Friday, October 28, 2011
Four Directions Walk to End Poverty
There is a lot of important information here put together by the folks in Winnipeg, Manitoba struggling against poverty. Lots of good ideas for activists in cities all across Canada and the United States. Some really good work going on here… Alan
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011
From: Four Directions Walk
Subject: Four Directions Walk Cte meeting – Tues, Nov 1
Four Direction Walk to End Poverty in Manitoba
Dear Friends, Sisters and Brothers,
Thank you everyone who attended, walked and helped out with this year’s 4DW last Saturday! We’ll be having a meeting to see how things went and make plans:
Four Directions Walk Committee
Tues, Nov. 1, 4:30 pm
St. Matthews Maryland Church
641 Maryland
(Use the South door on McGee)
Everyone is welcome.
Numbers, media, etc.
This was our largest annual Walk to date; more than 100 people participated including 10 Walkers from the perimeter with another 20 joining along the way.
A larger number of groups participated, swelling the numbers including Occupy Winnipeg, Action 1:21, FemRev Winnipeg, Feed My Lambs (thank you for the food!) and The Urban, among others. We want to thank all the groups that helped out, some of which are not listed here!
For the first time, we both major newspapers in Winnipeg covered the Walk. The articles are appended, below. Cheryl-Anne Carr, a Walk Committee member, is quoted accurately:
“The problems have been studied long enough, the situations have been looked at long enough, the problem is that there are not enough jobs, and the pay is not high enough. The problem is the province wants to keep people poor so that theres a huge pool of labour that’s frightened and can be used to keep wages down, and prices high. There’s a shortage of housing, theres a shortage of education spaces.”
Paul Graham with the help of Ken Harasym has produced a 30 minute video of the Walk, which will be broadcast repeatedly on Shaw Cable’s community channel: http://paulsgraham.ca/2011/10/24/video-four-directions-walk-to-end-poverty/
Many thanks! This is a must-see!
There is another video on youtube, but I don’t know who produced it:
It looks like we’ll have to have another Walk next year, because we had zero response from the government. We invited all elected politicians to listen, not speak). Only Harvey Smith from Winnipeg City Council attended (J Gerbasi and J Browaty sent their regrets they could not attend).
Of Winnipeg’s MPs, 3 Conservatives sent regrets (Fletcher, Toet and Bateman). Of MLAs, only one Progressive Conservative sent regrets (R Eichler, chair of the caucus).
If you have qs, we are at 792-3371 or reply by email.
Yours For Ending Poverty in Manitoba,
Four Directions Walk Committee
* * * * * *
Anti-poverty rally held at Legislature
By,Winnipeg Sun, Saturday, October 22, 2011
(81 internet comments omitted)
With flags waving and protest signs in the air, people marched from four directions of the city with one message eliminate poverty.
Protesters walked for hours before joining for a rally at the Manitoba Legislative Building Saturday afternoon.
“The problems have been studied long enough, the situations have been looked at long enough, the problem is that there are not enough jobs, and the pay is not high enough,” said Cheryl-Anne Carr, Four Directions Walk committee member.
“The problem is the province wants to keep people poor so that theres a huge pool of labour that’s frightened and can be used to keep wages down, and prices high. There’s a shortage of housing, theres a shortage of education spaces.”
The event marked the fourth annual Four Directions Walk to End Poverty. Clothing and food donations were being taken at the rally for the less fortunate.
Protester Terry Weaymouth said he hopes the protest will open people’s eyes to Winnipeg’s poverty problems.
“I think everybody’s affected by poverty, especially in my life,” he said. “I grew up in poverty and my friends have been affected by poverty. Its a big issue.”
Shon Villier held up a sign that read Solidarity in different languages.
“We don’t have to live in a society where people are hungry and living in the streets,” Villier said. “We have the resources to share, we have the money and it doesn’t have to be this way.”
