Sunday, December 29, 2013
More on the Minimum Wage.
I am hearing more and more from those who think we need to "compromise" on the Minimum Wage issue.
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton and Minnesota State Senator Kathy Sheran keep accusing me of "tightening the springs" in insisting on the Minimum Wage being a real living wage.
Some Democratic Party big-wigs banded together under the "leadership" of MN DFL Chair Ken Martin for a private meeting to discuss "how are we going to handle Maki on this thorny Minimum Wage problem."
The problem isn't with me; it is with them.
I'm not for cutting the Democrats one bit of slack on this very important issue. There will be no other issue that affects so many working people as this one.
DFL Chair Ken Martin says I should be smeared for not attacking the Republicans on this issue. What do the Republicans have to do with anything? It is the Democrats who have the super-majority--- a Democratic Governor, a Democratic majority in the State House and a solid Democratic majority in the State Senate. The only thing Republicans can do is cry.
Martin and Company are crying about my "Letters to the Editors" appearing in newspapers across the state accusing the Democrats of "Bait and Switch."
They say I am not taking on the Republicans. This is an outright lie. When these morons were capitulating and acquiescing to the Republicans, as an elected member of the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party's State Central Committee, my voice was more often than not the only voice publicly heard coming from the Minnesota DFL challenging the Republicans. The facts of this are plain as day for anyone who reads the newspapers, listens to the radio or watches the news on television to see and hear.
I have actually had quite a lot to say about the Republicans on this issue of the Minimum Wage, though, in my writings and speeches.
However, because, like everyone, I am forced to work within the number of words these newspapers allow, I can't get into the issue as I would want to in "Letters to the Editor."
So, I am content in leaving it to Minnesota Chair Ken Martin and Governor Dayton to explain to Minnesotans how these dirty Republicans are preventing them from passing real "Living Wage Legislation."
Anyone can write in following up on my letters pointing out what the problem is with the Democrats--- and I have stated this time and time again in relation to the Minimum Wage issue so I don't really find any need to waste my space allotted in a "Letter to the Editor" attacking Republicans when it is the Democrats we need to focus on.
I have made this clear about the Republicans--- over and over again:
1. The Republicans will not support an increase in the Minimum Wage;
2. Most Republicans in Minnesota are for doing away with Minimum Wage legislation altogether.
For years, many decades, the DFL has stated that if they were given a super-majority by the voters they would enact what amounts to a Minimum Wage that is a real living--- non-poverty--- wage.
It is not true that I would be opposed to anything the Democrats do in increasing the Minimum Wage as is being asserted to malign me.
If the Democrats enact real living wage legislation I welcome this.
A "living wage" means a non-poverty wage.
We, the tax-payers, are paying big money to two government agencies--- U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics--- responsible for compiling and collecting data relating to "cost of living."
It is not up to me to state what the Minimum Wage should be in order for the Minimum Wage to be a non-poverty wage.
A non-poverty wage is based on actual "cost-of-living" factors.
When I see my name on the paycheck for who is being paid to tell us what a living, non-poverty, Minimum Wage actually is, I will provide the detailed calculations of how I arrive at my figures--- but, my figures are irrelevant; it is the politicians, not me, who have to be held accountable for the figures they are bandying about.
It is not I anyone should be seeking this explanation from as to what a non-poverty Minimum Wage should be.
It is from the politicians like Governor Mark Dayton, State Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk, State House Leader Erin Murphy and Senator Tony Lourey who Chairs Health and Human Services Committee or State Senator Kathy Sheran who Chairs Health, Human Services and Housing.
I do know a little something about what the Minnesota DFL Platform has to say about "living wages" because I helped to write this part of the Platform, which states in no uncertain terms what the rank-and-file and grassroots base of the DFL stands for on this issue; and I quote from the MN DFL Party's Platform:
"A minimum wage that keeps pace with inflation and provides full time workers with an income above the poverty level."
ANY Minnesota DFL politician who is not going to use the DFL's super-majority to enact Minimum Wage legislation in line with this part of MN DFL Party's Platform should be sitting with the Republican Party's legislative caucus.
I think we are all very aware that DFL super-majorities are very rare and when achieved they should not be frivolously squandered.
Unless we have hugely different interpretations of what is meant by a "living wage" I don't see where there is a problem.
Unless anyone has reason to believe we shouldn't be able to trust the United States Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics to compile data for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) than it seems to me WHAT the Minimum Wage should be is rather cut-and-dried.
Why should any working man or working woman be satisfied with anything less than a real living wage which is determined by analyzing all "cost-of-living" factors?
In fact, to do otherwise leaves people of color, women, the handicapped, youth and now even seniors forced back into the workforce holding the shitty end of the stick forever.
If the Minimum Wage should be $7.60 as Wisconsin Democrats claim, or $8.50, $9.50, $10.10 or $11.00 as various Democrats here in Minnesota are claiming--- all they have to do is show us the data from either the U.S. Statistical Abstract compiled by the United States Census Bureau or the CPI monitored by the Bureau of Labor Statistics to prove these figures to be a "living wage."
Obviously all these figures can't be correct; and any working man or working woman can tell you that none of these figures are correct because no one can live a "non-poverty" life on any such pathetic miserly wages.
Is a $10.00 an hour Minimum Wage "better than" Minnesota's current Minimum Wage of $6.15?
Democrats did not promise "better than;" Democrats campaigning for public office do not promise "better than."
The promise of the Democrats and their Platform calls for "living wages" which can only be interpreted as, "A minimum wage that keeps pace with inflation and provides full time workers with an income above the poverty level."
Their own words:
"Above the poverty level."
Do you see any government agency stating that $8.50, $9.50, $10.10 or $11.00 an hour is "above the poverty level?"
Republicans have no say in any of this; however, apparently, the lobbyists for the employers are the only ones Minnesota politicians are listening to--- which means Minnesotans are going to have to speak with one clear voice on this issue: for a Minimum Wage that is a real living wage.
We are entitled to this in return for our votes.
E-N-T-I-T-L-E-D.
It is about accountability which is as fundamental to democracy as a living wage is as basic and fundamental to human rights.
We must not tolerate "Bait and Switch" politics anymore than we would tolerate the highly illegal practice of "Bait and Switch" in the retail marketplace.
