Sunday, January 5, 2014
Should Socialists and Communists engage in electoral struggles?
The election of a socialist to public office in this country is treated as some kind of novelty by both the mainstream media and most of the alternative and even left media; why?
This was my response to an article on a left wing web page and note I attached to it in an e-mail I sent out. A lot of people are being subjected to the lie that Socialists and Communists do not remain true once elected to public office in capitalist governments:
Socialists and Communists can, and more often than not, often do, "keep true" once elected to public office.
This has been proven time, and time, again. Examples are the socialist Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party, the most successful third party ever here in the United States. Even as Socialists and Communists were fighting tooth and nail at the national level, here in Minnesota they had the good common sense to figure out that if they worked together they could accomplish a great deal.
In more recent years there was the tremendous success of the Howard Pawley led socialist New Democratic Party majority government in Manitoba, Canada.
Fortunately, former New Democratic Party Premier Howard Pawley has written an excellent, honest, thought-provoking and informative book about his life in politics, "Keep True," which should be required reading for anyone involved in electoral politics. We have a great deal to learn about politics and the class struggle from our northern neighbors. We also have a great deal to learn from our own history which includes the incredible history of the socialist Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party.
If for no other reason, both the Pawley led NDP and the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party should be studied for the honest government that was delivered to the people of Manitoba and Minnesota. In addition to delivering honest and ethical governance with maximum citizen participation in the decision-making, both of these governments delivered huge reforms improving the lives of working people--- not to mention striking major blows against racist discrimination.
Many, many working class and progressive/left activists who become engaged in electoral struggles do remain true.
That there are also some who betray our struggles is just life--- no reason for us not to engage in electoral struggles as we fight in the streets, in our schools, our communities and places of employment for peace, social and economic justice.
We have seen and experienced first hand the betrayal of those on the left supporting Wall Street's imperialist warmonger--- Barack Obama. This has sown deep divisions in the progressive, left and working class movements which is proving to be a real challenge to overcome; but, this is the problem of our times, not whether or not we should be engaged in electoral struggles.
*****************
Note: I could have cited an untold number of Socialists and Communists who have run for public office--- and many who have won--- in both the United States and Canada to prove that most Socialists and Communists "keep true" once elected. I find, more often than not, that those who raise these questions about "if" we should be engaged in electoral activity, at least in some way, are just a tad dishonest since they are not providing a true picture of the electoral struggles in Canada and the United States. I could have provided the examples of Joe Zuken and Jacob Penner in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada or the long history of Coleman Young's election to public office. I think Jacob Penner may still be the holder of the record for the longest serving elected public official of any political party in North America--- Penner was continually elected and re-elected as the Communist Party of Manitoba-Canada's candidate. It is no secret to anyone that Coleman Young rose, not from the ranks of working class struggle--- but with the ranks of working class activists to become a state legislator and then Mayor of Detroit all the while carrying a Communist Party membership card.
There is nothing strange, nor unique, about Socialists and Communists being elected to public office here in the United States or Canada.
In fact, had it not been for the decades of never-ending severe governmental repression brought on by Republican Joe McCarthy and Democrat Hubert H. Humphrey (the primary author of the vicious, undemocratic and fascist-like Communist Control Act), it can very reasonably be assumed we would have Socialists and Communists occupying many seats of political power in this country today. It is not our electoral system, as corrupt as it is, which prevents Socialists and Communists from being elected in large numbers today--- it is the failure of the left to defy government repression and intimidation which includes lies, smears and slanders from the corporate mass media.
Just a few months ago I met with a group of people in the Frank P. Zeidler Municipal Building in Milwaukee, Wisconsin to discuss creating a campaign for a "21st Century Full Employment Act for Peace and Prosperity. Zeidler and his Socialist Party have played a dominant role in Milwaukee politics for the better part of the 20th Century. No one wants to talk about this; why not?
Why is it that one can go into almost any school on Minnesota's Mesabi Iron Range and no one, including the history teachers, knows who John Bernard was? A Communist Congressman from the small mining community of Eveleth elected by the workers from the Iron Range on the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party ticket.
It is one thing to disagree with Socialists and Communists--- this is everyone's right in a democracy; however, it is quite another thing for these cowards who don't even dare to debate Socialists and Communists in the public square, to use the apparatus of government and the media to restrict the participation of Socialists and Communists in the political process and then go on to boast to the rest of the world that the United States is the world's greatest bastion of democracy.
I would also point out one very simple, basic and fundamental fact:
Unless Socialists and Communists lead the way in challenging Wall Street for political and economic power--- no such challenge will ever be made... think about that.
To think that issues like peace, full employment, a living wage Minimum Wage, anti-scab and anti-lockout or the repeal of "At-Will Employment" legislation will even be discussed without bringing forward Socialist and Communist candidates for public office is very naive thinking.
This was my response to an article on a left wing web page and note I attached to it in an e-mail I sent out. A lot of people are being subjected to the lie that Socialists and Communists do not remain true once elected to public office in capitalist governments:
Socialists and Communists can, and more often than not, often do, "keep true" once elected to public office.
This has been proven time, and time, again. Examples are the socialist Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party, the most successful third party ever here in the United States. Even as Socialists and Communists were fighting tooth and nail at the national level, here in Minnesota they had the good common sense to figure out that if they worked together they could accomplish a great deal.
In more recent years there was the tremendous success of the Howard Pawley led socialist New Democratic Party majority government in Manitoba, Canada.
Fortunately, former New Democratic Party Premier Howard Pawley has written an excellent, honest, thought-provoking and informative book about his life in politics, "Keep True," which should be required reading for anyone involved in electoral politics. We have a great deal to learn about politics and the class struggle from our northern neighbors. We also have a great deal to learn from our own history which includes the incredible history of the socialist Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party.
If for no other reason, both the Pawley led NDP and the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party should be studied for the honest government that was delivered to the people of Manitoba and Minnesota. In addition to delivering honest and ethical governance with maximum citizen participation in the decision-making, both of these governments delivered huge reforms improving the lives of working people--- not to mention striking major blows against racist discrimination.
Many, many working class and progressive/left activists who become engaged in electoral struggles do remain true.
That there are also some who betray our struggles is just life--- no reason for us not to engage in electoral struggles as we fight in the streets, in our schools, our communities and places of employment for peace, social and economic justice.
We have seen and experienced first hand the betrayal of those on the left supporting Wall Street's imperialist warmonger--- Barack Obama. This has sown deep divisions in the progressive, left and working class movements which is proving to be a real challenge to overcome; but, this is the problem of our times, not whether or not we should be engaged in electoral struggles.
*****************
Note: I could have cited an untold number of Socialists and Communists who have run for public office--- and many who have won--- in both the United States and Canada to prove that most Socialists and Communists "keep true" once elected. I find, more often than not, that those who raise these questions about "if" we should be engaged in electoral activity, at least in some way, are just a tad dishonest since they are not providing a true picture of the electoral struggles in Canada and the United States. I could have provided the examples of Joe Zuken and Jacob Penner in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada or the long history of Coleman Young's election to public office. I think Jacob Penner may still be the holder of the record for the longest serving elected public official of any political party in North America--- Penner was continually elected and re-elected as the Communist Party of Manitoba-Canada's candidate. It is no secret to anyone that Coleman Young rose, not from the ranks of working class struggle--- but with the ranks of working class activists to become a state legislator and then Mayor of Detroit all the while carrying a Communist Party membership card.
There is nothing strange, nor unique, about Socialists and Communists being elected to public office here in the United States or Canada.