Politics blamed for plight of poor
Marchers rally at legislature
By: Alexandra Paul, Winnipeg Free Press, Sunday, October 23, 2011
(72 internet comments omitted)
Under grey skies, about 50 people with banners and placards that called for an end to poverty rallied on the steps of the Manitoba legislature Saturday.
The fourth annual Four Directions Walk to End Poverty saw groups of a dozen or more gather at each of the four cardinal points of the Perimeter Highway and walk through the city to meet at the government seat.
“I came all the way from the Perimeter at Headingley,” said Neil Adams, a community worker from the North End. “I told people on the way here, who were honking their horns on Portage Avenue, to honk for better housing, better water and more wages.”
The annual event draws together a coalition of anti-poverty groups that believe it is a lack of political will that keeps welfare rates low and the working poor dependent on food banks.
“The problem is the government wants to keep people poor so they’ll have a pool of cheap labour,” organizer Cheryl Ann Carr said.
“We’ve talked to hundreds of people and put together a justice charter, and we can eliminate poverty in this province and we can do it quickly,” Carr said.
The charter is a six-point plan that calls for housing, expanded health care, jobs and annual incomes to be human rights. It also calls for an end to racism, sexism and all forms of discrimination. The sixth demand is for proportional government and pay cuts to match the average workers wage and benefits for all MLAs.
The Lutheran Urban Ministry collected sweaters, coats, shoes and boots to distribute at the rally.
Another group was handing out food next to a sign that read, Feed My Lambs.
Walkers began at St. Mary’s Road and the Perimeter in the south, Portage Avenue at the Perimeter in the west, Main Street at the Perimeter in the north and Pembina Highway at the Perimeter in the south.
“The major problem we face in this city and in this province is poverty… What it requires is for some level of government action to do something about it,” Coun. Harvey Smith (Daniel McIntyre) said.
He pointed to municipal housing programs in cities like Calgary that could be adopted in Winnipeg to cut the rate of homelessness.
Longtime poverty advocate Nick Ternette said he puts the blame for a lack of political will squarely on the shoulders of the provincial government.
“The NDP has paid no attention to poverty issues in an effective way. During the election campaign, I asked one cabinet minister (if he supported) a guaranteed annual income and he said No. A single person on social assistance gets $481 a month; thats $4 a day for food. It hasn’t increased in over a decade,” Ternette said.
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Don't you just hate it when salespeople tell you something that isn't true just to sell you something?
I sent this to both Gander Mountain and Columbia.
Notice; I will be placing this exchange on my blog.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alan Maki
Date: Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: I bought these hiking boots at Gander Mountain in Forest Lake, Minnesota on Saturday [Incident: 111017-000020]
To: Columbia Sportswear Customer Care
James,
From: Alan Maki
Date: Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: I bought these hiking boots at Gander Mountain in Forest Lake, Minnesota on Saturday [Incident: 111017-000020]
To: Columbia Sportswear Customer Care
James,
Taking these boots back is not an option.
I live in Warroad, Minnesota over 400 miles from the store I purchased them at.
I tried taking them back to Gander Mountain in Bemidji, Minnesota and they told me they would not refund my money because "it was your responsibility to know what you purchased." The Bemidji store is over 140 miles from me--- one way.
Either way, an exchange would cost me more in gas than what I paid for the boots.
If you advertise something as "waterproof" (according to the salesman WP stands for "waterproof") the boots should be waterproof at least to the point where one can walk through the damp early morning grass.
I went to purchase hiking boots for fall hunting and ended up with boots that did not serve the purpose I specifically stated I wanted them for.
You should see to it that I am refunded a portion of my money in line with a comparable pair of boots that are not waterproof. In no place is there anything in the box or on the box explaining your coding as to what is waterproof and the limitations of waterproofing.
Alan L. Maki
--
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Columbia Sportswear Customer Care <columbia@custhelp.com> wrote:
Recently you requested personal assistance from our on-line support center. Below is a summary of your request and our response.
We will assume your issue has been resolved if we do not hear from you within 96 hours.
Thank you for allowing us to be of service to you.
