Texas Longhorns with newborn calf in Bluebonnets

Texas Longhorns with newborn calf in Bluebonnets

Please note I have a new phone number...

512-517-2708

Alan Maki

Alan Maki
Doing research at the LBJ Library in Austin, Texas

It's time to claim our Peace Dividend

It's time to claim our Peace Dividend

We need to beat swords into plowshares.

We need to beat swords into plowshares.

A program for real change...

http://peaceandsocialjustice.blogspot.com/2013/03/a-progressive-program-for-real-change.html


What we need is a "21st Century Full Employment Act for Peace and Prosperity" which would make it a mandatory requirement that the president and Congress attain and maintain full employment.


"Voting is easy and marginally useful, but it is a poor substitute for democracy, which requires direct action by concerned citizens"

- Ben Franklin

Let's talk...

Let's talk...

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Re: Syria... to bomb or not to bomb.

September 4, 2013

Letter to the Editor, submitted for publication to the International Falls Daily Journal (259 words) [Permission to edit as seen fit is granted.]

These Congressional hearings to be held to determine whether or not Syria should be bombed by the United States are turning into one big fiasco and farce, almost like a circus, since the real issues aren't even being broached.

Something no one wants to talk about:

What exactly created the current violent unrest in Syria?

George W. Bush and his administration used Shiite militias in Iraq against Sunni insurgents, which helped trigger the Shia-vs.-Sunni dimension of Syria's civil war.

This had been a civil war with leftists the United States government didn't like on the verge of bringing down Assad much the way George Washington defeated the British.

The CIA has used ethnic strife to inflame animosities to the point of violence since the end of World War II. The CIA's first objective in destabilizing foreign governments deemed to be "enemies" of the United States was to foment religious and ethnic violence.

Hopefully Congress is now going to completely explore these dirty deeds and the Syrian people will come to understand how they have been used by the CIA as part of Washington's plans to dominate the oil and gas fields along with the pipeline distribution system of this region.

Aren't all these dirty wars about defending Wall Street's assets and investments or to help these Wall Street vultures secure and accrue the wealth of other nations?

Just on its surface it is morally wrong to discuss whether or not we should bomb a country that has done nothing to hurt us. Since when has bombing anyone helped them?

Alan L. Maki
Founder and Chair,
Minnesotans for Peace and Social Justice

58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763

Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell phone: 651-587-5541

MoveOn.org finally shows its true colors... stop giving these phonies your money.

Hey; this MoveOn.Org is some peace outfit.

Now they are going to decide by vote if they should support Obama bombing the hell out of Syria.

What other foundation-funded peace organizations will follow this example of "democracy?"


Why not just toss a coin to make this decision?

Obama and McCain have a meeting of the minds when it comes to war.

To those people who pushed the theory of "voting for the lesser evil" it must seem kind of confusing to them seeing Barack Obama and John McCain uniting to bring war upon the Syrian people.

But, what is so confusing once it is understood Wall Street manipulates, controls and owns both the Democratic and Republican parties?

As we now see, in the end Obama and McCain both have had the same Wall Street agenda of fighting wars abroad paid for by shoving austerity measures down our throats here at home.

Obama and McCain have a meeting of the minds when it comes to these dirty Wall Street imperialist wars.

Remember--- we were sold a bill of goods that the main thing distinguishing Obama from McCain was that Obama was this evil warmonger and Obama was this peace-loving saint.

All a bunch of lies... it is hard to distinguish Donkey dung from Elephant dung once it is all in the same pile.

It doesn't take a genius to figure out that no one makes hundreds of thousands of dollars adding up to billions of dollars in campaign contributions to elect candidates not expecting to get something they want in return.

Blood money; profits from wars is what these Wall Street financiers have invested and expect in return when they contribute to politicians like Obama and McCain.

Raytheon will profit from the cruise missiles.

Bechtel will profit from operating the oil and gas pipelines.

The oil and gas companies will profit.

We will pay.

Our communities will suffer.

We will pay through the nose to pump gas into our cars and to heat our homes.

Syrians will die.

Profits derived from manufacturing weapons of war; profits that are multiplied many times over from war; and in the end these wars are fought to protect the assets and investments of these parasitical Wall Street profiteers--- whether it be oil and gas or the pipelines transporting the oil sand gas or access to other cheap natural resources extracted using cheap labor and then using more cheap labor to process these resources and more cheap labor manufacturing products we are then expected to purchase in this great "free market" of capitalism in which everything from health care to education and housing is turned into a commodity from which Wall Street profits instead of the government providing as a human need.

And, it is this scheme of things which brings together two fellow warmongers like Obama and McCain who now want to rain war on the Syrian people as they make their way to Iran.

Anyone can look at a map to see what domination of this region requires. Anyone can study the geography of this region to understand the vast wealth of gas and oil at stake. 

Really; do we want our taxes, resources and all these human lives and the massive destruction this war on Syria will entail just so a few greedy Wall Street profiteers can stuff their pockets with blood money as the children die while these pious hypocrites like Obama and McCain feed us lie upon lie to try to justify this barbaric insanity under the guise that in some perverted way bombing people will help them?

Don't buy into Obama's and McCain's lies.

Join together... Stand up and speak out for peace.

And there sits Hillary Clinton in silence, oblivious to it all.

Remember how Obama sat in silence as the Israeli killing machine piled up the bodies of Palestinian children in Gaza as if they were cord-wood as he took his children for ice cream cones while vacationing in Hawaii?

How much longer do we stand for these dirty wars before we break free from this two-party trap?

How much longer before We, The People, challenge Wall Street for power so we can put an end to these dirty wars?

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Winnipeg marks 40th anniversary of Chilean coup

Communist Party of Canada - Manitoba
3:39 PM (1 hour ago)

to Communist
[Please forward this email widely.]

Dear Friends, Sisters and Brothers,

I urge you to attend the outstanding events organized by Winnipeg's Chilean community.

Some of Winnipeg's finest citizens arrived as refugees from Chile 40 years ago, and they have organized a month of not-to-be missed activities. The powerful and moving political and cultural heritage of Salvador Allende's Popular Unity government has left a lasting mark on Canada for which we are grateful!

This is a month to play songs of Victor Jara, Inti Illimani and Quilapayun. This is a month to read about what Chilean fascism set out to destroy, with the active support of U.S. imperialism. This is a month to renew our inspiration for a better world.

For more info on the events, visit http://www.chile40winnipeg.ca/# or email info@chile40winnipeg.ca

I am appending a pdf of this email for your fridge door, or scotch tape it to the ceiling over your bed.

In Solidarity,
Darrell Rankin
Manitoba office, Communist Party of Canada

Winnipeg marks 40th anniversary of Chilean coupPeople's Voice, Manitoba Bureau

September 11, 2013 is the 40th anniversary of the 1973 military coup in Chile. During the coup and the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet thousands were illegally detained, tortured, executed and disappeared. Now, 40 years later, the Winnipeg Chilean community has come together to reflect upon this history.

The coup evoked an outpouring of global solidarity with Chile’s democrats, many of whom were forced into exile. The Soviet Union gave its full solidarity. In other countries like Canada, labour, communist and broad, democratic forces compelled governments to grant refuge and isolate the fascist Pinochet junta.

The activities organized by Winnipeg’s Chilean community will bring important memories to many, especially the struggles and solidarity of Canadians to support democracy in Chile in later years.

The activities will strengthen ideas about solidarity and democracy for new generations. Canadians have benefited greatly from this community’s presence in Canada.

