration is also encouraging creation of some charter schools, a long-time concern of teachers’ unions, who fear money will be diverted from other public schools. And an increase in the minimum wage, which supporters pushed in the last Congress, when Republican George W. Bush was in the White House, hasn’t even been introduced in this Congress.

“It’s beyond belief to me,’’ said Robert Haynes, president of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO. While Obama and Congress inherited “a big mess’’ from Bush, Haynes said, “there aren’t any excuses anymore. If you can’t deliver health care, and you can’t deliver jobs, and if you can’t deliver [card check legislation] , and you can’t figure out how to take care of the working people of this great city and country, you don’t deserve to stay in office.’’


The poor economy and the attention demanded by such issues as health care, Afghanistan, climate change, and the pending closure of the Guantanamo Bay prison have put labor unions’ concerns far down on the list in Washington, analysts and lawmakers say.

Many labor union leaders say they still have faith that Obama will push for their legislative wish list, especially the so-called card check bill to allow workers to organize unions without a secret ballot, once he gets a health care bill signed. And while unions are anxious about provisions in the health care bill that might affect union members, leaders say the larger goal of getting closer to universal health care is most important.

The White House is reassuring. “We’ve been able to make tremendous progress on issues important to the labor community,’’ said White House spokesman Bill Burton. “We have a good partnership, and we’re going to continue to work hard on issues important to the labor community.’’

Still, some labor advocates within Congress are venting their frustration.

“Labor is the core of the Democratic party. Labor has always delivered for the Democratic party. But the Democratic party doesn’t always deliver for labor,’’ said Representative Dennis Kucinich, Democrat of Ohio. Obama “still has time,’’ Kucinich said, but he added that he thinks Democrats need to step up and help workers to merit the campaign help unions can provide.

Only a small portion - 12.4 percent - of the workforce is unionized, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Excluding public employment, the percentage is even lower; just 7.4 percent of private-sector workers belong to a union. Union organizing is especially tough during a recession, said Vanderbilt University labor specialist Dan Cornfield, since people are more focused on getting and keeping a job than on securing workplace organizing rights.

But despite their low numbers, unions still corral their members to provide Democrats with crucial election help: phone banks, canvassing, and get-out-the- vote drives.

Union-sponsored political action committees are still heavy campaign contributors. In the 2007-2008 election cycle, PACs representing labor unions doled out $66.4 million to federal candidates, with 92 percent of it going to Democrats. Less than a year into the 2010 election cycle, the PACs have given almost $16 million to federal candidates, with 93 percent going to elect Democrats.

White House aides say that Obama remains committed to passing the Employee Free Choice Act, the formal name for the card check bill, and note that the president signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act early in his tenure. That law makes it easier for employees to sue for pay discrimination for a longer period of time after the alleged violations occurred.

But the bill is languishing, as Democrats and White House negotiators focus on health care and financial regulatory legislation. Obama, while giving verbal support for the bill, is not putting political muscle behind it, at least for the moment.

“A lot of folks on the left . . . thought that it would be this complete revolution in American society, and things just don’t work that way,’’ said Glen Spencer, executive director of the workforce freedom initiative at the US Chamber of Commerce, which opposes the card-check bill.

“The president is looking at some very significant issues, the kinds of things that really shape a legacy. This bill would be very tough to do, may not be successful, and is only going to be seen for what it is: a payoff to this large interest group that put a lot of money into their campaigns.’’

National labor leaders want to take advantage of the rare political advantage of having such Democratic dominance in Washington. But they say they are willing to be patient.

“The administration has been dealt a really tough economic hand. They’re doing the best they can,’’ said Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers.

Anna Burger, secretary-treasurer of the Service Employees International Union, said the health care bill was also important to the union, and she understood that Obama needed to get it finished first. Other leaders said that Obama has put strong union advocates in key jobs at the Department of Labor.

“On balance, he’s been a very pro-labor president ,’’ said Chuck Loveless, director of legislation at the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. But if Obama and Congress do not deliver for labor, lawmakers may lose the campaign help they will need next year, when Democrats face serious electoral challenges, Kucinich and Spencer each said.

Representative Marcy Kaptur, Democrat of Ohio, acknowledged the labor strides Obama has made but said it was not yet enough. “The president could do much more to give visibility to the cause of working men and women in this country, and their plight,’’ Kaptur said.

© Copyright 2009 Globe Newspaper Company.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Enforcement of Affirmative Action: Missing from Obama's--- and the Democrat's--- Agenda

This letter to the editor appeared in northern Minnesota's leading daily newspaper, The Bemidji Pioneer, (published Sunday, October 11, 2009) containing this introductory title which says it all:

"County governments employ few American Indians"

http://www.bemidjipioneer.com/event/article/id/100012354/


The "Letter to the Editor" is then published...

At election time all the politicians come looking for native American votes and our money — dollars derived from Indian gaming revenues. The real story of what these politicians are doing for Indian people is told in the employment statistics of local county governments:

Beltrami County:.. 16 native Anishinabe out of a workforce of between 385-400 employees

Cass County ... six native Anishinabe out of a workforce of 300 employees

Itasca County … one native Anishinabe out of a workforce of between 380-400 employees

Hubbard County ... Unknown native Anishinabe out of a workforce of 195 employees

Crow Wing County ... one native Anishinabe of a workforce of 489 employees

Our counties receive tremendous resources from the state and federal governments not to mention local tax revenues paid by Indian people, too.

How can anyone claim that affirmative action guidelines are being adhered to when we find this kind of racism in hiring practices at the county level of government?

Is there any wonder unemployment on Indian reservations is over 50 percent and poverty is all pervasive?

Is there any doubt that the disgraceful and deplorable conditions of poverty among native Americans is not the result of an official government policy of institutionalized racism permeating the highest to lowest levels of government?

How can we expect that affirmative action in hiring policies will be enforced on all these huge construction jobs now receiving billions of dollars in “stimulus funds” if no one has monitored and enforced affirmative action guidelines at the county government level where employment practices are easiest to control?

Obviously, this situation results because we have not one single native American sitting in the Minnesota state Legislature demanding accountability from any level of government and none of those making the claims they are looking out for our rights are doing anything.

Fewer than 30 native Americans are employed out of over 1,500 workers employed in the five county governments comprising Senate District 4; how does the present senator explain this?

This situation is a disgrace; just like the poverty which institutionalized racism in hiring practices breeds.

Gregory W. Paquin

Bemidji



Note: Gregory Paquin is the head of Native American Labor Union #12 and is a Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party (MNDFL) candidate for Minnesota State Senate District #4 a seat currently held by Democrat Mary Olson whose campaign manager is John McCarthy, the head of the Minnesota Indian Gaming Association.

I would add to this "letter to the editor" that Barack Obama and those supporting him have not done one single thing to see to it that long-standing affirmative action policies in place since the days of President Lyndon Johnson are being enforced.

Greg Paquin is right: Failure to enforce affirmative action in hiring only breeds greater poverty and the figure he has cited from an area in the United States with one of the largest Native American populations drives home this point.

Which begs the question:

Why aren't all these liberals, progressives, those on the left and the "leaders" of organized labor like Richard Trumka who supported Barack Obama and who roared that it was racism which threatened the election of Barack Obama, now stepping up to the plate and demanding stringent enforcement of Affirmative Action policies and guidelines already in place at every level of government as trillions of dollars in "stimulus funds" under the "American Recovery and Investment Act" now being dispersed?

Since these jobs being created will soon disappear along with the funds almost as quickly as they are dispersed; what is required is an immediate response to this problem... no doubt this community of left-wing intellectuals and university professors supporting Obama will call for an "investigation" years from now to find out how it happened that so much money could have been spent without the required oversight needed to assure that communities of people of color hardest hit and stricken by poverty were "overlooked" as trillions of "stimulus fund" dollars were spent.

In fact, if the billions of dollars being allocated for road repairs finding its way into the coffers of private corporations and contractors in the form of profits were instead ear-marked for poverty elimination through meaningful long-term employment initiatives on Indian Reservations like the Red Lake Nation, Leech Lake and White Earth Indian Reservations, poverty could practically be eliminated or at least brought "down to" and in line with the poverty, as disgraceful as this is, of the general population of this country.

Even the new head of the Minnesota AFL-CIO, Shar Knutson, has remained shamefully silent concerning institutionalized racism and its role in maintaining and expanding poverty in Minnesota.

Noted civil rights activist, Julian Bond, speaking on Minnesota Public Radio, fully knowledgeable of the deplorable poverty on Indian Reservations not once mentioned the role of institutionalized racism in perpetuating the most horrendous conditions of poverty being intentionally maintained by governments at every level who are refusing to enforce affirmative action guidelines.