Subject I bought these hiking boots at Gander Mountain in Forest Lake, Minnesota an Saturday, Oct. 15, 2011 Discussion Thread Response (James) 10/18/2011 01:46 PM Hi Alan,
I am sorry to hear about your boots. I am sure that Gander Mountain has a return policy, especially since these shoes are such a new purchase. As far as the Coretek Boot itself, the material is indeed meant to be waterproof. However, it doesn't have a waterproof membrane, meaning that if water penetrates the outer material, your feet end up getting soaked.
So in essence, the material on your boots is waterproof, but I would recommend buying something that has an Omni-Tech or OutDry membrane, meaning that even if water penetrates the outer material, your feet will remain dry.
I understand your frustration as a consumer, and don't want you to feel like you don't have any options. I would encourage you to take the footwear back to Gander Mountain and see what they can do for you. If they are not too much help, contact us and we will get you taken care of.
Regards,
James
Customer CareCustomer (Alan Maki) 10/17/2011 05:09 AM I bought these hiking boots at Gander Mountain in Forest Lake, Minnesota an Saturday, October 15. The salesman told me these boots were waterproof. He told me the "WP" stood for "waterproof." I walked through the moist grass this morning and they got soaked through. I obviously wasted $79.00. Question Reference #111017-000020
Date Created: 10/17/2011 05:09 AM Last Updated: 10/18/2011 01:46 PM Status: Waiting First Name: Alan Zip/postal code: 56763 Country:
Phone: 218-386-2432 Last Name: Maki Style # Columbia Coretek WP
Alan L. Maki
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell: 651-587-5541
Primary E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net
E-mail: alan.maki1951mn@gmail.com
Should an occupation of the Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant be considered to save it?

Eighty-six years of government subsidies in St. Paul and Ford packs up and moves its Ranger operation to Thailand:
http://www.twincities.com/ci_19134908?IADID=Search-www.twinc ities.com-www.twincities.com www.twincities.comFORD MOTOR CO.: EIGHTY-SIX YEARS IN ST. PAUL
Ford Motor Company announces its Christmas present for workers and the Twin Cities:
http://www.twincities.com/ci_19132527?IADID=Search-www.twinc ities.com-www.twincities.com
www.twincities.comWorkers at the Ford Motor Co. plant in St. Paul got the word Monday: The 86-year-old facility will close Dec. 19.
Thursday, October 13, 2011
Now is the time to bring back the "Rebuild America Act" and the push for "peace dividends."
The claim that the Occupy Wall Street movement is the "first populist movement" on the "left" since the 1930's is not really true. Those who push this view want to discourage today's activists from building on the struggles of the past.
The peace movement has been a "populist movement" for many years now.
The Occupy Wall Street movement could build on the struggles of the peace movement by reviving the progressive "Rebuild America Act" first proposed by left-wing labor leader William Winpisinger that found tremendous support among liberals, progressives and the left.
Since the AFL-CIO has entered the Occupy Wall Street movement, and this movement is growing by leaps and bounds, we need to find ways to help keep it growing. This would be the perfect time to talk with the leaders of organized labor about its responsibility for what Obama is doing by virtue of Organized labor's support for Obama and his phony "jobs legislation" by bringing forward the "Rebuild America Act."
The Occupy Wall Street movement could also start pushing for a "peace dividend;"end militarism and wars, fund human needs.
The AFL-CIO should not be pushing Obama's phony "American Jobs Act" that only creates more troughs for Wall Street's fat pigs to profit from.
What ever happened to William Winpisinger's "Rebuild America Act?"
The AFL-CIO should bring back to life its committee on conversion from military spending to spending on human needs; William Winpisinger worked hard to establish this committee.
Richard Trumka and Elizabeth Warren should do what they said they would do: Hold Obama's feet to the fire. They could do this by running against Obama and Biden promoting William Winpinsinger's "Rebuild America Act."
The Occupy Wall Street movement might have the political strength and muscle to put the progressive "Rebuild America Act" back on the table so we can begin to talk about "peace dividends" again.