In fact, had it not been for the decades of never-ending severe governmental repression brought on by Republican Joe McCarthy and Democrat Hubert H. Humphrey (the primary author of the vicious, undemocratic and fascist-like Communist Control Act), it can very reasonably be assumed we would have Socialists and Communists occupying many seats of political power in this country today. It is not our electoral system, as corrupt as it is, which prevents Socialists and Communists from being elected in large numbers today--- it is the failure of the left to defy government repression and intimidation which includes lies, smears and slanders from the corporate mass media.
Just a few months ago I met with a group of people in the Frank P. Zeidler Municipal Building in Milwaukee, Wisconsin to discuss creating a campaign for a "21st Century Full Employment Act for Peace and Prosperity. Zeidler and his Socialist Party have played a dominant role in Milwaukee politics for the better part of the 20th Century. No one wants to talk about this; why not?
Why is it that one can go into almost any school on Minnesota's Mesabi Iron Range and no one, including the history teachers, knows who John Bernard was? A Communist Congressman from the small mining community of Eveleth elected by the workers from the Iron Range on the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party ticket.
It is one thing to disagree with Socialists and Communists--- this is everyone's right in a democracy; however, it is quite another thing for these cowards who don't even dare to debate Socialists and Communists in the public square, to use the apparatus of government and the media to restrict the participation of Socialists and Communists in the political process and then go on to boast to the rest of the world that the United States is the world's greatest bastion of democracy.
I would also point out one very simple, basic and fundamental fact:
Unless Socialists and Communists lead the way in challenging Wall Street for political and economic power--- no such challenge will ever be made... think about that.
To think that issues like peace, full employment, a living wage Minimum Wage, anti-scab and anti-lockout or the repeal of "At-Will Employment" legislation will even be discussed without bringing forward Socialist and Communist candidates for public office is very naive thinking.
Saturday, January 4, 2014
The never-ending war in Iraq.
First Bush told us the war in Iraq was won and
then Obama told us the war in Iraq was over. Will U.S. troops be taking
on more casualties, again, in re-taking Fallujah:
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/03/22166297-al-qaeda-linked-forces-capture-town-of-fallujah-in-iraq?lite
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/03/22166297-al-qaeda-linked-forces-capture-town-of-fallujah-in-iraq?lite
Thursday, January 2, 2014
Elected public official responds to my Letter to the Editor in the Bemidji Pioneer.
An
exchange with an elected public official in response to a recent Letter
to the Editor of mine published in the Bemidji Pioneer.
This was my Letter to the Editor...
Letter: We need a full employment act
By Alan L. Maki from Warroad on Nov 27, 2013 at 8:01pm
http://www.bemidjipioneer.com/content/letter-we-need-full-employment-act
The article in the Oct. 25 Bemidji Pioneer headlined “Minimum wage discussion draws full house at City Hall” left out a very important aspect of what a living minimum wage should be based on.
Fact: Working people without jobs are going to be poor.
Fact: Working people paid poverty wages are going to be poor.
Seems to me a real living minimum wage tied to real cost of living factors is a basic and minimal requirement toward ending poverty with government assuming full responsibility for attaining and maintaining full employment which is so basic to ending poverty that it would seem that any politician talking about “jobs, jobs, jobs” when campaigning for election would be the very first, upon being elected, to introduce legislation requiring that the president and members of Congress mandate the responsibility for full employment to themselves lest they be viewed as hypocrites.
Instead of voting to fund militarism and wars which kill jobs the same way they kill people, we need to elect people to public office who will enact a “21st Century Full Employment Act for Peace and Prosperity.”
Alan L. Maki
Warroad, Minnesota
Response from Steve Pemble an elected public official...
Letter: Some issues are easy to resolve, if you don’t use your head
Posted on Dec 2, 2013 at 4:15pm
http://www.bemidjipioneer.com/content/letter-some-issues-are-easy-resolve-if-you-dont-use-your-head
I just finished reading the letter from Alan Maki (Nov. 28) wanting to put an end to poverty. I thought, “yeah, I’m for that’! Mr. Maki is suggesting that politicians run on a platform of introducing a “21st Century Full Employment Act for Peace and Prosperity”, where government would “assume full responsibility for attaining and maintaining full employment”.
I’m not sure if he is naïve, or just uniformed (or both). Does he honestly believe government can solve the unemployment issue by simply “mandating full employment”? Why didn’t I think of that. Some issues are so easy to resolve, if you don’t use your head.
A couple of quick notes for you Alan: 1. The government does not have any money. It gets its money from the producers in this country (through taxation). 2. If you haven’t been up on the news or your reading lately, this government has been currently spending about a $1 trillion more than it takes in with taxes each year (that $1T is created out of thin air by the Federal Reserve and passed on to us, the taxpayers, in the form of debt).
We are currently printing money to pay the interest on that debt (while adding more debt). So with that said, how do you expect to pay all the salaries in your “full employment” fantasyland? (remember, the government has no money of its own). I’m only to assume you would have the government “mandate all private businesses hire more people” since we now know the government can’t pay them (it is impossible to tax enough to make your fantasyland work). Are you a business owner? How would you handle that mandate? Please explain how that will work?
I know how it would end. My advice, Mr. Maki: Please don’t ever run for any political office; you’ll give politicians a bad name (wait, that was funny). I would also suggest brushing up on your economics just a tad.
Steve Pemble
Bemidji
My response to Steve Pemble, an elected public official...
I am responding to a letter written in response by Mr.Steve Pemble on December 2, 2013. Mr. Pemble made the claim that his letter was a response to what I wrote about the need for a "21st Century Full Employment Act."
First of all, Mr. Pemble's letter was needlessly mean spirited; a personal attack.
Second, Mr. Pemble created an entire argument in response to what I wrote based on his own mis-characterization of what I wrote.
What I wrote was very clear.
I stated I believed a full employment act was needed which mandated the president and the Congress to work together to attain and maintain full employment.
Mr. Pemble claims I wrote that these politicians should mandate full employment; something quite different.
Mr. Pemble then went on to suggest that I should never run for political office because I lack the intelligence.
I would suggest that Mr. Pemble is either an example of the deceitful politicians holding public office in our country today or he has never learned to read. Reading implies being able to comprehend what it written.
The majority of the United States Senate voted for the "Full Employment Act of 1945" which used the same language I used. The majority of the U.S. House voted against the "Full Employment Act of 1945" after its primary author, Texas Congressman Wright Patman, was viciously attacked by those like Mr. Pemble who claimed the Act was something other than what it really was. Congressman Patman was accused of being a Communist and this was the beginning of the nightmare known as the "Red Scare" launched by Joe McCarthy.
I expect an apology from Mr. Pemble. An elected public official. I also expect him to state his opinion based on what I wrote in my letter of November 28, 2013--- "We need a full employment act" and not what he made up about my letter.
It is no wonder people don't want to bring their views forward when a public elected official like Mr. Pemble, would so viciously attack an individual based on his own fabricated misinformation.
While I have no intent of running for public office, it is because I don't want to associate with dishonest people like Mr. Pemble not Mr. Pemble's mean-spirited insinuation that I am too stupid to hold an elected public position--- after all, how intelligent does one have to be to hold public office if Mr. Pemble is an example of such qualification. It might be wise for the voters to send Mr. Pemble packing given his dishonesty or inability to read. No doubt Mr. Pemble has both a reading problem and lacks basic ethical integrity required to hold public elective office.
As for me giving politicians a bad name, Mr. Pemble; you have done this quite well all on your own without any help from me.
Alan L. Maki
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
This was my Letter to the Editor...
