Texas Longhorns with newborn calf in Bluebonnets

Texas Longhorns with newborn calf in Bluebonnets

Please note I have a new phone number...

512-517-2708

Alan Maki

Alan Maki
Doing research at the LBJ Library in Austin, Texas

It's time to claim our Peace Dividend

It's time to claim our Peace Dividend

We need to beat swords into plowshares.

We need to beat swords into plowshares.

A program for real change...

http://peaceandsocialjustice.blogspot.com/2013/03/a-progressive-program-for-real-change.html


What we need is a "21st Century Full Employment Act for Peace and Prosperity" which would make it a mandatory requirement that the president and Congress attain and maintain full employment.


"Voting is easy and marginally useful, but it is a poor substitute for democracy, which requires direct action by concerned citizens"

- Ben Franklin

Let's talk...

Let's talk...

Sunday, October 14, 2007

A question for the Office of Applied Studies of the United States Government concerning its report on the link between employment and depression

I submitted this question to the Office of Applied Studies of the United States Government concerning the report referenced below:

As the Director of Organizing for the Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council, I am wondering if your study on the "most depressing jobs" surveyed the more than 2,000,000 American workers employed in the more than 400 so-called Indian owned and operated casinos and related hospitality industries where workers are employed in a smoke-filled environment at poverty wages without any rights under state or federal labor laws?

At present, Michigan Legislators are considering approving another "Compact" approving a new casino in west Michigan which continues these Draconian terms of employment without regard to the health and rights of working people which will subject another 2,000 workers to such a working environment.

I would further note, state and federal agencies have refused to make any records regarding employment in these casinos relating to health and safety issues, as well as statistics concerning other employment data, including wages and hours worked along with unjust firings, available to the public or state legislators. So, in addition to the other question I am wondering if your agency included this category of workers in your survey and study... if so, how many workers were involved; and, under what category and what percentage of this category are they in?





Michigan's Democratic "labor backed Governor" signs away workers' rights in another "Compact." Michigan Legislators in the House approved the "Compact," then under tremendous public pressure, have put approval on hold as the Governor tries to make the case that Michigan needs revenue from this new casino operation to subsidize and finance more handouts to corporations and the wealthy as public education and social services along with other programs for working people are put on the chopping block.

The Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council has called upon Michigan Legislators to turn down this "Compact" with the Gun Lake Band which is fronting for the Station Casinos--- a huge multi-national casino-resort-entertainment conglomerate operated by the Kansas City mob linked Fertitta Family--- and tell the Governor to renegotiate this "Compact" with the Gun Lake Band to include the same protections all other workers in Michigan are entitled to under State and Federal Labor Laws in addition to the right to work in a smoke-free environment like casino workers employed at Manitoba's casinos.

Workers will be employed at poverty wages in a smoke-filled workplace without any rights under Michigan or Federal Labor Laws unless this "Compact" is renegotiated prior to Michigan Legislators giving their final approval.



Depression among Adults Employed Full-Time, by Occupational Category

In Brief


• Combined data from 2004 to 2006 indicate that an annual average of 7.0 percent of full-time workers aged 18 to 64 experienced a major depressive episode (MDE) in the past year

• The highest rates of past year MDE among full-time workers aged 18 to 64 were found in the personal care and service occupations (10.8 percent) and the food preparation and serving related occupations (10.3 percent)

• The highest rates of past year MDE among female full-time workers aged 18 to 64 were found in the food preparation and serving related occupations (14.8 percent), and the highest rates among male full-time workers aged 18 to 64 were found in the arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media occupations (6.7 percent)

Depression can seriously impact a person's ability to perform routine activities at work. It negatively affects U.S. industry through lost productivity, employee absenteeism, and low morale.1,2 U.S. companies lose an estimated $30 to $44 billion dollars per year3,4 because of employee depression. Research shows that the rate of depression varies by occupation and industry.

The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) includes questions for adults aged 18 or older to assess lifetime and past year major depressive episode (MDE).5 In NSDUH, MDE is defined using the diagnostic criteria set forth in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV),6 which specifies a period of 2 weeks or longer during which there is either depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure and at least four other symptoms that reflect a change in functioning, including problems with sleep, eating, energy, concentration, and self-image.7 NSDUH also asks respondents about their current employment situation and the type of occupation and industry in which they work. NSDUH defines full-time employed respondents as those who usually work 35 or more hours per week and who worked in the past week or had a job despite not working in the past week.

This issue of The NSDUH Report uses data from the combined 2004 to 2006 surveys to present estimates of past year MDE among full-time workers aged 18 to 64 by occupational category.

For complete report of the study go to:

http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k7/depression/occupation.htm

Friday, October 12, 2007

Jimmy Carter steps forward--- again; disagrees with Hillary Clinton & Barack Obama

It's about time someone in the Democratic Party said this:

He said he also disagreed with positions taken by Democratic Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, who have declined
to promise to withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq over the following four years if elected president next year.
Former President Jimmy Carter

This criticism by Carter should be taken up widely by progressives and the peace movement; both have been very slow--- alarmingly slow--- to criticize Obama and Clinton. I would never vote for Clinton or Obama. Why should these opportunists and voices for capitalism dictate the terms of political debate in this country? Anyone can see just from looking at who is financing their campaigns they are the choice of big-business. Neither Obama nor Clinton has put forward a single position of substance when it comes to solving problems working people are experiencing... their reactionary positions on the war in Iraq is just one example of many. Both are playing games with the health care issue as well as the war in Iraq; what we need in this country is socialized health care... single-payer, universal health care is one step in this direction and neither Clinton nor Obama support such a modest reform. Jimmy Carter brings forward a welcome and healthy focus on the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights which would serve us well when considering most social and economic issues. Carter is right in stating Bush should not be allowed to redefine human rights issues which the United Nations did an excellent job in defining 60 years ago... December 10 marks another anniversary of this document and progressives should be making plans to widely disseminate and discuss this important document. Jimmy Carter continues to be a breath of fresh air and healthy voice in an otherwise very sick American political environment. Unfortunately, such views are mostly being dangerously silenced by the big-business dominated media in this country.


Jimmy Carter: US Tortures Prisoners

October 10, 2007. The Associated Press

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CARTER_WHITE_HOUSE?SITE=NYONE&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT


WASHINGTON - The U.S. tortures prisoners in violation of
international law, former President Jimmy Carter said
Wednesday, adding that President Bush makes up his own
definition of torture.

'Our country for the first time in my life time has abandoned
the basic principle of human rights,' Carter said on CNN.
'We've said that the Geneva Conventions do not apply to those
people in Abu Ghraib prison and Guantanamo, and we've said we
can torture prisoners and deprive them of an accusation of a
crime.'

Bush, responding to an Oct. 4 report by The New York Times on
secret Justice Department memorandums supporting the use of
'harsh interrogation techniques,' defended the techniques
Friday by proclaiming: 'This government does not torture
people.'

Carter said the interrogation methods cited by the Times,
including 'head-slapping, simulated drowning and frigid
temperatures,' constitute torture 'if you use the
international norms of torture as has always been honored -
certainly in the last 60 years since the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights was promulgated.

'But you can make your own definition of human rights and say
we don't violate them, and you can make your own definition
of torture and say we don't violate them,' Carter said.

In an interview that aired Wednesday on BBC, Carter ripped
Vice President Dick Cheney as 'a militant who avoided any
service of his own in the military.'

Carter went on to say Cheney has been 'a disaster for our
country. I think he's been overly persuasive on President
George Bush.'

Cheney spokeswoman Megan Mitchell declined to speak to
Carter's allegations.

'We're not going to engage in this kind of rhetoric,' she
said.

In the CNN interview, the Democratic former president
disparaged the field of Republican presidential candidates.

'They all seem to be outdoing each other in who wants to go
to war first with Iran, who wants to keep Guantanamo open
longer and expand its capacity - things of that kind,' Carter
said.

He said he also disagreed with positions taken by Democratic Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, who have declined
to promise to withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq over the following four years if elected president next year.

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Can we trust the Ford Motor Company and the Ford Site Planning Committee?

From: Anne Carroll Date: 2007-10-09 17:32

Posted on behalf and at the request of Brian Bates:

Ford apparently owns the power plant - there may be some issue as to
whether Ford owns the land the power plant sites on and there is the
issue of transferring the FERC permit - in process now.

BUT the real issue is distinguishing between the ownership of the hydro
plant and the ownwership of the lock and dam - called the ford lock and
dam and also called lock and dam #1 - which creates the "fall" or power
for the hydro plant..

Ford does not own the lock and dam and never has - it is owned us all
and run by the Corps of Engineers.

There is absolutely no guarantee that the lock and dam could not be
removed and leave the power plant high and dry without a source of power.

Nor does the possession of the FERC permit guarantee that the lock and
dam will remain; FERC and the Corps are two very different animals.

Brian Bates



**************************
My comment:

This is an interesting post from academic Anne Carroll who has posted on behalf of Brian Bates; Bates is not identified as to who he is and who he represents in all of this.

Second, I note the word “apparently” as it is used to define “ownership” of the Ford Hydro Dam. Someone selling something either owns what they are selling or they don’t. Who would purchase anything on the basis the seller is “apparently” the owner.

Third, the issue of who owns the land the power plant sits (or is it “sites”) on is a very important issue since the public may have more claims to have a say than what we have previously been led to believe.

Fourth, if the FERC permit is in the process of being transferred now, why is it none of the agencies will provide me with information concerning the permit transfer and the public hearing process?