In addition to my long-standing disdain for the reactionary Republican Party, my views regarding Minimum Wage legislation and small business is also well known--- I think small business should be excluded from Minimum Wage legislation when it comes to these employers hiring family members and relatives... if these people want to pay their grandmas and grandpas poverty wages and all parties are agreeable to this than so be it--- eliminate the enforcement of the Minimum Wage in these circumstances; we don't want a bunch of selfish small business people shedding a trail of tears out in the suburbs and gated communities which seems to be where the Minnesota DFL is picking up most of its campaign contributions from.
The DFL with its super-majority should accommodate both workers and small business people as part of being accountable to voters and even larger campaign contributors--- but, compromise with the lobbyists representing the largest corporate employers? No way in hell.
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton and Minnesota State Senator Kathy Sheran keep accusing me of "tightening the springs" in insisting on the Minimum Wage being a real living wage.
Some Democratic Party big-wigs banded together under the "leadership" of MN DFL Chair Ken Martin for a private meeting to discuss "how are we going to handle Maki on this thorny Minimum Wage problem."
The problem isn't with me; it is with them.
I'm not for cutting the Democrats one bit of slack on this very important issue. There will be no other issue that affects so many working people as this one.
DFL Chair Ken Martin says I should be smeared for not attacking the Republicans on this issue. What do the Republicans have to do with anything? It is the Democrats who have the super-majority--- a Democratic Governor, a Democratic majority in the State House and a solid Democratic majority in the State Senate. The only thing Republicans can do is cry.
Martin and Company are crying about my "Letters to the Editors" appearing in newspapers across the state accusing the Democrats of "Bait and Switch."
They say I am not taking on the Republicans. This is an outright lie. When these morons were capitulating and acquiescing to the Republicans, as an elected member of the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party's State Central Committee, my voice was more often than not the only voice publicly heard coming from the Minnesota DFL challenging the Republicans. The facts of this are plain as day for anyone who reads the newspapers, listens to the radio or watches the news on television to see and hear.
I have actually had quite a lot to say about the Republicans on this issue of the Minimum Wage, though, in my writings and speeches.
However, because, like everyone, I am forced to work within the number of words these newspapers allow, I can't get into the issue as I would want to in "Letters to the Editor."
So, I am content in leaving it to Minnesota Chair Ken Martin and Governor Dayton to explain to Minnesotans how these dirty Republicans are preventing them from passing real "Living Wage Legislation."
Anyone can write in following up on my letters pointing out what the problem is with the Democrats--- and I have stated this time and time again in relation to the Minimum Wage issue so I don't really find any need to waste my space allotted in a "Letter to the Editor" attacking Republicans when it is the Democrats we need to focus on.
I have made this clear about the Republicans--- over and over again:
1. The Republicans will not support an increase in the Minimum Wage;
2. Most Republicans in Minnesota are for doing away with Minimum Wage legislation altogether.
For years, many decades, the DFL has stated that if they were given a super-majority by the voters they would enact what amounts to a Minimum Wage that is a real living--- non-poverty--- wage.
It is not true that I would be opposed to anything the Democrats do in increasing the Minimum Wage as is being asserted to malign me.
If the Democrats enact real living wage legislation I welcome this.
A "living wage" means a non-poverty wage.
We, the tax-payers, are paying big money to two government agencies--- U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics--- responsible for compiling and collecting data relating to "cost of living."
It is not up to me to state what the Minimum Wage should be in order for the Minimum Wage to be a non-poverty wage.
A non-poverty wage is based on actual "cost-of-living" factors.
When I see my name on the paycheck for who is being paid to tell us what a living, non-poverty, Minimum Wage actually is, I will provide the detailed calculations of how I arrive at my figures--- but, my figures are irrelevant; it is the politicians, not me, who have to be held accountable for the figures they are bandying about.
It is not I anyone should be seeking this explanation from as to what a non-poverty Minimum Wage should be.
It is from the politicians like Governor Mark Dayton, State Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk, State House Leader Erin Murphy and Senator Tony Lourey who Chairs Health and Human Services Committee or State Senator Kathy Sheran who Chairs Health, Human Services and Housing.
I do know a little something about what the Minnesota DFL Platform has to say about "living wages" because I helped to write this part of the Platform, which states in no uncertain terms what the rank-and-file and grassroots base of the DFL stands for on this issue; and I quote from the MN DFL Party's Platform:
"A minimum wage that keeps pace with inflation and provides full time workers with an income above the poverty level."
ANY Minnesota DFL politician who is not going to use the DFL's super-majority to enact Minimum Wage legislation in line with this part of MN DFL Party's Platform should be sitting with the Republican Party's legislative caucus.
I think we are all very aware that DFL super-majorities are very rare and when achieved they should not be frivolously squandered.
Unless we have hugely different interpretations of what is meant by a "living wage" I don't see where there is a problem.
Unless anyone has reason to believe we shouldn't be able to trust the United States Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics to compile data for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) than it seems to me WHAT the Minimum Wage should be is rather cut-and-dried.
Why should any working man or working woman be satisfied with anything less than a real living wage which is determined by analyzing all "cost-of-living" factors?
In fact, to do otherwise leaves people of color, women, the handicapped, youth and now even seniors forced back into the workforce holding the shitty end of the stick forever.
If the Minimum Wage should be $7.60 as Wisconsin Democrats claim, or $8.50, $9.50, $10.10 or $11.00 as various Democrats here in Minnesota are claiming--- all they have to do is show us the data from either the U.S. Statistical Abstract compiled by the United States Census Bureau or the CPI monitored by the Bureau of Labor Statistics to prove these figures to be a "living wage."
Obviously all these figures can't be correct; and any working man or working woman can tell you that none of these figures are correct because no one can live a "non-poverty" life on any such pathetic miserly wages.
Is a $10.00 an hour Minimum Wage "better than" Minnesota's current Minimum Wage of $6.15?
Democrats did not promise "better than;" Democrats campaigning for public office do not promise "better than."
The promise of the Democrats and their Platform calls for "living wages" which can only be interpreted as, "A minimum wage that keeps pace with inflation and provides full time workers with an income above the poverty level."
Their own words:
"Above the poverty level."
Do you see any government agency stating that $8.50, $9.50, $10.10 or $11.00 an hour is "above the poverty level?"
Republicans have no say in any of this; however, apparently, the lobbyists for the employers are the only ones Minnesota politicians are listening to--- which means Minnesotans are going to have to speak with one clear voice on this issue: for a Minimum Wage that is a real living wage.
We are entitled to this in return for our votes.
E-N-T-I-T-L-E-D.
It is about accountability which is as fundamental to democracy as a living wage is as basic and fundamental to human rights.
