Please note: Send me your questions at: amaki000@centurytel.net
Bookmark this blog post because I will be answering your questions often.
"Jobs, jobs, jobs"
is all the talk coming out of Washington
and from the State Houses as well as being all the hype from the over-paid "economists" and media pundits.
There isn't a single politician running for office who doesn't promise
"jobs, jobs, jobs;" but, what happened to the idea the United States
government is responsible for maintaining "full employment?"
Question:
How come the words "full employment" never appear in what Robert Reich is writing? (See below: Why jobs must be our goal now)
Question:
Do you hear Barack Obama talk about his responsibility for "full employment?"
Check this out; seems to me Robert Reich's beloved Obama could do at least as good as Wright Patman:
This on-line book (Full Employment Act of 1945) available for downloading for free may be of interest to you:
http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015081304209;seq=10;view=1up
Do you hear Barack Obama talk about his responsibility for "full employment?"
Check this out; seems to me Robert Reich's beloved Obama could do at least as good as Wright Patman:
This on-line book (Full Employment Act of 1945) available for downloading for free may be of interest to you:
http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015081304209;seq=10;view=1up
(Note: If the above link does not work you
will have to copy and paste the link into your browser. I can not emphasize
enough how important it is for anyone concerned about jobs and unemployment to
read this transcript of the hearing--- which includes the Act itself--- the
"Full Employment Act of 1945")
This link above is to the entire transcript of the Congressional Hearing on the original Full Employment Act of 1945 which includes the actual Act brought forward by liberal populist, Wright Patman---
This link above is to the entire transcript of the Congressional Hearing on the original Full Employment Act of 1945 which includes the actual Act brought forward by liberal populist, Wright Patman---
Wright Patman was a U.S. Congressman from Texas in Texas's
1st congressional district and chair of the United States House Committee on
Banking and Currency.
Born: August 6, 1893, Hughes Springs, Texas
Died: March 7, 1976, Bethesda
Party: Democratic Party
We have to ask why Obama's supporters aren't pushing for the enactment of this "Full Employment" legislation today?
Born: August 6, 1893, Hughes Springs, Texas
Died: March 7, 1976, Bethesda
Party: Democratic Party
We have to ask why Obama's supporters aren't pushing for the enactment of this "Full Employment" legislation today?
All we get from Wall Street's politicians in the Democratic and Republican parties is "talk, talk, talk" instead of "jobs, jobs, jobs."
The working class needs its own political party just like labor in Canada has the New Democratic Party.
Without a strong, vibrant and active Communist Party made up of grass roots activists and rank-and-file workers defending the interests of the working class in the streets and in the electoral and legislative arenas; a Communist Party providing the catalyst for real change with movement building while pushing for the broadest possible working class and all people's united action we will not be able to win full employment here in the United States.
Consider organizing a Communist Club in your neighborhood, where you work or go to school.
It will be up to left wing working class rank-and-file activists together with liberals, progressives and leftists finding common ground and a "meeting of the minds" to bring forward and
advance "Full Employment" legislation; no political party or
organization is going to do this unless pushed even though the American people expect this
from their government.
Wall Street reactionaries from the Chamber of Commerce to the National Association of Manufacturers united to defeat the "Full Employment Act of 1945" as the United States government was carrying out political repression against working class activist as Republicans and Democrats acted in collusion bringing forward the most reactionary and anti-labor Taft-Hartley Act intended to criminalize and destroy the Communist Party USA.
Common sense tells us working people without jobs are going to be
poor; this is so basic it shouldn't have to be
stated.
"Jobs, Jobs, Jobs;" but what happened to the idea embodied in the defeated "Full Employment act of 1945" that the United States government is responsible for maintaining "full employment?"
This is from the Wall Street Journal:
Prospects for a stronger upturn, at least in the first half of 2013, remain slim. Many economists worry about losing even more ground, especially as lawmakers launch a potentially risky political battle this winter over raising the federal debt ceiling. The U.S. economy grew at an average annual rate of 3.6% from 1950 through 1999 but has since slowed to less than 2% ... Since the recession ended 3½ years ago, economists have been divided over long-run growth prospects after the downturn pushed millions of Americans out of the labor force. Looking forward five to 10 years, the argument goes, annual U.S. growth may reach a ceiling of 3% and unemployment could settle at a rate above the 5.7% annual average recorded during the last half of the 20th century.
--Wall
Street Journal, Jan 4, 2013
Without the United States
government becoming responsible for "full employment" in this country
where does this leave working people? In poverty.