Fifth, from the very beginning working people--- Ford employees especially--- have intentionally been kept out of the information loop and the decision making process at each stage as this plant closing/dam issue has proceeded. There is the continued boast that the United States is the world’s greatest bastion of democracy; yet, the majority of the people--- working people--- are repeatedly kept out of the information loop and the decision making process on these very basic issues affecting the lives of working people and the communities they live in.

From the very beginning of when Henry Ford first looked at this site for his manufacturing facility to be powered by this hydro dam which can not be separated from the lock and dam… the public and working people have been subjected to lie after lie after lie… Ford Motor Company continued the “big lie” in forcing, by scare tactics and threats, hundreds of workers into giving up their jobs in return for “buy-outs” that amount to a mass swindle… Ford claimed it was closing the operation this year and gave workers an ultimatum: accept the buy-outs or face an even more uncertain future… sheer trickery and deceit since Ford management is now laughing all the way to the bank pocketing millions of dollars they will save by paying temporary workers substantially less in wages and benefits than what long-time Ford employees would have received in wages and benefits… thereby cheating these workers out of well over $130,000.00 each based upon the length of time the plant will continue to operate.

Ford uses the same kind of lies to deceive the public regarding the hydro dam and Brian Bates who is apparently someone “in the know” being relied upon by a professor whose services were engaged by Merrit Clapp-Smith doesn’t even question the use of the term “apparently” regarding who actually owns the Ford Hydro Dam.

I am wondering what kind of paper-work transactions will have to be carried out in order to provide this multi-national Canadian power generating corporation with what is required. Is this entire transaction taking place in the darkness of Ford’s corporate boardroom? And, to what extent are local, state, and federal politicians and regulatory agencies “bending the rules” (as they did over eighty years ago) without informing the public?

Merritt Clapp-Smith has been the advocate of the St. Paul Chamber of Commerce, the Summit Hill Club of wealthy real estate speculators and upscale housing and retail developers… she is their hand-picked choice to lead the “Ford Site Planning Committee.

The UAW local and national leadership hasn’t questioned any of this. Local, state, and federal politicians haven’t raised their voices, much less acted, to protect the interests of Ford workers and the public in any of these crooked shenanigans… this is all the epitome of corruption.

Than you have this bunch of charlatans claiming to be community watch-dogs and worker advocates, many of them funded by “philanthropically” linked grants, others by union dues, and still others claiming to be advocates of social justice… all claiming this is a “done deal” as they sit on their hands, close their eyes, and cover their ears to the continuing, mounting injustices.

Kind of a little different than what most people expect from democracy I would say.

What is really bizarre is that Ford continues with its lies and deceit as the Ford Site Planning Committee and the St. Paul Chamber of Commerce seem to be able to find those in academia, the business community, and even among organized labor and political parties claiming to represent the interests of working people who are willing to help hoodwink working people as this fiasco continues to play out.

The lies and deceit of the Ford Motor Company will not end until this plant and the hydro dam are brought under public ownership and ordinary people become an integral part of the decision making process.

The MN DFL leadership doesn’t even care enough about Ford workers to put together a delegation composed of members of the MN DFL State Central Committee and elected public officials to go and talk to Ford workers--- those presently employed and those tricked into taking these “buy-outs--- to find out what Ford workers are thinking about all of this.

It appears we can trust the Ford Motor Company in all of this as much as we can trust President Bush concerning the war in Iraq… but then again, the Ford Motor Company is the only one in the neighborhood with a huge sign proclaiming support for this dirty war for oil in Iraq… and I notice the Blackwater Agency has a huge fleet of Ford pickup trucks they use in Iraq.

Something to think about while sitting around the kitchen table.

Alan L. Maki
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell phone: 651-587-5541
E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net

Wednesday, October 3, 2007

The General Motors/United Auto Workers settlement; job security and implications for other auto workers and the labor movement

Mr. Fletcher;

I read your article(see below) with great interest. I agree with what you say as far as you go; however, I don’t think your comments go anywhere near far enough given the present situation and gloomy economic forecast for the U.S. auto industry.

I think you miss the issue of “job security” by not addressing the problem of the Big Three having the complete monopoly over closing plants and tossing thousands of auto workers out into the streets. At this late date, there is only one way to address the issue of “job security;” this is through “Public Takeover and Ownership” of these plants.

Here in Minnesota the issue of Public Ownership is receiving considerable attention. People, including the workers at the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant slated for closure, are demanding working people have a say in the decision making process. I discussed this issue briefly with Jerry Tucker when he was in the Twin Cities for the “Working Class Studies” national conference at which he was a featured speaker on a panel, yet never in his presentation, mentioned the Ford Plant closing issue involving 2,000 jobs.

Also, you have failed to note that the SEIU has played a very divisive role in the auto industry as the Big Three have contracted out plant “house keeping;” cleaning in plant including bathrooms, eating areas, floors, etc. Many of these workers receive less than $12.00 an hour. Couple this with what is happening at the Twin Cities Ford Plant where Ford announced the Plant closing for 2008 and used this to coerce over half the UAW members to accept completely inadequate “buy-outs” which will not even pay off home mortgages for most workers let alone enable them to payoff other accumulated debts for cars, trucks, motorcycles, boats, vacations, summer homes and cottages, etc. The point here is not the inadequacy of the “buy-outs,” but the fact that after Ford tricked workers into believing they were closing the plant, Ford now announces it intends to continue production for as long as another two years (long enough for new international trade agreements to be put in place to allow their foreign built Rangers to come into the U.S.?) with Ford using fewer “temporary” employees doing the same work as the former UAW members without having to pay the same wages… plus, Ford is selling the hydro dam (to a foreign energy corporation) which has powered this plant in order to cover the costs of the “buy-outs.”

Ron Gettelfinger and the local UAW leadership make great sounding statements as if they negotiated the best “buy-out” packages possible while pretending to push the state legislature to pass legislation to keep the plant and dam intact as one unit until a new buyer for the plant can be found; but, the local UAW leadership goes before state House and Senate hearings bringing along only a handful of local members and their proposed legislation that is very mild and weak can’t even make it through a MN DFL Senate dominated and controlled committee… even though this local has invested hundreds of thousands of dollars of membership dues over the years supporting DFL candidates--- even the candidate they endorsed and campaigned for refused to support the legislation--- choosing instead to support the demands of the St. Paul Chamber of Commerce which is proposing the Plant be demolished and replaced with up-scale segregated housing. Obviously the Chamber of Commerce wants a downward pressure of area wages rather than the upwards pressure created by two-thousand union members receiving very good real living wages attainted through years of struggle. The workers’ struggle to attain a decent quality of life is never considered as an “investment” worth anything.

A vicious campaign of red-baiting has ensued against those supporting keeping this plant open continuing to produce Ranger pickups or a component of a green mass transit system. Ironically, at the time Henry Ford started up this plant and demanded the hydro dam on the Mississippi River be turned over to him rather than remain under the ownership and control of the U.S. Army Corps of engineers which was considering turning over the ownership and operation of this dam to the state and municipalities as a “public enterprise;” Henry Ford instigated a vicious campaign of red-baiting against the proponents of this hydro dam being a public enterprise.

I would point out that no one… not even the local UAW leadership or the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party has suggested Ford workers should be consulted regarding their views on public ownership which I have found to be running very strong in support of public ownership.

The real problem as I see it there is no organized rank and file movement which enables workers to exchange views and determine a course of action in resolving the problems you have outlined and these others you have not mentioned. Unless there is a “left” rank and file movement where issues such as public ownership can be brought forward, no matter how progressive any union leadership may be… it is darn hard to wage the required struggle against these corporations. Corporations and public officials should always be aware that union leaders are not shy about bringing along a big crowd in addressing the just demands of working people.

Jerry Tucker told me “Public Ownership might be an idea workers in the Twin Cities will respond to but it won’t fly in St. Louis.” (I am not sure I have the quote from Jerry Tucker verbatim; however, the gist of what he told me is correct; please feel free to ask him) I ask, “Why not? How does he know if he doesn’t raise the issue?” It seems too many people are afraid of a little controversy; others are just afraid to acknowledge the class struggle… which at its core involves the question of “ownership.”

Obviously, every time the question of “public ownership” is broached, red-baiting will follow… should whether or not red-baiting will ensue determine the parameters of this debate over “job security?” I don’t think so. At some point workers are going to have to demonstrate they have no fear of addressing issues simply because they will be called “communists.”

I am attaching an article for you to read from the quarterly magazine published by the Ramsey County Historical Society. I hope you will share my letter and this attachment with Jerry Tucker.

I also think the problems in the UAW go back well beyond the 1980’s to the reign of the Reuther brothers who, according to the recently released FBI and CIA files entitled “Family Jewels” were simultaneously on the FBI/CIA payroll with George Meaney; again, red-baiting is the issue. Kick the reds out of the union and you end all talk of the “ownership” question and you end up with a labor movement which sees itself in a “joint” venture of sorts with the automotive executives. Ron Gettelfinger appears quite content to maintain this debate over “job security” (and the health care issue) with in the confines of the capitalist system. Hence, no call for socialized health care and only token support for single-payer, universal health care which we all know will be a step towards socialized health care.

I assume you were looking for discussion in publishing your article on the “GM/UAW Settlement.”

By the way, as I am writing this, CBC Radio (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) news has just announced that the Ford Ranger is one of the most popular pick-up trucks sold in Canada and getting more popular… sales in the U.S. market would tend to support this finding also… so, why have UAW leaders remained silent about Ford having gone into Ranger production at a new plant in Thailand? Can Twin Cities UAW members produce a Ranger class product without the involvement of Ford management and without Wall Street coupon clippers reaping the profits?

