What is a "living wage?"
Here is how most dictionaries define a "living wage:"
liv·ing wage
noun
noun: living wage; plural noun: living wages
- 1.a wage that is high enough to maintain a normal standard of living.
But, is this definition sufficient to explain what we are fighting for?
What is missing from this definition when it comes to our livelihoods and our struggles for a real living wage?
Think about this; what is missing?
What is missing is the fact that a living wage can only be defined and considered in relation to:
"cost-of-living"
There is only one way to define what is a living wage and this is to compare wages to "cost-of-living."
For working people wages earned mean absolutely nothing except in relation to what can be purchased with wages.
Employers will always run away from any discussion which becomes focused on what workers can purchase with the wages they pay.
Compare your wages to the price you pay for the necessities required for and decent life--- your "cost-of-living":
food
clothing
housing
transportation
insurance
electricity
home heating fuels
gas for your car
health care
education
recreation
toys for the kids
... and so on and so forth--- the list goes on and on.
The United States Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics breaks all this down into 8 categories and 200 sub-categories; often we don't keep track of our actual "cost-of-living" in this detailed way. A lot of people, including our own government and the employers (one and the same thing?), would rather we not track and follow the actual expenses we have which taken together is our "cost-of-living."
Why should anyone have to work at any job and be paid less than the actual "cost-of-living" by any employer?
Don't be tricked by the employers and the politicians these employers' lobbyists bribe along with the polical hacks and Wall Street employed linguists, also known as pundits, who twist and pervert the meaning of words like "living wage."
Are you being paid a real "living wage?"
Determine your "cost-of-living" and you will find the answer to this question.
The State of Minnesota's Department of Labor and Industry created this report on the "Minimum Wage;" it doesn't even use the term "cost-of-living:"
https://www.dli.mn.gov/RS/PDF/13minwage.pdf
Here is a "Letter to the Editor" I wrote on the struggle for a real living Minimum Wage:
http://www.superiortelegram.com/content/miserly-minimum-wage-creates-poverty-0
Miserly minimum wage creates poverty
I also wrote this "Letter to the Editor" which was published in the Albert Lea Tribune:
Where is the real minimum wage?
Published 9:00am Wednesday, December 25, 2013http://www.albertleatribune.com/2013/12/where-is-the-real-minimum-wage/
Holiday shoppers and voters should beware of the bait and switch.
Bait and switch is an illegal advertising gimmick in the retail world; but, in politics bait and switch has become the way of life, the new normal.
For example: Obama campaigned for the Democratic Party’s
nomination telling everyone, everywhere he went, he was for a
single-payer universal health care system like they have in Canada; this
was the bait.
Once elected, Obama pulled a switch and delivered Obamacare/Romneycare or as it should be known, the Health Insurance and Pharmaceutical Industry Bailout and Profit Maximization Act of 2010.
Once elected, Obama pulled a switch and delivered Obamacare/Romneycare or as it should be known, the Health Insurance and Pharmaceutical Industry Bailout and Profit Maximization Act of 2010.
Another example: Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party
Gov. Mark Dayton campaigned for office saying he would raise the minimum
wage to a real living wage — this was the bait. Once elected, Dayton, a
multibillionaire, is now pushing a miserly increase in the minimum wage
which would keep the minimum wage a poverty wage — the switch.
Buyer (voter) beware of bait and switch.
The Minnesota DFL Party has a super-majority. Republicans have no say about anything; all they can do is cry.
We should at least be able to get a real living minimum wage
out of these Democrats corresponding to actual cost-of-living factors
as tracked and monitored by the United States Department of Labor’s
Bureau of Labor Statistics — the minimum wage should also be indexed to
inflation with periodic increases to improve the living standards of
working people.
Working people are entitled to this in return for their
votes, especially from a political party which makes the claim that it
is for labor.
If there are any obstacles the Democrats are encountering
that would prevent them from implementing a real living — non-poverty —
minimum wage, I would like to hear what the impediment is.
Alan L. Maki
director of organizing
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council
Warroad
There can be no talk of eliminating poverty without legislation:
- For a real living Minimum Wage based on actual "cost-of-living"
- For a real living Minimum Wage based on actual "cost-of-living"
- For a "Basic Income Guarantee"
- For a "21st Century Full Employment Act for Peace and Prosperity."
What is the main reason we have this "income inequality?"
Poverty wages.
Unemployment.
How is this fixed?
Pay working people real living wages.
Create jobs. Put people to work in massive government universal social programs designed to improve the lives of people.
For less than the cost of these dirty imperialist wars we can put people to work providing the American people with free health care and free child care in a National Public Health Care System and a National Public Child Care Program which would be: publicly funded, publicly administered and publicly delivered... just like public education.