Sat, Sept 7 - The Armed Forces and the Coup d’Etat in Chile/ Las fuerzas armadas y el golpe de estado en Chile - Presentation/ Presentacion, 11:00 am - 2:00 pm, Legislative Building, 334 - 450 Broadway

Sat, Sept 7 - Dance performance and reception. Chile Canta y Lucha presents "Reflections : Past, Present and Future", 7:00 pm, Reception to follow performance. Technical Vocational High School 1555 Wall Street, Admission $10 

Wed, Sept 11 - Main event: Never Again: 40th Anniversary of the Coup d’Etat in Chile/ Nunca Mas: 40oAniversario del golpe de estado, 7:00 pm, Winnipeg Chilean Association, 892 Burrows Ave.

Thur, Sept 12 – 15 - Film festival: 40 Years On: The narration of Chilean resistance and exile in cinema. All at Winnipeg Film Group's Cinematheque, 100 Arthur Street
"September 11, 1973 is the day Chile's democratic government was overthrown by a brutal and bloody CIA-backed military dictatorship led by General Augusto Pinochet. Forty years on, the investigation and interpretation of what actually happened in Chile has triggered a large body of cinema into existence around the world. While the essential elements of what happened are largely now without dispute, immersed within the core truths that surrounded this history, however, are myriad smaller and lesser known stories and perspectives - incredibly complex and telling of human nature, many still in the process of rising to the public consciousness." - Cecilia Araneda, Curator
Films featured :
Thur, Sept 12, 7:00 pm : Salvador Allende
Thur, Sept 12, 9:00 pm : The Chicago Conspiracy
Fri, Sept 13, 7:00 pm : Augustin's Newspaper
Fri, Sept 13, 9:00 pm : NO
Sat, Sept 14, 7:00 pm : Machuca
Sun, Sept 15, 3:00 pm : Violeta Went to Heaven
Sun, Sept 15, 7:00 pm : The Chilean Building
(Note: I have appended film descriptions, below. - DR)
Sat, Sept 14 - Music Concert: A celebration of his life and music, Victor Jara, 8 pm at the West End Cultural Centre, 586 Ellice Ave (at Sherbrook Street) Tickets available at WECC, Ticketmaster, Music Trader, Winnipeg Folk Festival Music Store $20 advance / $25 at the door
Winnipeg musicians pay tribute to Víctor Jara with a celebration of his life and music. Hugo Torres-Cereceda, who came to Canada as a refugee from Chile, will lead the line-up, performing a selection of Víctor Jara's songs, with his son Illya Torres-Garner and Jessee Havey (The Duhks). John K. Samson (The Weakerthans) will read poetry by Víctor Jara and Pablo Neruda. Natasha Torres-Garner will perform a piece of her own dance choreography inspired by Víctor Jara's last words from a poem he wrote during the several days between his arrest and his execution. Víctor Jara was arrested on September 12, 1973 and held in the Estadio Nacional in Santiago, Chile with 5000 other political prisoners. He was tortured and witnesses recounted that soldiers broke his fingers and taunted him with a guitar, challenging him to play it for them. In response he sang "Venceremos" - "We Will Overcome". Four days later, on September 16, 1973, Víctor Jara was executed.

Wed, Sept 25 - International solidarity with the Chilean people/ Solidaridad international con el pueblo Chileno - By invitation only, 6:00 pm - doors open at 5:45 pm Univ. of Manitoba Smartpark Event Centre, 100 - One Research Road.
Master of Ceremonies : Claudia García de la Huerta
6:00 pm - Panel discussion with Paul Graham, Howard Pawley, Darrell Rankin and Judy Wasylycia-Leis
7:15 pm - Reception
7:45 pm - Presentation of Certificates of Acknowledgment
8:30 pm - Closing Remarks

Fri, Sept 27 - Film and Presentation/ Pelicula y Presentation, 7:00 - 10:00 pm, Gas Station Theatre, 445 River Avenue, Osborne Village
Film: "The Judge and the General"
Dir. Elizabeth Farnsworth and Patricio Lanfranco 2008, 84 mins, Chile | USA – English
In 1998 Chilean Judge Juan Guzmán, who supported Pinochet in the 1973 coup, was assigned the first of the criminal cases launched against the dictator. Through interviews the film follows Guzmán's investigation into the crimes of the dictatorship and indeed his own role in endorsing the coup. The poignant cases of victims Manuel Donoso and Cecilia Castro are focused on. (See also IMDb synopsis)
Presentation: "Trade Unions Under Attack - Chile in the Aftermath of September 11, 1973"
This is an exhibition about union leaders in Chile and their work as representatives of the labour movement in the 1960s and particularly 1970 to 1973 during the Popular Unity government of Salvador Allende. The presentation also features Chilean leaders who have contributed to the labour movement in Canada and their solidarity with union leaders in Chile during the dictatorship. Stephen Hunt, Director of District 3, Western Canada of United Steelworkers, will recount his experiences of that era in the Canadian labour movement.

Sat, Sept 28 - Encounter with the Association of families of the detained disappeared (AFDD)/ Encuentro con la agrupacion de familiares de detenidos desaparecidos (AFDD), 10:00 am - 2:00 pm, University of Winnipeg Eckhardt-Gramatté Hall 3rd floor - 515 Portage Avenue 
A representative of the AFDD will talk about the mission of the ogranization that labours on behalf of the disappeared victims of the coup and their families. The AFDD is a non-governmental not-for-profit organization in Chile that originated when the families of detained and disappeared victims of the coup appeared before the Pro-Peace Committee in October 1973. The Committee was a coalition of Christian and Jewish communities, girded by the courage of their faith in a mission to protect the lives of citizens from their own dictatorial government. In 1975 the families of the detained disappeared formally organized as the AFDD and their cri de coeur ever since is TRUTH, JUSTICE and MEMORY. They demand the truth about the circumstances of the disappearances of their loved ones and where their bodies are. They demand justice for the victims and their families through legal sanctions for those who participated in the crimes. In memory of the disappeared and the infamy of the crimes against them they share widely the personal stories of the victims and build monuments to them.

Other dates and activities are listed at www.chile40winnipeg.cainfo@chile40winnipeg.ca


* * * * * * *"40 Years On" film synopsesThur, Sept 12, 7:00 pm : Salvador Allende
Dir. Patricio Guzman, 2006. France, Belgium, Germany, Spain, Mexico, Chile - 100 min. Documentary, Spanish, French, English - with English Subtitles
        A leftist revolutionary or a reformist democrat? A committed Marxist or a constitutional politician? An ethical and moral man or, as Richard Nixon called him, a "son of a bitch"? SALVADOR ALLENDE portrays the life, times and political formation of the Valparaiso-born doctor who was active in Chile's Socialist party politics as a senator and who ran unsuccessfully for President three times before finally being elected in 1970. 
        Former U.S. Ambassador Korry provides an insider's account of President Nixon and Henry Kissinger's determination to thwart Allende, but he is unrepentant about the CIA-sponsored coup that overthrew the Chilean government.
         Internationally acclaimed director Patricio Guzmán's personalized voice-over commentary provides a compelling narrative thread for this political biography - one which, in his attempt to understand the impact of Allende on hiw own life and his nation's political history, also serves to illuminate this controversial and inspirational public figure for an international audience.
        Plays with: Even if my hands were full of truths, Dir: Francisca Duran, 2012, Canada, 8 min, Experimental
The third in a series about the legacy of former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, this component contemplates how memory might or might not become history, using excerpts from now-unclassified CIA correspondence and a photo-montage taken at the Museum of Human Rights and Memory in Santiago, Chile. 