I was in Michigan during this “strike.” I talked with GM workers on picket lines in Grand Rapids and Lansing, Michigan; they thought the strike was a very sick, sad and cruel joke which they were the butt of and well understood they would come out holding the shitty end of the stick. The Gettelfinger led “nationwide strike” against GM was a farce… not one thing was gained by autoworkers… in fact, great losses were suffered by workers while the company will see its stock continue to increase in price as Wall Street coupon clippers once again reap greater profits.

Alan Maki


******************


Another take on the GM/UAW settlement October 01, 2007

By Bill Fletcher

ZNet Commentary - October 01, 2007

http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2007-10/01fletcher.cfm

The GM/United Auto Workers settlement may turn out to
be quite historic, but not necessarily in a good or
pro-worker way. As former UAW Regional Director and
one-time UAW presidential candidate Jerry Tucker noted
recently, the shift of health care liability to the UAW
by GM could be catastrophic if there is a severe
economic downturn.

Yet there are some matters that are not getting much
press attention which need addressing. The first issue
is the matter of the two-tier wage system. Two tier
wage systems, where newer workers start at wage rates
and benefits far lower than their predecessors, are not
new. During the 1980s when corporate America was
placing concession demands on workers-both those in
unions and those unorganized-this became a familiar
refrain. Allegedly the introduction of a two-tier
system provides financial breathing space for
distressed employers. Whether it does or does not, it
can definitely be said that it stresses out the
workers.

It has been demonstrated time and again that two-tier
systems have a demoralizing impact on the workforce.
In the case of the UAW, the Washington Post notes that
some entry level jobs that paid $28/hour will now drop
to $14. That is one hell of a drop! The impact on the
union cannot be overstated. The new workers, even if
they are now making more than they previously did, will
see themselves as having been sacrificed by the longer-
term workers, which also means sacrificed by the union.

The other piece of this overall puzzle, however, has to
do with how the UAW got itself into a situation like
this. In considering this critical situation, there
are some who might conclude that this turn of events
was somehow sudden and unexpected. That is not the
case. There are at least three sources of this
problem. The first has to do with the failure of the
US to enact universal healthcare. It is noteworthy
that GM's costs in Canada are lower precisely because
Canada has national healthcare. A reasonable person
would wonder, then, why GM does not push for national
healthcare in the USA? There are probably many
reasons, but one for certain is that it is far easier
to place the burden of healthcare on the backs of
workers and their unions, rather than joining in a
national campaign to shift the way that healthcare
operates in the USA. While the UAW has had plenty of
good rhetoric to offer regarding national healthcare,
there is little that they have done in practice over
the years to advance the growing demand for universal
coverage. Thus, the UAW is now handed what may quite
literally be a bill of goods.

There is another side to the healthcare issue. The
GM/UAW settlement may very well set a pattern for other
companies. The result could be a further distraction
away from the need for universal healthcare in favor of
a proliferation of Voluntary Employee Beneficiary
Associations. This is ironic coming at a point when
renewed calls AND energy have surfaced in favor of
universal healthcare. The proposed GM/UAW healthcare
exploratory committee, allegedly to be established to
consider alternative national healthcare options,
cannot be taken seriously. With the healthcare
insurance liability off the books of GM, what incentive
do they now have to explore genuine solutions to the
national healthcare crisis?

A second piece of the puzzle has to do with the
ideological orientation of the UAW going back at least
to the early 1980s. The notion of "jointness" which
emerged in the early 1980s in the midst of the
automobile manufacturing crisis (ignited by the
Chrysler near collapse) brought with it the idea that
the principal role of the union was not to defend the
interests of the members (let along the larger working
class) but to promote the competitiveness of the
particular company. Supposedly enhancing
competitiveness would enhance the job futures of the
members. Yet, few of the UAW leaders stopped to
consider-or at least discuss-who was competing against
whom, and toward what end? Thus, in the name of
quality and competitiveness, auto manufacturing plant
was played against auto manufacturing plant, sometimes
in the same company. Rather than promoting solidarity,
this promoted something akin to the narrow Japanese
enterprise unionismテや�ヲat best. There is only a short
distance between embracing the mission and expansion of
the corporation as the manner of protecting the
interests of one's members and taking on the company's
healthcare liability in order to promote the
competitiveness of the company.

Third, one must add that the UAW's failure to construct
an effective organizing strategy lies at the heart of
the union's dilemmas. Contrary to those who believe
that all manufacturing is disappearing overseas, in the
case of the auto industry it is quite the opposite.
Automobile manufacturing is coming to the USA FROM
overseas. Toyota, Volkswagen and others have moved to
the USA-they are called transplants-in search of
cheaper labor, believe it or not, which is what they
usually find in the so-called right to work (non-union)
South and in rural parts of the USA.

While the UAW embraced the language of organizing the
unorganized, and admittedly attempted some small-scale
organizing, the resources of the union were never fully
committed to the sort of venture that needed to unfold.
In addition to organizing non-union facilities, there
has been a critical need to organize the increasing
numbers of non-union parts facilities, plants often
staffed with immigrant labor working under abysmal
conditions. Yet, that is not where the UAW chose to
put resources. Instead, the focus was on those
currently unionized, even as their numbers decreased
and the waters of the non-union auto and auto-parts
industries rose steadily towards their heads.

It is in such a situation that the choices of the UAW
leadership are not particularly surprising, though
nevertheless quite problematic. Letting the Big Three
off the hook with regard to universal healthcare;
permitting the further growth of two-tier systems; and
an anemic organizing program to reach non-union
transplant facilities and parts manufacturers, has
added up to an industrial purgatory for the union.

The UAW not only needs a new type of leadership, but in
some ways more importantly, it must convince its
existing membership that a new type of unionism is
needed for the 21st century. No, this is not a call
for further so-called partnerships with employers, but
actually a call for a return to militant organizing and
struggle that embraces the demands and needs of workers
irrespective of whether they happen to currently be in
a union. The alternative? Well, actually in this
case, there really is not one since the demise of a
labor movement cannot be an option.

[Bill Fletcher, Jr. is a co-founder of the Center for
Labor Renewal ( www.centerforlaborrenewal.org) and the
immediate past president of TransAfrica Forum. He can
be reached at papaq54@hotmail.com]

Friday, September 21, 2007

United Auto Workers Union, job security, collective bargaining

As long as the future of the auto industry remains in the hands of Chief Executive Officers of the Big Three there can be no job security.

The time has come for autoworkers to become full participants in the decision making process.

So far, no one has asked the workers employed at the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant what they think should be done with this plant and the hydro dam.

All talk of job security is a farce unless autoworkers are involved fully in this process.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

All time record low turn out at the Polls in St. Paul, Minnesota

Well... it looks like the people of St. Paul, Minnesota are thrilled with their right to vote. Less than 5% of those eligible to vote showed up at the polls... I don't imagine we will be seeing this figure used any time soon to persuade the peoples of the world about how great American democracy is... but, already the political pundits are at it putting their spin on things... what are they saying? These pundits are telling us people didn't bother voting because they are just tickled pink with the performance of St. Paul politicians who never mentioned the Ford Plant closing or the Ford dam being sold to a foreign power generating company.

After interviewing dozens of St. Paul voters at the polling places during the last General Election, I have a little different take on the low voter turn out: People are fed up with not having any real options when they go to the polls.

With voter turnouts like this the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party (MN DFL) should be very concerned... maybe its time for Brian Melendez, the MN DFL Chair to organize that walk through the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant to find out what it is working people really want... looks to me like UAW Local 879 sat out this election... and so did everyone else who wants to see the Ford Plant saved.

Strange, but not a single candidate addressed the issue of the Ford Plant closing yet it is the single most important issue on peoples' minds. Maybe some people should consider write-in campaigns making saving the Ford Plant the issue?

Friday, September 7, 2007

Save the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant... voters should force the politicians to respond to this issue

Doesn't it seem a little strange, that during an election, St. Paul candidates for city council are evading the issue of what can be done to save the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant?

Two-thousand jobs are at stake and Pat Harris' major concern is the contamination of the Little League Fields. How is it this soil was not tested long ago knowing Ford's record for contaminating its sites? Young people were allowed to play ball on this site... a site which we now know presents a danger. Here we have another issue of politicians not caring about human health and safety... just like with the I-35W Bridge.

Now, are we to trust Council member Pat Harris and the St. Paul Chamber of Commerce in telling us that a manufacturing use for this Plant can not be found?

Well, why not consider the option of public ownership? Rangers can continue to be produced in this Plant indefinitely.

Common sense tells us there continues to be a strong market for the Ranger class of pick-up trucks in the construction industry, the Departments of Transportation and Natural Resources, as vehicles used in recreation to pull boats and campers and for hunting and fishing.

Slash the price of the vehicle, cut out advertising, and sell the vehicles to government agencies across the country and around the world at the real cost of production.

There is no reason why at least 7,000 workers can not be employed at a plant operating 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year.

Cut the work week to 36 hours with forty hours pay.

We talk about democracy in this country yet no one has asked Ford workers or the people in the community if they want to keep this plant operating. Certainly after all these years the existing work-force doesn't need Ford management to tell them how to build a world-class pick-up truck. Workers can run this plant if it is placed under State/Community ownership.

We always hear politicians talk about, "Jobs, Jobs, Jobs."

Well, here is the opportunity to create thousands of new jobs managing this plant to produce vehicles society needs while putting people to work; and, what do politicians want to do? Demolish a perfectly good plant sending the jobs down the river just like what Ford has been doing for years with its contaminated waste.