We must not tolerate "Bait and Switch" politics anymore than we would tolerate the highly illegal practice of "Bait and Switch" in the retail marketplace.
In addition to my long-standing disdain for the reactionary Republican Party, my views regarding Minimum Wage legislation and small business is also well known--- I think small business should be excluded from Minimum Wage legislation when it comes to these employers hiring family members and relatives... if these people want to pay their grandmas and grandpas poverty wages and all parties are agreeable to this than so be it--- eliminate the enforcement of the Minimum Wage in these circumstances; we don't want a bunch of selfish small business people shedding a trail of tears out in the suburbs and gated communities which seems to be where the Minnesota DFL is picking up most of its campaign contributions from.
The DFL with its super-majority should accommodate both workers and small business people as part of being accountable to voters and even larger campaign contributors--- but, compromise with the lobbyists representing the largest corporate employers? No way in hell.
Connecting the dots.
About "connecting the dots:"
There is massive unemployment, so many people forced to live on poverty wages--- and then people wonder why the Democrats and the mining companies make headway in their destruction of our living environment from peat mining and sulfide mining under the guise of promoting all of this as "jobs, jobs, jobs."
Think about this:
If people were being paid real living wages and everyone had a job, what would be the appeal of these Democrats and mining companies to promote environmental destruction in the name of "jobs, jobs, jobs."
They would have to promote all of this in the name of what it actually is:
"Profits, Profits, Profits."
It is all about divide and conquer--- labor gets exploited; Mother Nature gets raped.
And people are kept confused and fighting amongst themselves... as the mining companies profit and the politicians collect their bribes for doing dirty work for the mining companies.
Make the Minimum Wage a real living wage and provide jobs at decent living wages and people would begin to look at the need for protecting the environment in a different way.
And, as the mining companies destroy more pristine wilderness, habitat for wolves and other animals is destroyed and along comes the DNR with their wolf hunts to "ward off over-population."
But, who wouldn't want to work in a mine instead of a loud, noisy, smoke-filled casino at poverty wages and without any rights?
And, environmentalists and labor activists think they can win their battles without supporting one another because neither is looking to see how the "dots are actually connected."
As Wall Street seeks to expand into other countries, the process repeats--- and people object and wars ensue.
There is massive unemployment, so many people forced to live on poverty wages--- and then people wonder why the Democrats and the mining companies make headway in their destruction of our living environment from peat mining and sulfide mining under the guise of promoting all of this as "jobs, jobs, jobs."
Think about this:
If people were being paid real living wages and everyone had a job, what would be the appeal of these Democrats and mining companies to promote environmental destruction in the name of "jobs, jobs, jobs."
They would have to promote all of this in the name of what it actually is:
"Profits, Profits, Profits."
It is all about divide and conquer--- labor gets exploited; Mother Nature gets raped.
And people are kept confused and fighting amongst themselves... as the mining companies profit and the politicians collect their bribes for doing dirty work for the mining companies.
Make the Minimum Wage a real living wage and provide jobs at decent living wages and people would begin to look at the need for protecting the environment in a different way.
And, as the mining companies destroy more pristine wilderness, habitat for wolves and other animals is destroyed and along comes the DNR with their wolf hunts to "ward off over-population."
But, who wouldn't want to work in a mine instead of a loud, noisy, smoke-filled casino at poverty wages and without any rights?
And, environmentalists and labor activists think they can win their battles without supporting one another because neither is looking to see how the "dots are actually connected."
As Wall Street seeks to expand into other countries, the process repeats--- and people object and wars ensue.
Saturday, December 28, 2013
Reader's view: Forum to explore building progressive power
Forum to be held in...
Duluth, Minnesota on January 11, 2014
From the Duluth News-Tribune:
Published December 24, 2013, 12:00 AM
Reader's view: Forum to explore building progressive power
I am deeply worried about the world in which my grandchildren will live their adult lives; for the trends suggest a world with less-than-adequate livelihood, medical care, nutrition and retirement security.http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/event/article/id/286847/
I am deeply worried about the world in which my grandchildren will live their adult lives; for the trends suggest a world with less-than-adequate livelihood, medical care, nutrition and retirement security. Not to mention the looming specter of climate disruption.
I’m also deeply conflicted, for all my adult life I was led to believe that voting for liberal candidates and policies would solve or prevent such problems. But that hasn’t happened. The trends continue to worsen.
Intuitively, I know what’s wrong and what needs to be changed. But can I risk voting in a new direction? Will I be undermining the electoral victory of a liberal candidate? Or do I need to look seriously at what some progressive thinkers are proposing?
Those will be the questions to be explored by presenters and the audience alike at the Forum for Building Progressive Political Power on Saturday, Jan. 11 at the “copper top church” in Duluth starting at 11:00 a.m. The event is free and the public is encouraged to attend (facebook.com/unitingpeopleMN).
Vern Simula
Mountain Iron
FORUM
“Building Progressive Political Power
in Minnesota”
SATURDAY, JAN.
11TH. 11:00 A.M. – 4:00 P.M.
COPPER TOP CHURCH – DULUTH
231 East Skyline Parkway, Duluth 55811
11:00
Welcome/Opening/Overview
11:10 “Connecting the Dots - What Has Brought Us
Together - and Full Employment for All.”
Alan Maki, of Uniting People
11:30 “Achieving Livable Minimum Wage Legislation
for Minnesota
Workers”
Liane Gale of the Minnesota Green Party with David Flaherty, a local
college student.
12:00 Mobilizing Progressives for the Minimum
Wage Campaign: Small Group Discussion
12:30
==================== BREAK
==================================
12:45 Whole
Forum Deliberation
1:05 “Getting it Passed: Universal Single Payer Health Care for Minnesota”
Buddy Robinson of Minnesota Citizens Federation – Northeast
Dr. Jim Hart of Physicians for a National
Health Program
1:45 2014: A Year Of Decision; Centuries of Risk; Being
Idle No More!
Reyna
Crow of Northwoods Wolf Alliance
and Idle No More
NE MN
Enviro Orgs; Allen Richardson, et. al,: Polymet SDEIS hearings.
2:30 =================== BREAK
==================================
2:40 How Do We Organize in Minnesota??
2:40
Kristin Larson: “Precinct Caucus Importance”
2:55
Dennis Leahy: “A Heave-Ho to the Electoral Paradigm”
3:10 Nathan Ness: “Effective
vs. Ineffective Organizing”
3:25 Virgil Boehland: “Moving
to Amend”
3:40
Allen Hancock: “Building a Social Movement”
4:00+ Closing–
* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * *
Please arrive early.