Thur, Sept 12, 9:00 pm : The Chicago Conspiracy
Dir.: Subversive Action Films, 2010, Chile, 95 min., Documentary, Spanish and English, with English subtitles
This underground documentary takes its name from a group of Chilean economists who studied at the University of Chicago and other institutions and became followers of neoliberal economist Milton Friedman. These economists returned to Chile to assist Pinochet's military regime, privatizing nearly every aspect of Chile.
        THE CHICAGO CONSPIRACY does not focus on the story of the Allende government, but instead begins on March 29, 1985, when two young brothers and members of a left wing revolutionary organization, Rafael and Eduardo Vergara, were gunned down by police as they walked through the politically active community of Villa Francia. 
        This documentary recounts the story of the Vergara brothers alongside that of the poor neighbourhoods lining the outskirts of Santiago that originally cropped up as land occupations, as well as telling the story of recent Mapuche First Nation resistence - focusing on the legacy of dictatorship within the new Chilean democracy.

Fri, Sept 13, 7:00 pm : Augustin's Newspaper
Dir.: Ignacio Aguero, 2009, Chile, 80 min, Documentary, Spanish, with English subtitles
AGUSTÍN’S NEWSPAPER follows journalism students from the University of Chile as they launch an investigation into the work of the Chilean newspaper El Mercurio, owned by Agustín Edwards since 1956, and its reporting of and role in their country’s political history, in particular around the election of Salvador Allende in 1970, the violent coup against him in 1973, and the subsequent seventeen years of the military regime.
        Together, the students and the film dig into the particulars of several key events and their coverage in El Mercurio as case studies. They also look into relations between the owners and managers of the newspaper and Chilean political parties, the church, military, secret police, and the CIA. 
        In the end, through its attention to the details of one country’s journalistic history, AGUSTÍN’S NEWSPAPER raises profound questions not only about the role and responsibilities of Chile’s most important newspaper, but of all those who control or manage the dissemination of information and the reporting of news in every country.
        Plays with Pinochet's Women Dir.: Eduaro Menz, 2009, Canada, 12 min., Experimental, Spanish, with English subtitles
An examination of the forgotten history of two very different but significant women during Pinochet's brutal regime of Chile in the late 1980's - Cecilia Bolocco, who was crowned Miss Universe in 1987, and Carmen Gloria Quintana, who in 1986 suffered severe burns and was left for dead after being picked up by the military for protesting against Pinochet. 

Fri, Sept 13, 9:00 pm : NO
Dir: Pablo Larrain, 2012, Chile, 118 min., Drama, Spanish, with English subtitles
In 1988, Chilean military dictatory Augusto Pinochet is forced to call a plebiscite on his presidency due to international pressure. The country will vote Yes or No to Pinochet extending his rule for another eight years. Opposition leaders for the No persuade a brash young executive, René Saavedra (Gael García Bernal), to spearhead their campaign. 
        Against all odds, with scant resources and under scrutiny by the despots minions, Saavedra and his team devise an audacious plan to win the election and set Chile free.
        Director Pablo Larraín has said, in response to the question how much of the story is real?: "Everything. The concept, the jingles, the commercials, the slogans. All of it is true. What had to be adapted was that many of the characters had to be condensed into fewer people because we couldn't include every single one of these people and have a cast of 100. Also, something that became a point of dicussion in Chile afterwards was that the film shows one point of view, and doesn't show the reality and the importance that the political world had, which was very significant. It doesn't show the contribution of the people on the street, who played a very important part in what happened and succeeded in mobilising a country." - In Sounds and Colors

Sat, Sept 14, 7:00 pm : Machuca
Dir: Andrés Wood, 2004, Chile, Spain, 115 min, Drama, anish, with English subtitles
Set in Chile, 1973, this is an astonishingly intimate and painful coming-of-age story about a pair of 12-year-old boys from opposite extremes of society who form an unlikely friendship during the last days of President Allende and the first days of Pinochet. The potent events are accompanied by a searingly beautiful soundtrack with heart-stopping beats that propel the drama of the story.
        There is no separating the personal from the political in MACHUCA. This film's determination to tell a story of profound societal dislocation in intensely human terms favors neither part of the equation. In fact, director-co-writer Andrés Wood feels you cannot hope to understand one aspect of his fatally intertwined story unless you are willing to understand them both.” – LA Times 

Sun, Sept 15, 3:00 pm : Violeta Went to Heaven
Dir: Andrés Wood, 2011, Chile, Argentina, Brazil, 110 min, Drama, Spanish and French, with English subtitles
The extraordinary story of the iconic Chilean poet, musician and folk singer Violeta Parra, whose songs have become hymns for all Latina Americans and who was integral to the development of the Chilean "nueva canción" (new song) movement that used music as a tool for social change. 
        Director Andrés Wood (Machuca) traces the intensity and explosive vitality of her life, from her impoverished orgins to international fame, her defense of indigenous cultures and devotion to her art.
         "Indispensably supported by Miguel Ioan Littín's exquisite photography, Mr. Wood has created a poignant portrait of an artist unable to escape the stamp of her class or the burdens of aging. The grant exhibition tent she erects on a hilltop becomes, in the end, an apt metaphor for dashed dreams, its canvas unable to keep out the rain and its empty seats unable to turn back time." - Jeanette Catsoulis, NY Times
Sun, Sept 15, 7:00 pm : The Chilean Building
Dir: Macarena Aguilo, 2010, Chile, 99 min, Documentary, Spanish, with English subtitles 
        This story has never been documented before: While their parents battled the Pinochet dictatorship in Chile, a group of children were raised communally, first in Europe and then in Cuba. The 20 adults who supervised “Project Home” saw over 60 children through to adulthood, children whose mothers and fathers – members of the left wing revolutionary organization MIR (Movimiento de Izquierda Revolucionaria) – returned to Chile to fight for freedom, many never to be seen again.
        Director Macarena Aguiló chose a very personal story for this, her first film, as she is one of the children who grew up in “Project Home.” Says Aguiló: “’Project Home’ was a powerful collective experience at a time when words like ‘social participation’ had a positive connotation. That was certainly the way that the children who lived there viewed their experiences: The sacrifices our parents made in their fight to change Chilean society left us with painful memories, but with beautiful ones, too.”

Minneapolis race for mayor brings out corporate stooges and some nut jobs with the Green Party fielding the only credible candidate in the race.

Come Saturday Morning: The Corporate Blue-Greenwashing of Mark Andrew

[Story provided courtesy of Jane Hamsher's FireDogLake]

Saturday August 31, 2013 6:45 am

Photo by Karen Boros of MinnPost.

There are currently around three dozen candidates in the running to replace outgoing Minneapolis mayor R.T. Rybak. Many are serious, many are jokes, and at least one, former DFL chair and current alleged “Greenest City” guy Mark Andrew, is running under a false flag or two.
 Andrew, whose second biggest claim to fame (after being a Hennepin County commissioner and being its longtime chair) has been his mid-1990s role in steering the Minnesota DFL (our local branch of the Democratic Party) towards corporatism and Republicanism, is now going around Minneapolis touting his homeboy status while making himself out to be what looks like some Madison Avenue ad agency’s idea of a nice soft and fluffy pro-environment, pro-99-percent politician: Carrying a green manila folder while standing on a tree stump talking up tree planting, all while his silver hair gleams and blows gently in the winds. Seriously.

