But, what the Wall Street Journal also does not mention is that much of Mondragon's business is providing capitalist manufacturers with cheap parts and supplies.
And, worse yet is that what these workers have really lost in investing in these now bankrupt enterprises is their wages which means they have worked for next to nothing all this time.
But, not mentioned at all is what happened to all this money (wealth). Wealth just does not vanish into thin air--- this is one more way wealth get transferred... once, again, to the top. In the , the capitalist financiers and bankers get it all. Something else lost on the Wall Street Journal and those pushing Mondragon as an alternative to capitalism.
There is no escaping the need to challenge Wall Street and the other big financial centers across the world for political and economic power which requires a well organized and intense class struggle... something the promoters of these cooperative schemes try to evade as they try to convince workers there are ways around bringing mines, mills and factories under public ownership which is going to require the nationalization of entire industries.
In fact, these Mondragon workers are as bad off now with the closing of Fagor as the thousands of workers who were employed by Whirlpool in Benton Harbor, Michigan as their jobs were sent overseas as this article in the Wall Street Journal noted.
Members of the USW who have been sucked into this Mondragon scheme in Pennsylvania building components for wind generators will fair no better... this is why their contract and the details of what the workers are investing is guarded in absolute secrecy.
And this should serve as a warning to those like Gar Alperovitz who pushes these schemes as an alternative to nationalization and public ownership of the mines, mills and factories.
Of course, millionaire labor "leaders" like Leo "Red-baiting" Girard will end up enriching himself even further as Mondragon workers in Pennsylvania lose their shirts in his Mondragon scheme.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303290904579276551484127412
Dec. 25, 2013 5:59 p.m. ET
The failure of home-appliance maker Fagor has shaken
Spain's Mondragón network. Shown, workers outside Mondragón
headquarters in November.
Christopher Bjork/The Wall Street Journal
MONDRAGÓN, Spain—For decades, the
giant network of industrial and retail cooperatives born in this small
town was held up as an international model. Whenever one co-op got into
trouble, the rest of the Mondragón Corporation would rescue it with cash
or take on workers at risk of losing their jobs.
Then the unthinkable happened.
In
October, home appliance maker Fagor Electrodomésticos, a global
exporter and the U.S. market leader in pressure cookers, shut its
factories after the other co-ops denied it a lifeline. That, in turn,
has shaken the Mondragón network, the largest of its kind in the world,
fraying the bonds among its 109 surviving co-ops and eroding confidence
in the weaker ones. Many of its 80,000 employees now fear for their jobs
in a country with 26% unemployment.
"This
is our Lehman moment," said
Juan Antonio Talledo,
who lost his job on Fagor's refrigerator assembly line, recalling
the U.S. investment bank failure five years ago that nearly brought
down the global financial system.
With
debts of €850 million ($1.16 billion), Fagor is one of the biggest
casualties in Spain's record-setting year of bankruptcies. Even as the
economy emerges from its second recession in five years, growth remains
too weak to save many deeply indebted Spanish companies.
But
Fagor's abrupt closure reverberates beyond Spain. Many scholars in the
U.S. and Europe have argued for decades that employee-owned co-ops are a
more productive and worker-friendly alternative to traditional
shareholder capitalism. The crisis here highlights a weakness: Co-ops
have fewer options to raise capital when trying to ride out a recession.
The
long Spanish downturn that drained Fagor of resources now threatens
core principles of the network it had helped create—democratic
management and job security for employee-owners.
George Cheney,
a Kent State University professor who has studied Mondragón for
20 years, said the network will survive but faces severe strains.
Cooperatives around the world, he added, are watching how it resolves
competing demands of employees and lenders, and financial fallout among
its members.
The question, he said, is: "How can Mondragón maintain its soul?"
Fagor's
1,800 workers in Spain have lost their jobs and access to savings they
had plowed into the co-op. Tajo, a small co-op in the Mondragón network
that makes car parts and components for household appliances, says it
could face bankruptcy because Fagor bought much of its production.