Robert Reich and his fellow Democratic Party economists--- among them: Paul Krugman, Joseph Stiglitz, Dean Baker and their "linguist" George Lakoff--- are wrong to focus solely on "jobs" without bringing forward the need for the United States government to be responsible for "full employment;" our goal, the goal of the working class movement, must be to get the United States government to assume its responsibility to the American people for maintaining a "full employment economy" just like the immensely popular liberal populist United States Congressman from Texas, Wright Patman, proposed.
Check out what Robert Reich has written below at the very time the Wall Street Journal made the dire prediction above.
Does anyone really believe we can solve the
problem of unemployment in this country unless the United States government assumes
its responsibility to the American people for "full employment?"
The United States government is going
to have to create millions of jobs by re-establishing proven government programs
like WPA, CCC and C.E.T.A.
How we pay to create these jobs is an equally
important question which people have the right to have answers to:
1. End the wars and occupations which will yield huge "peace dividends."
2. Tax the rich; tax corporate profits; tax Wall Street transactions.
1. End the wars and occupations which will yield huge "peace dividends."
2. Tax the rich; tax corporate profits; tax Wall Street transactions.
Another huge benefit derived from "full
employment" is Social Security will be placed on a solid financial
footing; as long as everyone pays in, everyone will get from Social Security
what they are entitled to receive in benefits--- plus, we can reduce the age at which
people can retire while increasing the benefits to provide pensioners with real
living incomes... this, too, will create more jobs as aging workers retire, young workers find a place in the workforce.
We will derive numerous other benefits from
"full employment" which include reducing crime and pushing all wages
up instead of having this huge pool of unemployed people dragging wages down.
Workers will have maximum power in their places of employment which will assure
the protection of rights and a decent standard of living for everyone.
The best union-busting and strike-breaking weapon Wall Street has is this huge pool of unemployed labor.
Check out the budget priorities of Obama and
the Democrats. These budget priorities are not conducive to creating "full
employment;" in fact, such priorities squandering the wealth of our nation
on militarism and wars can only lead to making most Americans poor because wars kill jobs just like they kill people:
No; as Robert Reich is suggesting, the
American people should not have to pay an increase in Social Security taxes;
but, more importantly--- and the point Robert Reich refuses to bring forward---
is that the American people should not have to pay these "war taxes"
for militarism and wars most people in this country don't even want. What happened to democracy of "We, the People?"
We have a government working for Wall Street
instead of a government working for the American people.
What more proof do we need of this than the wrong-headed budget priorities combined with the fact this government with Democrats and Republicans at the helm shirk their responsibility to the American people in refusing to maintain "full employment."
These politicians want our votes; shouldn't working people at least get jobs in return for our votes?
What more proof do we need of this than the wrong-headed budget priorities combined with the fact this government with Democrats and Republicans at the helm shirk their responsibility to the American people in refusing to maintain "full employment."
These politicians want our votes; shouldn't working people at least get jobs in return for our votes?
"Full employment" is all about
governmental accountability to the people.
"Full employment" is all about peace and democracy.
"Full employment" is all about the most fundamental human right of all--- the right to a job at a real living wage.
"Full employment" is all about peace and democracy.
"Full employment" is all about the most fundamental human right of all--- the right to a job at a real living wage.
Alan L. Maki
Co-Chair,
Co-Chair,
Lake-of-the-Woods Communist Club
Why Jobs Must Be Our Goal Now
By Robert Reich
blog
January 3, 2013
http://robertreich.org/post/39656182596
The news today from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
is that the U.S. job market is treading water. The
number of new jobs created in December (155,000),
and percent unemployment (7.8), were the same as
the revised numbers for November.
Also, about the same number of people are looking
for work (12.2 million), with additional millions too
discouraged even to look.
Put simply, we're a very long way from the job
growth we need to get out of the gravitational pull of
the Great Recession. That would be at least 300,000
new jobs per month.
All of which means job growth and wage growth
should be the central focus of economic policy, not
deficit reduction.
Yet all we're hearing from Washington -- and all
we're likely to hear as Republicans and Democrats
negotiate over raising the debt ceiling -- is how to
cut the deficit.
The typical American worker's paycheck will drop
this week because his or her Social Security tax will
rise, from 4.2 percent to 6.2 percent. That's
nonsensical.
We need to put more money into the pockets of
average workers, not less. The first $25,000 of
income should be exempt from Social Security taxes
altogether, and we should make up the difference by
eliminating the ceiling on income subject to Social
Security taxes.
__________
Robert B. Reich, Chancellor's Professor of Public
Policy at the University of California at Berkeley,
was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton
administration.
__________________
Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
58891 County Road 13
Warroad, Minnesota 56763
Phone: 218-386-2432
Cell: 651-587-5541
Primary E-mail: amaki000@centurytel.net
E-mail:
alan.maki1951mn@gmail.com
Blog: http://thepodunkblog.blogspot.com/