The hydro dam and the plant should be protected through legislation as a single entity by bringing both under public ownership... after all, tax-payers have subsidized Ford's operation in St. Paul for about 80 years. Isn't it time tax-payers own the plant and the dam already?

For those who dislike the concept of public ownership because it sounds too much like socialism (as if capitalism has been able to solve this problem) I would suggest that should public ownership not work out, the plant could always be sold back to private industry or demolished later... but, saving this plant right now and at least 2,000 union jobs should be our primary concern.

The candidates for St. Paul City Council should be addressing this issue. Why aren't they?

Some people say it will take too much money to bankroll such an operation... well, let's put an end to this dirty war in Iraq and we can create a world class manufacturing facility... the school and research center already exist as an integral part of this plant's operation.

Actually, I am wondering why the Chair of the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party, Brian Melendez, has not led a delegation of St. Paul and Minneapolis City officials and DFL state legislators on a tour of this plant to talk directly to the workers who will be losing their jobs to see what they think about the idea of public ownership of this plant. Quite frankly, I think we all know the answer. two-thousand workers would rather be working and don't care who owns the plant. These politicians could ask the workers if they want to run the plant and if they are capable of doing so. From the plant this delegation could tour the community and surrounding neighborhoods to find out what people think about this idea. Isn't this what democracy is supposed to be about?

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Officials, workers respond rapidly, aggressively, on behalf of bridge victims, families, and commuters

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Officials, workers respond rapidly, aggressively, on behalf of bridge victims, families, and commuters

by Al McFarlane and B.P. Ford the editors

Last Updated: 8/10/2007 1:45:17 PM

Minnesota Senators Amy Klobuchar and Norm Coleman led the Minnesota Congressional delegation in securing passage of emergency assistance in the wake of the Interstate 35W bridge tragedy August 1. Their legislation authorizes $250 million for repair and rebuilding of the bridge, authorizes the project for emergency funding and waives the current cap on emergency funding dollars. President Bush signed the bill into law, allowing Minnesota to proceed with reconstruction efforts with the promise of federal reimbursement. The bill provides $5 million to enhance public transportation services while rebuilding takes place.

Klobuchar said the action was good news for Minnesota at the close of a week that has brought so much heartbreak to the state. "Senator Coleman and I were able to impress upon our colleagues the importance and urgency of this funding. This was the most-heavily traveled bridge in the state and our people and businesses absolutely depend on it. Our whole state is concerned about completing the recovery operations from this disaster and moving forward to build a new bridge," she said.

"As we mourn those who were lost to this horrible catastrophe, it is imperative that we determine how this happened to spare other cities from such tragedy," said Coleman. "At the same time, we must take immediate steps to rebuild this important artery in the heart of the Mill City. By authorizing the reconstruction of the bridge, authorizing the project for emergency relief funding, and providing transit assistance to ease congestion in the interim, we can begin this long but necessary process. We are going to rebuild this bridge as a community and we are going to rebuild it quickly."

On Thursday, Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters announced a $5 million grant to begin the rebuilding process. Senators Klobuchar and Coleman joined Secretary Peters in a tour of the site and visited the area again Saturday, August 3 with First Lady Laura Bush and Sunday, August 4 with President George Bush.

Third Ward Minneapolis City Council Member, Dianne Hofstede said, "Our thoughts go out to all of the families and individuals who were impacted by this tragic accident. Also, we think of the many emergency response personnel who came to the aid of many and who continue to engage in the recovery efforts. A city like ours cannot function without the care and compassion of such personnel. There are many heroes. One of them is Shannon Hansen, the Minneapolis Fire Department Captain and Third Ward resident who many of you saw on the news risking her life to do rescue work in the waters."

Hofstede said, "Locally I will be working with our state representatives, the Mayor, fellow council members, city staff, the University, the Met Council, Metro Transit and other officials on a plan to ensure a smooth transition as we move forward. Of particular concern is the re-routing of the traffic, which used the I-35 W Bridge for traffic routes both north and south. Another major concern has been that of the debris in the river."

Hofstede said public officials are discussing the impact of the I-35W Bridge on the surrounding neighborhoods. A request was made for more ongoing communication with the neighborhoods. "We are working with Metro Transit and the Met Council to order more buses and gather as many as possible from a variety of resources, looking at instituting more Park and Ride lots and other methods of encouraging the use of buses and alternative modes of transportation," she said.

Eliot Seide, Director of American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 5 said AFSCME members were on the bridge when it collapsed. He said one inspector was injured and hospitalized for surgery.

"AFSCME members are some of the everyday heroes who brought calm to this disaster. We saved lives as part of the medical teams at HCMC and Fairview Hospital. And our 911 and radio control operators took calls from motorists plunging into the river and dispatched first responders. Our state correctional officers provided additional security at the disaster site," Seide said.

Michael Wood, speaking on behalf of the Minneapolis club of the Communist Party USA said, "The Bush White House says that now is not the time to point fingers. We disagree."

"Under the Pawlenty administration we have seen a poor economy worsening, budgetary cutbacks on the state's infrastructure and attacks on vital social services. There has been no attempt by Pawlenty to stop St. Paul's Ford Plant from closing and save the union jobs of those employed there. Meanwhile, Governor Pawlenty supports and continues to use Minnesota taxpayer's money to fund the continuing war against Iraq. Pawlenty has supported tax breaks to the state's wealthiest individuals and corporations and thus shifted the costly burden of the war unto the shoulders of working class Minnesotans," Wood said.

The collapse of the bridge resulting in the unnecessary deaths and suffering also reveals a national crisis, with George Bush at the center, of prioritizing guns instead of butter; aircraft carriers instead of the rights of union workers; rifles instead of universal health care; missiles instead of full and guaranteed employment; and bombs instead of books. The Bush agenda is an agenda of war, economic insecurity, poverty and racism," he said.

"Now more than ever, working class people need state and national leaders that fund human needs instead of war and corporate greed. We need a movement that values people and bridge repair, not maximum corporate profit and military invasions of other countries."


http://www.insightnews.com/articles.asp?mode=display&articleID=3388

From: Insight News, Minneapolis African-American newspaper.

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Labor Day 2007

Alan Maki wrote:

This is being Blind Carbon Copied to a number of members of the DFL State
Central Committee who are very concerned about the impact that domination of
the DFL by the DFL Business Caucus and St. Paul Chamber of Commerce is
having inside of the MN DFL. I met with a group of members of the DFL State
Central Committee in Forest Lake about this very problem... I can assure
everyone... we have some very unhappy campers and a very serious crack is
getting bigger... many more hairline cracks with the potential of
dangerously expanding--- perhaps reflective of how the I 35W Bridge
collapsed? Something to consider and ponder.

Working people are not going to stand by indefinitely as their problems
worsen, unions lose influence, and business interests openly begin to
dominate the Minnesota DFL and other Democratic Party organizations like in
Michigan where a bunch of mobsters, the Fertitta Family--- fronting for the
Kansas City Mob, has greased the palms of so many Democratic politicians who
have taken the money... in the future, after the Fertitta's get their Gun
Lake casino... this money will flow to Republican Party coffers; this is
the way they have operated where ever they go. Just like the Ford Motor
Company and the St. Paul Chamber of Commerce has done with the future of the
Ford Plant.

I think we need to ask the question, "How much longer can the Minnesota DFL
continue under the present leadership which has refused to insist on the
unity of the Legislative Caucus on such an important and fundamental issue
as saving the Ford Plant?"

First we saw Michael Paymer desert Ford workers after being supported in
every way by the Local; then we saw Pat Harris and these other St. Paul
Council members (Democrats) get behind the DFL Business Caucus and the St.
Paul Chamber of Commerce in opposing the legislation to save the Ford Plant
and the dam.

Come on really... how does anyone expect working people to respond to all of
this.

First everyone was willing to look the other way as the issues of casino
workers were brought forward. Now it is the issues of auto workers. There
will be another group of workers next and so on and so forth.

Does anyone really believe that when you have 20,000 casino workers slighted
by the Minnesota DFL, now 2,000 auto workers (not to mention widespread
community support for saving the plant) that there will not come a point
where all of this comes to a head? Add to this the games being played by the
Democratic Party concerning the war in Iraq and on the issue of health
care... if a group of legislators and members of the DFL State Central
Committee does not step in here and exert their influence... you will have a
very serious problem on your hands. There are warning cracks everywhere...
all being ignored... just like with the collapse of the I 35W Bridge.

Brian Melendez, Susan Rego, and Andrew O'Leary can continue trying to focus
the blame on me for bringing these issues forward... this kind of crap may
work for awhile... but, as sure as this economy is going to collapse like
the I 35W Bridge... the DFL is facing a major crisis if these problems are
not addressed in a timely manner.

The present leadership of the Minnesota DFL can only be very thankful we
have not successfully organized casino workers yet... because, let me assure
you the arrogance of the MN DFL in ignoring their plight will not be
forgotten soon... there is an old saying in the labor movement... we reward
our friends and punish our enemies. Our electoral activity has been somewhat
negligible up until now... we first urged voters to vote for all DFL
candidates except for Valerie Solem and not vote for any Republicans in the
state legislative race. Last election we urged voters through a leaflet
distributed in seventeen communities surrounding casinos around the state to
vote for all DFL candidates except for Mike Hatch because he would not
support our efforts to secure the rights of casino workers to be employed in
healthy work environments free of second hand smoke and not vote for any
Republicans. Were we effective? I don't know... however, the election
results would tend to demonstrate we were in our distribution of over
100,000 leaflets.