We’ll try to start on time. It’s
a jam-packed schedule of presentations and audience discussion. The coffee and cookies will be ready by
10:40! For more information, call
218.591.5722
Wednesday, December 25, 2013
Mondragon: An alternative to capitalism or part of the capitalist scheme of things?
Of course, the Wall Street Journal (See article below) is going to paint the picture for cooperatives in the gloomiest ways; but, the fact remains, cooperatives aren't immune from capitalist depressions especially when they rely on the capitalist "free" markets.
But, what the Wall Street Journal also does not mention is that much of Mondragon's business is providing capitalist manufacturers with cheap parts and supplies.
And, worse yet is that what these workers have really lost in investing in these now bankrupt enterprises is their wages which means they have worked for next to nothing all this time.
But, not mentioned at all is what happened to all this money (wealth). Wealth just does not vanish into thin air--- this is one more way wealth get transferred... once, again, to the top. In the , the capitalist financiers and bankers get it all. Something else lost on the Wall Street Journal and those pushing Mondragon as an alternative to capitalism.
There is no escaping the need to challenge Wall Street and the other big financial centers across the world for political and economic power which requires a well organized and intense class struggle... something the promoters of these cooperative schemes try to evade as they try to convince workers there are ways around bringing mines, mills and factories under public ownership which is going to require the nationalization of entire industries.
In fact, these Mondragon workers are as bad off now with the closing of Fagor as the thousands of workers who were employed by Whirlpool in Benton Harbor, Michigan as their jobs were sent overseas as this article in the Wall Street Journal noted.
Members of the USW who have been sucked into this Mondragon scheme in Pennsylvania building components for wind generators will fair no better... this is why their contract and the details of what the workers are investing is guarded in absolute secrecy.
And this should serve as a warning to those like Gar Alperovitz who pushes these schemes as an alternative to nationalization and public ownership of the mines, mills and factories.
Of course, millionaire labor "leaders" like Leo "Red-baiting" Girard will end up enriching himself even further as Mondragon workers in Pennsylvania lose their shirts in his Mondragon scheme.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303290904579276551484127412
But, what the Wall Street Journal also does not mention is that much of Mondragon's business is providing capitalist manufacturers with cheap parts and supplies.
And, worse yet is that what these workers have really lost in investing in these now bankrupt enterprises is their wages which means they have worked for next to nothing all this time.
But, not mentioned at all is what happened to all this money (wealth). Wealth just does not vanish into thin air--- this is one more way wealth get transferred... once, again, to the top. In the , the capitalist financiers and bankers get it all. Something else lost on the Wall Street Journal and those pushing Mondragon as an alternative to capitalism.
There is no escaping the need to challenge Wall Street and the other big financial centers across the world for political and economic power which requires a well organized and intense class struggle... something the promoters of these cooperative schemes try to evade as they try to convince workers there are ways around bringing mines, mills and factories under public ownership which is going to require the nationalization of entire industries.
In fact, these Mondragon workers are as bad off now with the closing of Fagor as the thousands of workers who were employed by Whirlpool in Benton Harbor, Michigan as their jobs were sent overseas as this article in the Wall Street Journal noted.
Members of the USW who have been sucked into this Mondragon scheme in Pennsylvania building components for wind generators will fair no better... this is why their contract and the details of what the workers are investing is guarded in absolute secrecy.
And this should serve as a warning to those like Gar Alperovitz who pushes these schemes as an alternative to nationalization and public ownership of the mines, mills and factories.
Of course, millionaire labor "leaders" like Leo "Red-baiting" Girard will end up enriching himself even further as Mondragon workers in Pennsylvania lose their shirts in his Mondragon scheme.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303290904579276551484127412
By
Christopher Bjork
Dec. 25, 2013 5:59 p.m. ET
The failure of home-appliance maker Fagor has shaken
Spain's Mondragón network. Shown, workers outside Mondragón
headquarters in November.
Christopher Bjork/The Wall Street Journal
MONDRAGÓN, Spain—For decades, the
giant network of industrial and retail cooperatives born in this small
town was held up as an international model. Whenever one co-op got into
trouble, the rest of the Mondragón Corporation would rescue it with cash
or take on workers at risk of losing their jobs.
Then the unthinkable happened.
In
October, home appliance maker Fagor Electrodomésticos, a global
exporter and the U.S. market leader in pressure cookers, shut its
factories after the other co-ops denied it a lifeline. That, in turn,
has shaken the Mondragón network, the largest of its kind in the world,
fraying the bonds among its 109 surviving co-ops and eroding confidence
in the weaker ones. Many of its 80,000 employees now fear for their jobs
in a country with 26% unemployment.
"This
is our Lehman moment," said
Juan Antonio Talledo,
who lost his job on Fagor's refrigerator assembly line, recalling
the U.S. investment bank failure five years ago that nearly brought
down the global financial system.
With
debts of €850 million ($1.16 billion), Fagor is one of the biggest
casualties in Spain's record-setting year of bankruptcies. Even as the
economy emerges from its second recession in five years, growth remains
too weak to save many deeply indebted Spanish companies.
But
Fagor's abrupt closure reverberates beyond Spain. Many scholars in the
U.S. and Europe have argued for decades that employee-owned co-ops are a
more productive and worker-friendly alternative to traditional
shareholder capitalism. The crisis here highlights a weakness: Co-ops
have fewer options to raise capital when trying to ride out a recession.
The
long Spanish downturn that drained Fagor of resources now threatens
core principles of the network it had helped create—democratic
management and job security for employee-owners.
George Cheney,
a Kent State University professor who has studied Mondragón for
20 years, said the network will survive but faces severe strains.
Cooperatives around the world, he added, are watching how it resolves
competing demands of employees and lenders, and financial fallout among
its members.
The question, he said, is: "How can Mondragón maintain its soul?"
Fagor's
1,800 workers in Spain have lost their jobs and access to savings they
had plowed into the co-op. Tajo, a small co-op in the Mondragón network
that makes car parts and components for household appliances, says it
could face bankruptcy because Fagor bought much of its production.
Creditors owed €2.5 billion by supermarket chain Eroski, the network's
largest co-op, have told the management to retrench by selling or
closing outlets.