Letter: We need a full employment act
By Alan L. Maki from Warroad on Nov 27, 2013 at 8:01pm
http://www.bemidjipioneer.com/content/letter-we-need-full-employment-act
The article in the Oct. 25 Bemidji Pioneer headlined “Minimum wage discussion draws full house at City Hall” left out a very important aspect of what a living minimum wage should be based on.
Fact: Working people without jobs are going to be poor.
Fact: Working people paid poverty wages are going to be poor.
Seems to me a real living minimum wage tied to real cost of living factors is a basic and minimal requirement toward ending poverty with government assuming full responsibility for attaining and maintaining full employment which is so basic to ending poverty that it would seem that any politician talking about “jobs, jobs, jobs” when campaigning for election would be the very first, upon being elected, to introduce legislation requiring that the president and members of Congress mandate the responsibility for full employment to themselves lest they be viewed as hypocrites.
Instead of voting to fund militarism and wars which kill jobs the same way they kill people, we need to elect people to public office who will enact a “21st Century Full Employment Act for Peace and Prosperity.”
Alan L. Maki
Warroad, Minnesota
Response from Steve Pemble an elected public official...
Letter: Some issues are easy to resolve, if you don’t use your head
Posted on Dec 2, 2013 at 4:15pm
http://www.bemidjipioneer.com/content/letter-some-issues-are-easy-resolve-if-you-dont-use-your-head
I just finished reading the letter from Alan Maki (Nov. 28) wanting to put an end to poverty. I thought, “yeah, I’m for that’! Mr. Maki is suggesting that politicians run on a platform of introducing a “21st Century Full Employment Act for Peace and Prosperity”, where government would “assume full responsibility for attaining and maintaining full employment”.
I’m not sure if he is naïve, or just uniformed (or both). Does he honestly believe government can solve the unemployment issue by simply “mandating full employment”? Why didn’t I think of that. Some issues are so easy to resolve, if you don’t use your head.
A couple of quick notes for you Alan: 1. The government does not have any money. It gets its money from the producers in this country (through taxation). 2. If you haven’t been up on the news or your reading lately, this government has been currently spending about a $1 trillion more than it takes in with taxes each year (that $1T is created out of thin air by the Federal Reserve and passed on to us, the taxpayers, in the form of debt).
We are currently printing money to pay the interest on that debt (while adding more debt). So with that said, how do you expect to pay all the salaries in your “full employment” fantasyland? (remember, the government has no money of its own). I’m only to assume you would have the government “mandate all private businesses hire more people” since we now know the government can’t pay them (it is impossible to tax enough to make your fantasyland work). Are you a business owner? How would you handle that mandate? Please explain how that will work?
I know how it would end. My advice, Mr. Maki: Please don’t ever run for any political office; you’ll give politicians a bad name (wait, that was funny). I would also suggest brushing up on your economics just a tad.
Steve Pemble
Bemidji
My response to Steve Pemble, an elected public official...
I am responding to a letter written in response by Mr.Steve Pemble on December 2, 2013. Mr. Pemble made the claim that his letter was a response to what I wrote about the need for a "21st Century Full Employment Act."
First of all, Mr. Pemble's letter was needlessly mean spirited; a personal attack.
Second, Mr. Pemble created an entire argument in response to what I wrote based on his own mis-characterization of what I wrote.
What I wrote was very clear.
I stated I believed a full employment act was needed which mandated the president and the Congress to work together to attain and maintain full employment.
Mr. Pemble claims I wrote that these politicians should mandate full employment; something quite different.
Mr. Pemble then went on to suggest that I should never run for political office because I lack the intelligence.
I would suggest that Mr. Pemble is either an example of the deceitful politicians holding public office in our country today or he has never learned to read. Reading implies being able to comprehend what it written.
The majority of the United States Senate voted for the "Full Employment Act of 1945" which used the same language I used. The majority of the U.S. House voted against the "Full Employment Act of 1945" after its primary author, Texas Congressman Wright Patman, was viciously attacked by those like Mr. Pemble who claimed the Act was something other than what it really was. Congressman Patman was accused of being a Communist and this was the beginning of the nightmare known as the "Red Scare" launched by Joe McCarthy.
I expect an apology from Mr. Pemble. An elected public official. I also expect him to state his opinion based on what I wrote in my letter of November 28, 2013--- "We need a full employment act" and not what he made up about my letter.
It is no wonder people don't want to bring their views forward when a public elected official like Mr. Pemble, would so viciously attack an individual based on his own fabricated misinformation.
While I have no intent of running for public office, it is because I don't want to associate with dishonest people like Mr. Pemble not Mr. Pemble's mean-spirited insinuation that I am too stupid to hold an elected public position--- after all, how intelligent does one have to be to hold public office if Mr. Pemble is an example of such qualification. It might be wise for the voters to send Mr. Pemble packing given his dishonesty or inability to read. No doubt Mr. Pemble has both a reading problem and lacks basic ethical integrity required to hold public elective office.
As for me giving politicians a bad name, Mr. Pemble; you have done this quite well all on your own without any help from me.
Alan L. Maki
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763

Letter: We need a full employment act
www.bemidjipioneer.com
The
article in the Oct. 25 Bemidji Pioneer headlined “Minimum wage
discussion draws full house at City Hall” left out a very important
aspect of what a living minimum wage should be based on. Fact: Working
The great pension fund and Social Security Trust Fund swindles and robberies--- from Detroit to Minnesota's Mesabi Iron Range.
Thanks for getting this out about the Detroit pensions.
In fact, workers' pensions are under attack all over the country in both the public and private sectors.
Here in Minnesota on the Mesabi Iron Range, a rank-and-file miners' organization--- Hard Rock Miners--- has been organized to defend the pensions at National Steel, a major player in the taconite industry where workers are members of the United Steel Workers Union but corrupt union officials are working in cahoots with corporate executives and corrupt Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party politicians and pension fund "managers" (read swindlers) to cover up this enormous swindle of pension fund monies paid in by workers and as part of the contract agreements between the USW and National Steel and other companies over the years.
We saw what happened with billions of dollars of pension funds at LTV, before.
We have seen how these crooks in the unions have collaborated with these pension fund swindlers as they get paid huge salaries for sitting on these pension fund boards supposedly looking after the interests of the workers they are supposed to represent but knowing that they derive these huge pension fund salaries only as long as the close their eyes and keep their mouths shut as these swindles take place on their "watch."
For those who want to learn more about how these pension fund swindles take place and what can be done to fight back, I would suggest reading "Always Bring A Crowd, the story of Frank Lumpkin, steelworker" about the struggle of Wisconsin Steel Workers to recover their pension benefits.
For those who want to learn more about how these pension fund swindles take place and what can be done to fight back, I would suggest reading "Always Bring A Crowd, the story of Frank Lumpkin, steelworker" about the struggle of Wisconsin Steel Workers to recover their pension benefits.
We must remember that when these pension funds "disappear," they don't "disappear into thin air. What is actually happening is someone else ends up in possession of this tremendous wealth that has been created by workers and invested in these funds for their retirement years.
It is the Wall Street shysters, often called "investors" and "bankers," who end up with this tremendous stolen wealth.
It is ironic that when workers begin to inquire as to what is going on with their pension funds by asking very legitimate questions, they are treated as if they are trouble-makers.
And when they ask politicians who have been elected largely with their support, they are brushed off by being told, "We are looking into this for you and will get back to you with what we find out;" only to never hear from these politicians ever again.
The politicians continue to hold out one hand in front of them begging for campaign contributions and votes from from workers and their unions, while with one hand in back and out of sight they are taking campaign contributions and bribes from these Wall Street shysters robbing these pension funds blind as their greed is no longer satisfied with just the exorbitant "management fees the derive from supposedly taking care of these pension funds.