Creditors owed €2.5 billion by supermarket chain Eroski, the network's
largest co-op, have told the management to retrench by selling or
closing outlets.
"Contagion is
inevitable," said
Lorenzo Bernaldo de Quirós,
head of Freemarket International Consulting in Madrid and a
former adviser to Mondragón. "Some co-ops lent money to Fagor. Others
were its suppliers. They're all intertwined."
Laid-off
workers stage frequent protests outside Mondragón's austere
concrete-and-glass headquarters, perched on a hill overlooking the
factory town and a lush valley in the Basque region of northern Spain.
Mayor
Inazio Azkarragaurizar Larrea calculates that Fagor's closure alone
will raise unemployment in the town of 22,000 people to 20%, from the
current 15%.
"The town is in a state of
psychosis," said Estibaliz Iñurrieta Lauzirika, owner of the Plus Ultra
bar, where townspeople fret about the co-ops over evening drinks and
talk of little else.
They and their
elders had thrived as Fagor, founded in 1955, sold refrigerators,
washing machines and televisions to Spain's emerging middle class.
Fagor's pioneer entrepreneurs, influenced by socialist thinkers and
Christian values, gave financial backing to other factory workers to
start their own co-ops, then merged them into a forerunner to Mondragón
Corporation in 1984.
Workers in a co-op
pool resources and own the business collectively, sharing in profit and
loss. Mondragón took the model a step further by pooling individual
co-ops' research, training and banking services, and creating a common
safety net of employment guarantees and social-security benefits. It
grew to be the seventh-largest employer in Spain and reported €14
billion in revenue last year.
Fagor expanded to markets in more than 100 countries, becoming the fifth-largest appliance maker in Europe.
Three decisions exposed Fagor to trouble just before the recession hit Spain in 2008.
The co-op acquired a French appliance company to try to achieve the scale to compete with
Whirlpool Corp.
WHR +0.22%
and
Electrolux
ELUX-B.SK +0.54%
AB. But while those larger rivals moved production to low-wage
Asian countries, Fagor kept most of its assembly lines in Spain and
France to preserve worker-owners' jobs. It could no longer compete on
price, and the acquisition raised its debt burden as sales plummeted at
home.
Meanwhile, Fagor sank €6 million
into the Driron, a refrigerator-size invention that could dry and iron
clothes at the same time. A €1,875 price tag and clunky look made it a
colossal flop.
The appliance maker had
few options to stay afloat. As with other co-ops, its ownership
structure legally barred the sale of new shares to raise capital, and
its ability to borrow was exhausted. It turned to its Mondragón
partners, who injected €300 million into the co-op after 2008.
Fagor
also hit up employees, selling them €80 million in high-yield debt on
the promise they could withdraw the investments within a month.
That
wasn't enough. At a tense meeting of Mondragón's board in September,
Fagor chief executive
Sergio Treviño,
pleaded for an additional €50 million for an orderly
restructuring. The aid plan required unanimous board approval, but
chiefs of the two largest co-ops, Eroski and lender Caja Laboral,
balked, according to people familiar with the deliberations. At the next
meeting they voted to rebuff him, saying the plan would throw good
money after bad, these people said.
"I
warned that if Fagor fell, a tsunami would wash over them, but they
dismissed the idea," Mr. Treviño said in a subsequent interview.
Fagor's
demise has upended the lives of 44-year-old forklift operator Igor
Unamuno and his wife, Leire Barona, who worked on the refrigerator
assembly line. In addition to losing their jobs, he said, they worry
about recovering the €55,000 in savings they had invested in Fagor—money
now tied up in bankruptcy proceedings.
With
an expensive mortgage and two children at home, the couple pins their
hopes on Mondragón's pledge to find work at other co-ops for at least
1,000 of Fagor's employees. More than 300 have been relocated, most to
temporary positions with fewer rights and benefits.
"The
days pass, and you hear about other workers getting called in for a
[job] interview," Mr. Unamuno said. "You hunker down. What else can you
do?"
—Ilan Brat contributed to this article.
Write to Christopher Bjork at christopher.bjork@wsj.com