I
had a lengthy discussion with a very liberal Minnesota State Senator
this morning about my stating that there is nothing progressive about
Keynesian economics. His position is that any government initiative
which creates jobs should be considered progressive.
It is
impossible to ague that the creation of any number of jobs with so many
millions of people unemployed is not good. But, because the creation of
any jobs may be good does not make Keynesian economics progressive.
No matter how hard anyone tries, there is no getting around the fact
that Keynesian economics is all about using public capital and social
capital (many people use the term "public funds" which is an okay
definition but there is a difference between public capital and social
capital which combined we can consider "public funds") during times of
economic recession and depression in order to stimulate just enough
spending get the capitalist consumer market going in order to increase
production in the private sphere.
Keynesians prefer to spend
public and social capital putting people to work on public projects
managed by privately owned corporations but will agree to limited public
works projects as a last resort--- hence what they do in the public
sphere is always too little, too late even though the money workers
employed on these public works projects ends up in the coffers of the
extremely wealthy.
Keynesians view production as being the
prerogative--- the exclusive right--- of private sector of the economy.
They can make all the exaggerated claims they want about helping "small
business" but anyone who looks can see they are really about helping
only the largest Wall Street monopolies and multi-national corporations.
Does anyone really believe the Congressional Progressive
Caucus would be able to create 7 million new jobs through subsidizing
small business? The government doesn't even hire small businesses to
pick up the garbage or fill small pot-holes in the roads and when public
infrastructure like water and sewer is privatized, how often do you see
the work turned over to small businesses?
The first insight we
have that Keynesian economics is not progressive is that it's primary
concern is the stimulation of the capitalist consumer market. The second
is that the Keynesians take the position production is the exclusive
right of private industry.
Progressives take the position that
production should take place for social well-being so everyone can have
the basic needs met.
Most people in this country, or any other
country, spend what income they have on meeting their basic human needs
so it is not any kind of far out left thinking to assert this basic fact
of life--- and economics.
Progressives take the position that
production in a public sector should occur--- especially when private
production fails. A progressive position would be one in which it is
advocated to bring all these closed mines, mills and factories back into
production under public ownership using public capital and social
capital--- just imagine what we could do with the trillions of dollars
from the Social Security Trust Fund in order to start up production to
meet social and human needs. Keynesians want no part of public ownership
of the mines, mills and factories or power generating, communications,
transportation or retail industry (distribution of goods produced
through cooperatives).
Anyone with an ounce of common sense
can see that for the Keynesians the economy can "bounce back" to what is
considered a "recovery" with the "new norm" for unemployment remaining
for years at 7% to 8.5%--- the president of the Minneapolis Federal
Reserve Board stated this.
The Keynesians in fact believe, but
won't publicly state, that this obscene level of unemployment is good
because it depresses all wages. In fact, they will couch their approval
by talking about how they use various levers to manage the economy so we
don't get hyper inflation from spending on militarism and wars--- huge
"public works projects" though the Keynesians don't like to admit how
much they love militarism and wars--- hence the Congressional
Progressive Caucus makes no bones they are for huge military
expenditures while claiming they are for making "modest reductions"
while using tax-dollars in a most frugal way only to "modernize" the war
machine--- but, you notice when they speak of "modernization" they
avoid all talk of what they really mean--- making the killing machine
more efficient and effective... thus they deliver drone warfare, etc. as
they evade ever talking about the imperialist nature of these wars.
I pointed out to the Senator that he had done nothing to keep the St.
Paul Ford Plant in production under public ownership even though he
repeatedly voted to spend public funds (social capital) to subsidize
Ford's operation and then he compounded his "errors" when he enabled the
Ford hydro-electric generating dam--- compliments of local, state and
federal tax-dollars--- to be sold by the Ford Motor Company to a
Canadian multi-national at a profit so obscene no one will state the
amount and then the public gets screwed again because the electricity is
sold to a monopoly to rip-off consumers when this hydro-electric
generating plant could have been brought under public ownership and
operated to bring free electricity to our public schools, to power
street lights and other public buildings saving the very tax-payers who
built this hydro-electric generating plant millions upon millions of
dollars just like it saved the Ford Motor Company for some 85 years.
Would anyone call allowing Ford to sell a plant it never owned
"progressive?" These Keynesians want to evade all talk about specifics
because every time there is a discussion they end up exposing themselves
for the reactionaries they are while pretending they are progressives.
The Keynesians like to pass themselves off as progressive job creators
but they don't like to talk about the two-thousand jobs they flushed
down the sewers into the Mississippi River when they allowed Ford Motor
Company to close the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant and they
don't want to talk in public about how much the public is losing as
water going through the Ford Dam generates 18 megawatts of electricity
at a loss to tax-payers and the public for which the public once again
subsidizes the electricity these Keynesians don't give a second thought
to.
Keynesian economics is not only reactionary, it fosters the
most crooked and corrupt kind of government seeing as how Brookfield
Asset Management really spread around the campaign contributions to
secure this secretive deal with the Ford Dam.
It makes me sick to hear these Keynesians try to hide their reactionary economics under the guise of being progressive.
And then when they find they can't defend their reactionary economics
they claim we are too stupid to understand the complexities of
economics.