We are about to begin testing this same strategy in Michigan where the
Democratic Governor has ignored the plight of casino workers--- should the
Michigan House and Senate continue on the legislative path of approving this
Gun Lake Casino Compact.

I am assuming a number of unions will be looking at our strategy very
closely. It is just so easy to destroy political campaigns with so little
financial investment in which so much money and work has been invested in
this way. Consider the cost of distributing one-hundred thousand leaflets as
opposed to the resources invested trying to get Mike Hatch elected governor.

Voters are very sympathetic right now to appeals being made by workers
struggling against injustices.

This should come as no surprise to anyone considering the beating working
people have been taking.

Consider this: No matter how you view things; working people are the
majority of voters.

Now, I am once again suggesting that members of the MN DFL State Central
Committee and the Michigan Democratic Party ask themselves if they want to
continue down this road of allowing business interests to dominate their
state Parties and their legislative caucuses?

Already in Michigan we have linked up with a number of rank and file
organizations like Soldiers of Solidarity who are taking a look at our
electoral strategy.

Working people who have camped out in Democratic fields are just not happy
campers right now.

Anyone should feel free to distribute this e-mail as they see fit.

I have heard from a couple members of the MN DFL State Central Committee who
have just decided to throw in the towel, fed up with all of this... I am
sure more will follow... these quitters don't amount to much... but I would
assume some voters will follow... and this does matter, eh?

Alan L. Maki

Director of Organizing,

Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council

And

Elected member, Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party State Central
Committee





-----Original Message-----

From: vivian votava [mailto:oldladyslater@yahoo.com]

Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 10:03 AM

To: Alan Maki; lhinkle@peoplepc.com; 'Christine Frank'; djrie@visi.com; eric-angell@riseup.net; 'David Shove'; DLONG@uaw.net; 'Nadine Nosal'; gdubovich@usw.org; lgerard@usw.org; miaflcio@voyager.net; charleyunderwood@hotmail.com

Cc: rep.bill.hilty@house.mn; rep.al.juhnke@house.mn; 'Mike Jaros'; rep.neva.walker@house.mn; 'Gary Garbarino'; 'Michael Johnston'

Subject: Re: a St. Paul city candidate and sitting council member answers an important question...

Alan,

I find your tactics trying. I know you are not happy with the present DFL administration. I also think your targeting of Susan Rego is completely offbase. My goal as a grassroots democratic organizer is to encourage people that I view as having healthy and balanced outlooks get involved. The democratic party is the people who are involved. A lot of us work very hard and do not necessarily agree with everything going on. Instead of being angry at what is happening and encouraging people to defect, I believe we should be angry and encourage more people to participate. The angry people need to use their anger to fuel action. They need to be participating to change the party from the inside, so they can make sure they set the agenda, they push the agenda, they move up from the inside, they replace administrators they do not agree with.

Encouraging rage that leads to non-participation will make it more likely Republicans will be successful--and that will not suit your purposed, either. Is it really better for Minnesota to have Pawlenty than Hatch? Better for our schools? Better for our healthcare? Better for teenagers who get pregnant? Better for our roads? Better for our environment? Better for working people? We need to work to get people involved, not just angry. The rants make people tune out.

Better to get people to the caucuses--tell them we need to change the party, train them on how to do it, find someone you think would make a better Party Chair, and organize to make this happen. We need more union people involved in my district (SD56--Stillwater/Woodbury.) This is what should be--the more good people involved, the better the DFL will get. Right now your e-mails are rage and threats and only make things worse. I know I sound idealistic--and I am idealistic, but I have a strong realistic streak. Why waste our energy in anger when there is so much to do? We need to funnel anger to constructive actions. Our idealistic side needs to be tempered by our pragmatic side, and we need to be extremely persistent as we plow along, through an extremely frustrating process and time. We need to make positive change happen.

Vivian Votava




-----Original Message-----

From: Alan Maki [mailto:amaki000@centurytel.net]

Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 12:05 PM

To: 'vivian votava'; '

lhinkle@peoplepc.com'; 'Christine Frank'; 'djrie@visi.com'; 'eric-angell@riseup.net'; 'David Shove'; 'DLONG@uaw.net'; 'Nadine Nosal'; 'gdubovich@usw.org'; 'lgerard@usw.org'; 'miaflcio@voyager.net'; 'charleyunderwood@hotmail.com'

Cc: 'rep.bill.hilty@house.mn'; 'rep.al.juhnke@house.mn'; 'Mike Jaros'; 'rep.neva.walker@house.mn'; 'Gary Garbarino'; 'Michael Johnston'; 'colemanayoungii@house.mi.gov'

Subject: An exchange of views... RE: a St. Paul city council candidate and sitting council member answers an important question...


Vivian,

I appreciate your response; although I disagree with most of it. Because I disagree with you does not mean I don’t respect you and your views. I do think dialogue is very healthy; democracy requires an open dialogue and exchange of views. It is with that in mind I respond to you.

First, there is life outside the Democratic Party-DFL. I welcome the opportunity to work in the Democratic Party-DFL and with others not in the DFL, or those now leaving the DFL.

Second, what brings me to the Democratic Party-DFL at this time is primarily the casino workers and the unions who pay me to do what I do. They pay me rather well to do what I do because they are satisfied with what I do and how I do it. The only thing different about me is that I openly acknowledge why I am involved in the Democratic Party-DFL, I have no hidden agenda as some others like the DFL Business Caucus and the St. Paul Chamber of Commerce and some others do.

All of us are involved because certain issues bring us here.

Third, I have not “targeted” Susan Rego. She made herself the bull’s-eye on the target when she arbitrarily, undemocratically and heavy-handedly barred me from participating on the DFL List Serve simply because I raised these issues. Preventing someone from bringing forward the issues does not make these issues go away. If it were so simple we wouldn’t be having this dialogue now.

I assume you agree, the issues I raise are very legitimate, even if you dislike my tactics and find them hard to take.

On the other hand, try to place yourself in the position of being one of the casino workers among some 60,000 between Minnesota and Michigan who go to their jobs in smoke-filled casinos at poverty wages and without any rights at work… which means you have no rights in the community where you live because if the employer doesn’t like you being an advocate for living wages, etc. you get fired with no recourse of action under any law.

Which begs the question: What can you and others in the Democratic Party-DFL do in order to right this wrong and blatant injustice for which Democratic-DFL controlled legislators are largely responsible. After all, Jennifer Granholm, in Michigan has just negotiated another of these Compacts without considering the rights of casino workers or the condition under which they work. Well, here a top Democratic Party politician had the opportunity to make a difference and set the pattern for all future Compact negotiations in much the same way the United Auto Workers union has set the pattern for collective bargaining in our country for all working people beginning with the historic Flint Sit Down Strike, along with the Steel Workers Union on the Iron Range; whom I might add, many Democrats found their “tactics very trying” at the time, I am sure. But, on this Labor Day those struggles will be hailed by Democrats as campaign contributions from these unions pour into their coffers--- well, maybe with the exception of UAW Local 879 representing workers at the Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant.

At some point, if you want me to consider your perspective, which I can assure you I can completely empathize with, you and others working as hard as you do in the Democratic Party-DFL are going to have to say something like this to your colleagues:

Ok, we got this Maki guy who is enraged and bad-mouthing us. What has triggered his anger? Is it he just makes peoples’ lives miserable for a living? Or, is there anything of substance we should be concerned about with what he is saying?

Now, if there is nothing of substance in what I am saying you can simply write me off as some kind of “nut case.” You need not even be concerned because no one is paying any attention to what I am saying… case closed.

However, if the situation of casino workers is as I am portraying it, and, if you don’t believe me you should look into it yourself… maybe walk into a casino… see if you observe much smoke… ask the employees how much they make… ask them what kind of rights they have. This is all very simple for anyone to do. Am I telling lies about all of this? I will let the facts speak for themselves.

Obviously I am telling the truth. If I am not it would be very easy to expose me as a liar… I have posted plenty on my blog… everything of which is there to be refuted, none of it has.

Don’t you find it unsettling that over two-thousand workers are losing their jobs at the Ford Plant and the UAW Local 879 used to be one of the major supporters of DFL and Democratic Party candidates and now when it comes to something so basic and so simple as the State Legislature taking action to save these jobs the legislation can not even get through a State Senate Committee dominated by Democrats?

Now, you ask me, wouldn’t we be better with Mike Hatch. Perhaps, but, given the DFL track record and the record of the Democratic sitting Governor in Michigan, I would not say “no” to your question… However, I do say it really doesn’t make any difference.

We had intended to run a campaign against Granholm like that which we ran against Hatch and Valerie Solem. After consulting with many labor leaders and especially rank and file activists in Michigan we decided not to. Plus, we really didn’t want to see Rich DeVos elected… he is the epitome of everything wrong with the corporate domination of our country… however, for casino workers, the outcome of the election really wouldn’t have mattered much just as Hatch’s election wouldn’t have helped much… he is adamantly opposed to casino workers having the same rights as all other workers--- he has stated this.

Plus, do you really believe Hatch’s election would have helped save the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant? If so, what prevented Mike Hatch from showing up at the Senate Committee hearing and backing the legislation that would have kept the Plant and Dam intact so that either a buyer could be found, or the issue of public ownership had been thoroughly explored--- which it has not. Why not? Don’t you think the Minnesota DFL at least owes this to the workers and their union which has been a foundation and base of support to first, the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party, and then the MN DFL? Anyways, nothing prevented Mike Hatch from showing up at this state senate hearing. He was a "no show." And, without getting through the Senate Committee, even if he had been elected Governor the legislation would not have come to his desk to sign.