"Contagion is
inevitable," said
Lorenzo Bernaldo de Quirós,
head of Freemarket International Consulting in Madrid and a
former adviser to Mondragón. "Some co-ops lent money to Fagor. Others
were its suppliers. They're all intertwined."
Laid-off
workers stage frequent protests outside Mondragón's austere
concrete-and-glass headquarters, perched on a hill overlooking the
factory town and a lush valley in the Basque region of northern Spain.
Mayor
Inazio Azkarragaurizar Larrea calculates that Fagor's closure alone
will raise unemployment in the town of 22,000 people to 20%, from the
current 15%.
"The town is in a state of
psychosis," said Estibaliz Iñurrieta Lauzirika, owner of the Plus Ultra
bar, where townspeople fret about the co-ops over evening drinks and
talk of little else.
They and their
elders had thrived as Fagor, founded in 1955, sold refrigerators,
washing machines and televisions to Spain's emerging middle class.
Fagor's pioneer entrepreneurs, influenced by socialist thinkers and
Christian values, gave financial backing to other factory workers to
start their own co-ops, then merged them into a forerunner to Mondragón
Corporation in 1984.
Workers in a co-op
pool resources and own the business collectively, sharing in profit and
loss. Mondragón took the model a step further by pooling individual
co-ops' research, training and banking services, and creating a common
safety net of employment guarantees and social-security benefits. It
grew to be the seventh-largest employer in Spain and reported €14
billion in revenue last year.
Fagor expanded to markets in more than 100 countries, becoming the fifth-largest appliance maker in Europe.
Three decisions exposed Fagor to trouble just before the recession hit Spain in 2008.
The co-op acquired a French appliance company to try to achieve the scale to compete with
Whirlpool Corp.
WHR +0.22%
and
Electrolux
ELUX-B.SK +0.54%
AB. But while those larger rivals moved production to low-wage
Asian countries, Fagor kept most of its assembly lines in Spain and
France to preserve worker-owners' jobs. It could no longer compete on
price, and the acquisition raised its debt burden as sales plummeted at
home.
Meanwhile, Fagor sank €6 million
into the Driron, a refrigerator-size invention that could dry and iron
clothes at the same time. A €1,875 price tag and clunky look made it a
colossal flop.
The appliance maker had
few options to stay afloat. As with other co-ops, its ownership
structure legally barred the sale of new shares to raise capital, and
its ability to borrow was exhausted. It turned to its Mondragón
partners, who injected €300 million into the co-op after 2008.
Fagor
also hit up employees, selling them €80 million in high-yield debt on
the promise they could withdraw the investments within a month.
That
wasn't enough. At a tense meeting of Mondragón's board in September,
Fagor chief executive
Sergio Treviño,
pleaded for an additional €50 million for an orderly
restructuring. The aid plan required unanimous board approval, but
chiefs of the two largest co-ops, Eroski and lender Caja Laboral,
balked, according to people familiar with the deliberations. At the next
meeting they voted to rebuff him, saying the plan would throw good
money after bad, these people said.
"I
warned that if Fagor fell, a tsunami would wash over them, but they
dismissed the idea," Mr. Treviño said in a subsequent interview.
Fagor's
demise has upended the lives of 44-year-old forklift operator Igor
Unamuno and his wife, Leire Barona, who worked on the refrigerator
assembly line. In addition to losing their jobs, he said, they worry
about recovering the €55,000 in savings they had invested in Fagor—money
now tied up in bankruptcy proceedings.
With
an expensive mortgage and two children at home, the couple pins their
hopes on Mondragón's pledge to find work at other co-ops for at least
1,000 of Fagor's employees. More than 300 have been relocated, most to
temporary positions with fewer rights and benefits.
"The
days pass, and you hear about other workers getting called in for a
[job] interview," Mr. Unamuno said. "You hunker down. What else can you
do?"
—Ilan Brat contributed to this article.
Write to Christopher Bjork at christopher.bjork@wsj.com
Christmas Day and hundreds die in South Sudan--- for what?
What a
Christmas Day; hundreds of people have died in South Sudan, today; and
for what? Because the Wall Street crowd inflamed this ethnic hate as a
means to destabilize another country so these greedy vultures could get
their dirty hands on even greater profits derived from oil and gold.
Think about this: In a country where people are going hungry and don't have proper homes, someone is footing the bill to put the most deadly modern weaponry in their hands.
We need to know who is responsible for arming this country?
We need to know who these culprits are.
Something is drastically wrong when so much money can be found to arm people instead of spending the money to properly feed, cloth and house the people.
What kind of monsters would arm a nation of people to kill one another motivated only by ethnic hatreds?
Who is financing this war in Southern Sudan?
Find those who has financed the arming of both sides and we will find those who bear full responsibility for inflaming these ethnic hatreds.
Something to think about:
Had all this money spent on arming these people been used instead to bring about decent lives for ALL the people, this ethnic strife could not have been inflamed.
Think about this: In a country where people are going hungry and don't have proper homes, someone is footing the bill to put the most deadly modern weaponry in their hands.
We need to know who is responsible for arming this country?
We need to know who these culprits are.
Something is drastically wrong when so much money can be found to arm people instead of spending the money to properly feed, cloth and house the people.
What kind of monsters would arm a nation of people to kill one another motivated only by ethnic hatreds?
Who is financing this war in Southern Sudan?
Find those who has financed the arming of both sides and we will find those who bear full responsibility for inflaming these ethnic hatreds.
Something to think about:
Had all this money spent on arming these people been used instead to bring about decent lives for ALL the people, this ethnic strife could not have been inflamed.
Guest Blog: South Sudan's Most Vulnerable Face Hard Struggles In World's Youngest Country
Brian McAfee
2838 Mason Blvd.
Muskegon Hts., Michigan USA 49444
(231) 737-8726
brimac6@hotmail.com
South Sudan's Most Vulnerable Face Hard Struggles In World's Youngest Country
by Brian McAfee
Latest reports now indicate that about 34,000 South Sudanese civilians have sought refuge in United Nations missions in Juba and Bor. South Sudan, having only recently come into existence as an independent nation, July 9, 2011, has a population of 11,367,276 (worldpopulationreview.org). Since fighting broke out on December 15 about 500 thought to be killed and about 800 wounded. It began when former vice president Riek Machar, who had been fired from his position this past July, Machar's attacks against the South Sudan military and President Salva Kiir's responses appear to have primarily only resulted in tens of thousands of the civilian population left in desperate situations, many homeless with injuries and possibly thousands of orphans.