We have experienced the same kind of swindles in the Indian Gaming Industry where these politicians and the United States Department of Justice have not only allowed, but enabled, crooked and corrupt outfits like Alerus who work in conjunction with the mobsters who own the slot machines to rob workers of their hard-earned poverty wages invested in these "pension" scams and schemes.
In fact, workers would be better off fighting to expand Social Security and prevent the politicians from dipping their dirty, corrupt fingers into the Social Security Trust Fund so all workers would receive decent retirement benefits they could actually live on rather than the meager and miserly payouts leaving so many retired workers mired in poverty in their later years.
Just think what kind of pensions all workers could be receiving today had all these pension fund monies been placed in the Social Security Trust Fund with all these funds protected from the clutches of these Wall Street politicians who have robbed the Social Security Trust Fund to pay for their dirty imperialist wars from which Wall Street derives the greatest profits of all as people suffer and die.
One has to wonder why the media is covering up how this swindle of the pension funds is taking place.
Just think what kind of pensions all workers could be receiving today had all these pension fund monies been placed in the Social Security Trust Fund with all these funds protected from the clutches of these Wall Street politicians who have robbed the Social Security Trust Fund to pay for their dirty imperialist wars from which Wall Street derives the greatest profits of all as people suffer and die.
One has to wonder why the media is covering up how this swindle of the pension funds is taking place.
Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
Monday, December 30, 2013
In state after state, Republican Party super-majorities have enthusiastically used their power to pummel the rights and livelihoods of working people... the question:
Why haven't the Democrats with their super-majorities wielded their power to defend and expand the rights of working people with the same enthusiasm the Republicans have used in attacking us?
Check out the map in this article:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2012/12/13/states-supermajority-legislatures/1758567/
Democrats are playing us for suckers and fools using "Bait and Switch" politics.
There can be only one explanation for what is going on:
The same corporate lobbyists are controlling both the Republicans and Democrats... bribing the Republicans to attack; bribing the Democrats to do nothing.
Sunday, December 29, 2013
More on the Minimum Wage.
I am hearing more and more from those who think we need to "compromise" on the Minimum Wage issue.
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton and Minnesota State Senator Kathy Sheran keep accusing me of "tightening the springs" in insisting on the Minimum Wage being a real living wage.
Some Democratic Party big-wigs banded together under the "leadership" of MN DFL Chair Ken Martin for a private meeting to discuss "how are we going to handle Maki on this thorny Minimum Wage problem."
The problem isn't with me; it is with them.
I'm not for cutting the Democrats one bit of slack on this very important issue. There will be no other issue that affects so many working people as this one.
DFL Chair Ken Martin says I should be smeared for not attacking the Republicans on this issue. What do the Republicans have to do with anything? It is the Democrats who have the super-majority--- a Democratic Governor, a Democratic majority in the State House and a solid Democratic majority in the State Senate. The only thing Republicans can do is cry.
Martin and Company are crying about my "Letters to the Editors" appearing in newspapers across the state accusing the Democrats of "Bait and Switch."
They say I am not taking on the Republicans. This is an outright lie. When these morons were capitulating and acquiescing to the Republicans, as an elected member of the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party's State Central Committee, my voice was more often than not the only voice publicly heard coming from the Minnesota DFL challenging the Republicans. The facts of this are plain as day for anyone who reads the newspapers, listens to the radio or watches the news on television to see and hear.
I have actually had quite a lot to say about the Republicans on this issue of the Minimum Wage, though, in my writings and speeches.
However, because, like everyone, I am forced to work within the number of words these newspapers allow, I can't get into the issue as I would want to in "Letters to the Editor."
So, I am content in leaving it to Minnesota Chair Ken Martin and Governor Dayton to explain to Minnesotans how these dirty Republicans are preventing them from passing real "Living Wage Legislation."
Anyone can write in following up on my letters pointing out what the problem is with the Democrats--- and I have stated this time and time again in relation to the Minimum Wage issue so I don't really find any need to waste my space allotted in a "Letter to the Editor" attacking Republicans when it is the Democrats we need to focus on.
I have made this clear about the Republicans--- over and over again:
1. The Republicans will not support an increase in the Minimum Wage;
2. Most Republicans in Minnesota are for doing away with Minimum Wage legislation altogether.
For years, many decades, the DFL has stated that if they were given a super-majority by the voters they would enact what amounts to a Minimum Wage that is a real living--- non-poverty--- wage.
It is not true that I would be opposed to anything the Democrats do in increasing the Minimum Wage as is being asserted to malign me.
If the Democrats enact real living wage legislation I welcome this.
A "living wage" means a non-poverty wage.
We, the tax-payers, are paying big money to two government agencies--- U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics--- responsible for compiling and collecting data relating to "cost of living."
It is not up to me to state what the Minimum Wage should be in order for the Minimum Wage to be a non-poverty wage.
A non-poverty wage is based on actual "cost-of-living" factors.
When I see my name on the paycheck for who is being paid to tell us what a living, non-poverty, Minimum Wage actually is, I will provide the detailed calculations of how I arrive at my figures--- but, my figures are irrelevant; it is the politicians, not me, who have to be held accountable for the figures they are bandying about.
It is not I anyone should be seeking this explanation from as to what a non-poverty Minimum Wage should be.
It is from the politicians like Governor Mark Dayton, State Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk, State House Leader Erin Murphy and Senator Tony Lourey who Chairs Health and Human Services Committee or State Senator Kathy Sheran who Chairs Health, Human Services and Housing.
I do know a little something about what the Minnesota DFL Platform has to say about "living wages" because I helped to write this part of the Platform, which states in no uncertain terms what the rank-and-file and grassroots base of the DFL stands for on this issue; and I quote from the MN DFL Party's Platform:
"A minimum wage that keeps pace with inflation and provides full time workers with an income above the poverty level."
ANY Minnesota DFL politician who is not going to use the DFL's super-majority to enact Minimum Wage legislation in line with this part of MN DFL Party's Platform should be sitting with the Republican Party's legislative caucus.
I think we are all very aware that DFL super-majorities are very rare and when achieved they should not be frivolously squandered.
Unless we have hugely different interpretations of what is meant by a "living wage" I don't see where there is a problem.
Unless anyone has reason to believe we shouldn't be able to trust the United States Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics to compile data for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) than it seems to me WHAT the Minimum Wage should be is rather cut-and-dried.
Why should any working man or working woman be satisfied with anything less than a real living wage which is determined by analyzing all "cost-of-living" factors?
In fact, to do otherwise leaves people of color, women, the handicapped, youth and now even seniors forced back into the workforce holding the shitty end of the stick forever.
If the Minimum Wage should be $7.60 as Wisconsin Democrats claim, or $8.50, $9.50, $10.10 or $11.00 as various Democrats here in Minnesota are claiming--- all they have to do is show us the data from either the U.S. Statistical Abstract compiled by the United States Census Bureau or the CPI monitored by the Bureau of Labor Statistics to prove these figures to be a "living wage."
Obviously all these figures can't be correct; and any working man or working woman can tell you that none of these figures are correct because no one can live a "non-poverty" life on any such pathetic miserly wages.
Is a $10.00 an hour Minimum Wage "better than" Minnesota's current Minimum Wage of $6.15?
Democrats did not promise "better than;" Democrats campaigning for public office do not promise "better than."
The promise of the Democrats and their Platform calls for "living wages" which can only be interpreted as, "A minimum wage that keeps pace with inflation and provides full time workers with an income above the poverty level."
Their own words:
"Above the poverty level."