How is Barack Obama's Wall Street war economy working for you?
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Racism in Minnesota elections exposed
My comment on this article... Something to think about:
The Minnesota Indian Gaming Association has spent tens of millions of dollars over the last 20 plus years in campaign contributions and there isn't one single Native American sitting in the Minnesota State Legislature. This is not democracy. These politicians elected with the money from Indian Gaming don't even know how to say the word "poverty" let alone do anything to end poverty.
If they use redistricting to continue splitting the Native American vote there should be a federal lawsuit filed because the pattern of racism in public employment proves racism is a very serious problem. Native Americans pay out a lot in taxes yet get none of the jobs when taxes are spent. The Bemidji Regional Events Center is a perfect example of racism in employment. Over 60 million tax-payer dollars were spent and Affirmative Action was not enforced. Not one single politician receiving campaign funds from the Indian Gaming Industry would raise their voice and insist that racist hiring be brought to an end through Affirmative Action.
Anyone who becomes involved in the Democratic or Republican Parties quickly find they have entered an extremely racist environment and these racists work in collusion to make sure the problems of Native Americans are ignored.
At a bare minimum, Senate District 4 and House District 4-A should be redistricted to assure the election of Native American candidates. I mean really, is there any legitimate reason why there shouldn't be Native American voices in Minnesota with a large Native American Indian population plus the millions of dollars spent on campaign contributions coming from the Indian Gaming Association? This money should be for the use of Native American politicians.
Ribs is a "yes man" for John McCarthy. Anyone who attends a Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party State Convention sees this right away... John McCarthy is constantly telling Ribs how to vote. Ribs has not uttered one single word in defense of jobs and ending poverty at any state convention. Not once has he insisted on accountability from the DFL when it comes to health care, housing, environmental issues.
Northern Minnesota residents speak up on redistricting at hearing
Keeping American Indian tribes at the forefront of the decision-making process was a plea heard frequently by five judges Monday evening. By: Anne Williams, Bemidji Pioneerhttp://www.bemidjipioneer.com/event/article/id/100032210
- Image
A special panel of judges appointed by a Minnesota’s Supreme Court chief justice held a public hearing on redistricting in Bemidji Tuesday evening at the Beltrami County Administrative Building. Though a serious issue for many who spoke at the hearing, Judges John R. Rodenberg, left, Edward L. Lynch and Wilhelmina M. Wright found humor in Mike Simpkins’ opening remark. Pioneer Photo/Monte Draper
A public hearing was held in Bemidji in which a panel heard the opinions of 14 northern Minnesota residents about how new congressional and legislative district lines should be redrawn.
Bemidji was one of eight cities chosen to host a public hearing on redistricting. Redrawing district lines is a federal requirement every 10 years to keep all districts’ population the same.
The judges plan to release their decision on Feb. 21, unless the state Legislature and Gov. Mark Dayton agree on their own maps.
Several people who spoke at Tuesday’s hearing were in favor of keeping American Indian bands together in congressional or legislative districts.
Kathryn Beaulieu, a member of the Red Lake Band of Chippewa, asked the panel to consider not splitting up American Indian reservations.
“We should never, as a state, split up any reservation,” she said. “Until such time as American Indians are truly represented on all levels of government, no matter how you dice up the congressional or legislative maps, we refuse to be the forgotten American.”
Sally Fineday, a representative with the Native Vote Alliance of Minnesota, said fair redistricting for American Indians could mean the White Earth, Red Lake and Leech Lake Reservations should be included in the same Senate and Congressional districts.
She also suggested the three reservations plus the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe be included in one congressional district.
“I encourage you to take a stand, to be fair by including American Indian tribes at the redistricting decision table,” Fineday said.
Eugene “Ribs” Whitebird, the District 3 representative with the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe, was not in favor of keeping all American Indian bands in one district.
“As for congressional districts, I do not believe the interest of Leech Lake or other Native Americans in northern Minnesota are well served by being in one single Congressional district,” he said.