Remember, these aren't Republicans opposing this legislation to save the Ford Plant, these are Democrats like Representative Michael Paymer.

Previously another member of the DFL State Central Committee asked me if the workers wanted to run the Ford Plant. I responded very honestly; I said I didn’t know… but, I also pointed out no one asked them this question. Would it be too much for Brian Melendez along with a delegation of legislators to walk through the Ford Plant asking workers this question and what they think of the idea of public ownership? Instead of doing this, we now learn from Kathy Lantry and another DFL candidate for St. Paul City Council they were never even asked any question about the Ford Plant during the DFL endorsing process. I would call this adding insult to injury if ever there was such a thing.


In addition we have the health care issues and the issue of the war in Iraq and many other issues that have gone unresolved. I don’t expect the Democratic Party or the Minnesota DFL to work miracles and solve all these problems. What I, and many others, do expect (well, many people, unlike me, have given up expecting anything from the DFL and Democratic Party) is that an effort be made to acknowledge, address, and then work to solve these problems.

I don’t know, how can I be more diplomatic or whatever it is in getting my points across in a way that will be listened to? Before our Organizing Committees took one single action I met with every single state legislator personally and Governor Pawlenty on this issue… you may ask Representative Bill Hilty, Tom Rukavina and others if you think what I am saying is not true.

You can’t solve a problem unless you first acknowledge the problem.

Has the Michigan Democratic Party or the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party acknowledged the problems I have brought forward:

1.) The plight of casino workers;

2.) The Ford Plant closing?

No. Not even an acknowledgment these problems exist.

I would like to know from you, and the many others who have made their views known along the lines as you have to me, what is it you really want me to do? Should I just walk away, wring my hands, and say, “Oh well, they win”?

To be very honest with you, if the Michigan Democratic Party and the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party will not provide an avenue to advance such issues of concern to working people I want no part of either.

Is this what I am now hearing? If so, I need a letter from Brian Melendez here in Minnesota and Steve Tobacman in Michigan stating that these issues are of no concern to the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party and the Michigan Democratic Party… the Party organizations and the legislative caucuses.

With such a letter in hand I will walk away from the Democratic Party; but, not the issues… and then, well, I think you get the picture of where I am coming from… I have no anger. No disrespect for anyone. These are issues that have been placed on what I understand is a more than full plate… however, issues requiring immediate attention none-the-less… a Plant is scheduled to close and be demolished; casino workers are dropping dead from second-hand smoke related cancers, lung, and heart problems--- unless, of course, you think casino workers are somehow immune to the problems the scientific and medical community have made us so aware of.

I don’t mean for this to be taken as a letter of anger by you. But, neither should this letter be taken by you, or anyone else, to mean that I am smiling; because I am not.

The Democratic Party and the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party will be involved in all kinds of Labor Day festivities this weekend, making endless speeches about the dignity of working men and women, about the alliance between labor and Democrats… through it all casino workers will be breathing in second-hand smoke without any rights, employed at poverty wages.

I appreciate the work you do in the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party; I know you are sincerely concerned and want a better world for all of us to live in. Please raise your voice on the MN DFL State Central Committee and let your fellow State Central Committee members know there is a serious problem here.

As you can see this e-mail is going to leaders of both the United Steel Workers and the United Auto Workers… I am assuming a few of them might be making a speech or two during this Labor Day weekend… I am wondering if they will be including in their remarks reference to the plight of casino workers or those workers and the community faced with the closure of the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant; it will be interesting to see if they do.

My tactics may be “trying;” however, try breathing through lungs destroyed by second-hand smoke; try finding a job with wages and benefits like at the Ford Plant--- won through years of unrelenting and determined struggle to achieve a better life.

Happy Labor Day, yours in the struggle,

Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council

And

Elected member, Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party State Central Committee


58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell phone: 651-587-5541
E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net

Check out my blog:

Thoughts From Podunk

http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/









-----Original Message-----

From: kathy.lantry@comcast.net [mailto:kathy.lantry@comcast.net]

Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 8:48 AM

To: Alan Maki

Subject: Re: Question...



I have received UAW endorsement in the past. I have not heard from them yet
this year.




Thanks,

Kathy



-------------- Original message --------------

From: "Alan Maki"

Have you received the endorsement of UAW Local 879 representing Ford workers
in this election?



Have you received UAW endorsement in the past?



Alan L. Maki

58891 County Road 13

Warroad, Minnesota 56763

Phone: 218-386-2432

Cell phone: 651-587-5541

E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net


Check out my blog:

Thoughts From Podunk

http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/

Monday, August 27, 2007

St. Paul City Council Election and the future of the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant

Dear St. Paul City Council candidate;

I represent a group of concerned citizens from across Minnesota, many of whom reside in St. Paul; and, who will be voting for St. Paul City Council candidates.

We will be getting out the views of all candidates concerning their stand on this issue and what they think should be done with the Ford Plant.

This is a primary, if not the primary, issue of the campaign.

Where there are no responses we will take this to mean the candidate does not care about the future of the plant; and, this will be so noted.

To provide you with some back-ground information from various perspectives feel free to click the link below and check out this blog on the issue:

http://capitalistglobalization.blogspot.com/

Candidates might want to spend some time talking with Ford workers and UAW 879 elected officials about how they view the pending closing of the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant before responding; we look forward to sharing your response with residents of St. Paul and voters.

This is a primary issue for St. Paul residents… random exit surveys we conducted at polling places during the last election indicated voters were very dissatisfied candidates for governor and state legislative races did not address this important issue; we assume this means voters expect candidates for City Council will certainly provide their views on this issue before Election Day.

Some of the topics you may want to comment on:

1.) There is a lot of talk about job creation; however, it is very difficult to create 2,000 good paying jobs where workers are protected by a union. We are expecting any candidate who is for the demolition of the Ford Plant to explain how another 2,000 jobs with similar wages and benefits will be created in the City of St. Paul.

2.) We would also like your position on the Ford Dam, and if you intend to oppose the sale of this dam to a foreign company? If so, what steps will you take, and advocate the City of St. Paul takes?

3.) Would you support the continuing operation of the Ford Plant and Dam under public ownership? Would you support public bodies using the right of eminent domain for this purpose? If not, what are the other options?

4.) Do you feel Ford workers should be a part of this decision making process concerning the future of the Ford Plant?

5.) Do you feel the citizens should have the right to determine what is done with the Ford Dam and who should own it?

6.) Do you agree with the position of the St. Paul Chamber of Commerce on this issue?

You may want to comment on this statement:

To date, all efforts made by public officials, the union, and others to keep this plant operating have failed. The one option that has not been considered is that of Public Ownership; an option which has worked very successfully in saving industries and jobs all over the world. The plant could continue producing pick-up trucks or “green” related devices like components for wind generating equipment, solar devices, and public transit. Continuing to produce a fuel efficient, environmentally friendly pick-up for use by construction companies, farmers, small business, and the outdoor recreational community would make the most sense. Public ownership could be considered as a long-tern solution or as a measure until a new corporate owner of the plant can be found. Obviously, an operating plant is worth much more than an abandoned building. Workers and management have negotiated, over the years, to make this plant a “clean, green, environmentally friendly operation” in many ways… closing and demolishing this plant just when it has become a model for industrial production makes little sense to most people. There are worse things the government spends our tax-dollars on… the war in Iraq being one.


While we are focused on saving the Ford Plant and Dam, we are concerned about the direction of the Ford Site Planning Committee in that upscale housing seems to be the objective while there is a need for racially integrated, quality, affordable public housing for the presently employed low-wage workers in St. Paul, most of whom have to travel long distances to their jobs for which they are receiving minimum wages working at establishments like Lund’s Supermarket on Ford Parkway and cleaning floors in upscale jewelry stores like Moeller.

Responses received after September 20, 2007 will be ignored.

(Please note: All candidates who did not list an e-mail address have been contacted by phone and asked to respond.)

Thank you for taking the time to respond.

Alan L. Maki

Member, Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party State Central Committee



58891 County Road 13

Warroad, Minnesota 56763

Phone: 218-386-2432

Cell phone: 651-587-5541

E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net


Check out my blog:

Thoughts From Podunk

http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/

This was e-mailed to the following candidates:

'info@melvincarter.org'; 'sharon4anderson@aol.com'; 'bill4dahn@aol.com'; 'franzambforcitycouncil@gmail.com'; 'billhosko@yahoo.com'; 'patforcouncil@comcast.net'; 'russ@russforward4.org'; 'bushardforcouncil@comcast.net'; 'thor8851@yahoo.com'; 'helgen00005@hotmail.com'; 'pakouh@aol.com'; 'andersonforward5@aol.com'; 'kathy.lantry@comcast.net'; 'jim.casci@comcast.net'

Further contact and info on the candidates can be found by links from this site:

http://www.co.ramsey.mn.us/elections/CandidatesWhoFiled2007.htm


Or contacting:

Sherri Nesseth

Ramsey County Elections

50 West Kellogg Boulevard, Suite 722

St. Paul, MN 55102

Phone: 651.266.2207

Fax: 651.266.2177

sherri.nesseth@co.ramsey.mn.us


This was sent to the following newspapers, you make want to contact them and encourage coverage of this issue:

prinfo@myvillager.com

editors@myvillager.com

al@insightnews.com

bjohnson@pioneerpress.com

dlien@pioneerpress.com

advocate@stpaulunions.org

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

The I-35W Bridge... two views

This was sent to David Shove's "Progressive Calendar"

Even though it was not published in the "Progressive Calendar" it received wide circulation.