Do you see any government agency stating that $8.50, $9.50, $10.10 or $11.00 an hour is "above the poverty level?"
Republicans have no say in any of this; however, apparently, the lobbyists for the employers are the only ones Minnesota politicians are listening to--- which means Minnesotans are going to have to speak with one clear voice on this issue: for a Minimum Wage that is a real living wage.
We are entitled to this in return for our votes.
E-N-T-I-T-L-E-D.
It is about accountability which is as fundamental to democracy as a living wage is as basic and fundamental to human rights.
We must not tolerate "Bait and Switch" politics anymore than we would tolerate the highly illegal practice of "Bait and Switch" in the retail marketplace.
In addition to my long-standing disdain for the reactionary Republican Party, my views regarding Minimum Wage legislation and small business is also well known--- I think small business should be excluded from Minimum Wage legislation when it comes to these employers hiring family members and relatives... if these people want to pay their grandmas and grandpas poverty wages and all parties are agreeable to this than so be it--- eliminate the enforcement of the Minimum Wage in these circumstances; we don't want a bunch of selfish small business people shedding a trail of tears out in the suburbs and gated communities which seems to be where the Minnesota DFL is picking up most of its campaign contributions from.
The DFL with its super-majority should accommodate both workers and small business people as part of being accountable to voters and even larger campaign contributors--- but, compromise with the lobbyists representing the largest corporate employers? No way in hell.
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton and Minnesota State Senator Kathy Sheran keep accusing me of "tightening the springs" in insisting on the Minimum Wage being a real living wage.
Some Democratic Party big-wigs banded together under the "leadership" of MN DFL Chair Ken Martin for a private meeting to discuss "how are we going to handle Maki on this thorny Minimum Wage problem."
The problem isn't with me; it is with them.
I'm not for cutting the Democrats one bit of slack on this very important issue. There will be no other issue that affects so many working people as this one.
DFL Chair Ken Martin says I should be smeared for not attacking the Republicans on this issue. What do the Republicans have to do with anything? It is the Democrats who have the super-majority--- a Democratic Governor, a Democratic majority in the State House and a solid Democratic majority in the State Senate. The only thing Republicans can do is cry.
Martin and Company are crying about my "Letters to the Editors" appearing in newspapers across the state accusing the Democrats of "Bait and Switch."
They say I am not taking on the Republicans. This is an outright lie. When these morons were capitulating and acquiescing to the Republicans, as an elected member of the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party's State Central Committee, my voice was more often than not the only voice publicly heard coming from the Minnesota DFL challenging the Republicans. The facts of this are plain as day for anyone who reads the newspapers, listens to the radio or watches the news on television to see and hear.
I have actually had quite a lot to say about the Republicans on this issue of the Minimum Wage, though, in my writings and speeches.
However, because, like everyone, I am forced to work within the number of words these newspapers allow, I can't get into the issue as I would want to in "Letters to the Editor."
So, I am content in leaving it to Minnesota Chair Ken Martin and Governor Dayton to explain to Minnesotans how these dirty Republicans are preventing them from passing real "Living Wage Legislation."
Anyone can write in following up on my letters pointing out what the problem is with the Democrats--- and I have stated this time and time again in relation to the Minimum Wage issue so I don't really find any need to waste my space allotted in a "Letter to the Editor" attacking Republicans when it is the Democrats we need to focus on.
I have made this clear about the Republicans--- over and over again:
1. The Republicans will not support an increase in the Minimum Wage;
2. Most Republicans in Minnesota are for doing away with Minimum Wage legislation altogether.
For years, many decades, the DFL has stated that if they were given a super-majority by the voters they would enact what amounts to a Minimum Wage that is a real living--- non-poverty--- wage.
It is not true that I would be opposed to anything the Democrats do in increasing the Minimum Wage as is being asserted to malign me.
If the Democrats enact real living wage legislation I welcome this.
A "living wage" means a non-poverty wage.
We, the tax-payers, are paying big money to two government agencies--- U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics--- responsible for compiling and collecting data relating to "cost of living."
It is not up to me to state what the Minimum Wage should be in order for the Minimum Wage to be a non-poverty wage.
A non-poverty wage is based on actual "cost-of-living" factors.
When I see my name on the paycheck for who is being paid to tell us what a living, non-poverty, Minimum Wage actually is, I will provide the detailed calculations of how I arrive at my figures--- but, my figures are irrelevant; it is the politicians, not me, who have to be held accountable for the figures they are bandying about.
It is not I anyone should be seeking this explanation from as to what a non-poverty Minimum Wage should be.
It is from the politicians like Governor Mark Dayton, State Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk, State House Leader Erin Murphy and Senator Tony Lourey who Chairs Health and Human Services Committee or State Senator Kathy Sheran who Chairs Health, Human Services and Housing.
I do know a little something about what the Minnesota DFL Platform has to say about "living wages" because I helped to write this part of the Platform, which states in no uncertain terms what the rank-and-file and grassroots base of the DFL stands for on this issue; and I quote from the MN DFL Party's Platform:
"A minimum wage that keeps pace with inflation and provides full time workers with an income above the poverty level."
ANY Minnesota DFL politician who is not going to use the DFL's super-majority to enact Minimum Wage legislation in line with this part of MN DFL Party's Platform should be sitting with the Republican Party's legislative caucus.
I think we are all very aware that DFL super-majorities are very rare and when achieved they should not be frivolously squandered.
Unless we have hugely different interpretations of what is meant by a "living wage" I don't see where there is a problem.
Unless anyone has reason to believe we shouldn't be able to trust the United States Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics to compile data for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) than it seems to me WHAT the Minimum Wage should be is rather cut-and-dried.
Why should any working man or working woman be satisfied with anything less than a real living wage which is determined by analyzing all "cost-of-living" factors?
In fact, to do otherwise leaves people of color, women, the handicapped, youth and now even seniors forced back into the workforce holding the shitty end of the stick forever.
If the Minimum Wage should be $7.60 as Wisconsin Democrats claim, or $8.50, $9.50, $10.10 or $11.00 as various Democrats here in Minnesota are claiming--- all they have to do is show us the data from either the U.S. Statistical Abstract compiled by the United States Census Bureau or the CPI monitored by the Bureau of Labor Statistics to prove these figures to be a "living wage."
Obviously all these figures can't be correct; and any working man or working woman can tell you that none of these figures are correct because no one can live a "non-poverty" life on any such pathetic miserly wages.
Is a $10.00 an hour Minimum Wage "better than" Minnesota's current Minimum Wage of $6.15?
Democrats did not promise "better than;" Democrats campaigning for public office do not promise "better than."
The promise of the Democrats and their Platform calls for "living wages" which can only be interpreted as, "A minimum wage that keeps pace with inflation and provides full time workers with an income above the poverty level."
Their own words:
"Above the poverty level."
Do you see any government agency stating that $8.50, $9.50, $10.10 or $11.00 an hour is "above the poverty level?"
Republicans have no say in any of this; however, apparently, the lobbyists for the employers are the only ones Minnesota politicians are listening to--- which means Minnesotans are going to have to speak with one clear voice on this issue: for a Minimum Wage that is a real living wage.
We are entitled to this in return for our votes.
E-N-T-I-T-L-E-D.
It is about accountability which is as fundamental to democracy as a living wage is as basic and fundamental to human rights.
We must not tolerate "Bait and Switch" politics anymore than we would tolerate the highly illegal practice of "Bait and Switch" in the retail marketplace.