He added the district lines should be drawn to include the entire Leech Lake Reservation in one House district and, if possible, to include Bemidji in the same district.
City Councilor Ron Johnson, who is also on the Bemidji Regional Airport Authority committee, said it would be in the Bemidji Regional Airport’s best interest to have district lines drawn similarly to how they currently exist.
“The proposed congressional map puts Bemidji in the same district as Duluth,” Johnson said. “While we work closely with the Duluth airport, we also compete directly with (them). We feel we have better representation with being in separate districts like we are now.”
If Bemidji continues to be split into two congressional districts as it is now, Johnson added, he prefers the airport be included in congressional district 7.
Mike Simpkins, a resident of Beltrami County, said because Bemidji is split between two congressional districts, it gets two Congress members, which he said is a bonus. However, he added, “Bemidji has more in common with Congressional District 7.”
Steve Engel, a resident of Guthrie Township in northern Hubbard County, suggested that all of Hubbard County remain in the same congressional district and that the county be placed in the same Senate and legislative district.
“We find it is difficult having in our county two different Senate districts and two different legislative districts,” he said. “People are confused. I believe it would also be easier and preferable for county officials to deal with one set of legislators.”
Bud Stone, president of the Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce, and Joe Silko, superintendent of the Grand Rapids Public School District, also spoke at the hearing, as did others from around northern Minnesota, including the city of Cohasset.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright of the Appeals Court presided over the panel. The other four judges were Ivy S. Bernhardson of Hennepin County, James B. Florey of St. Louis County, Edward I. Lynch of Dakota County and John R. Rodenberg of Brown County.
Members of the public are invited to submit written comments to the panel. Written statements must be received by the panel no later than Friday, Oct. 21. More information on submitting written comments can be found on the panel’s website, www.mncourts.gov/?page=4469.
The Democrats bring the smoke-filled backrooms of corrupt politics to FaceBook
By Alan L. Maki as posted on FaceBook; Wednesday, October 12, 2011 at 6:01am
Has anyone noticed how so many of the Democratic Party's groups here on Wall Street--- whoops, I mean FaceBook--- are going to "closed" and "secret" status?
Isn't it is nice to know that we have people who want to engage in politics in secret little groups free from dialog, discussion and debate--- what used to be referred to as "smoke-filled backrooms"--- where they can discuss and manipulate the rest of us free from being challenged?
Where any challengers to their big-business, neo-liberal thinking they proclaim to be "progressive" get "blocked" and booted out.
They want our money; they want our votes. They want us to work their phone banks. They want us to walk the neighborhoods and put up their yard signs, where their buttons and t-shirts and place their bumper-stickers on our cars.
But, when we say we want peace and jobs they bring out the duct tape to put over our mouths.
And they have the unmitigated gall to boast to the world that this is "democracy."
Now these Democrats meet in their "secret" FaceBook rooms when they aren't meeting in the smoke-filled casinos of the Indian Gaming Industry where people are forced to work at poverty wages and without any rights as a "gift" to the mobsters who own the slot machines who then turn around and make big financial contributions to their dirty, corrupt political campaigns.
Quite the system and way of doing things, eh?
Isn't it is nice to know that we have people who want to engage in politics in secret little groups free from dialog, discussion and debate--- what used to be referred to as "smoke-filled backrooms"--- where they can discuss and manipulate the rest of us free from being challenged?
Where any challengers to their big-business, neo-liberal thinking they proclaim to be "progressive" get "blocked" and booted out.
They want our money; they want our votes. They want us to work their phone banks. They want us to walk the neighborhoods and put up their yard signs, where their buttons and t-shirts and place their bumper-stickers on our cars.
But, when we say we want peace and jobs they bring out the duct tape to put over our mouths.
And they have the unmitigated gall to boast to the world that this is "democracy."
Now these Democrats meet in their "secret" FaceBook rooms when they aren't meeting in the smoke-filled casinos of the Indian Gaming Industry where people are forced to work at poverty wages and without any rights as a "gift" to the mobsters who own the slot machines who then turn around and make big financial contributions to their dirty, corrupt political campaigns.