The consultants who dream up this sort of carefully-contrived greenwashing schtick don’t come cheap, so it shouldn’t surprise anyone to learn that at a nice homey hometown fundraiser held for him last Thursday the 29th, the following decidedly non-soft, non-fluffy, non-homey, and very much un-green and un-progressive entities were present:





John E. Derus
, lobbyist for Minnesota Metalcasters, a metal industry group that claims to be green but seems to be more “green by assertion”.

Jason George, pro-sulfide union mining lobbyist (creating short-term jobs through long-term polluting of trout streams and groundwater).

Dan Gunderson, lobbyist for the American Petroleum Institute, which among other things backs the Keystone XL pipeline.

Tony Kwilas (click on “Public Policy”), prominent member of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and strong mining backer.

Duane Arens, until recently a lobbyist for Connexus Energy.
John Evans, lobbyist for Wells Fargo Bank.

The husband and wife team of Ron and Val Jerich, whose bread and butter comes from lobbying for the ethanol and Big Ag (especially Big Corn) industries.

Vic Moore, a lobbyist whose clients include the health insurance industry and anti-environmental “wise use” groups such as the Minnesota Snowmobilers Association.

Mark Oyaas, lobbyist for Minnesota CenterPoint Energy.

Erin Roth, yet another American Petroleum Institute lobbyist.

Brian Rice, longtime lobbyist for various local police and fire federations, groups not exactly known for their progressive natures.

And just in case you still aren’t sure whether Mr. Andrew really is just another corporatist DINO-saur dressed up in shiny new and ill-fitting progressive/green togs, check out this glowingly approving passage from a glowingly approving editorial titled “DFL’S NEW CHAIRMAN FACES DAUNTING TASK OF TURNING PARTY BACK TO MAINSTREAM”. The editorial was penned by the highly conservative Steve Dornfeld for the October 9, 1995 edition of the Saint Paul, Minnesota Pioneer Press:
Andrew is upbeat about his chance of turning things around. He calls his own election “a gesture of political pragmatism” by party activists.

“I want to build the party so that it matters again, and has an impact on people’s lives,” Andrew says. To do that, he says the DFL must develop “a mainstream agenda” that emphasizes bread-and-butter issues such as job creation and tax equity, and avoids “the hot-button issues that have torn the party apart for years.”
“Hot-button issues” that Dornfeld said were the province of “liberals, gays, feminists, environmentalists and others who wield great influence within the DFL”.

Needless to say, Andrew’s effort to Third Way the DFL didn’t produce the electoral bonanza that was promised.

Meanwhile, there are other elements in his past — such as the FBI probe into plumbing work done while he was a Hennepin County Commissioner — that are surfacing again, despite all the lobbyist-enabled corporate blue-greenwashing:
Not only is Mark Andrew divisive, but he’s the only candidate who has been investigated by the FBI for corruption after his service as a Hennepin County Commissioner. I really wish some more of his history would come out, especially his mandated work-for-welfare program that got unions upset that unskilled laborers were being put next to union professionals on road construction projects, and his single-handed advocacy FOR the downtown trash burner. Do your research of his time in office, people!
We don’t need to see this slickly repackaged shill become the next mayor of Minneapolis. There are other, better choices out there. Any of them would be better than the Blue-Greenwashed Man.

[Unfortunately, Jane Hamsher and her FireDogLake urged support for other very corrupt and corporate-owned Democratic Party candidates in this article without encouraging readers to check out Doug Mann, the Green Party candidate: see details about Doug Mann below.]
******

Hopefully Jane Hamsher and FireDogLake, since they know who shouldn't become mayor of Minneapolis, will consider Doug Mann:

Check out the only real alternative for Minneapolis Mayor---

Doug Mann:


http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/news/2013/07/22/doug-mann-green-party-mayoral-candidate

COMMUNITY VOICES | Doug Mann of the Green Party is a mayoral candidate

I am endorsed by the New Progressive Alliance, and support its platform.

City Council member Cam Gordon also sought and received the NPA endorsement.

Last year I stood for election to the Minneapolis School Board, advanced to the
general election and obtained 31,300 votes, about 25% of the total vote, with
endorsements from the NPA, the Green Party, Democratic Socialists of America,
and Lavender Greens (the LGBTIQ caucus of the Green Party).

I am fighting for a stadium referendum this fall. On July 16, 2013, I filed a
petition for a writ of mandamus with the District Court, seeking an order
commanding the City Council to hold a Vikings Stadium referendum. A hearing is
scheduled on August 20, 2013, at 8:30 a.m. at the Hennepin County Government
Center. Shortly thereafter, I expect a ruling. I intend to give the judge no
choice but to rule that the Citizens of Minneapolis have the right to vote on
the use of City of Minneapolis tax revenues and other obligations imposed on
the City by the Vikings Stadium Act of 2012.
housing, the Court system and the Public School System. I advocate the
establishment of a division in the City's Civil Rights Department empowered to
detect and prosecute those engaged in illegal, covert discrimination in the
employment and housing markets. I advocate an end to the war on drugs, which
has been extremely effective in criminalizing, marginalizing, and
disenfranchising people of color. I advocate steps to eliminate systemic racism
in the K-12 school system: Students of color are heavily exposed to less
qualified and less experienced teachers, and more heavily concentrated in
watered-down curriculum tracks. I oppose the corporate-style reforms,
charter-ization and de-unionization of the Public School system that is being
orchestrated at the federal level, and is being carried out by the State of MN
and the Minneapolis Public Schools.

Mann for Minneapolis Mayor
http://facebook.com/mann4mayor

Fill the Courtroom to demand a stadium vote!

08/20/2013 - 8:00am
Doug Mann's petition for a writ of mandamus, demanding a referendum on the use of City of Minneapolis tax revenues for the Viking stadium has a court date.

Monday, September 2, 2013

From Michael Munk... now is the time for direct contact with your members of Congress; stop Obama's war on Syria.

Obama’s decision to ask Congress to vote on his plan to attack Syria is a real opportunity to personally smoke out your own representative by name. As their constituent, urge her or him to tell you if they intend to vote against war or explain why they won’t. This is probably more effective than signing petitions from organized groups.
 
While the most despicable warmongers in the Senate, McCain and Graham, suggested that the Lesser Evil got their support by promising them his attack would be stronger and more destructive than originally described, a House member provided his colleagues with a model statement of a righteous position. Democrat Rick Nolan of Minnesota declared:
I want you to know that I am vehemently opposed to a military strike that would clearly be an act of war against Syria, especially under such tragic yet confusing circumstances as to who is responsible for the use of chemical weapons.
 