One of the more alarming attacks was the one that occurred on Dec. 20 in which 20 Dinka (a native ethnic group) were killed in an attack on a UN compound where the Dinka were being sheltered from just such attacks. Despite this singular case the UN and UN peacekeepers are and will be an indispensable element for a safe and secure South Sudan.
Some demographics, 82% of SS is Christian, 18 Islamic. Primary natural resources, copper, chromium ore, zinc, mica, silver, gold and diamonds. One problem area (in which South Sudan is definitely not alone) is access to drinkable water.
While it seems about half the population do have relatively easy access to water many, too many do not. This is a fundamental rights issue that people should bear in mind for everyone.
I urge and appreciate any cocideration of people donating- I of course suggest the UN, especially UNICEF and also OXFAM, they have been working in both Sudan and South Sudan (as long as SS has existed).
If you have any thoughts or comments write me at: brimac6@hotmail.com
Note: Here some additional articles for background information (ALM):
South Sudan became an independent
state on 9 July 2011,
"MINERAL OCCURRENCES AND
EXPLORATION WORK DONE IN SOUTH SUDAN. • There are a vast number of
metallic minerals spread all over the South Sudan: gold, copper,
zinc, lead, manganese, iron, silver, tin, etc. • Also industrial
minerals exist: marble, limestone, dolomite, kaolin, clay, asbestos,
etc. • Apart from gold at Kapoeta and Luri; copper at Hofrat
Ennahas, bauxite/iron ore at Wau area and marble at Kapoeta..."
Guest Blog: Syrian Refugee Crisis results in UN's Largest Emergency Appeal
Brian McAfee
2838 Mason Blvd.
Muskegon Hts., Michigan USA 49444
(231) 737-8726
brimac6@hotmail.com
Syrian Refugee Crisis results in UN's Largest Emergency Appeal
by Brian McAfee
According to the United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees the number of Syrian refugees is now over 2.3 million. The UNHCR also says that within Syria there are 4.2 displaced people as a result of the civil war that has been going on between Syria's president Bashar al-Assad and primarily an Al Quada lead rebel force, with both sides allowing and engaging in attacks on civilian targets.
The Kurds, who are about 9% of the Syrian population and traditionally have had a role in the Syrian government now are targeted from both al-Assad and the al-Quada like rebels.
The ongoing attacks on civilians have been shocking and heartbreaking. The government has engaged in air rades on civilian targets, one such raid, on the city of Aleppo, resulted in more than 300 deaths. During the past few months there were some hints that the U.S. and Obama may have some interest in supporting those at the forefront fighting against the Syrian president but to support an Islamic absolutist force dead set against any form egalitarianism or freedom of thought seems like somewhat less than a good idea.
Twenty percent of the people now living in Lebanon are newcomers. They are just some of those that have fled the violence and terror being lashed out against the civilian population in Syria. OXFAM is helping re-settle people in Jordon and Lebanon.
Almost half of the refugees are reported to be children. This is looking as though it may be the harshest winter on record for the region. With a million plus children, living through the winter in tents, the need is obvious. UNICEF has warned of the combined effects of a harsh winter living in tents, babies and infants and probably about 200,000 pregnant women. I urge you to donate to OXFAM and the other charities I will mention related to this issue . In a UNHCR statement on this they say " These children, women and men have made perilous journeys across country borders in search 0f safety. They are traumatized and fearful for their lives. Many are also physically wounded or suffering from illness and disease." This sums up the situation and the need. With the extreme cold that it appears will hit the region over the next few mew months babies, the sick and young children will be at risk for pneumonia. It is a bit too late for a Merry Christmas, we should do our best to try to make it as much of a Happy New Year as possible.
I very much encourage you to help the Syrian refugees.
UNHCR the UN High Commissioner for refugees
1-855-808-6427
OXFAM
1(800) 776-9326
info@oxfamamerica.org
Doctors without borders
1 888 392-0392
donations@newyork.msf.org
I welcome any comments. -Brian
brimac6@hotmail.com
Sunday, December 22, 2013
Is the huge, well-funded army of employer lobbyists the obstacle to workers getting a Minimum Wage that is a real living wage?
Notice: I sent this to all Minnesota State Legislators.
An interesting tid-bit of information:
Lobbying expenditures are five times bigger than campaign contributions (election-related, including PACs, super-PACs, 527s, etc). Lobbying is much bigger, although campaign finance is more controversial and higher-profile as a form of influencing the political system.
I have an interesting suggestion:
Before you vote on the Minimum Wage, why don't all of you disclose who the lobbyists are that have been bribing you to betray Minnesotans who expected you to deliver a Minimum Wage that is a real living wage?
I have an interesting suggestion:
Before you vote on the Minimum Wage, why don't all of you disclose who the lobbyists are that have been bribing you to betray Minnesotans who expected you to deliver a Minimum Wage that is a real living wage?
Come on; come clean.
Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell: 651-587-5541
Primary E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net
E-mail: alan.maki1951mn@gmail.com
Buyer and voter beware!
Beware of Bait and Switch while Holiday shopping... and when voting.
Bait and switch... it is an illegal advertising gimmick in the retail world but in politics it has become the way of life, the new normal.
For example: Obama campaigned for the Democratic Party's nomination telling everyone he was for a single-payer universal health care system like they have in Canada; this was the BAIT--- once elected, Obama pulled a SWITCH and delivered Obamacare/Romneycare or as it should be known, the "Health Insurance and Pharmaceutical Industry Bailout and Profit Maximization Act of 2010.
Another example: Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party Governor Mark Dayton campaigned for office saying he would raise the Minimum Wage to a real living wage; this was the Bait; once elected, Dayton, a multi-billionaire whose inherited fortune is the result of poverty wages paid to employees, is now pushing a miserly increase in the Minimum Wage which would keep the Minimum Wage a poverty wage--- the SWITCH.
Buyer (Voter) beware of Bait and Switch.
In the retail world Bait and Switch is illegal; it is time to tell the politicians we aren't going to be sucked in by Bait and Switch.
If we can't get anything else out of this worthless Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party's super-majority where Republicans have no say about anything, we should at least be able to get a real living Minimum Wage out of these shysters that corresponds to actual cost-of-living factors as tracked by the United States Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Working people are entitled to this in return for their votes; especially from a political party which makes the claim that it is for labor.
Bait and switch... it is an illegal advertising gimmick in the retail world but in politics it has become the way of life, the new normal.