Of course, the Minnesota Indian Gaming Association does not want to see Native Americans sitting in the Minnesota State legislature because they are aware that the first question that will be asked is:

Why are workers being paid poverty wages for working in smoke-filled casinos without any rights under state or federal labor laws?

Democrats who created these "Compacts" which gave birth to the Indian Gaming Industry are now looking to get their fingers on casino revenues as a quick-fix to Minnesota's, and other state's, deep financial problems exacerbated by this capitalist economic crisis made worse by billions of dollars of debt... and a situation made even more severe by government squandering our resources on wars and militarism.

A recent posting to a Democratic Party controlled list serve by, Marc Asch, a wealthy businessman prominent in Democratic Party circles in Minnesota calling for re-opening these "Compacts" so the state could get some of the revenues along with the mobsters who own the slot machines, declared:

From: Marc Asch

Subject: Re: press conference from legislators

To: mn-politics@forums.e-democracy.org

Date: Monday, October 5, 2009, 2:21 PM


Lee (Surma) wrote:
> Bcause the Indian Gaming Lobby and the Democrat party
> have reached nirvana and have become one in the same. If
> we taxed Indian Gaming like other states do,
Lee continues his practice of creating alternate realities.

Indian Gaming is controlled by a compact negotiated and signed by two
Minnesota Governors. The original compact was negotiated and signed by
Gov. Perpich (DFL). It was replaced by a later compact expanding the
type of gambling permitted negotiated and signed by Gov. Carlson (R.)

Governors of both parties are responsible for where we now are in our
ability to extract revenue from Indian Gaming. Certainly both signed
bad deals for the people, citizens and workers of MN. They not only
failed to extract reasonable payments in exchange for permitting Indian
gaming but they left workers without adequate workplace protections and
injured customers without access to fair and unbiased legal protection.

The how and why of two MN Governors getting it so wrong is a fascinating
story that I have never any solid reporting on the the press or in book
form.

Our failures in this area have been curiously bipartisan.

--
Marc Asch marc@asch.org
34 North Oaks Road 651-484-9037
North Oaks, MN 55127

"Democracy is not a spectator sport."
Craig S. Wilson

Marc Asch


Noticeably, Marc Asch and the Democrats who in fact created this problem no matter how feebly Mr. Asch tries to portray this as a "bi-partisan" creation, are now looking to get their fingers into gaming revenues and profits only after they have no other place to look to come up with funds to solve the state's budget problems... although, this group of extremely wealthy business people led by Mr. Asch now controlling the Democratic Party in Minnesota which is led by their hand-picked leader, Brian Melendez--- a wealthy corporate attorney and backer of Barack Obama, have refused to consider they should perhaps levy a tax on their own obscene incomes lest Minnesota's historically progressive electorate starts calling for a tax on the wealthy to solve the problems created by this financial and economic crisis.

That Mr. Asch and his wealthy band of Democrats known as the "Summit Hill Club" and organized through the St. Paul Chamber of Commerce and the Minnesota Democratic Party's "Business Caucus," also profit from a working class divided when affirmative action guidelines are ignored and not enforced says something about how concerned Mr. Asch really is about the rights and the plight of casino workers... Native American workers form the base of the casino industry's workforce.

Poverty can run rampant in creating a living hell for Native Americans forced onto reservations; but, let the state slide into bankruptcy and these Democrats now want to call attention to the plight of casino workers as their excuse to re-open these "Compacts" which should have protected the rights of casino workers and extracted revenues for the state right from the very beginning of these "Compacts" being created... these Draconian "Compacts" are part of the racist and anti-labor legacy of the Humphrey family's dominance over Minnesota politics for so many years.

Mr. Asch and the Democrats have an interesting party line as they seek to protect their own wealth from being taxed; but, casino workers know that their rights and their plight will be ignored in Minnesota by Democrats just like the labor-backed Democrats led by Jennifer Granholm in Michigan ignored the rights and the plight of casino workers as they extracted some of the casino revenues for the state through opening these "Compacts."

A lot of people, most notably those suffering from poverty, are waiting to hear from Mr. Marc Asch and the dozen or so of the Democrats now vying to become the next Governor of Minnesota, what they intend to do right now in seeing to it that affirmative action guidelines are strictly enforced by government agencies like the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) and the Minnesota Department of Human Rights.

Minnesotans know they can't rely of lame-duck and discredited Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty who is now seeking the Republican nomination for President in 2012 as a way to escape the mess he has left Minnesota in to do anything of benefit for working people, much less enforce affirmative action guidelines.

Minnesota Democrats, including all but one of the dozen, now running for governor, were all involved in killing legislation aimed at saving the jobs of two-thousand Ford workers employed at the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant slated for closure and legislation known as "The Minnesota People's Bailout." Tom Rukavina,the long-serving state representative from Minnesota's Iron Range, who makes no bones about being from the historically liberal and progressive "Farmer-Labor wing of the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party" is the lone voice for labor running out of this large field of candidates, and from all appearances it looks like the Democrat's "Business Caucus" is already ganging up on Rukavina, trying to eliminate him from the field of candidates as the mainstream media mocks his efforts.

Rukavina's only hope for success will be determined by how effectively he can link his campaign to the grassroots and rank and file progressives in Minnesota who are active around peace and for enforcement of affirmative action and social and economic justice issues; since the same top echelons in the labor movement who have ignored, chided and ridiculed the "warriors for justice" are mocking and ignoring Rukavina's campaign.

As Richard Trumka and his staff claim they are looking for "warriors for justice," Native Americans in Minnesota are wondering why their plight and the poverty they are forced to endure at levels far exceeding the "average" were not addressed at a recent Political Action Conference sponsored by the Minnesota AFL-CIO and a number of Native American activists have already called upon Shar Knudson and Brad Lehto to explain how this happened with all the talk people heard coming from Richard Trumka that racism needed to be vigorously combated.

Of course, Sam Webb and the People's Weekly World trumpeted similar remarks... and just as similarly all questions of enforcement of affirmative action--- a most important key link in the struggle against racism--- are being ignored.

Is not this story now unfolding in Minnesota grist for the People's Weekly World?

Over the years working people have been able to count on the Communist Party U.S.A. and its publications to lead the way, and often blaze new ground and new paths, in the struggle against racism... today, one can't help but ask why there is such a deafening silence from its leadership and publications when it comes to insisting that Barack Obama and the Democrats monitor and enforce affirmative action guidelines for hiring minorities especially when millions, billions and even trillions of tax-dollars are being spent under the guise of "economic stimulus" which appears to be passing by the poverty plagued Indian Reservations in Minnesota and elsewhere in this country except for a very few short-term, poverty wage jobs.

When I recently very publicly inquired how many Native Americans had been directly hired into programs receiving these "stimulus funds," Brian Melendez, the Chair of the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party issued an "order" instructing Minnesota's Democratic elected public officials not to provide me with this information because the information they supplied would be used to "embarrass" them.

What could, or should, be a bigger embarrassment to Democrats claiming the mantle of "progressivism" than their failure to insist that affirmative action guidelines in how our tax-dollars are being spent, should be enforced?

Someone did get some of the facts, and, as we can see, these facts definitely are a major embarrassment... something one would think the United States Department of Justice would be investigating... but, then again, the regional head of the U.S. Department of Justice, Ken Bergeron, boasts that he is a personal friend... of guess who? President Barack Obama.

The entire government of this country is nothing but a web constructed by Wall Street parasites held together by all forms of racism and bigotry--- especially institutionalized racism--- and its twin evil, corruption; Barack Obama has not lifted a finger to turn this situation around--- quite to the contrary, Obama has signaled, by his lack of voice and his intentional inaction in calling for strict enforcement of affirmative action; Obama has given a green light that this pernicious web of exploitation be strengthened rather than torn to smithereens as is required.

Affirmative action must be seen as an important weapon in combating the racist induced poverty in this country, and it is a weapon one would expect any liberal, progressive or those on the left to insist that Barack Obama should wield with enthusiasm; this "club" in the form of affirmative action should be used in smashing racist injustice and the poverty racism breeds.

Alan L. Maki

http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/

Friday, October 9, 2009

Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize








I published my response to Barack Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize on The Huffington Post:

Ironically, the most hypocritical statement (which most likely quite by accident is also the truth) I have ever heard from an American politician, comes from Mr. Steele, the head of the Republican Party, who has probably given us valuable insight into how the 2010 and 2012 elections will proceed and shape-up when he states this so very obvious, basic, elemental and fundamental political truth in asking this question:

"The real question Americans are asking is, What has President Obama actually accomplished?"


Are Democrats and Obama actually so stupid that they do not see what most people see; or, are they just so much a part of this rotten and corrupt capitalist system that they are just playing their assigned role by their Wall Street masters in stringing the American people along in playing a game that they are not even aware they are a part of?