Some members will be more vulnerable to Pelosi and Obama, since their declaration did not clearly state that an actual vote by Congress was required.*
But all members of Congress will be subjected to heavy pressure intended to intimidate them by suggesting they are (1) endorsing WMDs, Assad and the killing of women and children (2) failing to protect Israel (3) eroding US credibility about Obama’s “Red Line,”et al. Many may be noncommittal and claim they’re waiting to see the final form of the war resolution or for more information, but ask them: no matter whether it turns out to be “narrow” (i.e. limited and no ground troops) or “broad” (a blank check as Obama prefers) where they stand on attacking Syria.
 POLITICO writes today:
“With morning news coverage reporting that President Obama could lose his Syria vote, White House officials are embarking on a massive, member-by-member lobbying surge. "The strategy will be to flood the zone," a White House official told Playbook. "We want every member to feel briefed, to have everything they need, to have every question answered. In-person visits, one-on-one phone calls, conference calls, classified briefings, unclassified briefings - everything is on the menu.A House Republican aide, asked if Obama can win, says: "I think probably yes. But historically these are considered conscience votes [what he means is that it’s not a donation driven vote—except for a sector of the military-industrial complex-mm], and we haven't broken arms. Pelosi will have to post a big number."- politicoplaybook@politico.com;
 
That surprisingly close vote approving NSA spying late in the last session resulted from an unlikely coalition of libertarian Repubs and liberal Dems that almost upset Obama’s agenda. But in this vote, the consequences for liberal Dems look to be far more severe. Already, we have examples of the tactics the Lesser Evil’s team is stooping to: The spectacle of John Kerry shamelessly playing the Israel First card by warning hesitant Dems that “I don't think they will want to vote,ultimately, to put Israel at risk,” and that of Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL) shamelessly playing the “Kawaiti incubator murders” card, by imploring her party colleagues to keep "The searing image of babies lined up dead” in their minds when voting. For liberal Dems who take orders from Pelosi this will mean defying the Lesser Evil on the issue. Of course, unlike Brit PM Cameron who cancelled the UK’s participation in Obama’s “Coalition of the Willing”when Parliament rejected it, Obama has suggested he would go ahead  (with only his new “French poodle”) even if he losses the vote. Reporting on what called Obama’s “lobbying blitz”, the NYT quoted another of its anonymous “administration sources” calling AIPAC “the 800-pound gorilla in the room,” and said it was pressuring vulnerable members of Congresss, “If the White House is not capable of enforcing this red line..we’re in trouble.”
 
POINTS
 
(1) Regarding the “humanitarian” mission to punish the Assad regime for using WMDs (chemical weapons) Syria has noted that when it proposed the UN should ban all WMDs from the middle east, the US opposed it (to protect Israel’s nukes). Still many argue that the only nation to use nuclear weapons against a civilian population has forfeited standing to decide which nations are violating “international norms.” That tops its use of Agent Orange and napalm in Vietnam, and expended uranium and white phosphorus in Iraq
 
(2) Outside the US (since the media do not allow it to be raised inside), people wonder how any nation’s legislature can “legalize” acts of war under international law, which permits military action against another country only in self defense or with permission of the Security Council. But ever since Truman evaded Congress in 1950 (he got the UN OK only because the Soviets were boycotting in protest of Taiwan sitting in China’s seat) to intervene in a civil war in Korea by calling it a “police action,” Congress has either been ignored or bamboozled with fake “raisons de la guerre” like LBJ’s Tonkin Gulf incident or Bush’s WMDs.
 
(3) During the June, 2011 debate in which the house rejected Obama’s request for support for his Libyan regime change 295-213, his then-secretary of state signaled how her successor will try to intimidate dissenters in this vote. Hillary Clinton demanded to know if lawmakers were “On Qaddafi's side, or are you on the side of the aspirations of the Libyan people and the international coalition that has been bringing them support?" All Kerry does is exchange “Qaddafi” to “Assad”, and “Libyan people” to “Syrian people.”
 
(4) Insiders claim Obama was scared off by the Brit Parliament’s rejection. If so, I hope that vote suddenly made him realize he had boxed himself into only two choices. As one Labour MP put it: “Is not the real reason we are here today not the horror at these weapons — if that horror exists — but as a result of the American president having foolishly drawn a red line, so that he is now in the position of either having to attack or face humiliation?” I hope he understood his unfortunate declaration had turned a controversial military decision into an unwanted test of his personal credibility.
 
Obama could salvage some of the reputation with which he won nomination over Hillary Clinton in ‘08 if he would admit his “red line” was a mistake ( or just ignore it) and instead commit himself to ending all forms of Syrian deaths by insisting the Geneva negotiations that the US and Russia had agreed should have begun in June, must be held.. To achieve that, he must force the opposition to attend without the preconditions that so far have prevented the talks. As Robert Parryhttp://truth-out.org/news/item/18525-getting-syria-ous-about-peace-talks reminds us.“Though many Americans may believe – from absorbing the mainstream U.S. news – that it is Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad who needs to be pressured to the negotiating table,the reality is that Assad has repeatedly offered to join peace talks in Geneva. It is “our” opposition that has refused to go. The rebel leaders have offered up a host of excuses: they want the U.S. government to provide sophisticated weapons first; they want all Hezbollah fighters from Lebanon to withdraw; they want to be in a winning position before talks begin; they want Assad to agree to resign as a precondition of talks.” 
 
One possible road to at least a cease fire enforced by troops of neutral members of the UN would be agreement on holding the national elections already scheduled by the Syrian government next year. Assad has already agreed they could be supervised by neutral observers and has raised the possibility he would not be a candidate. So if Obama would end his military support for the opposition and force the fundamentalist oil and gas sheiks to do likewise, Geneva II could happen. However, he would have to acknowledge the US is not a neutral for the purpose of selecting when UN cease fire and election observers.
 
There lies Obama’s opportunity for a genuine “humanitarian” intervention.-MM
------------------------------------------------------------ 
* These include: Barbara Lee, Suzanne Bonamici, Mike Honda, Lois Capps, John Lewis, Jackie Speier, Raúl Grijalva, Robin Kelly, Michael H. Michaud, Mark Pocan, Chellie Pingree, Nydia M. Velázquez, Stephen F. Lynch, Lloyd Doggett, Janice Hahn, Jared Huffman, Tulsi Gabbard, Emanuel Cleaver, Sheila Jackson Lee, Eddie Bernice Johnson, José E. Serrano, George Miller, Donna F. Edwards, Robert C. “Bobby” Scott, Steve Cohen, Marcy Kaptur, Danny K. Davis, Alcee L. Hastings, James P. McGovern, Judy Chu, Marcia L. Fudge, Alan S. Lowenthal, Charles B. Rangel, Bobby L. Rush, Carolyn B. Maloney, Janice Schakowsky, Donna M. Christensen, Richard M. Nolan, Henry A. Waxman, Diana DeGette, Yvette D. Clarke, Keith Ellison, Niki Tsongas, Eleanor Holmes Norton, John A. Yarmuth, and Julia Brownley.
 
Dems who signed a stronger letter (some of whom also signed the other one) were
Zoe Lofgren, Rush Holt, Beto O’Rourke, Peter DeFazio, Sam Farr, Jim McDermott, Peter Welch, David Loebsack ,Kurt Schrader, Earl Blumenauer, William Enyart, Tim Walz, , Bruce Braley,  Michael Capuano, Anna Eshoo, Rick Nolan, Jim Matheson, Collin Peterson, Elizabeth Listy, Daniel Lipinsky and Daniel Maffei.

Would Paul Wellstone have supported Obama's dirty war against Syria?



Labor Day and the workers employed in the Indian Gaming Industry

On this Labor Day, around two-million workers employed in the heinous and hideous Indian Gaming Industry with over 350 operations spread out across the country--- an industry which is nothing but a front for wealthy white mobsters who own all the slot machines and the entire fabulously profitable industry except for the racist poverty causing debt with which Native American Indian tribes are saddled with--- are forced to work in loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos at poverty wages without any rights under state or federal labor laws because corrupt state, federal and tribal politicians (mostly Democrats) working in cahoots with organized crime in return for massive campaign contributions have created this deplorable situation through a maze of "Compacts" intended to provide cheap labor as the source of massive profits.

Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council

Benjamin Franklin had it right...

"Voting is easy and marginally useful, but it is a poor substitute for democracy, which requires direct action by concerned citizens"
- Ben Franklin

Sunday, September 1, 2013

A dialog with Professor Wallerstein.