For example: Obama campaigned for the Democratic Party's nomination telling everyone he was for a single-payer universal health care system like they have in Canada; this was the BAIT--- once elected, Obama pulled a SWITCH and delivered Obamacare/Romneycare or as it should be known, the "Health Insurance and Pharmaceutical Industry Bailout and Profit Maximization Act of 2010.
Another example: Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party Governor Mark Dayton campaigned for office saying he would raise the Minimum Wage to a real living wage; this was the Bait; once elected, Dayton, a multi-billionaire whose inherited fortune is the result of poverty wages paid to employees, is now pushing a miserly increase in the Minimum Wage which would keep the Minimum Wage a poverty wage--- the SWITCH.
Buyer (Voter) beware of Bait and Switch.
In the retail world Bait and Switch is illegal; it is time to tell the politicians we aren't going to be sucked in by Bait and Switch.
If we can't get anything else out of this worthless Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party's super-majority where Republicans have no say about anything, we should at least be able to get a real living Minimum Wage out of these shysters that corresponds to actual cost-of-living factors as tracked by the United States Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Working people are entitled to this in return for their votes; especially from a political party which makes the claim that it is for labor.
Saturday, December 21, 2013
Miserly minimum wage creates poverty
Miserly minimum wage creates poverty
By Alan L. Maki from director of organizing for Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council on Dec 20, 2013 at 8:19am
Wisconsin State Rep. Nick Milroy, D-South Range, wrote we need a living wage. I agree.
But if Milroy believes we need a real living wage, why is he advocating a minimum wage that is still a poverty wage?
In fact, Milroy is proposing a pathetic miserly “increase” in the minimum wage.
Milroy would like us to believe the Republicans are responsible for the present miserly minimum wage of $7.25 an hour.
However, President Obama had a super-majority of Democrats when he first entered office and this Democratic super-majority never raised the minimum wage to a real living wage.
In Minnesota, Democrats have a super-majority; and like Milroy, these Democrats mouth the words “living wage,” but not only did they not use their super-majority to raise the minimum wage a plug nickle, they now call for a minimum wage increase that is another poverty wage.
Why this hypocrisy between political rhetoric for votes and actual legislation?
Any schoolchild understands that if you pay a workingman or working woman a poverty wage they are going to be poor.
The minimum wage should be a real living wage which means it needs to be legislatively tied to all cost-of-living factors tracked and monitored by the United States Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, indexed for inflation and then periodically increased to provide an improved standard-of-living.
In addition, most minimum wage workers do not work a 40-hour week.
So, a real living hourly minimum wage is still not the complete answer.
What we need, in addition to the minimum wage being a real living wage, is a guaranteed annual income based on the same cost-of-living factors for every working class family.
Of course, with the huge number of working people unemployed in this country right now the real solution is jobs.
But, if these jobs don’t pay real living wages what good is a job?
Most people work so they won’t be poor.
The politicians — from both parties — talk about “jobs, jobs, jobs” then refuse to take it upon themselves to be responsible for full employment in the same way they hypocritically talk about living wages, and then legislate poverty wages, again.
So this cycle continues and everyone wonders why there is poverty in the midst of such tremendous wealth in the richest country in the world.
And if all this isn't bad enough, both parties continue to squander the wealth of our Nation on these dirty wars killing our jobs the same way they kill people.
We need to create tens of millions of jobs to put America to work. How do we create jobs when we are wasting all this money on wars?
Thanks to Democrats like Milroy who take campaign contributions from the managements of the Indian Gaming Industry, we are having one heck of a time trying to organize workers employed at the Bad River Lodge, Casino and Convention Center.
With the miserly minimum wage of $7.60 an hour being proposed by Milroy, and opposed by Republicans, a working man or working woman would have to work three 40 hour a week jobs and they would still be living on the edge of poverty.
What we need is a huge working class movement like the one that forced President Roosevelt to enact minimum wage legislation in the first place. From this movement will come working class politicians. We need a new working class based progressive people’s party if we are going to turn this country around.
Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell: 651-587-5541
Primary E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net
E-mail: alan.maki1951mn@gmail.com
Friday, December 20, 2013
Resolution on "At-Will Employment" for use in precinct caucuses, conventions, etc.
Note: This Resolution is submitted for
discussion, dialog, debate and action by the Midwest Casino Workers
Organizing Council as our part in celebrating the United Nations'
Universal Declaration of Human Rights on December 10, 2013:
http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/
Feel free to circulate.
Resolution on Repealing and Rescinding “At-Will Hiring and At-Will Firing”
Resolution on Repealing and Rescinding “At-Will Hiring and At-Will Firing”
Where as the Doctrine of “At-Will
Employment” is undemocratic;
Where as “At-Will Employment” is
the main and primary obstacle to union organizing;
Where as employers use “At-Will
Employment” as a means to coerce workers not to report health and
safety violations in the workplace;
Where as the United Nations' Universal
Declaration of Human Rights declares it is the right of all to fully
participate in society and "At-Will Employment" prevents this;
Where as “At-Will Employment” is used to silence workers in the communities where they live in a way which prevents their full participation in the political process with an intent to solve their problems;
Where as “At-Will Employment” is used to silence workers in the communities where they live in a way which prevents their full participation in the political process with an intent to solve their problems;
Where as “At-Will Employment” is
used to enforce racist and sexist discrimination in the workplace;
Therefore, be it resolved that “At-Will
Employment” must be rescinded and repealed and replaced with the
protection of “Just Cause” legislation;
Therefore, be it resolved that this
becomes the position of the (name of party/organization here).
Sunday, December 15, 2013
About springs wound too tight...
People always ask me what exactly are the things the Minimum Wage should be attached to.
This is from the site of the Bureau of Labor Statistics:
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has classified all expenditure items into more than 200 categories, arranged into eight major groups. Major groups and examples of categories in each are as follows:
FOOD AND BEVERAGES (breakfast cereal, milk, coffee, chicken, wine, full service meals and snacks);
HOUSING (rent of primary residence, owners' equivalent rent, fuel oil, bedroom furniture);
APPAREL (men's shirts and sweaters, women's dresses, jewelry);
TRANSPORTATION (new vehicles, airline fares, gasoline, motor vehicle insurance);
MEDICAL CARE (prescription drugs and medical supplies, physicians' services, eyeglasses and eye care, hospital services);
RECREATION (televisions, cable television, pets and pet products, sports equipment, admissions);
EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION (college tuition, postage, telephone services, computer software and accessories);
OTHER GOODS AND SERVICES (tobacco and smoking products, haircuts and other personal services, funeral expenses).