To Subscribe to Shove's "Progressive Calendar," write: - David Shove shove001@tc.umn.edu

Shove rhymes with clove Progressive Calendar
over 2225 subscribers as of 12.19.02
please send all messages in plain text no attachments


I have noticed that in your Progressive Calendar you tend to ignore local issues during a period when people could be effectively organizing around specific local issues, only to condemn the consequences after our chance to act have passed; and, columnists like James Clay Fuller write about things in general, like about infrastructure and dams but never get to local specifics (please see Fuller's blog below).

In this case I would note the Ford Dam powering the St. Paul Twin Cities Ford Assembly Plant which has been heavily subsidized by tax-payers since it was initially built in one way or another--- either through direct government handouts or tax abatements, or simply allowing Ford to use a public resource without compensating the community in any way. Actually, ditto for the manufacturing plant and the equipment inside of it, too. I notice the concept of “public ownership” is seldom broached as a solution.

I would think in an article that, on the surface, appears to be so thorough in covering “everything;” what is being completely ignored by the media, the bloggers, and the politicians in pointing out what is going under our radar, concealed by the “surface” as in the case of the I-35-W Bridge--- one of the first things which should be brought forward is the fact of how much money tax-payers are already coughing up for bridges, roads, and other infrastructure repairs, routine maintenance, replacement and new construction; and pointing out the fact that the architectural firms and contractors in this sector are second only to the military-financial-industrial complex in feeding at the public trough as tax-payers subsidize their huge and obscene profits.

Caterpillar Corporation makes big profits selling its huge, used bulldozers no longer of use in road construction for which they have already been paid the cost of this equipment many times over by tax-payers--- by selling this written-off, junk equipment to Israel for bulldozing over Palestinian homes and an American protester on occasion.

If corporate profits were to be eliminated by doing all of this work through real public works projects without the hand of private industry in the mix in the first place, all this work could be done for much less and at a great savings to tax-payers--- where is there a real tax-payers league when you need them?.

Second, the entire highway system of roads and bridges is a farce in this country as public transit never even is considered as the main and primary way to transport people… just stand on any highway overpass in the Cities on any given morning or evening and look at all the vehicles with only one person in it… wasting all kinds of resources from what is consumed in building the vehicles to the fuel they are using to building the extensive and high priced highway system to begin with. Think about it… what do most people use transportation for these days--- to get to work. Vacations? Who needs an automobile for vacations any more; vacations are a thing of the past as many working people now have to have a second job just to pay for the gas to get to their first job; and, even a third job to pay a lawyer to file for bankruptcy or to fight against a home foreclosure as another set of rip-off artists posing as your friendly lending institution take away what has been referred to as a working person’s greatest investment in the capitalist system.

All of these people could be happily using an efficient mass transit system. There is no longer any justification for transporting wage-slaves to and from their places of employment in private automobiles… especially since there are so many automobiles being produced overseas with even cheaper labor by people living in tar paper shacks and tin hovels within walking distance of their jobs making cars for us.

It is not like such a mass transit system is all that difficult to create. One only has to experience the mass transit systems of Vancouver, British Columbia; Toronto, Ontario; or Montreal, Quebec to understand that it really is possible to create a very high quality and efficient mass transit system which can take you where ever you want to go--- from suburb to city, and, even from city to city… I was able to get to a labor/Communist Party sponsored rally against racism from downtown Vancouver to Burnaby, British Columbia in minutes using public transit. I was able to ride the transit system for twenty- four hours sight-seeing in Toronto after meeting with the federal Minister of Immigration trying to deport me before getting off the bus for the Canadian Labour Party Convention for less than two dollars! In Montreal I traveled from the monument erected in the memory of Doctor Norman Bethune the Canadian Communist Party member who is widely considered a hero in Canada who gave birth to the modern movement for socialized health care to participate in a demonstration of unity with hundreds of Kurdish Communists who were protesting at the Israeli consulate; again, costing me just over one dollar--- and after Montreal’s finest on horse-back got done beating us all up… I was able to continue on my way using my transfer riding around the city for the rest of the day.

There is but one obstacle to creating a truly sensible, peaceful, and safe way of living: capitalism, which turns every single thing into a question---- of not what is best for people, society, and the environment--- but into a question of what is most profitable for corporations.

Liberals like James Clay Fuller and the Greens just aren’t capable of making these connections in a way that we can educate, organize, and mobilize people to take united action around issues like saving the Ford Plant and the Ford Dam. You are always willing to talk about the generalities and for some reason those generalities you can always spin into making it look like a comprehensive assessment even though you leave out of your equations discussion of the very specific at the local level, and fail to include the general thrust of everything centering around corporate profits; these corporate profits, and how they are generated through the exploitation of labor, are seldom spoken of--- so seldom, in fact, one would have as difficult time seeing this aspect as much as any motorist would have a difficult time seeing for herself/himself the true condition of any bridge they cross on their way to and from work.

I found it very interesting that James Clay Fuller could write what at first glance appears to be such a wonderful and comprehensive look at that which is not being discussed; but, then, upon thinking, I had to ask myself why would such a comprehensive piece like this not make any mention of that which the media really hides, like the surface of the I-35-W Bridge hid from motorists, its real condition?

It seems there is constant pressure to keep the real truth from the people; be it the condition of the bridges we need to go across daily; or, what really is the underlying problem of it all… a rotten capitalist system.

And then we throw our hands up in the air and wonder why people are willing to put up with everything from this dirty war in Iraq to collapsing bridges to the Ford Plant being leveled to make way for high-rise condos working people in the area receiving poverty wages will not be able to afford as they have to pay through the nose at the pumps and drive in to work over bridges that are in disrepair and collapsing; creating a system where legislators boast of legislating smoke-free environments--- supported by the Greens--- yet, almost two-million casino workers in this country continue to go to their jobs in smoke-filled casinos without any rights because these same politicians who let the I-35-W Bridge collapse are the ones who have negotiated the Compacts creating these casinos where greedy, money-grubbing capitalists pay these politicians off for their “services” in the manner of the construction firms and the merchants of death and destruction.

Yes, once in a while this gets challenged in the Progressive Calendar like when Michael Parenti’s book was reviewed… the exposure of this rotten system and how all of this is integrally connected in a complex web spun by capitalism which has advanced to its barbaric and cannibalistic stage is seldom, very seldom, exposed or mentioned.

Unless people, especially working people, are educated to the true nature of this rotten capitalist system and its most decadent stage of imperialism we will continue to see bridges collapse and our entire infrastructure go to hell as the corporations profit by exploiting labor and feeding like pigs at the public trough building bridges in the most profitable manner rather than in the interest of public safety... like the Kansas City mob and the casino business, the capitalists “skim” the cream from everything… leaving us nothing of substance; then claiming the cream isn’t healthy for us anyways so they are actually doing us a favor.

I am sorry… I didn’t even mention the health care system… I sure hope those hundred or so people injured in the I-35-W Bridge collapse had the maximum auto insurance if they don’t have any health insurance; or they are likely to be losing their homes to pay the medical bills… and now there is one less bridge for them to sleep under.

Let’s keep playing games with the health care issue, too, by telling people we are for single-payer, universal health care and assuring them we are not on the road to socialized health care; again hiding the real problem just like the Minnesota Department of Transportation failed to disclose to the general public the true condition of the I-35-W Bridge--- until after it collapsed.

We have such an open and democratic society… the world’s great bastion of democracy where a government is so free with the information our tax-dollars pay some private consulting firm to collect because the government official who has pulled themselves up by their bootstraps in kissing the ass of some political hack has found a nice cushy job working for the government but is a complete incompetent in doing anything other then passing the boss an envelope with a campaign contribution every few years… and then these pathetic excuses who pass themselves off as human beings tell us the “public sector” has failed and we need to hire private contractors to run the government for us.

Until a Bridge like the I-35-W collapses this entire bunch of parasites is allowed to get on with their daily routines without any accountability what-so-ever.

Gees, speaking of things “collapsing” and the truth being told to people in order to protect themselves from crashing into the Mighty Mississippi River and being buried in the debris as they are on their way home from being exploited… when are we going to talk about how the capitalist system comes crashing down in depressions every so often… are there any large cracks in the economic system that remain hidden from view we should be worried about?

Oh, I forgot… no need to worry, we working people have experts doing our thinking for us… no need for working class think tanks like Communist Party Clubs anymore, these are relics of the past to be buried in obscure cemeteries along with the Red Finns of the Iron Range--- all relics of the past from when there used to be a class struggle in America; but now we all get along just fine with the ruling capitalist class. Toss out the books by Karl Marx and don’t wear t-shirts with Lenin’s or Che’s likenesses on them because we lose all credibility; and, we lose our ever so important friends “friends” in the Democratic Party. Abandon Marxism which could take a closer look at all of this and prepare us for what is in store and get us ready to prevent another “bridge” of sorts from collapsing… capitalism has a few cracks, a little rot here and there; but, nothing we need to be too concerned about at the moment. Ya, sure… you betcha. If you believe any of these problems will be solved under capitalism, I have a nice I-35-W Bridge I would like to sell you… at a “sub”stantially reduced, almost submerged, price.

You know, I heard John Sweeney, the President of the AFL-CIO talk in glowing terms about how great it was that the Canadian Labour Congress backs the New Democratic Party--- the socialist oriented labour party in Canada; the problem is, he made his remarks in Toronto at the Canadian Labour Congress convention… what does he do before fifteen-thousand trade unionists assembled at Wrigley Field in Chicago? He stands with a bunch of dumb donkeys like Barack Obama and Hilary Clinton.