That a warmonger like Barack Obama was actually nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, let alone receiving it, even though he couldn't deliver the Olympics to Chicago, is like we are living inside of a freakish, bizarre Gore Vidal novel... no doubt Barack Obama "winning" the Nobel Peace Prize has provided Gore Vidal the motivation, impetus and material for his next, and final, novel.

We should tell Barack Obama to cherish his Nobel Peace Prize; but, unless these dirty imperialist wars for oil actually end--- he can forget about taking home our votes.

Alan L. Maki

58891 County Road 13

Warroad, Minnesota 56763

Phone: 218-386-2432

Cell phone: 651-587-5541

E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net



Check out my blog:

Thoughts From Podunk

http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/

Thursday, October 8, 2009

America Needs Warriors for Justice

Below is the posting of Stewart Acuff who heads up the National Organizing Department of the AFL-CIO which he posted on The Huffington Post on October 2, 2009.

Following Mr. Acuff's post are my comments which Mr. Acuff has not responded to.

On one thing stated by Stewart Acuff I whole-heartedly agree:

America is ready for change.

I could have asked:

Why doesn't the AFL-CIO put "warriors for justice" on its staff as organizers?

Why does the AFL-CIO merely criticize one aspect of capitalism which it knows can not be changed or reformed rather than join the movements and struggles of the rest of the working people around the world for socialism--- the only socially just economic system?

Why did the AFL-CIO pump millions of dollars into Barack Obama's campaign for the presidency rather than spending all that money helping to create a real party for working people like they have in Canada in the New Democratic Party?

Why doesn't the AFL-CIO support a real living wage for every single worker employed in the United States of America (and notice I say every single worker in America rather than every single American worker) based upon real cost of living factors determined by the scientific calculations of the United States Department of Labor and its Bureau of Labor Statistics?

Mr. Acuff then goes on to ask the grand-daddy of questions of all questions:

Why then is change so hard to achieve?


The answer is rather simple:

Because the AFL-CIO allows the corporations to educate and indoctrinate working people with capitalist ideas instead of the AFL-CIO conducting the needed socialist education of working people.


The AFL-CIO will get its "Warriors for Justice" when it begins to properly educate working people as to the real nature of capitalism and the need for socialism and begins a discussion in earnest based upon the real politics and economics of livelihood.

And it just might help if Stewart Acuff was not so arrogant that he feels he does not have to respond to the questions and ideas posed when he makes a posting to The Huffington Post.

If Mr. Acuff understands anything about what working people in this country want he would understand that the questions and concerns that I am raising are the questions and concerns shared by most working people in the United States.

What I find most noticeably absent from Mr. Acuff's blog posting citing the need for "Warriors for Justice" is that he omits any mention of the fact that affirmative action in hiring guidelines are not being enforced by Barack Obama and the Democrats as trillions of tax-payer dollars are being dished out for massive projects which creates one of the greatest injustices in America as communities of people of color from urban inner cities to Indian Reservations are being intentionally plunged into worse poverty and despair than what has ever existed in the past as unemployment rates on Indian Reservations soar over 70% when multi-billion dollar construction projects on public buildings is taking place without the enforcement of the governments' own affirmative action guidelines within a stones throw... if Mr. Acuff needs a specific example I would cite the Bemidji Regional Events Center here in Minnesota and I would be happy to take Mr. Acuff and the leadership of the AFL-CIO on a tour across this country where trillions of dollars are being spent from the funds allocated under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act... funds, which in the first place should be allocated in a way that serve to end the extreme poverty being experienced by those living on Indian Reservations and other communities primarily inhabited by people of color where politicians are fully aware of the extreme poverty and most despicable living conditions in the richest country in the world.

I hope that Mr. Acuff's thoughts along with my voiced concerns and questions will give working class families something to think about around the dinner table and in the mines, mills, factories and other workplaces across this country, in community centers and classrooms or as friends gather in living rooms over a game of Scrabble or Cribbage or in peace vigils and demonstrations or on the picket lines or at labor union conventions.

Yes, America needs many "Warriors for Justice"... in the tradition of Eugene V. Debs, Mother Bloor, William Z. Foster, James W. Ford, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, Gus Hall, Phil Raymond...

Yours in the Struggle,

Alan L. Maki
A working class warrior for justice


America Needs Warriors for Justice

It is beyond doubt that we are living in a period of potentially great historical change in the United States.

Just a year ago we trade unionists, progressives, and Americans of good will made history with the election of an African-American President--something many of us never thought possible -- and large majorities of pro-working family Democrats in both Houses of Congress.

With the implosion of our financial services sector and the consequent economic crisis and recession, it has become abundantly clear that unregulated, unfettered free market capitalism doesn't work for anyone. We now have irrefutable proof that greed is not good, that the markets don't by themselves work for the common good in the nation's interest, that if all the money and resources go to the top, the middle and the bottom are starved. And speaking of the middle, we now know that the middle class is in peril -- endangered by the policies of free market economics -- unfettered corporate-driven globalization, illegal and immoral union busting, contracting out, working rat, privatization, benefit busting, wage thievery -- all the policies that have made up the 30 year assault on working families and unions. While some may have doubted these truths two or four or more years ago, these truths are beyond doubt today.

Those who once held themselves up to be leaders of our society and government are now scorned -- Wall St, Bush, Cheney, AIG. The recipients of the governments bailouts continue to shovel obscene amounts of our money to executives without a clue while we suffer 10 percent unemployment, continued loss of health care, and declining wages and a consequent declining standard of living, and a potentially frightening future for our kids and grandkids and beyond.

Most importantly, our people are ready for and even demanding change. By significant majorities, Americans want a public healthcare plan included in the larger health care reform package, and Americans want the Employee Free Choice Act to be passed to once again allow American workers to freely form unions and bargain collectively.

America is ready for change.

Why then is change so hard to achieve?

Those who've prosecuted and benefited from the 30 year financial assault on America's working families refuse to let go, to give up what they've come to see as theirs -- the insurance companies, the union busters, the ABC, the Comcasts, the Walmarts, Wall St and manipulators of our finances, the Radical Rightwing including Cheney and Rush Limbaugh and Karl Rove and Dick Armey and the Heritage Foundation and Cato Institute.

It is clear that if we are to win the change we voted for last fall and many of us have worked for for years, we are gonna have to fight, fight hard, and fight outside the normal Washington lobbying box.

Washington politics and lobbying does not work for workers and working families.

We cannot forget that we've gotten to the verge of passing the Employee Free Choice Act by running the largest national grassroots legislative campaign in the history of the American labor movement. Over the six year course of this campaign we've put literally hundreds of thousands of people on the street and more than a million workers in motion. We delivered one and a half million signatures to the Congress, sent half a million emails, wrote 300,000 handwritten letters and made 200,000 phone calls to Senators.

That's a ton of good work. But it is more than clear that we have to do more of it.

While the Employee Free Choice Act has not yet passed, we have realized many benefits -- more than a dozen states have passed new public employee collective bargaining laws including majority authorization. Public officials from town and county commissions to city councils to state assemblies to governors and mayors to the Congress to the President of the United States now realize what hell workers go through when they try to organize and bargain for a better life. More public officials than ever have weighed in to support workers trying to organize.

We have got to ramp up our grassroots lobbying by our members.

But just as importantly, we have to ramp up our effort to engage and organize workers who don't have a union, to make use of the progress and allies we've made and enlist unorganized workers in the struggle to organize their workplaces and to fight and struggle in the public policy fight to pass the Employee Free Choice Act. Every organizing campaign is a direct and clear reason to pass the Employee Free Choice Act.

It is not enough to wait for the Employee Free Choice Act to pass. We have to demonstrate its necessity with struggle--old fashioned struggle right now, today not tomorrow. And by their actions, unorganized workers have to demonstrate the necessity for the passage of the Employee Free Choice Act.

It is not enough to wait on the law to change.

History is not made and humanity is not advanced by those who accept the status quo. History is made and the human condition is advanced by warriors willing to struggle for a better life for their kids and grandkids, warriors who understand what they have was won by the blood and tears and sacrifice of our forebears.

America today needs warriors -- warriors to organize and struggle, to fight for change, to fight the Radical Right and corporate domination, to organize and struggle, to dare the rat bastards to stop us, to refuse to lose, to challenge the status quo, to tell those who've run our country and too many lives into the ditch that change is now, that we will fight in Washington but that we will also fight all across America.

The future is ours. Let's take it.


My two responses as posted on The Huffington Post:


Your insinuation that we have a Congress composed of those sympathetic to working people demonstrates just how out of touch you are with reality.