Professor Wallerstein,

While the Egyptian right has "won" for the moment as you say, I think you are wrong in assuming, or you seem to be assuming, that this "victory" will be long-term.

I also think you are wrong in saying the United States wants stability in the region when it is the instability that allows the United States to control and dominate the region--- otherwise why would the promotion of ethnic strife be the main focus of the CIA's activities in the region? Once ethnic strife is inflamed it usually takes many years to stop, and it usually takes a strong socialist government implementing some kind of Affirmative Action for the minorities who have suffered the brunt of ethnic hatreds--- something Nasser took into account.  

You mention the role of Nasser and you mis-characterize his role in the region; he did in fact help bring into existence a very strong anti-imperialist (often pro-socialist) and very progressive alliance which served the interests of the people.

Nasser never promoted the interests of imperialism in the region and most notably was an ardent foe of U.S. imperialism as he helped lead the non-aligned movement--- certainly nothing like the conqueror Napoleon to whom you compare his actions.

You don't mention the extremely deep roots of Nasser's Arab Socialist Union party in Egypt.

While you have acknowledged Nasser, something few others do in discussing Egypt, you don't mention the strength of the Nasserists in Egypt, today, which is a very strong movement--- their candidate (Hamdeen Sabahi) came in a very strong third (21 percent of the vote to Morsi's 24% in the first vote--- just barely loosing out to the second place finisher) in the last election even though the Nasserists are somewhat divided between what they call the "old" Nasserists (the minority; stronger adherents of socialism) and the "new" Nasserists (the majority; with whom the Nasserist candidate who came in third is aligned [these "new" Nasserists promote more capitalism than the "old" Nasserists but still promote a much larger government responsibility in most everything including the "market"--- Hamdeen Sabahi is kind of a Henry Wallace type of progressive).

One could easily speculate that if the "old" and "new" Nasserists were less at odds with one another, Sabahi may have finished first; but, most likely second, and have been in a run-off with Morsi.

Sabahi, who has been jailed many times for opposing military rule may come to regret that he supported this military coup.

I find it kind of strange you make a comparison between Nasser and Napolean; but, then, again, I find it kind of strange that with you being an anti-imperialist and an ideological leader of the movement against globalization, you would lend your name to supporting Obama--- who next, Hillary? 

​Alan L. Maki​


On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Becky Dunlop <dunlop@binghamton.edu> wrote:
Please do not reply to the listserv. To correspond with the author, write immanuel.wallerstein@yale.edu. To correspond with us about your email address on the listserv, write dunlop@binghamton.edu. Thank you.

Commentary No. 360, Sept. 1, 2013
"Armies in Power"

It is almost always bad news when armies are in power. In Egypt, the army has been the deciding force since 1952. The recent destitution by the Egyptian army of President Mohamed Morsi was not a coup d'état. One cannot commit a coup d'état against oneself. What happened was simply that the army changed the way it was governing Egypt. For a short period, the army had allowed the Muslim Brotherhood to make some limited state decisions. When they began to feel that the actions of the Morsi government might lead to a significant increase in Muslim Brotherhood power at the expense of the Egyptian army, General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi decided that enough was enough, and acted ruthlessly to increase the day-to-day power of the army. 
Armies in power are in general highly nationalist and very authoritarian. They tend to be very conservative forces in terms of the world-economy. Furthermore, the senior officers not only permit the army to have a direct entrepreneurial role, but they also tend to use their military power as a mode of personal enrichment. This has certainly been the case for most of the time since the Egyptian army assumed direct power in 1952 - or shall we say, at least since 1952.
Is it possible for armies to play a progressive role in national and world politics? Yes, certainly. Sometimes the nationalism of the army leads them to espouse an anti-imperialist line in geopolitics and a populist role in supporting the needs of the underclasses. This was the case with the initial role of Gamal Abdel Nasser. But progressive populism is unnatural for armies, which find it difficult to engage in the bargaining process it necessarily entails internally. And progressive populism leads to a readiness to impose the army's views on neighboring countries, thereby undermining precisely what had been progressive in their geopolitical stances. This was true of Nasser as it had been true of Napoleon. 
What is interesting about the Egyptian army's crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood is the reaction it has evoked within and outside the country. Remember first of all that before the initial uprising against Hosni Mubarak began in Tahrir Square in 2011 the Muslim Brotherhood had managed to obtain a limited role in political life (a small minority of seats in the legislature and some limits to its repression) by a tacit deal with the Mubarak regime, which means with the army. 
So when the populace began to flow into Tahrir Square demanding change, neither the army nor the Muslim Brotherhood was very supportive. However, when the popular uprising seemed to be taking off, both the army and the Muslim Brotherhood decided hastily to join it, in order to tame it by appropriating it. And when the run-off in the first presidential election reduced the choice to one between Morsi and a former leading figure of the Mubarak regime, both the secular left and centrist voters and the army chose Morsi, enabling him to win by a small margin.
When Morsi decided to proceed to put into effect a new constitution with a decidedly Muslim tilt, the secular voters returned to Tahrir Square to denounce him. The army joined them once again to control the situation. And the secular voters now cheered on the very army they had denounced two years earlier. 
The political situation is straightforward. Both the Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian right (the forces that had long supported Mubarak) command enough voters so that any reasonably honest election will allow one or the other to be victorious. The secular forces - the multiple socialist parties and the middle-class centrists whose leading figure at the moment is Mohamed el-Baradei, are too few in number. In the end, they have to join forces with one or the other, while they really want neither the right nor the Muslim Brotherhood. And the Egyptian Salafists joined the anti-Morsi coalition, hoping thereby to strengthen their own hand among Muslim activists. 
In the rest of the world, the enthusiasts for the actions of the army are a strange lot: Israel, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, Russia, Algeria and Morocco, and probably Bashar al-Assad. The unhappy ones are Hamas, Ennahda in Tunisia, Turkey, and Qatar. As for the United States (as well as western Europe), it loses whoever wins, and has become irrelevant.
For Israel, Morsi represented a threat whereas the Egyptian army will preserve the relative detente. For Saudi Arabia, the Brotherhood represented their great rivals in the Arab world. For al-Assad, the Brotherhood had been great supporters of the Free Syrian Army. Algeria and Morocco both work hard to constrain Islamist forces, and the fall of Morsi is therefore to be applauded. For Russia, the fall of Morsi probably guarantees no major shift in the geopolitics of the region, which is what Russia wants. 
For Turkey (as for Ennahda in Tunisia), the fall of Morsi undermines the case for a "moderate" Islamic government. For Qatar, the fall of Morsi weakens their hand in their struggle with Saudi Arabia. 
The U.S. government wants above all stability in the region. It was ready to work with Morsi, if necessary. It has long had the closest possible ties with the Egyptian army. It has tried to wiggle between the two, offending both sides as well as both neo-cons and human rights supporters in the United States. 
The one presumed piece of U.S. leverage with Egypt - its financial aid, of which 80% goes to the army - cannot be used. For one thing, Saudi Arabia and the Emirates have already sent in more money than the United States has been giving. And secondly, the U.S. government needs the Egyptian army more than the other way around. The Egyptian army likes to buy its equipment from the United States. But if cut off from that, it can find equipment elsewhere. The U.S. government needs the Egyptian army for overflight rights, intelligence assistance, assurances about detente with Israel, and many other things, for which there is no replacement. So, Obama is reduced to making symbolic gestures, with no teeth.
The Egyptian right has won, the Egyptian left has lost (even if it doesn’t yet acknowledge this), and the Muslim Brotherhood will go underground, from which it may yet re-emerge, strengthened. 
 by Immanuel Wallerstein

-- 
Becky Dunlop
Secretary, Fernand Braudel Center
Binghamton University
PO Box 6000
Binghamton NY 13902
http://www.binghamton.edu/fbc/



-- 
Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
 
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763

Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell: 651-587-5541

Primary E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net

Friday, August 30, 2013

"To Fulfill These Rights"

"To Fulfill These Rights;" The Presidential speech you are not supposed to know about because, unlike Obama's speeches, this speech by President Lyndon B. Johnson was followed up with real action.