Alan L. Maki

58891 County Road 13

Warroad, Minnesota 56763

Phone: 218-386-2432

Cell phone: 651-587-5541

E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net

Check out my blog:

Thoughts >From Podunk

http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/


*****************************************************************************


Jim FULLER is a retired veteran journalist, 30 years with the
Minneapolis Star Tribune, as their business reporter. He now has a blog

at http://www/jamesclayfuller.com/

Monday, August 06, 2007

Infrastructure funding: abridged too far

by: Jim Fuller

http://www.jamesclayfuller.com/

The collapse of that Hwy. I35W bridge across the Mississippi in downtown
Minneapolis could have, and should have, big-time consequences, but I
have yet to see any mention of what may be the most significant of the
likely long-term outcomes.

They involve further cuts to programs and systems necessary to the
well-being of most citizens -- not, as you might expect, improvements.

For now, of course, there is a Greek chorus chanting about how we must
not talk about blame, nor outcomes; we must simply honor the losses of
those who were directly affected by the terrible event.

It's not difficult to understand such feelings, particularly in
Minnesota, where people do tend to rush to the aid of others in times of
emergency – even if they are among those who ignore pedestrians in
crosswalks and run red lights at other times – but it should be noted
that the loudest of those condemning “the blame game,” are those on the
right whose favorite politicians deserve to be in career-ending trouble
over this mess.

Those who cry “Don't bring politics into it,” are the same people who
most surely were figuring a way to cover their sorry asses within 10
minutes of hearing of the tragedy.

Politics is in it, has to be in it, because it is the political and
social views of a powerful minority in our society that got us into the
mess we're in now with a rapidly failing infrastructure.

It is their political maneuvering that is likely to trade on the
Minneapolis bridge collapse to lead us further down the road toward the
ruination of American democracy, along with America's roads, bridges,
dams, transit, communications, air travel, utilities and other systems.

They are the same people who created the circumstances under which our
bridge, or some other bridge, or a dam, or an airplane, simply had to
fall down.

The Star Tribune's Nick Coleman is the only commentator, local or
national, I've seen to address that fact head on, and he obviously has
been taking considerable heat from the “Don't talk blame” phonies.
Unfortunately, Coleman is like others with public platforms who have yet
to recognize the worst of the likely consequences.

Here's what we're almost sure to see when the talk has died down and the
network and cable news crews have gone back east:

First, the promised federal funding to rebuilding the Minneapolis I35
bridge will come through – though maybe not as promptly nor as
adequately as promised under the scrutiny of television cameras.

But not too far down the road, the White House and its sycophants in
Congress will begin a push to “privatize” more of our infrastructure.
The argument, bolstered by millions of dollars worth of propaganda
provided by industry, will be that government simply can't afford to
maintain public highways and major bridges at a safe and efficient
level. Our collapsed bridge will be cited as proof of that claim.

Therefore – ahem – we should sell those bridges and roads and suchlike
burdens at very low prices to corporations that are courageously
offering to take them off our hands and run them as toll roads and bridges.

The propaganda will not mention – nor will most of the undertrained
scribes who pass themselves off as journalists these days – that the
tolls, in providing enormous profits for the corporations, will cost us
far more, in perpetuity, than would the taxes to bring our
infrastructure up to acceptable levels.

Neither will there be any notice of the fact that by turning roads and
bridges and other public assets into businesses, the rich, the corporate
elite, get a permanent protection against paying their fair share of
taxes. The poor and middle class tax rate will, in effect, rise,
however, because tolls will, in the long run, cost us more than adequate
taxes.

I know this is coming, because the push began long before the
Minneapolis bridge collapsed, though it's still largely under the public
radar -- and anyone who knows anything about news, selling and marketing
knows that those who seek to turn the entire country over to profiteers
simply cannot let such an opportunity pass.

Second, dead certain, outcome:

There will be a strong effort to pull money away from public
transportation, especially light rail transit, to fund some repairs to
roads and bridges.

This is an opportunity the right will not miss. Despite occasional
claims to the contrary, they despise public transit; they don't use it,
they have a deeply emotional fear of being “forced” from their cars onto
trains and buses with the great unwashed, they mostly live in burbs
which public transportation doesn't effectively reach, and some major
funders of right wing politicians, notably executives of the oil and
auto industries, are enraged by efforts to increase use of public
transportation.

Third certain outcome:

Both the Republicans in Washington and Minnesota's neocon governor, his
department heads and the right wing extremists who still hold many seats
in our state legislature, will block every move to start repairing our
crumbling infrastructure that doesn't include “practical measures” to
“keep spending within reasonable limits.”

What that means, bluntly, is further cuts to virtually every state
service that aids the poor, children, elderly citizens, anyone who now
relies on state aid for survival at some level.

It also means further cuts in funding for education at all levels – a
favorite target of those right wingers through the years they controlled
the legislature – and for aid to cities. If the right wins this battle,
the burden of paying for such already tragically sagging services as
police and fire departments will be shifted further to property taxes
and away from income taxes, which have been cut substantially for the
state's richest residents.

They have a good chance of winning, given the usual weak-willed, feeble
responses of Democrats to such attacks on the public good.

As widely reported in the past week, almost 600,000 road bridges in the
United States are classified as “deficient” by the American Society of
Civil Engineers. But as the coverage of the Minneapolis mess dies down,
we'll start to be told, over and over, that “deficient” really doesn't
mean dangerous until a bridge actually falls down.

Not so widely reported, but still out there, is the fact that one third
of our country's dams are rated as “hazardous.” I won't take the space
to list examples, but if you want an idea of what that can and at some
unknown point will mean here, Google “failed dams” or “dam collapses” or
some such.

It's possible we'll see a move to sell our publicly owned dams, too.

Another disaster that will (not just “may”) occur at any time is a major
airline crash, or two or three.

There have been numerous reports on the disastrous state of our air
traffic control system – overworked and undertrained controllers,
grossly outdated computer systems and more. If it isn't completely
overhauled, soon and, yes, at great expense, the crashes are coming.
Should we somehow avoid that for another year or two or three, it will
be only because of heroic efforts on the part of the remaining competent
controllers -- who are bailing out at a fearsome rate, by the way.

The anti-government, anti-tax right is responsible for all of these
messes. Our president, our mad vice president, the right wing nutters in
Congress, are as responsible for the deaths and maimings that have
occurred and that will occur in result of neglect of our infrastructure
just as surely at they are responsible for the horrors in Iraq.

Our governor and his sponsors, the Minnesota Taxpayers League, and their
servants in the legislature are responsible for all sorts of human pain
because of their program cuts. We have fewer cops on city streets
because of them, more kids are going without medical care because of
them, more young people are unable to afford college because of them,
and so much more.

At the moment, talking about the bridge, they're singing a different
dirge, but it's an act. Any course changing they're doing is only minor,
and temporary.

Our governor, Tim Pawlenty, slavish servant of the Taxpayers League, is
playing statesman at the moment, in the most obvious and phony way possible.

At first he lied blatantly, proclaiming that 2005 and 2006 bridge
inspections showed that there were “no structural defects” in the I35
bridge. He backed down quickly on that after being caught.

He ordered inspection of all bridges in the state, with immediate
attention to a handful that are of the same type as the one that went
down. He is being sympathetic to the people who were hurt and the
families of those who were killed or injured. He is pledging quick
replacement for the bridge, and generally doing a good job of following
the politicians' script for such events.

But.

Carol Molnau, Pawlenty's lieutenant governor, whom he also appointed as
commissioner of the state's Department of Transportation, is firmly and
repeatedly proclaiming that despite the thousands of bridges in the
state that also are known to be “deficient,” and few of which have
repairs or replacement scheduled, her department is doing a fine job.

She insists on that even though the Star Tribune and some national news
outfits have reported that the department knowingly rejected
recommendations for adding steel plates to reinforce the bridge that
went down because, and only because, it was cheaper just to inspect it
more often.

She also had her chin jutting out when pushed on the need for further
spending now that the true dangers of deteriorating bridges have been
exposed.

“We put together a system in this state that addresses the needs that we
have within the fiscal restraints we have, as well,” she was quoted as
saying by the Strib.

Note: Many of those “fiscal restraints” exist only because of Republican
cuts in taxes paid by the rich, and because Pawlenty and the rest of the
Republican crew have squeezed spending on infrastructure until there is
no juice left.

And then there is Mary Liz Holberg, a Republican senator from semi-rural
Lakeville, a still powerful member of the Senate Transportation
Committee, who grew visibly angry on Minnesota public television's
“Almanac” a couple of days after the bridge collapse when one of the
show's hosts tried to get her to admit that much more spending on
infrastructure, and bridges in particular, is necessary.

Democrats must give in on a number of Republican demands for cuts in
other programs before her party can agree to pay for making bridges
safe, she insisted, though she didn't phrase it quite that way.

“Something will get done,” she repeated two or three times, but she
wouldn't say what, and she still insisted that the money had to come
from elsewhere in the state budget because Republicans will not allow
tax increases (or taking back substantial cuts they gave the rich).
Fixes in funding of infrastructure repairs “can't happen overnight,” she
said, and “We still have to respect the family budget,” which is
Republican code for “hold taxes on the rich to a bare minimum.”

Conclusion: The right wingers in the legislature will stall, obfuscate,
dig in and refuse to fund even bridge repair, let alone other badly
needed infrastructure fixes, unless the Democrats cave in and agree to
take the money from the usual places: education, food programs, health
care programs and the like.

The only thing that could change that is honest and complete press
coverage of every ploy and a resulting public outcry of considerable volume.

Don't hold your breath.