Congress is dominated over by Wall Street's coupon clippers and Barack Obama is anything but progressive.

You talk about organizing the unorganized yet the AFL-CIO has sat in silence as over two-million American workers are forced to work in the Indian Gaming Industry's smoke-filled casinos at poverty wages without any rights under state or federal labor laws as the direct result of your Democratic Party partners creating the "Compacts" which brought this despicable casino industry into existence without one iota of concern or respect for the human rights of the working people who you knew would be employed in this industry just so the Democratic Party could reap huge political contributions from the mobsters controlling these casino operations.

The AFL-CIO has a back-bone about as stiff as a wet noodle; organize a political party like workers have in the New Democratic Party in Canada... a party for socialism not afraid to stand up for the rights of working people.

No mention of the need to enforce state and federal affirmative action guidelines in hiring policies when it comes to billions of dollars spent through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act projects leaving people of color and women in a lurch having to fend off poverty and discrimination by themselves.


Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council






I was hoping others might comment on other aspects of Stewart Acuff's self-serving, hypocritical drivel about "we need Warriors for Justice."

First of all, there is not one single mention here of single-payer universal health care... by far the most popular health care reform proposal supported by working people who as "Warriors for Justice" have taken up this struggle by bringing the struggle for single-payer universal health care directly from the mines, mills, factories and working class communities where they work and live right onto the floor of the national AFL-CIO convention where Mr. Acuff did not even support their resolution... and the resolution passed in spite of opposition from the "leaders" of the AFL-CIO who did not want to embarrass President Barack Obama who has become an insurance salesman rather than the advocate for the needs of working people as Mr. Acuff and those at the helm of the AFL-CIO claim him to be.

Why hasn't the AFL-CIO divested all of its investments--- including the union health care plans and pension funds--- from the health insurance companies?

Why hasn't the leadership of the AFL-CIO "led" the way by becoming, themselves, "Warriors for Justice" on this and so many other fronts... including the fight for peace and the reordering of this country's priorities away from war and military spending?

Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Leading figure in Democratic Party brings to light the abuse of casino workers in the Indian Gaming Industry

-----Original Message-----

From: Alan Maki [mailto:amaki000@centurytel.net]

Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:06 AM

To: 'marc@asch.org'

Cc: 'Jim Hart'; 'shove001@tc.umn.edu'; 'Gordon, Cam A.'; 'farheen@farheenhakeem.org'; 'info@jamesmayer.org'; 'rep.al.juhnke@house.mn'; 'rep.bill.hilty@house.mn'; 'rep.brita.sailer@house.mn'; 'rep.carolyn.laine@house.mn'; 'rep.dave.olin@house.mn'; 'rep.maryellen.otremba@house.mn'; 'rep.tom.anzelc@house.mn'; 'rep.tom.Rukavina@house.mn'; 'rep.tony.sertich@house.mn'; 'Carl Levin'; 'Sen.Jim Carlson'; 'sen.mary.olson@senate.mn'; 'sen.david.tomassoni@senate.mn'; 'john mccarthy'; 'brian.melendez@usa.net'; 'charleyunderwood@hotmail.com'; 'Alan Uhl'; 'ddepass@startribune.com'; 'Randy Furst'; 'bswenson@bemidjipioneer.com'; 'mmiron@bemidjipioneer.com'; 'laurel1@dailyjournal-ifalls.com'; 'Working_Class_Study_and_Action@yahoogroups.com'; 'mzweig@notes.cc.sunysb.edu'; 'joel@joelclemmer.org'; 'amistad.nai@rcn.com'

Subject: For once you, a Democrat, have mentioned workers rights denied in the Indian Gaming Industry...

Mr. Asch,

Thank you!!!!!!!!

Now the question is:

What steps will the Democratic Party take to resolve this problem of worker’s rights… or, are you bringing in the issue of worker’s rights only as leverage for Democrats to re-open these disgraceful, unjust “Compacts” in an attempt by Democrats to raise much needed revenue?

I would note that in Michigan Democrats have successfully gotten a very small chunk of change by re-negotiating some of the “Compacts” but they have all but forgotten the rights of casino workers forced to work in these smoke-filled casinos for poverty wages without any rights under state or federal labor laws.

Mr. Asch, I hope it is not your and the Democrats intent to use worker’s rights as a bargaining chip to simply extract some funds from these casinos to pay down Minnesota’s enormous debts to the bankers and then conveniently ignore the plight of casino workers as you and the Democrats have done for so many years. Of course, when it comes to worker’s rights there is no need to speak of the Republicans; because, with the exception of honest Abe Lincoln and the Republican Vito Marcantonio, they have never been concerned about the plight of working people.

Again, thank you Mr. Asch for helping to raise awareness concerning the plight of casino workers employed in the Indian Gaming Industry in Minnesota.

Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council


From: Marc Asch
Subject: Re: [Minnesota] Viking stadium-10 am press conference from legislator
To: mn-politics@forums.e-democracy.org
Date: Monday, October 5, 2009, 2:21 PM


Lee wrote:
> Bcause the Indian Gaming Lobby and the Democrat party
> have reached nirvana and have become one in the same. If
> we taxed Indian Gaming like other states do,
Lee continues his practice of creating alternate realities.

Indian Gaming is controlled by a compact negotiated and signed by two
Minnesota Governors. The original compact was negotiated and signed by
Gov. Perpich (DFL). It was replaced by a later compact expanding the
type of gambling permitted negotiated and signed by Gov. Carlson (R.)

Governors of both parties are responsible for where we now are in our
ability to extract revenue from Indian Gaming. Certainly both signed
bad deals for the people, citizens and workers of MN. They not only
failed to extract reasonable payments in exchange for permitting Indian
gaming but they left workers without adequate workplace protections and
injured customers without access to fair and unbiased legal protection.

The how and why of two MN Governors getting it so wrong is a fascinating
story that I have never any solid reporting on the the press or in book
form.

Our failures in this area have been curiously bipartisan.


--
Marc Asch marc@asch.org
34 North Oaks Road 651-484-9037
North Oaks, MN 55127

"Democracy is not a spectator sport."
Craig S. Wilson


Marc Asch



Alan L. Maki
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell phone: 651-587-5541
E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net

Check out my blog:

Thoughts From Podunk

http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/

The key to health care reform

Barack Obama's misfortune in the polls has turned into our possible good fortune... we now have something to bargain with Barack Obama and the Democrats in exchange for health care reform: our votes.

Our country is embroiled in controversy and debate over health care reform. Focus on the purpose of health care has been lost. Health care has two purposes:

1. Keep people healthy.

2. Get people well when sick.

Barack Obama and the Democrats have killed single-payer universal health care which was by far the most popular alternative. Now they are confusing the issue with talk about a "public option" when the only real "public option" is something like VA or the Indian Health Service; both of which could be combined and expanded to include everyone under a Public Health Service.

Obama and the Democrats have confused the issue even further by now veering from discussing legislation for health care reform by derailing this discussion and diverting the discussion to "health insurance reform."

Our public officials squander our limited and scarce resources--- during a period of a crumbling capitalist economy--- financing wars in three countries; subsidizing the Israeli military machine; and spending trillions of dollars financing 800 U.S. military bases on foreign soil dotting the globe; and then they tell us there is no money for health care. Instead, we should be building 800 public health care centers stretching out across the United States providing a public health care system which includes:

• No-fees/No premiums

• Comprehensive (cradle to grave)

• All-inclusive (general, dental, eyes, physical therapy, prescription drugs)

• Universal (everybody in; nobody out)

• Publicly funded

• Publicly administered

• Publicly delivered

The United States is the wealthiest country in the world.

We can afford to provide a first-rate, world-class, free public health care system for our own people--- if we get our priorities straight.

We need health care reform based upon: Everybody in; all the profiteers out.Health care is supposed to be about people, a human right; not about profits.

We must not let Barack Obama and the Democrats do with health care reform what Bill Clinton did with welfare reform.

There are those that confuse what needs to be done by suggesting that some kind of massive grassroots coalition brought Barack Obama to power when the fact is that what brought Barack Obama to power was no organized coalition seeking anything; just plain old resentment and disgust with a thoroughly corrupt, warmongering Republican Party--- and the Democratic Party has proven to be no better.

There are those who want to turn the need for real progressive health care reform into nothing but a struggle to save Barack Obama's worthless political butt.

We need to begin discussions about creating a real all people's united front to win real progressive health care reform before Barack Obama gives us the shaft and sticks us with mandatory health insurance that is no better than the high-priced automobile or home-owners insurance which are good until needed.

Some people pawned Barack Obama off on us as a progressive when all we got was an insurance salesman.