Quite the system and way of doing things, eh?
Monday, October 10, 2011
Some more thoughts about the Occupy Wall Street movement
I assume my comments are welcome by the Occupy Wall Street movement whether there is agreement or not--- part of the democratic participation we are all striving for; correct?
The Occupy Wall Street movement suggests, and correctly so, that "democracy" with full participation of the people (99%) in the decision making processes (I assume full participation means social, political and economic?)is the objective yet it seems some solutions to problems are not being considered. Why not put everything on the table for discussion, dialog and debate and let people decide?
We want a participatory democratic process where working people (the majority of the 99%) are involved at all levels of society in ways where our participation actually allows us to make decisions affecting our lives instead of being trapped into thinking that our role is to rubber stamp the actions of Wall Street's two-party scheme and scam; right?
"They" is referred to in this "Declaration" < http://nycga.cc/2011/09/30/declaration-of-the-occupation-of-new-york-city/ > of the OWS movement, and this is called "Occupy Wall Street," yet Wall Street has not been declared our common enemy and obviously this "Declaration" is so vague you do not interpret it to be a statement against capitalism and its most decadent stage, imperialism. Not a single Wall Street office has been occupied--- at least not yet.
The grievances are stated but where are the solutions to these problems stated?
Who are these grievances being presented to for solution?
What is being demanded of government?
Will methods be found to present these grievances to those who have the power to resolve these problems?
Above in my comment I have presented a "people's program for real change" which BEGINS to address many of the specific grievances that are listed in this "Declaration"
< http://nycga.cc/2011/09/30/declaration-of-the-occupation-of-new-york-city/ > you provide us a link to.
We need solutions (reforms) to our (the 99%; mostly working people) problems that are financed by redistributing the wealth of this 1% (Wall Street).
The Occupy Wall Street movement is a very important development only to the extent that it brings people into struggles for very specific reforms (personally, I hope OWS is preparing the ground to get rid of capitalism sooner rather than later) as we challenge Wall Street for power which will take struggles in the streets combined with electoral struggle and occupations of mines,mills and factories where employers lock out workers in an attempt to evade collective bargaining and where Wall Street (corporations/banks) decide to close down factories and ship jobs to low wage/cheap resource areas. Student occupations of colleges and universities demanding free higher-level education while negotiating lower tuitions, etc. Occupations of welfare offices when these arrogant bureaucrats deny people the help they are entitled to. Occupations of Congressional offices demanding peace, the prosecutions of war criminals like Bush, Cheney, Obama.
Occupations of public parks and public squares are good for the purpose of holding discussions about what needs to be done but let us not delude ourselves or anyone else that these occupations of public parks and public squares are going to lead to reforms getting our grievances resolved--- let alone revolution.
Change simply isn't going to come through one big occupation of a park or a public square or even the occupation of hundreds of public parks or public squares.
Begin to occupy Goldman Sachs, congressional offices and dogging Barack Obama on the campaign trail insisting on real reforms intended to solve the very real and very specific problems people are experiencing and we take this movement to a higher level which will assure this movement will not be manipulated and controlled by Obama and the other Wall Street bribed and owned politicians.
If out of these discussions taking place during these occupations we agree to organize a political movement to free ourselves from Wall Street's two-party trap, a political movement capable of articulating these grievances and their solutions, and we elect people's politicians from the ranks of those involved in and supporting the OWS movement we bring together a massive anti-monopoly coalition that can challenge Wall Street for power (take power away from Wall Street and make "power to the people" a reality) we will then have a movement against "them" ("They")--- Wall Street.
The New York Times advises Barack Obama to engage in a demagogic populist rhetoric using the grievances articulated by the OWS movement... are WE (99%) going to allow THEM (Wall Street- 1%)to get away with this--- without so much as solving one single one of our problems?