In addition to my long-standing disdain for the reactionary Republican Party, my views regarding Minimum Wage legislation and small business is also well known--- I think small business should be excluded from Minimum Wage legislation when it comes to these employers hiring family members and relatives... if these people want to pay their grandmas and grandpas poverty wages and all parties are agreeable to this than so be it--- eliminate the enforcement of the Minimum Wage in these circumstances; we don't want a bunch of selfish small business people shedding a trail of tears out in the suburbs and gated communities which seems to be where the Minnesota DFL is picking up most of its campaign contributions from.
The DFL with its super-majority should accommodate both workers and small business people as part of being accountable to voters and even larger campaign contributors--- but, compromise with the lobbyists representing the largest corporate employers? No way in hell.
Connecting the dots.
About "connecting the dots:"
There is massive unemployment, so many people forced to live on poverty wages--- and then people wonder why the Democrats and the mining companies make headway in their destruction of our living environment from peat mining and sulfide mining under the guise of promoting all of this as "jobs, jobs, jobs."
Think about this:
If people were being paid real living wages and everyone had a job, what would be the appeal of these Democrats and mining companies to promote environmental destruction in the name of "jobs, jobs, jobs."
They would have to promote all of this in the name of what it actually is:
"Profits, Profits, Profits."
It is all about divide and conquer--- labor gets exploited; Mother Nature gets raped.
And people are kept confused and fighting amongst themselves... as the mining companies profit and the politicians collect their bribes for doing dirty work for the mining companies.
Make the Minimum Wage a real living wage and provide jobs at decent living wages and people would begin to look at the need for protecting the environment in a different way.
And, as the mining companies destroy more pristine wilderness, habitat for wolves and other animals is destroyed and along comes the DNR with their wolf hunts to "ward off over-population."
But, who wouldn't want to work in a mine instead of a loud, noisy, smoke-filled casino at poverty wages and without any rights?
And, environmentalists and labor activists think they can win their battles without supporting one another because neither is looking to see how the "dots are actually connected."
As Wall Street seeks to expand into other countries, the process repeats--- and people object and wars ensue.
There is massive unemployment, so many people forced to live on poverty wages--- and then people wonder why the Democrats and the mining companies make headway in their destruction of our living environment from peat mining and sulfide mining under the guise of promoting all of this as "jobs, jobs, jobs."
Think about this:
If people were being paid real living wages and everyone had a job, what would be the appeal of these Democrats and mining companies to promote environmental destruction in the name of "jobs, jobs, jobs."
They would have to promote all of this in the name of what it actually is:
"Profits, Profits, Profits."
It is all about divide and conquer--- labor gets exploited; Mother Nature gets raped.
And people are kept confused and fighting amongst themselves... as the mining companies profit and the politicians collect their bribes for doing dirty work for the mining companies.
Make the Minimum Wage a real living wage and provide jobs at decent living wages and people would begin to look at the need for protecting the environment in a different way.
And, as the mining companies destroy more pristine wilderness, habitat for wolves and other animals is destroyed and along comes the DNR with their wolf hunts to "ward off over-population."
But, who wouldn't want to work in a mine instead of a loud, noisy, smoke-filled casino at poverty wages and without any rights?
And, environmentalists and labor activists think they can win their battles without supporting one another because neither is looking to see how the "dots are actually connected."
As Wall Street seeks to expand into other countries, the process repeats--- and people object and wars ensue.
Saturday, December 28, 2013
Reader's view: Forum to explore building progressive power
Forum to be held in...
Duluth, Minnesota on January 11, 2014
From the Duluth News-Tribune:
Published December 24, 2013, 12:00 AM
Reader's view: Forum to explore building progressive power
I am deeply worried about the world in which my grandchildren will live their adult lives; for the trends suggest a world with less-than-adequate livelihood, medical care, nutrition and retirement security.http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/event/article/id/286847/
I am deeply worried about the world in which my grandchildren will live their adult lives; for the trends suggest a world with less-than-adequate livelihood, medical care, nutrition and retirement security. Not to mention the looming specter of climate disruption.
I’m also deeply conflicted, for all my adult life I was led to believe that voting for liberal candidates and policies would solve or prevent such problems. But that hasn’t happened. The trends continue to worsen.
Intuitively, I know what’s wrong and what needs to be changed. But can I risk voting in a new direction? Will I be undermining the electoral victory of a liberal candidate? Or do I need to look seriously at what some progressive thinkers are proposing?
Those will be the questions to be explored by presenters and the audience alike at the Forum for Building Progressive Political Power on Saturday, Jan. 11 at the “copper top church” in Duluth starting at 11:00 a.m. The event is free and the public is encouraged to attend (facebook.com/unitingpeopleMN).
Vern Simula
Mountain Iron
FORUM
“Building Progressive Political Power
in Minnesota”
SATURDAY, JAN.
11TH. 11:00 A.M. – 4:00 P.M.
COPPER TOP CHURCH – DULUTH
231 East Skyline Parkway, Duluth 55811
11:00
Welcome/Opening/Overview
11:10 “Connecting the Dots - What Has Brought Us
Together - and Full Employment for All.”
Alan Maki, of Uniting People
11:30 “Achieving Livable Minimum Wage Legislation
for Minnesota
Workers”
Liane Gale of the Minnesota Green Party with David Flaherty, a local
college student.
12:00 Mobilizing Progressives for the Minimum
Wage Campaign: Small Group Discussion
12:30
==================== BREAK
==================================
12:45 Whole
Forum Deliberation
1:05 “Getting it Passed: Universal Single Payer Health Care for Minnesota”
Buddy Robinson of Minnesota Citizens Federation – Northeast
Dr. Jim Hart of Physicians for a National
Health Program
1:45 2014: A Year Of Decision; Centuries of Risk; Being
Idle No More!
Reyna
Crow of Northwoods Wolf Alliance
and Idle No More
NE MN
Enviro Orgs; Allen Richardson, et. al,: Polymet SDEIS hearings.
2:30 =================== BREAK
==================================
2:40 How Do We Organize in Minnesota??
2:40
Kristin Larson: “Precinct Caucus Importance”
2:55
Dennis Leahy: “A Heave-Ho to the Electoral Paradigm”
3:10 Nathan Ness: “Effective
vs. Ineffective Organizing”
3:25 Virgil Boehland: “Moving
to Amend”
3:40
Allen Hancock: “Building a Social Movement”
4:00+ Closing–
* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * *
Please arrive early.
We’ll try to start on time. It’s
a jam-packed schedule of presentations and audience discussion. The coffee and cookies will be ready by
10:40! For more information, call
218.591.5722
Wednesday, December 25, 2013
Mondragon: An alternative to capitalism or part of the capitalist scheme of things?
Of course, the Wall Street Journal (See article below) is going to paint the picture for cooperatives in the gloomiest ways; but, the fact remains, cooperatives aren't immune from capitalist depressions especially when they rely on the capitalist "free" markets.
But, what the Wall Street Journal also does not mention is that much of Mondragon's business is providing capitalist manufacturers with cheap parts and supplies.
And, worse yet is that what these workers have really lost in investing in these now bankrupt enterprises is their wages which means they have worked for next to nothing all this time.
But, not mentioned at all is what happened to all this money (wealth). Wealth just does not vanish into thin air--- this is one more way wealth get transferred... once, again, to the top. In the , the capitalist financiers and bankers get it all. Something else lost on the Wall Street Journal and those pushing Mondragon as an alternative to capitalism.
There is no escaping the need to challenge Wall Street and the other big financial centers across the world for political and economic power which requires a well organized and intense class struggle... something the promoters of these cooperative schemes try to evade as they try to convince workers there are ways around bringing mines, mills and factories under public ownership which is going to require the nationalization of entire industries.