Our initiatives for real progressive health care reform as articulated above require that we inform Barack Obama and the Democrats that they will not be receiving our votes in 2010 or 2012 unless real progressive health care reform legislation is enacted.

No health care reform; no votes... it really is as simple as that.


Alan L. Maki
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432


Check out my blog:


http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/

Sunday, October 4, 2009

Health care: The facts begin to trickle in

Health insurance bills could be hardship for many

By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, Associated Press Writer Ricardo Alonso-zaldivar, Associated Press Writer – Sun Oct 4, 2009

Link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091004/ap_on_go_co/us_health_care_affordability

WASHINGTON – Many middle-class Americans would still struggle to pay for health insurance despite efforts by President Barack Obama and Democrats to make coverage more affordable.

The legislation advancing in Congress would require all Americans to get insurance — through an employer, a government program or by buying it themselves. But new tax credits to help with premiums won't go far enough for everyone. Some middle-class families purchasing their own coverage through new insurance exchanges could find it out of reach.

Lawmakers recognize the problem.

"For some people it's going to be a heavy lift," said Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del. "We're doing our best to make sure it's not an impossible lift."

Added Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine: "We have no certainty as to whether or not these plans are going to be affordable." Both are on the Senate Finance Committee, which finished writing a health care bill on Friday.

A new online tool from the Kaiser Family Foundation illustrates the predicament.

The Health Reform Subsidy Calculator provides ballpark estimates of what households of varying incomes and ages would pay under the different Democratic health care bills. The legislation is still a work in progress and the calculator only a rough guide. Nonetheless, the results are revealing.

A family of four headed by a 45-year-old making $63,000 a year is in the middle of the middle class. But that family would pay $7,110 to buy its own health insurance under the plan from the committee chairman, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont.

The family would get a tax credit of $3,970 to help pay for a policy worth $11,080. But the balance due — $7,110 — is real money. Maybe it's less than the rent, but it's probably more than a car loan payment.

Kaiser's calculator doesn't take into account co-payments and deductibles that could add hundreds of dollars, even several thousand, to a family's total medical expenses. A Congressional Budget Office analysis estimates total expenses could average 20 percent of income for some families by 2016.

The issue of affordability "has been lurking in the background and is nowhere near resolved yet," said Kaiser's president, Drew Altman. "It's tricky because it doesn't take a lot of people to make affordability a political problem. It just takes some very visible and understandable cases."

At the root of the concerns is the push to cut the overall cost of health care overhaul legislation. Congress is trimming the budget for subsidies to meet Obama's target of $900 billion over 10 years — as the Baucus plan does. It means premiums will be higher than under earlier Democratic proposals.

The trade-off directly affects people who buy their own coverage. For those with job-based insurance, employers would continue to cover most of the costs.

Most of the uninsured are in households headed by someone who's self-employed or works at a business that doesn't provide coverage. It's this group that Democrats are trying to help.

Because health insurance is so expensive, lawmakers recognize that if they're going to pass a law requiring all Americans to get coverage, government has to defray the cost. The size of those subsidies makes an enormous difference.

Under the Baucus bill, a family of four making $63,000 would have to pay 11 percent of its income for health insurance, according to Kaiser. By comparison, an earlier bill from the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee with more generous subsidies required the same hypothetical family to pay about 7 percent of its income for premiums — a difference of about $2,500.

"This is not the loaves and the fishes — you can't just throw some subsidies out there and expect that will take care of everybody's needs," said Karen Pollitz, a Georgetown University professor who studies the insurance market for people buying their own coverage.

The legislation provides the most generous subsidies to those at or near the poverty line, about $22,000 for a family of four. That's where the problem is concentrated because about three-fourths of the uninsured are in households making less than twice the poverty level.

But as income rises, the subsidies taper off.

For a family of four making $45,000, federal subsidies would pick up 71 percent of the premium under the Baucus plan, according to the Kaiser calculator.

For a family with an income of $63,000, the subsidies would only cover 36 percent of the premium.

A family making $90,000 would get no help.

Pollitz said the subsidies disappear rapidly for households with solid middle-class incomes. That could be tricky for a self-employed individual who has a particularly good year financially.

Another problem is that people won't be able to get the insurance tax credits immediately after the bill passes. To hold down costs, the assistance won't come until 2013, after the next presidential election.

White House officials say that while Obama wants the cost of the final bill to stay manageable, it has to provide affordable coverage.

"The president is absolutely committed to making this affordable. That's the whole point," said Linda Douglass, spokeswoman for the White House health reform office.

Douglass said it's premature to draw any conclusions while the bill is being shaped in Congress. But House leaders are also cutting back their legislation to meet Obama's target.

Acknowledging the affordability problem, Baucus' committee voted Friday to exempt millions of people from the requirement to buy insurance and reduce penalties for those who fail to do so. But that would mean leaving at least 2 million more uninsured — not very satisfying to Democrats who started out with the goal of coverage for all.

"I think we've got to do something about it," said Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. "We've got to make sure health insurance is affordable for the middle class."

Thursday, September 3, 2009

The truth about Obama's HR 3200

An article from an Obama supporting newspaper blazed the headline:

Missouri state capital rallies for health care reform


But, the picture accompanying the story told the real truth:



Yes, Obama is talking about "health insurance reform;" not health care reform...

There is a very big difference between "health insurance reform" and "health care reform."

So, why is Barack Obama trying to pass off his legislation as "health care reform" when anyone can readily see in looking at this photo and from reading HR 3200 that this legislation is all about "health insurance" not "health care."

Health insurance is not a requirement for receiving health care.

Lots of countries provide health care without selling people health insurance and the facts prove that the standard of health care without health insurance is far superior. Of course, insurance companies don't reap huge profits... the money, instead, goes where it is supposed to go; towards health care.

The entire Democratic Party apparatus is talking as if they are about to bring about HEALTH CARE REFORM...

Lies, lies, lies and more lies--- HR 3200 is not about health care reform.

Here is further proof:

Here is an email I received from a leader of the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party complaining about my "e-mail blasts:"

From: Kathleen Murphy

Subject: Re: More lies from the Democrats and Obama crowd

To: "Alan Maki"

Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009, 12:17 AM


I'd like to think I'm open minded. What I don't want to read from either side of the aisle is name calling and extremist positions -- such as the title of your email. I am a Democrat, and a DFLer, and a strong supporter of Obama and his healthcare INSURANCE reform. So your calling what we are trying to do to reform the over-profiteering insurance industry as lies, I don't want to be part of your string of communication. I don't have time for it.

As for an email blast, it's when you select a large number of recipients and "blast" a message. That's all, nothing techie.


There you have it "straight from the horses mouth" as they say.

Kathleen Murphy placed "insurance" in upper case "INSURANCE" to emphasize that I am not telling the truth about Barack Obama and the Democrats telling lies about what House Resolution 3200 is all about.

In fact, HR 3200 isn't really about a "reform" of the insurance industry either because as I have repeatedly stated a "reform" of anything is intended to make something BETTER.

I suppose one could argue that HR 3200 is a "reform" because it makes things "better"--- more profitable--- for the insurance industry...

However, I thought the purpose behind all of this was supposed to be to provide relief and help to the majority of the American people.

In fact, in Barack Obama's very own words he has stated that his initiatives will provide the insurance industry with greater profits. Obama's very own words.

We need to ask why all of Barack Obama's surrogates like the AFL-CIO's--- Richard Trumka, the United Steelworkers'--- Leo Gerard, the Campaign for America's Future's--- Robert Borosage, the Progressive Democrats of America's--- Tim Carpenter, the Progressive for Obama's--- Carl Davidson... why do all of these people keep referring to HR 3200 as "health care reform" when this is about "health insurance reform"?

I think I speak for the majority of the American people when I say: We want real health care reform.

Forcing the American people to purchase health insurance is not my idea of health care reform.

Question:

What is HR 3200?

Answer:

Barack Obama and a bunch of dumb donkeys are trying to sell us health insurance.



Just what one would expect from a flim-flam man and con-artist like Barack Obama--- he turns out to be an insurance salesman... and who could be more unethical than a used car salesman? An insurance salesman. And here I thought most insurance salesmen were Republicans.

There really is a very big difference between "health insurance reform" and "health care reform."

Isn't it time to give these dumb donkeys a dictionary instead of your vote?

Tell Barack Obama and these dumb donkeys: No health care reform; no votes.

With Barack Obama's popularity on the skids to oblivion in the polls and important Congressional elections just fourteen months away, we have a chance to get something for our votes if we stick together and insist on real health care reform.

What we need is 800 public health care centers providing free public health care for the American people not three wars and 800 U.S. foreign military bases dotting the globe.

We might as well be throwing all this money being squandered on wars out into Lake Superior... at least we wouldn't be killing and maiming people in unjust, illegal and unconstitutional wars... but, again, I think I speak for most Americans who would rather see our resources used on health care, not wars.