This is a speech sometimes, but not often, quoted; and almost never published in it's entirety for people to read.

"To this end equal opportunity is essential, but not enough, not enough. Men and women of all races are born with the same range of abilities. But ability is not just the product of birth. Ability is stretched or stunted by the family that you live with, and the neighborhood you live in--by the school you go to and the poverty or the richness of your surroundings. It is the product of a hundred unseen forces playing upon the little infant, the child, and finally the man."


"We are trying to attack these evils through our poverty program, through our education program, through our medical care and our other health programs, and a dozen more of the Great Society programs that are aimed at the root causes of this poverty."


"These differences are not racial differences. They are solely and simply the consequence of ancient brutality, past injustice, and present prejudice. They are anguishing to observe. For the Negro they are a constant reminder of oppression. For the white they are a constant reminder of guilt. But they must be faced and they must be dealt with and they must be overcome, if we are ever to reach the time when the only difference between Negroes and whites is the color of their skin."


"The Negro, like these others, will have to rely mostly upon his own efforts. But he just can not do it alone. For they did not have the heritage of centuries to overcome, and they did not have a cultural tradition which had been twisted and battered by endless years of hatred and hopelessness, nor were they excluded--these others--because of race or color--a feeling whose dark intensity is matched by no other prejudice in our society."

http://www.lbjlib.utexas.edu/johnson/archives.hom/speeches.hom/650604.asp

President Lyndon B. Johnson's

Commencement Address at Howard University: "To Fulfill These Rights"

June 4, 1965

Dr. Nabrit, my fellow Americans:

I am delighted at the chance to speak at this important and this historic institution. Howard has long been an outstanding center for the education of Negro Americans. Its students are of every race and color and they come from many countries of the world. It is truly a working example of democratic excellence.

Our earth is the home of revolution. In every corner of every continent men charged with hope contend with ancient ways in the pursuit of justice. They reach for the newest of weapons to realize the oldest of dreams, that each may walk in freedom and pride, stretching his talents, enjoying the fruits of the earth.

Our enemies may occasionally seize the day of change, but it is the banner of our revolution they take. And our own future is linked to this process of swift and turbulent change in many lands in the world. But nothing in any country touches us more profoundly, and nothing is more freighted with meaning for our own destiny than the revolution of the Negro American.

In far too many ways American Negroes have been another nation: deprived of freedom, crippled by hatred, the doors of opportunity closed to hope.

In our time change has come to this Nation, too. The American Negro, acting with impressive restraint, has peacefully protested and marched, entered the courtrooms and the seats of government, demanding a justice that has long been denied. The voice of the Negro was the call to action. But it is a tribute to America that, once aroused, the courts and the Congress, the President and most of the people, have been the allies of progress.

LEGAL PROTECTION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Thus we have seen the high court of the country declare that discrimination based on race was repugnant to the Constitution, and therefore void. We have seen in 1957, and 1960, and again in 1964, the first civil rights legislation in this Nation in almost an entire century.

As majority leader of the United States Senate, I helped to guide two of these bills through the Senate. And, as your President, I was proud to sign the third. And now very soon we will have the fourth--a new law guaranteeing every American the right to vote.

No act of my entire administration will give me greater satisfaction than the day when my signature makes this bill, too, the law of this land.

The voting rights bill will be the latest, and among the most important, in a long series of victories. But this victory--as Winston Churchill said of another triumph for freedom--"is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning."

That beginning is freedom; and the barriers to that freedom are tumbling down. Freedom is the right to share, share fully and equally, in American society--to vote, to hold a job, to enter a public place, to go to school. It is the right to be treated in every part of our national life as a person equal in dignity and promise to all others.

FREEDOM IS NOT ENOUGH
But freedom is not enough. You do not wipe away the scars of centuries by saying: Now you are free to go where you want, and do as you desire, and choose the leaders you please.

You do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him up to the starting line of a race and then say, "you are free to compete with all the others," and still justly believe that you have been completely fair.

Thus it is not enough just to open the gates of opportunity. All our citizens must have the ability to walk through those gates.

This is the next and the more profound stage of the battle for civil rights. We seek not just freedom but opportunity. We seek not just legal equity but human ability, not just equality as a right and a theory but equality as a fact and equality as a result.

For the task is to give 20 million Negroes the same chance as every other American to learn and grow, to work and share in society, to develop their abilities--physical, mental and spiritual, and to pursue their individual happiness.

To this end equal opportunity is essential, but not enough, not enough. Men and women of all races are born with the same range of abilities. But ability is not just the product of birth. Ability is stretched or stunted by the family that you live with, and the neighborhood you live in--by the school you go to and the poverty or the richness of your surroundings. It is the product of a hundred unseen forces playing upon the little infant, the child, and finally the man.

PROGRESS FOR SOME
This graduating class at Howard University is witness to the indomitable determination of the Negro American to win his way in American life.

The number of Negroes in schools of higher learning has almost doubled in 15 years. The number of nonwhite professional workers has more than doubled in 10 years. The median income of Negro college women tonight exceeds that of white college women. And there are also the enormous accomplishments of distinguished individual Negroes--many of them graduates of this institution, and one of them the first lady ambassador in the history of the United States.

These are proud and impressive achievements. But they tell only the story of a growing middle class minority, steadily narrowing the gap between them and their white counterparts.

A WIDENING GULF
But for the great majority of Negro Americans-the poor, the unemployed, the uprooted, and the dispossessed--there is a much grimmer story. They still, as we meet here tonight, are another nation. Despite the court orders and the laws, despite the legislative victories and the speeches, for them the walls are rising and the gulf is widening.

Here are some of the facts of this American failure.

Thirty-five years ago the rate of unemployment for Negroes and whites was about the same. Tonight the Negro rate is twice as high.

In 1948 the 8 percent unemployment rate for Negro teenage boys was actually less than that of whites. By last year that rate had grown to 23 percent, as against 13 percent for whites unemployed.

Between 1949 and 1959, the income of Negro men relative to white men declined in every section of this country. From 1952 to 1963 the median income of Negro families compared to white actually dropped from 57 percent to 53 percent.

In the years 1955 through 1957, 22 percent of experienced Negro workers were out of work at some time during the year. In 1961 through 1963 that proportion had soared to 29 percent.

Since 1947 the number of white families living in poverty has decreased 27 percent while the number of poorer nonwhite families decreased only 3 percent.

The infant mortality of nonwhites in 1940 was 70 percent greater than whites. Twenty-two years later it was 90 percent greater.

Moreover, the isolation of Negro from white communities is increasing, rather than decreasing as Negroes crowd into the central cities and become a city within a city.

Of course Negro Americans as well as white Americans have shared in our rising national abundance. But the harsh fact of the matter is that in the battle for true equality too many--far too many--are losing ground every day.