Again, here are some ideas I put forward for discussion, let's discuss how this fits in with the grievances and what kind of specific legislation, etc. it is going to take to get our (99%) problems solved--- this is our common goal and objective, is it not? Let's call this our "revolutionary road;" reforms on the road to revolution:
A people’s program for real change...
* Peace--- end the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya and shutdown the 800 U.S. military bases on foreign soil protecting Wall Street’s interests.
* A National Public Health Care System - ten million new jobs; free health care for all.
* A National Public Child Care System - three to five million new jobs; free child care for all working families.
* Works Progress Administration - three million new jobs; repair, restore and build new infrastructure.
* Civilian Conservation Corps - two million new jobs protecting and restoring to health our ecosystems.
* Public Ownership of the 58,000 mines, mills and factories closed by Wall Street – twenty-five million good paying, decent union jobs.
* Tax the hell out of the rich and cut the military budget by ending the wars to pay for it all which will create full employment.
* Enforce Affirmative Action; end discrimination.
* Raise the minimum wage to a real living wage.
* What tax-payers subsidize in the way of businesses, tax-payers should own and reap the profits from.
* Moratorium on home foreclosures and evictions.
* Defend democracy by defending workers' rights including the right to collective bargaining for improving the lives and livelihoods of working people.
* Roll-back and freeze the price of food, electricity, gas and heating fuels; not wages, benefits or pensions.
* Defend and expand Social Security.
* Wall Street is our enemy.
Let's talk about the politics and economics of livelihood for a real change.
The time has come for working people to break free from Wall Street’s “two-party trap.” We need a working class-based progressive people’s party.
Peace + tax the rich = millions of new jobs at real living wages putting people to work solving our social problems which will solve our economic problems… Redistribute the wealth. Put people before Wall Street profits.
The OWS movement needs to have a real dialog with the American people beginning with asking the question:
How is Barack Obama's Wall Street war economy working for you?
This is a most basic and fundamental question requiring an answer because from the way people answer this question we find get to the specific problems and what it is going to take to agree on solutions.
Primarying Obama and electing activists from the Occupy Wall Street movement to local, state and federal offices on a third party ticket should also become a part of this movement--- just look at the base of support for these candidates there would be. Occupy public offices with candidates prepared to fight Wall Street for power.
The Occupy Wall Street movement suggests, and correctly so, that "democracy" with full participation of the people (99%) in the decision making processes (I assume full participation means social, political and economic?)is the objective yet it seems some solutions to problems are not being considered. Why not put everything on the table for discussion, dialog and debate and let people decide?
We want a participatory democratic process where working people (the majority of the 99%) are involved at all levels of society in ways where our participation actually allows us to make decisions affecting our lives instead of being trapped into thinking that our role is to rubber stamp the actions of Wall Street's two-party scheme and scam; right?
"They" is referred to in this "Declaration" < http://nycga.cc/2011/09/30/declaration-of-the-occupation-of-new-york-city/ > of the OWS movement, and this is called "Occupy Wall Street," yet Wall Street has not been declared our common enemy and obviously this "Declaration" is so vague you do not interpret it to be a statement against capitalism and its most decadent stage, imperialism. Not a single Wall Street office has been occupied--- at least not yet.
The grievances are stated but where are the solutions to these problems stated?
Who are these grievances being presented to for solution?
What is being demanded of government?
Will methods be found to present these grievances to those who have the power to resolve these problems?
Above in my comment I have presented a "people's program for real change" which BEGINS to address many of the specific grievances that are listed in this "Declaration"
< http://nycga.cc/2011/09/30/declaration-of-the-occupation-of-new-york-city/ > you provide us a link to.
We need solutions (reforms) to our (the 99%; mostly working people) problems that are financed by redistributing the wealth of this 1% (Wall Street).