Any country that can afford to squander trillions upon trillions of dollars on war and militarism sure as heck can afford to provide free health care for its own people rather than trying to force them to buy health insurance from a bunch of profit-gouging crooks in the insurance business and then have the unmitigated gall to turn around and lie by calling this "health care reform."

Kathleen Murphy "doesn't have time" to listen to what Minnesotans have to say about health care reform... what if Minnesotans were to tell Kathleen Murphy "we don't have time to vote for your candidates?"

I hope with Barack Obama in free-fall in the polls, Kathleen Murphy and the Democrats make a little time to reconsider what 72% of the delegates to the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party's State Convention had to say about health care reform in passing a clearly worded resolution supporting single-payer universal health care... real health care reform... no one, not even Kathleen Murphy introduced a resolution for "health insurance reform."

We have a little issue involving democracy at play here.

And yes, there are a few special perks for doctors in HR 3200 like a $250 billion dollar increase for Medicare fees...

And, the multi-trillion dollar give away to the pharmaceutical industry.

How this benefits most Americans Barack Obama will have to explain.

Kill HR 3200... resuscitate single-payer universal health care and vastly expand public health care--- this is the only way to real health care reform.

Why should working people continue to give away our votes to a bunch of dumb donkeys just to get another insurance bill in the mail when we can't even afford the monthly mortgage and electric bills not to mention home and auto insurance and heating bills?

Something to think about around the dinner table.

Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council



If you want to contact Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party officials about Obama's and the Democrat's plan to force us all to buy health insurance, give these Party hacks a blast--- just "copy" and "paste" and give them a "blast." E-mail list provided courtesy of MN DFL Secretary Susan Rego--- keep in mind, these people like to hear from you and they like to hear from you often:

alanapetersen@hotmail.com, Anna@tinklenberg08.com, olseenfour@msn.com, Bethany_Snyder@franken.senate.gov, blake@oberstar.org, BOVINEMIDWIFE@aol.com, dweinlick@dfl.org, jaxter34@aol.com, jeanettemartimo@yahoo.com, rep.jeremy.kalin@house.mn, joanh2@charter.net, thomaskurhajetz@frontiernet.net, rjolsondjk@yahoo.com, christian.foust@gmail.com, travelwithcindy@aol.com, epitome76@hotmail.com, elmstrand@msn.com, georgland@aol.com, cj_woodcock@yahoo.com, jebruno@visi.com, sunborn@sunbornstables.com, kblomquist@sherbtel.net, starkmad@frontiernet.net, pamkling@hotmail.com, ryancredfield@hotmail.com, stevenkling@hotmail.com, dripdropplumbing@gmail.com, steven51fbe@mac.com, steven51fbe@mac.com, nordfam@izoom.net, kseww@aol.com, tomomara@edinarealty.com, inyansa_redwing@hotmail.com, fullergary57@gmail.com, irenea@whiteearth.com, nativepr@paulbunyan.net, riihiluoma@msn.com, lorit@whiteearth.com, lornal@whiteearth.com, lornal@whiteearth.com, mary.sam@millelacsband.com, peggy@wellstone.org, sallyfineday@hotmail.com, veronicasmith@fdlrez.com, alicejseuffert@yahoo.com, betsyo@visi.com, charrison1026@comcast.net, jnodes@eckberglammers.com, jennyloretha@yahoo.com, mkathleenmurphy@gmail.com, koskinen63@comcast.net, nicque.mabrey@gmail.com, sandy55305@comcast.net, susan.rego@embarqmail.com, tmtesky@hotmail.com, mburnspenn@hotmail.com

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Tobacco seen killing 6 million people next year

* Occupational exposure to secondhand smoke kills 200,000 workers every year.

The corrupt Democratic Party, working in cahoots with the Indian Gaming Industry, has forced over two-million casino workers to be exposed to second-hand smoke while working for poverty wages without any rights under state or federal labor laws.




Tobacco seen killing 6 million people next year

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090825/us_nm/us_cancer_tobacco

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Tobacco use will kill 6 million people next year from cancer, heart disease, emphysema and a range of other ills, global cancer experts said in a report issued on Tuesday.

The new Tobacco Atlas from the World Lung Foundation and the American Cancer Society estimates that tobacco use costs the global economy $500 billion a year in direct medical expenses, lost productivity and environmental harm.

"Tobacco's total economic costs reduce national wealth in terms of gross domestic product (GDP) by as much as 3.6 percent," the report reads.

"Tobacco accounts for one out of every 10 deaths worldwide and will claim 5.5 million lives this year alone," the report said. If current trends hold, by 2020, the number will grow to an estimated 7 million and top 8 million by 2030.

Last week the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on launched a tobacco center to oversee cigarettes and other related products, after winning the power to do so from Congress in June. On Tuesday it set up a committee of advisers to help guide it.

Over the past four decades, smoking rates have declined in rich countries like the United States, Britain and Japan while rising in much of the developing world, according to the nonprofit research and advocacy organizations.

Some other findings from the report, available at http://www.tobaccoatlas.org/:

* 1 billion men smoke -- 35 percent of men in rich countries and 50 percent of men in developing countries.

* About 250 million women smoke daily -- 22 percent of women in developed countries and 9 percent of women in developing countries.

* Smoking rates among women are either stable or increasing in several southern, central and eastern European countries.

* The risk of dying from lung cancer is more than 23 times higher for men who smoke than for nonsmokers and 13 times higher for women smokers.

* Tobacco kills one-third to one-half of those who smoke. Smokers die an average of 15 years earlier than nonsmokers.

* Nearly 60 percent of Chinese men smoke and China consumes more than 37 percent of the world's cigarettes.

* 50 million Chinese children, mostly boys, will die prematurely from tobacco-related diseases.

* Tobacco use will eventually kill 250 million of today's teenagers and children.

* Nearly one-quarter of young people who smoke tried their first cigarette before the age of 10.

* Occupational exposure to secondhand smoke kills 200,000 workers every year.

"One hundred million people were killed by tobacco in the 20th century. Unless effective measures are implemented to prevent young people from smoking and to help current smokers quit, tobacco will kill 1 billion people in the 21st century," the report predicts.

China by far leads the world in cigarette production followed by the United States, Russia and Japan.

Publicly traded cigarette makers include Altria Group Inc's Philip Morris unit, Reynolds American Inc's R.J. Reynolds Tobacco and Lorillard Inc's Lorillard Tobacco Co.

(Reporting by Maggie Fox, editing by Alan Elsner)

Friday, August 21, 2009

Why Is Barack Obama's Popularity in the Polls Dropping Like A Lead-filled Balloon?

The media is reporting:

Poll: Americans losing confidence in Obama

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090821/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_poll

WASHINGTON – A new poll says that Americans, concerned over the future of health care reform and anxious about the growing federal budget deficit, are losing faith in President Barack Obama.

The Washington Post-ABC News survey found that less that half of Americans — 49 percent — say they believe the president will make the right decisions for the country. That's down from 60 percent at the 100-day mark of the Obama presidency.

The poll published Friday says Obama's overall approval is 57 percent, 12 points lower than it was at its peak in April. Fifty-three percent disapprove of the way he's handling the budget deficit and his approval on health care continues to deteriorate.

The national survey was conducted Aug. 13-17 and has a sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points.


The fact of the matter is that Barack Obama was not elected because people supported him or his policies.

In fact, Barack Obama never articulated "what" his policies actually were while he was campaigning for the presidency; he mesmerized some with his promises of "hope" and "change."

In fact, Barack Obama won the election because people are fed up with the Republicans.

And, if the truth be told, not many people really believed Barack Obama would do things much differently than the Republicans... but, it is no longer a surprise to anyone that Barack Obama could be even worse than George Bush.

Barack Obama has turned out to be a warmonger like Lyndon Johnson, a liar like Richard Nixon, more crooked and corrupt than Bush and Cheney and a better actor than Ronald Reagan; to Wall Street's delight, Obama is not the dunce of a Gerald Ford.

And, now, when people are getting a good chance to see what kind of "change" Obama and the Democrats are really for with their health care fiasco, people want no part of Obama.

People went to the polls to vote in overwhelming numbers because they wanted an end to these dirty imperialist wars for oil and U.S. regional domination of the Middle East and what Obama and the Democrats are delivering is an expensive and long term occupation of the region through U.S. military force dictating to people how they will think, work, live and have their wealth and natural resources allocated in a way creating the largest profits for Wall Street coupon clippers.

In the area of health care, if a poll was to be taken which included expanding VA, the Indian Health Service and the National Public /health Service to include everyone on the same no-fee/no-premium basis upon which these programs--- when fully funded--- are intended to operate there is no question the majority of the American people would choose this route of socialized health care and socialized medicine.