These things taken together are what I am referring to when I say "cost-of-living."
If anyone can tell me a better method in establishing what the Minimum Wage should be based on I would like to hear it.
I have asked Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton and numerous state and federal elected officials what they are using to justify their proposed "increase" (their numbers vary from who you ask--- from $7.50 to $10.10--- but not one of these politicians will tell you where they get these figures from.
Why not?
Why would anyone expect a working man or working woman of any age to work for wages that won't allow them to purchase the basic necessities of life?
Any wage that doesn't allow the basic necessities of life to be purchased is not a "living wage" no matter what "spin" is placed on the explanation.
When anyone states they are for "living wages" this means something very specific. It means the necessities of life can be purchased. Again, there is no other way to "spin" this although Minnesota Democrats are trying very hard to tell us, after pounding us with the message they all support a "living wage" that "something is better than nothing."
And when we challenge them they get extremely angry.
I have been accused--- in writing--- by Minnesota State Senator, Kathy Sheran of "winding the spring too tight" in insisting that the Minimum Wage must correspond to a real living wage BASED ON ALL COST-OF-LIVING factors from the eight categories above.
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton has told his Democratic Party Caucus that "We need to get some kind of increased in the Minimum Wage passed real quick as soon as the legislative session opens because Maki is winding the spring so tight it is going to bust and break into pieces and hit us."
Working people want a real living wage and these politicians are only concerned about their political futures.
What they fear is that if they enact Minimum Wage Legislation assuring employers are forced to pay workers at least a real living non-poverty wage these employers will only lavish their campaign contributions on the Republicans.
Who is "winding the spring tight?"
Not me; it is the employers who reap huge super-profits by paying workers poverty wages.
As I travel across Minnesota the only thing I am pointing out is what a real living wage consists of.
Mark Dayton came to me in person begging for our support when he was trying to get the DFL nomination--- now he is stooping to blaming me because his credibility, and that of the Democratic Party, is at stake.
I am not the one who suggested Mark Dayton and these other politicians pull a Minimum Wage figure from a hat for self-serving political expediency--- they are the ones who did this all on their own.
Let these Democrats come up with a Minimum Wage based on scientific and empirical facts and data.
If they don't think the Bureau of Labor Statistics is doing their job properly in the way they compile these cost-of-living factors let them come forward with proof.
But, any working class family can easily figure out by a trip to the grocery store, being robbed at the gas pump, being stiffed when paying for home heating fuel and having to pay increasing rents or trying to keep up with mortgage payments that these Democrats are not providing a Minimum Wage that is a real living wage.
If these union leaders and foundation-funded groups fronting for the Democrats shamefully pushing these poverty wages down our throats can't understand this then they should not be pretending to represent working people who never asked them to intervene in the first place.
This is from the site of the Bureau of Labor Statistics:
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has classified all expenditure items into more than 200 categories, arranged into eight major groups. Major groups and examples of categories in each are as follows:
FOOD AND BEVERAGES (breakfast cereal, milk, coffee, chicken, wine, full service meals and snacks);
HOUSING (rent of primary residence, owners' equivalent rent, fuel oil, bedroom furniture);
APPAREL (men's shirts and sweaters, women's dresses, jewelry);
TRANSPORTATION (new vehicles, airline fares, gasoline, motor vehicle insurance);
MEDICAL CARE (prescription drugs and medical supplies, physicians' services, eyeglasses and eye care, hospital services);
RECREATION (televisions, cable television, pets and pet products, sports equipment, admissions);
EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION (college tuition, postage, telephone services, computer software and accessories);
OTHER GOODS AND SERVICES (tobacco and smoking products, haircuts and other personal services, funeral expenses).
These things taken together are what I am referring to when I say "cost-of-living."
If anyone can tell me a better method in establishing what the Minimum Wage should be based on I would like to hear it.
I have asked Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton and numerous state and federal elected officials what they are using to justify their proposed "increase" (their numbers vary from who you ask--- from $7.50 to $10.10--- but not one of these politicians will tell you where they get these figures from.
Why not?
Why would anyone expect a working man or working woman of any age to work for wages that won't allow them to purchase the basic necessities of life?
Any wage that doesn't allow the basic necessities of life to be purchased is not a "living wage" no matter what "spin" is placed on the explanation.
When anyone states they are for "living wages" this means something very specific. It means the necessities of life can be purchased. Again, there is no other way to "spin" this although Minnesota Democrats are trying very hard to tell us, after pounding us with the message they all support a "living wage" that "something is better than nothing."
And when we challenge them they get extremely angry.
I have been accused--- in writing--- by Minnesota State Senator, Kathy Sheran of "winding the spring too tight" in insisting that the Minimum Wage must correspond to a real living wage BASED ON ALL COST-OF-LIVING factors from the eight categories above.
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton has told his Democratic Party Caucus that "We need to get some kind of increased in the Minimum Wage passed real quick as soon as the legislative session opens because Maki is winding the spring so tight it is going to bust and break into pieces and hit us."
Working people want a real living wage and these politicians are only concerned about their political futures.
What they fear is that if they enact Minimum Wage Legislation assuring employers are forced to pay workers at least a real living non-poverty wage these employers will only lavish their campaign contributions on the Republicans.
Who is "winding the spring tight?"
Not me; it is the employers who reap huge super-profits by paying workers poverty wages.
As I travel across Minnesota the only thing I am pointing out is what a real living wage consists of.
Mark Dayton came to me in person begging for our support when he was trying to get the DFL nomination--- now he is stooping to blaming me because his credibility, and that of the Democratic Party, is at stake.
I am not the one who suggested Mark Dayton and these other politicians pull a Minimum Wage figure from a hat for self-serving political expediency--- they are the ones who did this all on their own.
Let these Democrats come up with a Minimum Wage based on scientific and empirical facts and data.
If they don't think the Bureau of Labor Statistics is doing their job properly in the way they compile these cost-of-living factors let them come forward with proof.
But, any working class family can easily figure out by a trip to the grocery store, being robbed at the gas pump, being stiffed when paying for home heating fuel and having to pay increasing rents or trying to keep up with mortgage payments that these Democrats are not providing a Minimum Wage that is a real living wage.
If these union leaders and foundation-funded groups fronting for the Democrats shamefully pushing these poverty wages down our throats can't understand this then they should not be pretending to represent working people who never asked them to intervene in the first place.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