THE CAUSES OF INEQUALITY
We are not completely sure why this is. We know the causes are complex and subtle. But we do know the two broad basic reasons. And we do know that we have to act.

First, Negroes are trapped--as many whites are trapped--in inherited, gateless poverty. They lack training and skills. They are shut in, in slums, without decent medical care. Private and public poverty combine to cripple their capacities.

We are trying to attack these evils through our poverty program, through our education program, through our medical care and our other health programs, and a dozen more of the Great Society programs that are aimed at the root causes of this poverty.

We will increase, and we will accelerate, and we will broaden this attack in years to come until this most enduring of foes finally yields to our unyielding will.

But there is a second cause--much more difficult to explain, more deeply grounded, more desperate in its force. It is the devastating heritage of long years of slavery; and a century of oppression, hatred, and injustice.

SPECIAL NATURE OF NEGRO POVERTY
For Negro poverty is not white poverty. Many of its causes and many of its cures are the same. But there are differences-deep, corrosive, obstinate differences--radiating painful roots into the community, and into the family, and the nature of the individual.

These differences are not racial differences. They are solely and simply the consequence of ancient brutality, past injustice, and present prejudice. They are anguishing to observe. For the Negro they are a constant reminder of oppression. For the white they are a constant reminder of guilt. But they must be faced and they must be dealt with and they must be overcome, if we are ever to reach the time when the only difference between Negroes and whites is the color of their skin.

Nor can we find a complete answer in the experience of other American minorities. They made a valiant and a largely successful effort to emerge from poverty and prejudice.

The Negro, like these others, will have to rely mostly upon his own efforts. But he just can not do it alone. For they did not have the heritage of centuries to overcome, and they did not have a cultural tradition which had been twisted and battered by endless years of hatred and hopelessness, nor were they excluded--these others--because of race or color--a feeling whose dark intensity is matched by no other prejudice in our society.

Nor can these differences be understood as isolated infirmities. They are a seamless web. They cause each other. They result from each other. They reinforce each other.

Much of the Negro community is buried under a blanket of history and circumstance. It is not a lasting solution to lift just one corner of that blanket. We must stand on all sides and we must raise the entire cover if we are to liberate our fellow citizens.

THE ROOTS OF INJUSTICE
One of the differences is the increased concentration of Negroes in our cities. More than 73 percent of all Negroes live in urban areas compared with less than 70 percent of the whites. Most of these Negroes live in slums. Most of these Negroes live together--a separated people.

Men are shaped by their world. When it is a world of decay, ringed by an invisible wall, when escape is arduous and uncertain, and the saving pressures of a more hopeful society are unknown, it can cripple the youth and it can desolate the men.

There is also the burden that a dark skin can add to the search for a productive place in our society. Unemployment strikes most swiftly and broadly at the Negro, and this burden erodes hope. Blighted hope breeds despair. Despair brings indifferences to the learning which offers a way out. And despair, coupled with indifferences, is often the source of destructive rebellion against the fabric of society.

There is also the lacerating hurt of early collision with white hatred or prejudice, distaste or condescension. Other groups have felt similar intolerance. But success and achievement could wipe it away. They do not change the color of a man's skin. I have seen this uncomprehending pain in the eyes of the little, young Mexican-American schoolchildren that I taught many years ago. But it can be overcome. But, for many, the wounds are always open.

FAMILY BREAKDOWN
Perhaps most important--its influence radiating to every part of life--is the breakdown of the Negro family structure. For this, most of all, white America must accept responsibility. It flows from centuries of oppression and persecution of the Negro man. It flows from the long years of degradation and discrimination, which have attacked his dignity and assaulted his ability to produce for his family.
This, too, is not pleasant to look upon. But it must be faced by those whose serious intent is to improve the life of all Americans.

Only a minority--less than half--of all Negro children reach the age of 18 having lived all their lives with both of their parents. At this moment, tonight, little less than two-thirds are at home with both of their parents. Probably a majority of all Negro children receive federally-aided public assistance sometime during their childhood.

The family is the cornerstone of our society. More than any other force it shapes the attitude, the hopes, the ambitions, and the values of the child. And when the family collapses it is the children that are usually damaged. When it happens on a massive scale the community itself is crippled.

So, unless we work to strengthen the family, to create conditions under which most parents will stay together--all the rest: schools, and playgrounds, and public assistance, and private concern, will never be enough to cut completely the circle of despair and deprivation.

TO FULFILL THESE RIGHTS
There is no single easy answer to all of these problems.

Jobs are part of the answer. They bring the income which permits a man to provide for his family.
Decent homes in decent surroundings and a chance to learn--an equal chance to learn--are part of the answer.

Welfare and social programs better designed to hold families together are part of the answer.
Care for the sick is part of the answer.

An understanding heart by all Americans is another big part of the answer.

And to all of these fronts--and a dozen more--I will dedicate the expanding efforts of the Johnson administration.

But there are other answers that are still to be found. Nor do we fully understand even all of the problems. Therefore, I want to announce tonight that this fall I intend to call a White House conference of scholars, and experts, and outstanding Negro leaders--men of both races--and officials of Government at every level.
This White House conference's theme and title will be "To Fulfill These Rights."

Its object will be to help the American Negro fulfill the rights which, after the long time of injustice, he is finally about to secure.

To move beyond opportunity to achievement.

To shatter forever not only the barriers of law and public practice, but the walls which bound the condition of many by the color of his skin.

To dissolve, as best we can, the antique enmities of the heart which diminish the holder, divide the great democracy, and do wrong--great wrong--to the children of God.

And I pledge you tonight that this will be a chief goal of my administration, and of my program next year, and in the years to come. And I hope, and I pray, and I believe, it will be a part of the program of all America.

WHAT IS JUSTICE
For what is justice?

It is to fulfill the fair expectations of man.

Thus, American justice is a very special thing. For, from the first, this has been a land of towering expectations. It was to be a nation where each man could be ruled by the common consent of all--enshrined in law, given life by institutions, guided by men themselves subject to its rule. And all--all of every station and origin--would be touched equally in obligation and in liberty.

Beyond the law lay the land. It was a rich land, glowing with more abundant promise than man had ever seen. Here, unlike any place yet known, all were to share the harvest.

And beyond this was the dignity of man. Each could become whatever his qualities of mind and spirit would permit--to strive, to seek, and, if he could, to find his happiness.

This is American justice. We have pursued it faithfully to the edge of our imperfections, and we have failed to find it for the American Negro.

So, it is the glorious opportunity of this generation to end the one huge wrong of the American Nation and, in so doing, to find America for ourselves, with the same immense thrill of discovery which gripped those who first began to realize that here, at last, was a home for freedom.

All it will take is for all of us to understand what this country is and what this country must become.
The Scripture promises: "I shall light a candle of understanding in thine heart, which shall not be put out."
Together, and with millions more, we can light that candle of understanding in the heart of all America.
And, once lit, it will never again go out.

NOTE: The President spoke at 6:35 p.m. on the Main Quadrangle in front of the library at Howard University in Washington, after being awarded an honorary degree of doctor of laws. His opening words referred to Dr. James M. Nabrit, It., President of the University. During his remarks he referred to Mrs. Patricia Harris, U.S. Ambassador to Luxembourg and former associate professor of law at Howard University.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was approved by President Johnson on August 6, 1965; followed by...

Federal Executive Order #11246 (Affirmative Action) was signed into law by President Lyndon Baines Johnson on September 24, 1965.


Source: Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1965. Volume II, entry 301, pp. 635-640. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1966.