It is not hard to figure out that Barack Obama's popularity is on the skids to oblivion just like this rotten capitalist system itself is...

The only remaining question to be answered is: Will the American people be satisfied with a brief stay in Obama's created purgatory as they make their way to hell?

Capitalism has spun a web of corruption that is being held together by racism and lies as the Wall Street parasites suck their many victims dry like a trapped fly in a spider's web... this is the nature of a thoroughly rotten system based upon exploitation of man by man where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

If ever there was a time when the American people should organize take to the streets and organize to take matters into their own hands rather than meekly waiting until the next Election, that time is now.

And the struggle for real health care reform should be only the beginning of a movement and struggle to turn this country around by challenging Wall Street for power.

Organizationally we need to develop some kind of "people's lobby" to accomplish real health care reform, bring the troops home and put an end to these disgraceful home foreclosures and evictions... a "people's lobby" pushing for a "people's bailout" is what the requirements of the moment are.

Put Barack Obama out on a used car lot selling the clunkers and he will do just fine.

Alan L. Maki

Friday, August 7, 2009

Health care reform

Winning any reform requires that people thoroughly understand the issues and what needs to be done.

Health care reform is no exception; the complexities involved in health care reform require working people to take even more time in studying and understanding the issues involved. When it comes to winning reforms of substance--- like single-payer universal health care or something much more substantive like a national public health care system which would be socialized health care--- under this rotten and thoroughly corrupt capitalist system where everything, including health care, is turned into a racket and a scheme for some to profit and grow rich, winning battles and struggles for reform require we be up-to-speed on all the developments and completely understand what is happening.

For almost forty years I have been involved in the struggles for health care reform in this country and I had the opportunity to study and experience the Canadian Health Care system for ten years--- not just through reading magazines, newspaper and books; but, by living in Manitoba Canada and experiencing the health care system first hand: by using it.

What I have found is the American people still understand very little when it comes to understanding why we are in this health care mess that is now a full-blown crisis with some forty-six million people without access to health care, many more having to choose between health care and keeping their home, with many working class people taking drastic cuts in their standards of living in order to pay--- in one way or another--- for rapidly rising increases in health care costs while the middle class and the wealthy few are relatively content. And I make a distinction between working class and middle class--- the two are not one and the same as some would have us believe which adds to the massive confusion on this issue because Barack Obama and the Democrats are intentionally using the term "middle class" to further confuse this issue.

Further complicating and confusing this issue of health care reform are the so-called "labor leaders" living on middle class salaries derived from the dues of working people who add to this confusion because many of them confuse their middle class standing as being the same as that of union members, and the fact that they are supposed to be representing working people who pay the dues which pay their salaries has been severely compromised as their thinking which stems from their middle class status prevents these labor leaders from understanding the plight of the vast majority of working people who are not in their unions to begin with because there has been an unwillingness and failure of these union "leaders" invest their vast sums to organize the unorganized... but, worse yet, these labor leaders have lost touch with the day-to-day struggle for existence most of their members now have to endure as they struggle to feed their families, pay utility bills, strive to meet the mortgage payments on their homes and cars and whatever else they have on their credit cards ranging from boats to snowmobiles and all kinds of high-priced "toys" mostly associated with recreational activities, not to mention summer homes and cottages.

In order to successfully achieve health care reform we are going to have to understand just who this Barack Obama is and who he works for because if you think that Barack Obama is a "friend of the people" you are going to get the royal shafting with his so-called "health care reform package" known as the "public option."

Barack Obama is nothing but a shrewd con-artist taken in by the Wall Street coupon clippers--- the military-financial-industrial complex--- to do their dirty work of trying to save a dying capitalist system on the road to oblivion... perhaps making a long stop in some kind of purgatory on its way to hell.

With the system crumbling, real health care reform becomes even more needed now than at any other time because more and more people are going to be joining the ranks of the forty-six million people now without proper and needed access to health care.

Barack Obama's "public option" is designed, not to enable people to access health care; the primary purpose behind Barack Obama's "public option" has to do with protecting the profits of the health care industry that has grown so fat all the players can not longer squeeze into the feeding trough.

Barack Obama and the Democrats killed single payer universal health care with quite a little help from their muddle-headed and confused middle class intellectual liberal, progressive and leftists supporters who have come to dote and drool over Barack Obama's every word like my dog Fred, a Chocolate Lab, sits under the dinner table drooling in anticipation of being tossed a round steak bone.

In fact, Barack Obama has designed a scheme, under the confusing title of "public option" that will greatly expand the public feeding trough to let these over-stuffed fat pigs from the insurance companies, private for-profit hospitals, HMO's, pharmaceutical companies and the greedy, money-grubbing doctors continue to access the public feeding trough even though they have grown so fat on profits derived from health care that they are ready to explode.

Reforms make things better.

The so-called "public option" Barack Obama and the Democrats are proposing will make this health care mess worse while increasing, rather than decreasing, the number of people who will not have access to health care.

It is very interesting, that the claim being made that this "public option" scheme will provide some kind of relief to some of the forty-six million people presently without access to health care will only come about AFTER Barack Obama is elected to his second term.

Barack Obama is nothing but a self-promoting, self-serving opportunist Wall Street politician who might have learned a lot from his Marxist mentor Frank Marshall Davis but I am sure that Frank Marshall Davis would be rolling in his grave to learn that Barack Obama is using what he learned from him against the working class. Frank Marshall Davis taught the young college bound Barack Obama about how only a public health care system--- socialized health care--- could solve the health care needs of the working class.

Now, Barack Obama has taken his knowledge of Marxism and used that knowledge to mislead working people into believing the "public option" is something that it is not and Obama and the Democrats have the Republicans and their "Tea Party" friends calling this "public option" socialized health care and some kind of Bolshevik plot designed to undermine this "great" temple of "free enterprise" while undermining this great "bastion of democracy"--- "watch out," Rush Limbaugh exclaims, "the commies are coming."

As a result, a false and phony caricature of the "public option" is being created and Barack Obama and the Democrats just love this because they know the American people want socialized health care.

How convenient for Barack Obama and the Democrats having these Tea Party people calling for tarring and feathering Barack Obama and the Democrats for being socialists and communists.

Barack Obama is as much a socialist, communist or Marxist as Benito Mussolini the murderous Italian fascist dictator was; in fact, in many of the ways that Barack Obama operates puts him right in league with this fascist swine. I don't think it is a coincidence that Frank Marshall Davis taught Barack Obama about these fascists like Benito Mussolini, either, because Barack Obama seems to have learned very well... the problem is, Barack Obama learned very well and is now using the very things Frank Marshall Davis warned him about fascism to use what he was taught against the very people that Frank Marshall Davis encouraged him to use his knowledge and education to help by imparting Marxist thinking among the working class.

Agree with me or not about Barack Obama, the fact remains that Barack Obama is no friend of the people or of the working class; Barack Obama is for Barack Obama and he bends and bows to Wall Street and carries out the agenda of these industrialists and bankers of whom the health care industry only plays second fiddle to the military-financial-industrial complex when it comes to ripping off the people and causing so much misery.

The needed reforms...

First things first.

There are those in the single-payer universal movement intent on proclaiming that single-payer is not socialized health care.

This is true; however, by making this distinction that single-payer is not socialized health care they are undermining their own movement because the fact of the matter is, the overwhelming majority of the American people support socialized health care and the proof of this is that most people will tell you they want a health care system along the lines of VA (Veteran's) or the Indian Health Service--- the two best socialized health care systems in the entire world; the VA and Indian Health Service are real "public options" in that they are fine examples of how good and efficient public health care really is--- public health care is far superior to any other health care system in terms of how inexpensive it is when properly and fully publicly funded with administrations that put health care needs of people first while supplying the health care needs through public delivery... in fact, the supporters of single-payer have allowed Barack Obama and the Democrats to kill off single-payer universal health care...

We can thank the Progressive Democrats of America and the Progressives for Obama--- these muddle-headed middle class intellectuals and the labor union mis-leaders--- for this because they stabbed the single-payer universal health care movement in the back just as it was reaching a maximum potential in support among the American people when they then, intentionally, went behind our backs and made an agreement--- based upon Barack Obama's political future--- with Barack Obama to drop single-payer universal health care from being considered for inclusion in the Platform of the National Democratic Party just prior to the Democratic National Convention.

Those of us here in Minnesota felt the full brunt of this rough, jagged dagger being driven into our backs after we worked tirelessly for six long years to win an overwhelming majority of delegates at our Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party State Convention to support our single-payer universal health care resolution. For six years, I traveled Minnesota, from the Iowa border to the Canadian border; from the shores of Lake Superior to the Red River Valley... speaking to groups--- small and large--- in the living rooms of workers and farmers and in union halls and church basements... on Indian Reservations and in the Club Houses of Edina.