The Occupy Wall Street movement is a very important development only to the extent that it brings people into struggles for very specific reforms (personally, I hope OWS is preparing the ground to get rid of capitalism sooner rather than later) as we challenge Wall Street for power which will take struggles in the streets combined with electoral struggle and occupations of mines,mills and factories where employers lock out workers in an attempt to evade collective bargaining and where Wall Street (corporations/banks) decide to close down factories and ship jobs to low wage/cheap resource areas. Student occupations of colleges and universities demanding free higher-level education while negotiating lower tuitions, etc. Occupations of welfare offices when these arrogant bureaucrats deny people the help they are entitled to. Occupations of Congressional offices demanding peace, the prosecutions of war criminals like Bush, Cheney, Obama.
Occupations of public parks and public squares are good for the purpose of holding discussions about what needs to be done but let us not delude ourselves or anyone else that these occupations of public parks and public squares are going to lead to reforms getting our grievances resolved--- let alone revolution.
Change simply isn't going to come through one big occupation of a park or a public square or even the occupation of hundreds of public parks or public squares.
Begin to occupy Goldman Sachs, congressional offices and dogging Barack Obama on the campaign trail insisting on real reforms intended to solve the very real and very specific problems people are experiencing and we take this movement to a higher level which will assure this movement will not be manipulated and controlled by Obama and the other Wall Street bribed and owned politicians.
If out of these discussions taking place during these occupations we agree to organize a political movement to free ourselves from Wall Street's two-party trap, a political movement capable of articulating these grievances and their solutions, and we elect people's politicians from the ranks of those involved in and supporting the OWS movement we bring together a massive anti-monopoly coalition that can challenge Wall Street for power (take power away from Wall Street and make "power to the people" a reality) we will then have a movement against "them" ("They")--- Wall Street.
The New York Times advises Barack Obama to engage in a demagogic populist rhetoric using the grievances articulated by the OWS movement... are WE (99%) going to allow THEM (Wall Street- 1%)to get away with this--- without so much as solving one single one of our problems?
Again, here are some ideas I put forward for discussion, let's discuss how this fits in with the grievances and what kind of specific legislation, etc. it is going to take to get our (99%) problems solved--- this is our common goal and objective, is it not? Let's call this our "revolutionary road;" reforms on the road to revolution:
A people’s program for real change...
* Peace--- end the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya and shutdown the 800 U.S. military bases on foreign soil protecting Wall Street’s interests.
* A National Public Health Care System - ten million new jobs; free health care for all.
* A National Public Child Care System - three to five million new jobs; free child care for all working families.
* Works Progress Administration - three million new jobs; repair, restore and build new infrastructure.
* Civilian Conservation Corps - two million new jobs protecting and restoring to health our ecosystems.
* Public Ownership of the 58,000 mines, mills and factories closed by Wall Street – twenty-five million good paying, decent union jobs.
* Tax the hell out of the rich and cut the military budget by ending the wars to pay for it all which will create full employment.
* Enforce Affirmative Action; end discrimination.
* Raise the minimum wage to a real living wage.
* What tax-payers subsidize in the way of businesses, tax-payers should own and reap the profits from.
* Moratorium on home foreclosures and evictions.
* Defend democracy by defending workers' rights including the right to collective bargaining for improving the lives and livelihoods of working people.
* Roll-back and freeze the price of food, electricity, gas and heating fuels; not wages, benefits or pensions.
* Defend and expand Social Security.
* Wall Street is our enemy.
Let's talk about the politics and economics of livelihood for a real change.
The time has come for working people to break free from Wall Street’s “two-party trap.” We need a working class-based progressive people’s party.
Peace + tax the rich = millions of new jobs at real living wages putting people to work solving our social problems which will solve our economic problems… Redistribute the wealth. Put people before Wall Street profits.
The OWS movement needs to have a real dialog with the American people beginning with asking the question:
How is Barack Obama's Wall Street war economy working for you?
This is a most basic and fundamental question requiring an answer because from the way people answer this question we find get to the specific problems and what it is going to take to agree on solutions.
Primarying Obama and electing activists from the Occupy Wall Street movement to local, state and federal offices on a third party ticket should also become a part of this movement--- just look at the base of support for these candidates there would be. Occupy public offices with candidates prepared to fight Wall Street for power.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