In fact, these Mondragon workers are as bad off now with the closing of Fagor as the thousands of workers who were employed by Whirlpool in Benton Harbor, Michigan as their jobs were sent overseas as this article in the Wall Street Journal noted.
Members of the USW who have been sucked into this Mondragon scheme in Pennsylvania building components for wind generators will fair no better... this is why their contract and the details of what the workers are investing is guarded in absolute secrecy.
And this should serve as a warning to those like Gar Alperovitz who pushes these schemes as an alternative to nationalization and public ownership of the mines, mills and factories.
Of course, millionaire labor "leaders" like Leo "Red-baiting" Girard will end up enriching himself even further as Mondragon workers in Pennsylvania lose their shirts in his Mondragon scheme.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303290904579276551484127412
But, what the Wall Street Journal also does not mention is that much of Mondragon's business is providing capitalist manufacturers with cheap parts and supplies.
And, worse yet is that what these workers have really lost in investing in these now bankrupt enterprises is their wages which means they have worked for next to nothing all this time.
But, not mentioned at all is what happened to all this money (wealth). Wealth just does not vanish into thin air--- this is one more way wealth get transferred... once, again, to the top. In the , the capitalist financiers and bankers get it all. Something else lost on the Wall Street Journal and those pushing Mondragon as an alternative to capitalism.
There is no escaping the need to challenge Wall Street and the other big financial centers across the world for political and economic power which requires a well organized and intense class struggle... something the promoters of these cooperative schemes try to evade as they try to convince workers there are ways around bringing mines, mills and factories under public ownership which is going to require the nationalization of entire industries.
In fact, these Mondragon workers are as bad off now with the closing of Fagor as the thousands of workers who were employed by Whirlpool in Benton Harbor, Michigan as their jobs were sent overseas as this article in the Wall Street Journal noted.
Members of the USW who have been sucked into this Mondragon scheme in Pennsylvania building components for wind generators will fair no better... this is why their contract and the details of what the workers are investing is guarded in absolute secrecy.
And this should serve as a warning to those like Gar Alperovitz who pushes these schemes as an alternative to nationalization and public ownership of the mines, mills and factories.
Of course, millionaire labor "leaders" like Leo "Red-baiting" Girard will end up enriching himself even further as Mondragon workers in Pennsylvania lose their shirts in his Mondragon scheme.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303290904579276551484127412
By
Christopher Bjork
Dec. 25, 2013 5:59 p.m. ET
The failure of home-appliance maker Fagor has shaken
Spain's Mondragón network. Shown, workers outside Mondragón
headquarters in November.
Christopher Bjork/The Wall Street Journal
MONDRAGÓN, Spain—For decades, the
giant network of industrial and retail cooperatives born in this small
town was held up as an international model. Whenever one co-op got into
trouble, the rest of the Mondragón Corporation would rescue it with cash
or take on workers at risk of losing their jobs.
Then the unthinkable happened.
In
October, home appliance maker Fagor Electrodomésticos, a global
exporter and the U.S. market leader in pressure cookers, shut its
factories after the other co-ops denied it a lifeline. That, in turn,
has shaken the Mondragón network, the largest of its kind in the world,
fraying the bonds among its 109 surviving co-ops and eroding confidence
in the weaker ones. Many of its 80,000 employees now fear for their jobs
in a country with 26% unemployment.
"This
is our Lehman moment," said
Juan Antonio Talledo,
who lost his job on Fagor's refrigerator assembly line, recalling
the U.S. investment bank failure five years ago that nearly brought
down the global financial system.
With
debts of €850 million ($1.16 billion), Fagor is one of the biggest
casualties in Spain's record-setting year of bankruptcies. Even as the
economy emerges from its second recession in five years, growth remains
too weak to save many deeply indebted Spanish companies.
But
Fagor's abrupt closure reverberates beyond Spain. Many scholars in the
U.S. and Europe have argued for decades that employee-owned co-ops are a
more productive and worker-friendly alternative to traditional
shareholder capitalism. The crisis here highlights a weakness: Co-ops
have fewer options to raise capital when trying to ride out a recession.
The
long Spanish downturn that drained Fagor of resources now threatens
core principles of the network it had helped create—democratic
management and job security for employee-owners.
George Cheney,
a Kent State University professor who has studied Mondragón for
20 years, said the network will survive but faces severe strains.
Cooperatives around the world, he added, are watching how it resolves
competing demands of employees and lenders, and financial fallout among
its members.
The question, he said, is: "How can Mondragón maintain its soul?"
Fagor's
1,800 workers in Spain have lost their jobs and access to savings they
had plowed into the co-op. Tajo, a small co-op in the Mondragón network
that makes car parts and components for household appliances, says it
could face bankruptcy because Fagor bought much of its production.
Creditors owed €2.5 billion by supermarket chain Eroski, the network's
largest co-op, have told the management to retrench by selling or
closing outlets.
"Contagion is
inevitable," said
Lorenzo Bernaldo de Quirós,
head of Freemarket International Consulting in Madrid and a
former adviser to Mondragón. "Some co-ops lent money to Fagor. Others
were its suppliers. They're all intertwined."
Laid-off
workers stage frequent protests outside Mondragón's austere
concrete-and-glass headquarters, perched on a hill overlooking the
factory town and a lush valley in the Basque region of northern Spain.
Mayor
Inazio Azkarragaurizar Larrea calculates that Fagor's closure alone
will raise unemployment in the town of 22,000 people to 20%, from the
current 15%.
"The town is in a state of
psychosis," said Estibaliz Iñurrieta Lauzirika, owner of the Plus Ultra
bar, where townspeople fret about the co-ops over evening drinks and
talk of little else.
They and their
elders had thrived as Fagor, founded in 1955, sold refrigerators,
washing machines and televisions to Spain's emerging middle class.
Fagor's pioneer entrepreneurs, influenced by socialist thinkers and
Christian values, gave financial backing to other factory workers to
start their own co-ops, then merged them into a forerunner to Mondragón
Corporation in 1984.
Workers in a co-op
pool resources and own the business collectively, sharing in profit and
loss. Mondragón took the model a step further by pooling individual
co-ops' research, training and banking services, and creating a common
safety net of employment guarantees and social-security benefits. It
grew to be the seventh-largest employer in Spain and reported €14
billion in revenue last year.
Fagor expanded to markets in more than 100 countries, becoming the fifth-largest appliance maker in Europe.
Three decisions exposed Fagor to trouble just before the recession hit Spain in 2008.
The co-op acquired a French appliance company to try to achieve the scale to compete with
Whirlpool Corp.
WHR +0.22%
and
Electrolux
ELUX-B.SK +0.54%
AB. But while those larger rivals moved production to low-wage
Asian countries, Fagor kept most of its assembly lines in Spain and
France to preserve worker-owners' jobs. It could no longer compete on
price, and the acquisition raised its debt burden as sales plummeted at
home.
Meanwhile, Fagor sank €6 million
into the Driron, a refrigerator-size invention that could dry and iron
clothes at the same time. A €1,875 price tag and clunky look made it a
colossal flop.
The appliance maker had
few options to stay afloat. As with other co-ops, its ownership
structure legally barred the sale of new shares to raise capital, and
its ability to borrow was exhausted. It turned to its Mondragón
partners, who injected €300 million into the co-op after 2008.
Fagor
also hit up employees, selling them €80 million in high-yield debt on
the promise they could withdraw the investments within a month.
That
wasn't enough. At a tense meeting of Mondragón's board in September,
Fagor chief executive
Sergio Treviño,
pleaded for an additional €50 million for an orderly
restructuring. The aid plan required unanimous board approval, but
chiefs of the two largest co-ops, Eroski and lender Caja Laboral,
balked, according to people familiar with the deliberations. At the next
meeting they voted to rebuff him, saying the plan would throw good
money after bad, these people said.