I spoke of the need to win single-payer legislation as a step towards socialized health care. Make no mistake, people are not afraid of talking about the need for socialized health care here in Minnesota where the only two governments that ever existed without corruption scandals were the socialist Farmer-Labor Party governments headed up by Floyd B. Olson and Elmer Benson with considerable help from communist John Bernard who was to become a United States Congressman from the Iron Range.

Minnesotans know and understand what all Americans know but have been prevented from speaking freely about: only socialized health care--- a full blown public health care system--- can solve this health care mess by bringing quality health care to everyone in a country with such a huge population... over 300 million people and growing... all of whom require health care and are ENTITLED to health care--- from prenatal to grave without any exclusions--- by right of birth.

The American Medical Association has been screaming "Bolshevism" for over 90 years every time the word "public health care" comes forward in this country. And, for good reason they scream "Bolshevism" because the Soviet Union was the first country in the world to provide its people with a completely publicly funded, publicly administered and publicly delivered health care system... second to none until VA and then the Indian Health Service came along in our own country which the AMA is as loath to discuss as the Soviet health care system WAS--- good old capitalist gangster capitalism put an end to seventy years of the first country in the world proving the supremacy of a publicly funded, publicly administered, and publicly delivered health care system--- socialized health care.

I do not hear the AMA or anyone else calling for closing down the VA or Indian Health Care Service on the grounds that these are socialized health care systems.

Nor do I hear the AMA or the insurance industry calling for shutting down our other very successful socialized institutions... where are those calling for closing our public schools--- only idiots would think of making the claim that any other kind of institution other than public education could educate 300 million people. If private education can't teach a nation to read, it sure as heck can't provide adequate health care for 300 million people. And, who among these Republicans and Tea Party people would be dumb enough to tell any U.s. Congressperson or United States Senator that they should be taken out and tarred and feathered if they don't close down the United States Postal Service... if you can't even trust a letter to reach its destination without a socialized postal system, how can anyone expect that the free enterprise system is going to deliver health care?

I would like to hear the Tea Party people call for closing down fire and police departments because they are socialist enterprises that have served the people well... try privatizing the police departments and what do you get--- Blackwater. Does anyone want Blackwater thugs patrolling their streets and protecting school children?

It is idiotic and insane to believe after over two-hundred years of "entrepreneurial" doctoring which has led us to this health care mess that the private financing now consuming ever more from an expanding public trough, private administration and private delivery of health care can solve this mess let alone provide adequate health care for 300 million people in this country as 46,000,000 people are without access to health care and as unemployment rises with each new day this number soars right along with the suffering working people are being forced to endure as Barack Obama and his Wall Street masters through Rosy Scenario provide us with this sage advice:

"The thing about recessions is that they always end."


Does anyone actually believe this will be the case?

Just recently, I traveled Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan talking to people one-on-one and in small gatherings at post offices and at public libraries and in people's homes about what kind of health care reform we need.

Barack Obama and any member of the U.S. House or Senate can go out amongst the people and find out what I have discovered:

People want a national public health care program as a solution to this health care mess.

Toss in VA and the Indian Health Service with all the other options being discussed and people are going to pick these excellent health care services that don't cost people a single penny.

Here is what we need to do:

First; we need to get health care to the forty-six million people without health care... this is a national prerequisite tantamount to a national emergency.

Continuing to deny 46 million people health care to save Barack Obama's political butt is unconscionable.

The immediate task and solution: Combine VA and the Indian Health Service into a public health care agency covering Veterans, Indians and the forty-six million people now without health care... this is only common sense and the right thing to do.

Second, serve notice on Barack Obama and the Democrats (we can forget the Republicans they are so far out in right field picking their noses they aren't even in the game); we need to serve notice on the Democrats that if they continue with this phony scheme of the intentionally and deliberately confusing mis-named "public option" that they are not going to be getting our votes in 2010 or any other time.

We need to finally tell Barack Obama to pack up and move on with his con-game. Let him go to Canada to push his "public option" for Bay Street. Lol! There would be a socialist revolution in Canada before he could get across the border.

What we need to focus on is solving this health care mess for the rest of the American people... we need a single-payer universal health care system that will work in conjunction with a vastly expanded public health care system as a first step to creating a fully operational public health care system--- socialized health care.

For those who don't like the idea of socialized health care... well, don't call the local fire department if your house starts burning, don't bother sending your children to public schools, deliver your own letters and mail, and go out and pay thirty dollars for every book you want to read instead of going to the public library--- get clunked over the head and robbed by a thug, call Blackwater, don't bother the local police... and, oh, ya... give your Social Security check back to the government...

... and just keep calling your doctor who thinks private delivery of health care is the cat's meow and the way to go--- the same doctor who you can't trust telling you that you need an operation because it will cure you--- or pay for membership at a country club reserved only for the well-heeled.

Obviously, we can't build much of a public health care system with our resources being squandered on wars.

And, what we need as a base of operations for a public health care system is 800 public health care centers strategically spread out across this country serving the health care needs of people instead 800 U.S. foreign military bases dotting the globe protecting Wall Street's interests. Kind of funny when Wall Street wants its investments protected they call upon the largest socialized institution in the world: the United States military.

Something to think about around the dinner table.

Don't forget, let your Congress person and Senators know that you won't be voting for them or Barack Obama... that they can rely on the votes of the lobbyists from the health care industry whose bribes they have taken to get re-elected as we work to build a new political movement and a real progressive party based upon an assessment of our problems and the solutions required using the advice the Marxist, Frank Marshall Davis, really taught Barack Obama... it is nice Barack Obama has brought the accusation from the right that he is some kind of Marxist, socialist or Communist down to laughing off this accusation that he shared a peanut butter sandwich with a buddy in grade school...

... well, what we Marxists like Frank Marshall Davis now want to do is make sure the wealth of this country now being horded by the Wall Street coupon clipper crowd gets shared, too--- just like Barack Obama shared his peanut butter and jelly sandwich with a school chum; only we don't want Barack Obama to share his peanut butter and jelly sandwich--- nor do we even care to be served a beer in the White House rose garden--- we want a national public health care system paid for by money saved ending these dirty oil wars and by the greedy Wall Street crowd of coupon clippers Barack Obama is working for... after all, we are talking about the wealth created by the working class and the need for the fair and equitable distribution of this wealth during a national emergency... and 46 million people not having access to health care is nothing short of a national emergency.

By the way, Barack Obama has taken care of the members of the American Medical Association by allocating $250,000,000,000.00 (two-hundred fifty billion dollars) towards fees for doctors and hospitals in INCREASED FEES for health care services obtained by people through Medicare... another instance of Barack Obama expanding the public trough making it easier for these greedy, money grubbing doctors to feed...

... couldn't we call this a form of a form of "socialism" for the well-heeled and wealthy... or should we just call it what it really is, plain old capitalist greed and corruption with those with the most once again profiting from the problems of the many?

I would also add, there are those who repeatedly point out that health care reform never would have taken place had not the socialist Tommy Douglas been calling for socialized health care--- single-payer was the compromise... something the advocates of single-payer universal health care might want to keep in mind.

Personally, based on what we have witnessed with the huge influence big-business has over the Democrats and they way the health insurance industry paid Barack Obama and the Democrats to kill single-payer universal health care, I doubt this country will see any meaningful health care reform until we stop trying to influence the Democrats; and instead, start building a movement with the aim of taking power out of the hands of this Wall Street crowd that is more comfortable funding "stupid" wars than real health care reform.

I would note, that from Frank Marshall Davis, Barack Obama learned about imperialist wars being stupid wars just as Barack Obama learned from Frank Marshall Davis that private, for-profit health care is just as stupid as imperialist wars and for the same reason summed up with one word: P-R-O-F-I-T-S.

Just like if we want real peace and not Barack Obama's phony concept of peace... we will have to unite and fight for real health care reform... something else Frank Marshall Davis taught Barack Obama... and Barack Obama seems to understand this all too well... therefore he knows he has to keep people confused and disoriented before they figure out what he is doing in trying to ram this sham health care "reform" down our throats... kind of like doctors and hospitals letting patients die after Medicare stops paying.

First cover those 46 million people without health care in an expanded VA/Indian Health Service public health care program; step up the drive for single-payer universal health care as a first step towards socialized health care… it takes a struggle to win.


Tell Barack Obama and the Democrats to take their “public option” and shove it where the sun doesn’t shine… some place other than the corporate boardrooms and in the brown paper bags toted around Washington by the lobbyists.


Alan L. Maki