"I
warned that if Fagor fell, a tsunami would wash over them, but they
dismissed the idea," Mr. Treviño said in a subsequent interview.
Fagor's
demise has upended the lives of 44-year-old forklift operator Igor
Unamuno and his wife, Leire Barona, who worked on the refrigerator
assembly line. In addition to losing their jobs, he said, they worry
about recovering the €55,000 in savings they had invested in Fagor—money
now tied up in bankruptcy proceedings.
With
an expensive mortgage and two children at home, the couple pins their
hopes on Mondragón's pledge to find work at other co-ops for at least
1,000 of Fagor's employees. More than 300 have been relocated, most to
temporary positions with fewer rights and benefits.
"The
days pass, and you hear about other workers getting called in for a
[job] interview," Mr. Unamuno said. "You hunker down. What else can you
do?"
—Ilan Brat contributed to this article.
Write to Christopher Bjork at christopher.bjork@wsj.com
Christmas Day and hundreds die in South Sudan--- for what?
What a
Christmas Day; hundreds of people have died in South Sudan, today; and
for what? Because the Wall Street crowd inflamed this ethnic hate as a
means to destabilize another country so these greedy vultures could get
their dirty hands on even greater profits derived from oil and gold.
Think about this: In a country where people are going hungry and don't have proper homes, someone is footing the bill to put the most deadly modern weaponry in their hands.
We need to know who is responsible for arming this country?
We need to know who these culprits are.
Something is drastically wrong when so much money can be found to arm people instead of spending the money to properly feed, cloth and house the people.
What kind of monsters would arm a nation of people to kill one another motivated only by ethnic hatreds?
Who is financing this war in Southern Sudan?
Find those who has financed the arming of both sides and we will find those who bear full responsibility for inflaming these ethnic hatreds.
Something to think about:
Had all this money spent on arming these people been used instead to bring about decent lives for ALL the people, this ethnic strife could not have been inflamed.
Think about this: In a country where people are going hungry and don't have proper homes, someone is footing the bill to put the most deadly modern weaponry in their hands.
We need to know who is responsible for arming this country?
We need to know who these culprits are.
Something is drastically wrong when so much money can be found to arm people instead of spending the money to properly feed, cloth and house the people.
What kind of monsters would arm a nation of people to kill one another motivated only by ethnic hatreds?
Who is financing this war in Southern Sudan?
Find those who has financed the arming of both sides and we will find those who bear full responsibility for inflaming these ethnic hatreds.
Something to think about:
Had all this money spent on arming these people been used instead to bring about decent lives for ALL the people, this ethnic strife could not have been inflamed.
Guest Blog: South Sudan's Most Vulnerable Face Hard Struggles In World's Youngest Country
Brian McAfee
2838 Mason Blvd.
Muskegon Hts., Michigan USA 49444
(231) 737-8726
brimac6@hotmail.com
South Sudan's Most Vulnerable Face Hard Struggles In World's Youngest Country
by Brian McAfee
Latest reports now indicate that about 34,000 South Sudanese civilians have sought refuge in United Nations missions in Juba and Bor. South Sudan, having only recently come into existence as an independent nation, July 9, 2011, has a population of 11,367,276 (worldpopulationreview.org). Since fighting broke out on December 15 about 500 thought to be killed and about 800 wounded. It began when former vice president Riek Machar, who had been fired from his position this past July, Machar's attacks against the South Sudan military and President Salva Kiir's responses appear to have primarily only resulted in tens of thousands of the civilian population left in desperate situations, many homeless with injuries and possibly thousands of orphans.
One of the more alarming attacks was the one that occurred on Dec. 20 in which 20 Dinka (a native ethnic group) were killed in an attack on a UN compound where the Dinka were being sheltered from just such attacks. Despite this singular case the UN and UN peacekeepers are and will be an indispensable element for a safe and secure South Sudan.
Some demographics, 82% of SS is Christian, 18 Islamic. Primary natural resources, copper, chromium ore, zinc, mica, silver, gold and diamonds. One problem area (in which South Sudan is definitely not alone) is access to drinkable water.
While it seems about half the population do have relatively easy access to water many, too many do not. This is a fundamental rights issue that people should bear in mind for everyone.
I urge and appreciate any cocideration of people donating- I of course suggest the UN, especially UNICEF and also OXFAM, they have been working in both Sudan and South Sudan (as long as SS has existed).
If you have any thoughts or comments write me at: brimac6@hotmail.com
Note: Here some additional articles for background information (ALM):
South Sudan became an independent
state on 9 July 2011,
"MINERAL OCCURRENCES AND
EXPLORATION WORK DONE IN SOUTH SUDAN. • There are a vast number of
metallic minerals spread all over the South Sudan: gold, copper,
zinc, lead, manganese, iron, silver, tin, etc. • Also industrial
minerals exist: marble, limestone, dolomite, kaolin, clay, asbestos,
etc. • Apart from gold at Kapoeta and Luri; copper at Hofrat
Ennahas, bauxite/iron ore at Wau area and marble at Kapoeta..."
Guest Blog: Syrian Refugee Crisis results in UN's Largest Emergency Appeal
Brian McAfee
2838 Mason Blvd.
Muskegon Hts., Michigan USA 49444
(231) 737-8726
brimac6@hotmail.com
Syrian Refugee Crisis results in UN's Largest Emergency Appeal
by Brian McAfee
According to the United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees the number of Syrian refugees is now over 2.3 million. The UNHCR also says that within Syria there are 4.2 displaced people as a result of the civil war that has been going on between Syria's president Bashar al-Assad and primarily an Al Quada lead rebel force, with both sides allowing and engaging in attacks on civilian targets.
The Kurds, who are about 9% of the Syrian population and traditionally have had a role in the Syrian government now are targeted from both al-Assad and the al-Quada like rebels.
The ongoing attacks on civilians have been shocking and heartbreaking. The government has engaged in air rades on civilian targets, one such raid, on the city of Aleppo, resulted in more than 300 deaths. During the past few months there were some hints that the U.S. and Obama may have some interest in supporting those at the forefront fighting against the Syrian president but to support an Islamic absolutist force dead set against any form egalitarianism or freedom of thought seems like somewhat less than a good idea.
Twenty percent of the people now living in Lebanon are newcomers. They are just some of those that have fled the violence and terror being lashed out against the civilian population in Syria. OXFAM is helping re-settle people in Jordon and Lebanon.
Almost half of the refugees are reported to be children. This is looking as though it may be the harshest winter on record for the region. With a million plus children, living through the winter in tents, the need is obvious. UNICEF has warned of the combined effects of a harsh winter living in tents, babies and infants and probably about 200,000 pregnant women. I urge you to donate to OXFAM and the other charities I will mention related to this issue . In a UNHCR statement on this they say " These children, women and men have made perilous journeys across country borders in search 0f safety. They are traumatized and fearful for their lives. Many are also physically wounded or suffering from illness and disease." This sums up the situation and the need. With the extreme cold that it appears will hit the region over the next few mew months babies, the sick and young children will be at risk for pneumonia. It is a bit too late for a Merry Christmas, we should do our best to try to make it as much of a Happy New Year as possible.
I very much encourage you to help the Syrian refugees.
UNHCR the UN High Commissioner for refugees
1-855-808-6427
OXFAM
1(800) 776-9326
info@oxfamamerica.org
Doctors without borders
1 888 392-0392
donations@newyork.msf.org
I welcome any comments. -Brian
brimac6@hotmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
